Personal assistance, adaptations and participation in students with cerebral palsy mainstreamed in elementary schools

References

• World Health Organization. ICF: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. World Health Organization, Geneva 2001
   Google Scholar
• Beckung E, Hagberg G. Neuroimpairments, activity limitations, and participation restrictions in children with cerebral palsy. Develop Med Child Neurol 2002; 44: 309–316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenker R, Coster W, Parush S. Classification, severity, neuroimpairments, activity performance and participation in students with cerebral palsy mainstreamed in elementary schools. Develop Med Child Neurol 2005; 47: 808–814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simeonsson R J, Carlson D, Huntington G S, McMillan J S, Brent J L. Students with disabilities: A national survey of participation in school Activities. Disab Rehab 2002; 23: 49–63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmingsson H, Borell L. Environmental barriers in mainstream schools. Child Care, Health Develop 2002; 28: 57–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pivik J, Mccomas J, Lafamme M. Barriers and facilitators to inclusive education. Except Children 2002; 69: 97–108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmingsson H, Borell L, Gustavsson A. Participation in school: School assistants creating opportunities and obstacles for pupils with disabilities. OTJR – Occup Particip Health 2003; 23: 88–100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancini M C, Coster W J. Functional predictors of school participation by children with disabilities. Occup Ther Int 2004; 11: 12–25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schenker R, Coster W, Parush S. Participation and activity performance of students with cerebral palsy within the school environment. Disab Rehab 2005; 27(10)539–552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostensjo S, Brogren E, Vollestad N K. Everyday functioning in young children with cerebral palsy: Functional skills, caregiver assistance, and modifications of the environment. Develop Med Child Neurol 2003; 45: 603–617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palisano R J, Tieman B L, Walter S D, Bartlett D J, Rosenbaum P L, Russel D, Hanna S E. Effect of environmental setting on mobility methods of children with cerebral palsy. Develop Med Child Neurol 2003; 45: 113–120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammal D, Jarvis S N, Colver A F. Participation of children with cerebral palsy is influenced by where they live. Develop Med Child Neurol 2004; 46: 292–298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihaylov S I, Jarvis S N, Colver A F, Bryony B. Identification and description of environmental factors that influence participation of children with cerebral palsy. Develop Med Child Neurol 2004; 46: 299–304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washington Workshop. Definition and classification of cerebral palsy. USA, Bethesda, MD 2004
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum P, Stewart D. The World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: A model to guide clinical thinking, practice and research in the field of cerebral palsy. Seminars in Pediatric Neurol 2004; 11: 5–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coster W, Deeney T A, Haltiwanger J T, Haley S M. School function assessment, user's manual. Therapy Skill Builders, San Antonio, TX 1998
   Google Scholar
• Giangreco M F, Edelman S W, Luiselli T E, MacFarland S ZC. Helping or hovering? Effects of instructional assistant proximity on students with disabilities. Except Children 1997; 64: 7–18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutch L, Alberman E, Hagberg B, Kodama K, Velikovic Perat M. Cerebral palsy epidemiology: where are we going?. Develop Med Child Neurol 1992; 34: 547–551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Walter S, Russel D, Wood E, Galuppi B. Development and reliability of a system to classify Gross Motor Function in children with cerebral palsy. Develop Med Child Neurol 1997; 39: 214–223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coster W, Ludlow L, Mancini M. Using IRT variable to enrich understanding of rehabilitation data. J Outcome Measure 1999; 3: 123–133
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coster W, Mancini M, Ludlow L H. Factor structure of the school function assessment. Educat Psychol Measure 1999; 59: 665–677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang J L, Davies P L, Taylor M P, Gavin W J. Validation of school function assessment with primary school children. Occupat Ther J Res: Occupat, Particip and Health 2002; 22: 48–58
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies L P, Lee Soon P, Clausen-Yamaki A. Validity and reliability of the school assessment in elementary school students with disability. Phys Occupat Ther Pediatrics 2004; 24: 23–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guttman L. Ageneral nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points. Psychometrica 1968; 33: 469–506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingoes J C. The Guttman-Lingoes nonmetric program series. Mathesis, Ann Arbor, MI 1973
   Google Scholar
• Guttman R, Greenbaum C W. Facet theory: Its development and current status. Eur Psychologist 1998; 3: 13–36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg I, Shye S. Facet theory: Form and content. Sage, London 1995
   Google Scholar
• Skar L, Tamm M. My assistant and I: Disabled children's and adolescents' roles and relationships to their assistants. Disab Soc 2001; 16: 917–931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar