Reliability and validity of the Japanese-language version of the physical performance test (PPT) battery in chronic pain patients

References

• Fordyce W E, Lansky D, Calsyn D A, Shelton J L, Stolov W C, Rock D L. Pain measurement and pain behavior. Pain 1984; 18: 53–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White J, Strong J. Measurement of activity levels in patients with chronic pain. Occupat Ther J Res 1992; 12: 217–228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jette A M, Smith K, Haley S M, Davis K D. Physical therapy episodes of care for patients with low back pain. Phys Ther 1994; 74: 101–110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakeney A B. Occupational therapy intervention in chronic pain. Occupational therapy and the patient with pain, F S Cromwell. Haworth Press, New York 1984; 43–54
   Google Scholar
• Simmonds M J, Kumar S, Lechelt E. Psychosocial factors in disabling low back pain: Cause or consequences?. Disab Rehab 1996; 18: 161–168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater M A, Hall H F, Atkinson J H, Garfin S R. Pain and impairment beliefs in chronic low back pain: Validation of Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (PAIRS). Pain 1991; 44: 51–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacker J M, Carosella A M, Feuerstein M. Pain expectancies, pain, and functional self-efficacy expectancies as determinants of disability in patients with chronic low back disorders. J Consult Clin Psychol 1996; 64: 212–220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan G M, Wurtele S K, Gillis D. Maximal effort during functional capacity evaluations: An examination of psychological factors. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1996; 77: 161–164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddell G, Main C J, Morris E W, DiPaola M, Gray I CM. Chronic low-back pain, psychological distress and illness behavior. Spine 1984; 9: 209–213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstrom I, Ohlund C, Nachemson A. Physical performance, pain, pain behavior and subjective disability in patients with subacute low back pain. Scand J Rehab Med 1995; 27: 153–160
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mayer T G, Gatchel R J, Kishino N, et al. Objective assessment of spine function following industrial injury. A prospective study with comparison group and one-year follow-up. Spine 1985; 10: 482–493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer T G, Gatchel R J, Kishino N, et al. A prospective short-term study of chronic low back pain patients utilizing novel objective functional measurement. Pain 1986; 25: 53–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher K, Johnston M. Validation of the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, its sensitivity as a measure of change following treatment and its relationship with other aspects of the chronic pain experience. Physiother Theory Pract 1997; 13: 67–80
   Google Scholar
• Reuben D V, Siu A L. An objective measure of physical function of elderly outpatients: The Physical Performance Test. J Am Geriat Soc 1990; 38: 1105–1112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan P W, Weiner D K, Chandler J, Studenski S. Functional reach: A new clinical measure of balance. J Gerontol 1990; 45: 192–197
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harding V R, Williams A C, Richardson P H, et al. The development of a battery of measures for assessing physical functioning of chronic pain patients. Pain 1994; 58: 367–375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmonds M J, Olson S L, Jones S, et al. Psychometric characteristics and clinical usefulness of physical performance tests in patients with low back pain. Spine 1998; 23: 2412–2421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmonds M J. Physical function in patients with cancer: Psychometric characteristics and clinical usefulness of a Physical Performance Test Battery. J Pain Sympt Management 2002; 24: 404–414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filho I T, Simmonds M J, Protas E J, Jones S. Back pain, physical function, and estimates of aerobic capacity: What are the relationships among methods and measures?. Am J Phys Med Rehab 2002; 81: 913–920
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novy D M, Simmonds M J, Lee C E. Physical performance tasks: What are the underlying constructs?. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2002; 83: 44–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novy D M, Simmonds M J, Olson S L, Lee C E, Jones S C. Physical performance: Differences in men and women with and without low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1999; 80: 195–198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee C E, Simmonds M J, Novy D M, Jones S C. Self-reports and clinician-measured physical function among patients with low back pain: A comparison. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2001; 82: 227–231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bercker M, Hughes B. Using a tool for pain assessment. Nursing Times 1990; 86: 50–52
   Google Scholar
• Mineda Y, Totoki T, Harano K. Assessment of pain in pain clinics [Japanese]. J Pain Clin 1986; 7: 577–584
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton B B, Laughlim J A, Fiedler R C, Granger C V. Interrater reliability of the 7-level functional independence measure (FIM). Scand J Rehab Med 1994; 26: 115–119
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yamamoto M, Sonoda S, Hayashi T. New evaluation method of ADL–Functional Independence Measure (FIM)– [Japanese]. Japan J Nursing Techniques 1992; 38: 922–925
   Google Scholar
• Eliasziw M, Young S L, Woodburg M G, Fryday-Field K. Statistical methodology for the concurrent assessment of interrater and interrater reliability: using goniometric measurements as an example. Phys Ther 1994; 74: 777–788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tait R C, Pollard C A, Margolis R B, Duckro P N, Krause S J. The Pain Disability Index. psychometric and validity data. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1987; 68: 438–441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz J M, Irrgang J J. A comparison of a modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Phys Ther 2001; 81: 776–788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delitto A. Are measures of functional and disability important in low back care?. Phys Ther 1994; 74: 452–262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beurskens A J, de Vet H C, Koke A J, et al. Measuring the functional status of patients with low back pain. Assessment of the quality of four disease-specific questionnaires. Spine 1995; 20: 1017–1028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deyo R A, Battie M, Beurskens A JHM, et al. Outcome measures for low back pain research: A proposal for standardized use. Spine 1998; 23: 2003–2013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deyo R A, Centor R M. Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: An analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chron Dis 1986; 39: 897–906
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jensen M P, Strom S E, Turner J A, Romano J M. Validity of the Sickness Impact Profile Roland scale as a measure of dysfunction in chronic pain patients. Pain 1992; 50: 57–162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick D L, Deyo R A, Atlas S J, Singer D E, Chapin A, Keller R B. Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatica. Spine 1995; 20: 1899–1908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratford P W, Binkley J, Solomon P, Gill C, Finch E. Assessing change over time in patients with low back pain. Phys Ther 1994; 74: 528–533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beurskens A J, de Vet H C, Koke A J. Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: A comparison of different instruments. Pain 1996; 65: 71–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddle D L, Stratford P W, Binkley J M. Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire: Part 2. Phys Ther 1998; 78: 1197–1207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollman G B. Measurement of experimental pain in chronic pain patients: Methodological and individual factors. Pain measurement and assessment, R Mezack. Raven Press, New York 1983; 251–258
   Google Scholar
• Keefe F J, Bradley L A, Crisson J. Behavioural assessment of low back pain: Identification of pain behaviour subgroups. Pain 1990; 40: 153–160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar