Essential elements for assessment of persons with severe neurological impairments for computer access utilizing assistive technology devices: A Delphi study

References

• Barker P. Technologies for information, communication, and access. Clinicians guide to assistive technology, D Olson, F DeRuyter. Mosby, Inc., St. Louis, MO 2002; 3–13
   Google Scholar
• Derer K, Polsgrove L, Rieth H. A survey of assistive technology applications in schools and recommendations for practice. Journal of Special Education Technology 1996; 13(2)62–80, Retrieved May 3, 2003, from WilsonWeb database.
   Google Scholar
• Carey J, Dimmet C. A delphi study of critical school counseling research questions 2003, Retrieved September 26, 2003 from University of Massachusetts Center for School Counseling Outcome Research: http://www.umass.edu/schoolcounseling/1
   Google Scholar
• Delphi-history of the concept 2003, Retrieved October, 29, 2003, from http://www.elthamcollege.vic.edu.au/arthur/delp_2000_history.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelm W. Alchemy of an oracle: History of the Delphi technique. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal 2001; 43(1)6–26, Retrieved November 28, 2003, from Wilson Web database.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig B. Predicting the future: Have you considered using the delphi methodology [Electronic Journal]. Journal of Extension 1997; 35(5)
   Google Scholar
• Turoff M, Hiltz S, (n.d.). Computer based Delphi processes. Retrieved, October, 29, 2003, from http://eies2.njit.edu/∼ turoff/Papers/delphi3.html.
   Google Scholar
• Adaptive Technology Resource Center (ATRC), University of Toronto (n.d.). Technical glossary, Retrieved March 10, 2004, from http://www.utoronto.ca/atrc/reference/tech/altkey.html#built-in.
   Google Scholar
• AbilityHub (n.d.). Assistive technology solutions, Retrieved March 10, 2004, from http://www.abilityhub.com/index.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Rose D, Meyer A. Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. 2002, Retrieved October 17, 2003, fromhttp://www.cast.org/teachingeverystudentideas/tes/.
   Google Scholar
• Newfound Brain Injury Newfoundland Brain Injury Association (n.d.). Brain injury: Brain neurology (n.d.), Retrieved September 12, 2003, from http://www.nbia.nf.ca/brain_neurology.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Frederick C, Saladin L. Pathophysiology of the motor systems. F.A. Davis Company, Philadelphia, PA 1996
   Google Scholar
• Seitz J. I move … therefore I am. [Electronic version]. Psychology Today 1993; 26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haggard P. The psychology of action. British Journal of Psychology 2001; 92: 113–128, Retrieved July 11, 2003, from EBSCO Academic Search Premier database.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng Y, Scholz J, Gregor S, Hotchkiss L. Effect of accuracy constraint on joint coordination during pointing movements. [Electronic version]. Exp Brain Res 2003; 149: 276–288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vetter P, Wolpert D. Context estimation for sensorimotor control. [Electronic version]. Journal of Neurophysiology 2000; 84(2)1026–1034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarter M, Bernston G, Cacioppo J. Brain imaging and cognitive neuroscience toward strong inference in attributing function to structure. American Psychologist 1996; 51(1)13–21, Retrieved June 13, 2003, from APA PsycNET database.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennet D. Are we explaining consciousness yet?. Cognition 2001; 79: 221–237, Retrieved from Elsevier ScienceDirect database.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auruin A, Tetsuo O, Latash L. Anticipatory postural adjustments associated with lateral and rotational perturbations during standing. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 2001; 11: 39–51, Retrieved July 7, 2003 from Elsevier ScienceDirect database.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan J, Horak F. Emergence of postuPral patterns as a function of vision and translation frequency. [Electronic version]. Journal of Neurophysiology 1999; 81: 2325–2339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdet E, Osu R, Franklin D, Milner T, Kawato K. The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance. [Electronic version]. Nature 2001; 414: 46–49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodges P, Cresswell A, Thorstensson A. Preparatory trunk motion accompanies rapid upper limb movement. [Electronic version]. Exp Brain Res 1999; 124: 69–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Severe disabilities. Handicapped and Gifted Children. Reston, VA 1990, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED371507)
   Google Scholar
• Palmer M, Toms J. Manual for functional training. F.A. Davis Company, Philadelphia, PA 1992
   Google Scholar
• Smith D, Maeney D, Sboll W. Diffuse axonal injury in head trauma. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2003; 18(4)307–316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao V, Lyketsos C. Neuropsychiatric sequelae of traumatic brain injury. [Electronic version]. Psychosomatics 2000; 41(2)95–103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgaro S, Prigatano G. Early cognitive and affective sequelae of traumatic brain injury: A study using the BNI screen for higher cerebral functions. Journal Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2002; 6: 526–534, Retrieved September 14, 2003, from EBSCO Academic Search Premier database.
   Google Scholar
• O'Donnell B. Forms of attention and attentional disorders. Seminars in Speech and Language 2002; 23(2)99–105, Retrieved September 14, 2003, from Thieme database.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ebner I. Abandonment of assistive technology. Paper presented and the 2004 Center on Disabilities Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference. City Lights, San Francisco, Retrieved December, 18, 2004,http://www.cenmi.org/uploaded/2004/APR/21368183837_AbandonAT.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer-Reiss M. Assistive technology discontinuance 2000, http://www.csun.edu/cod/conf/2000/proceedings/0003Reimer.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer M. The importance of measuring assistive technology outcomes 2002, Retrieved December, 18, 2004, from http://e-bility.com/articles/at.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Increasing Capabilities Access Network (n.d.). What makes a good evaluation for assistive technolgy (ICAN), Retrieved September 16, 2003, from http://www,Arkansas-ican.org/txt/fs_eval.html.
   Google Scholar
• Lahm E, Sizemore L. Factors that influence assistive technology decision making. [Electronic journal]. Journal of Special Education Technology 2002; 17(1)15–26
   Google Scholar
• Sparks N. Assistive technology assessment criteria, Paper presented at ISEC 2000. Retrieved September 16, 2003, from http://www.isec2000.org.uk/abstracts/papers_s/sparks_1.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Technology Resources for Education (T.R.E.) Center (n.d.). Assistive technology assessment: A team approach, Retrieved October 3, 2003, from http://www.trecenter.org/appendixA.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Beigel A. Assistive technology assessment: More than the device. [Electronic version]. Intervention in School and Clinic 2000; 35(4)237–243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntinger P. Technology team assessment project. (project ttap) Final report. Western Illinois University. 1998, Macom. Coll. Of Education and Human Services (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 420138);
   Google Scholar
• Trefler E. Positioning, access, and mobility module. Technology in the classroom, applications and strategies, for the education of children with severe disabilities. American Speech Language and Hearing Association, Rockville, MD 1992, (Report No. ISBN-0-910329-69-9), (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED384147);
   Google Scholar
• Babbage D, Leathum J. Neuropsychological assessment difficulties associated with ‘hard-to-assess’ individuals: A retrospective review. 2000
   Google Scholar
• Brain Injury, 15: 673–682, Retrieved August 24, 2003, from EBSCO Academic Search Premier database.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittner-Heir R. Assistive Technologies. School Planning and Management 2003; 41: 32–33, Retrieved September, 16, 2003, from GaleGroup InfoTrac OneFile database.
   Google Scholar
• Jasch C. Adaptive aids for accessing technology. Clinicians guide to assistive technology, D Olson, F DeRuyter. Mosby, Inc., St. Louis, MO 2002; 251–263
   Google Scholar
• Edyburn D. Assistive technology and evidence based practice. ConnSENSE Bulletin 2003, Retrieved December 14, 2003, from http://www.connsensebulletin.com/edyatevidence. html.
   Google Scholar
• Hall S, Doe T, Noakes A. The effectiveness of assistive technology for access and function: What we know now, (n.d.) Retrieved December 3, 2003, from Community Research for Assistive Technology Web site: http://www.atnet.org/CR4AT/PositionPapers/Function.html.
   Google Scholar
• Zabala J. Quality indicators for assistive technology services in school settings. Journal of Special Education Technology 2000; 15(4), Retrieved May 6, 2003, from WilsonWeb database.
   Google Scholar
• Love C. A Delphi study examining standards for patient handling. [Electronic version]. Nursing Standard 1997; 11(45)34–38
   PubMedGoogle Scholar