References
- Chamberlain A. Advances in rehabilitation: an overview and odyssey. Clinical Medicine 2003; 3: 62– 67.
- Shangali H. Curent and future trends in medical rehabilitation (editorial). Prosthetics and Orthotics International 2003; 27: 1.
- Dobkin BH. Functional rewiring of brain and spinal cord after injury: the three Rs of neural repair and technological rehabilita- tion. Current Opinion in Neurology 2000; 13: 655– 659.
- Liepert J, Bauder H, Miltner WHR, Taub W, Weiller C. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke 2000; 31: 1210– 1216.
- Dobkin BH, Davis B, Brookheimer S. Functional magnetic resonance imaging assesses plasticity in locomotor networks. Neurology 2000; 54(suppl.): A8–S04.
- McDonald JW, Becker D. Spinal Cord Injury – promising interventions and realistic goals. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2003; 82(suppl.): S38–S49.
- Good DC. Stroke – promising neurorehabilitation interventions and steps toward testing them. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2003; 82(suppl.): S50–S57.
- DeLisa JA. Clinical trials – the cornerstone of medical rehabilitation. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2003; 82(suppl.): S1–S2.
- Johnston MV. Desiderata for clinical trials in medical rehabilita- tion. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2003; 82(suppl.): S3–S7.
- Fuhrer MJ. Overview of clinical trials in medical rehabilitation: impetuses, challenges and needed future directions. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2003; 82(suppl.): S8–S15.
- Dittmar SS, Gresham GE. (Eds.) Functional Assessment and Outcome Measures for the Rehabilitation Health Professional. Maryland: Aspen Publ., 1997.
- Ring H, Feder M, Schwartz J, Samuels G. Functional measures of first stroke in-patient rehabilitation; the use of the Functional Independence Measure with a clinical rationale. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1997; 78: 630– 635.
- Catz A, Itzkovich M, Agranov E, Ring H, Tamir A. SCIM – Spinal Cord Independence Measure: a new disability scale for patients with spinal cord lesions. Spinal Cord 1997; 35: 850– 856.
- Gray DB, Hendershot GE. The ICIDH-2: developments for a new era of outcomes research. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2000; 81(suppl.) 2: S10–S14.
- Stineman MG. Defining the population, treatments and outcomes of interest. Reconciling the rules of biology with meaningfulness. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2001; 80: 147– 159.
- Clauser SB, Bierman AS. Significance of functional status data for payment and quality. Health Care Financing Review 2003; 24(3): 1– 12.
- Ware JE Jr. Conceptualization and measurement of health-related quality of life: comments on an evolving field. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2003; 84(suppl.) 2: S43–S51.
- Tulsky DS, Rosenthal M. Measurement of quality of life in rehabilitation medicine: emerging issues. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2003; 84(suppl.) 2: S1–S2.
- Gok H, Ring H, Arasil T. Assisstive technology in rehabilitation: current issues and future trends. J. Rheum. Med. Rehab. 2003; 14(2): 118– 126.
- Whyte J. Clinical trials in rehabilitation – what are the obstacles?Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2003; 82(suppl.): S16–S21.
- Wade DT. Barriers to rehabilitation research and overcoming them (editorial). Clin. Rehabil. 2003; 17: 1– 4.
- Ring H, Soroker N (eds). Proceedings of the 2nd World Congress of the ISPRM. Monduzzi Editore—International Proceedings Division, Bologna, 2003.
- Soroker N, Ring H (eds). Advances in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. Monduzzi Editore—International Proceedings Division, Bologna, 2003.