Population-based study of home accessibility features and the activities of daily living: Clinical and policy implications

References

• Andersson G BJ, Cocchiarella L. Guides to the Evaluation of Permanment Impairment. American Medical Association. 2001
   Google Scholar
• Batavia A I. Assessing the function of functional assessment: a consumer perspective. Disabil Rehabil 1992; 14(3)156–160
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DeJong G. Independent living: from social movement to analytic paradigm. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1979; 60(10)435–446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frieden L, Richards L, Cole J, Bailey O. IRLU Source book: A technical assistance manujal on independent living. The Institute for Rehabilitation and Research, Houston, TX 1979
   Google Scholar
• Hurst R. The International disability rights movement and the ICF. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 572–576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ustun T B, Chatterji S, Bickenbach J, Kostanjsek N, Schneider M. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a new tool for understanding disability and health. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25(11 – 12)565–571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stineman M G. A model of health environmental integration. Top Stroke Rehabil 2001; 8(2)34–45
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland 2001; 299
   Google Scholar
• Engel G. The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. Am J Psychiatry 1980; 137(5)535–544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations (1993) The standard rules on the equalization of opportunities for person with disabilities. Adopted by the United Nations General Assembly at its 48th session on 20 December 1993 (Resolution 48/96). December, 201994. United Nations Department of Public Information, New York
   Google Scholar
• United States. Healthy people 2010: Understanding and improving health. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 2000
   Google Scholar
• The White House. Executive Order 13217, community-based alternatives for individuals with disabilities. US Government Office, Washington, DC June 18, 2001
   Google Scholar
• Americans with Disabilities Act. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Public Law No. 101 – 336. US Statut Large 1990; 104: 327–378
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark F A, Parham D, Carlson M E, Frank G, Jackson J, Pierce D, Wolfe R J, Zemke R. Occupational science: Academic innovation in the service of occupational therapy's future. Am J Occup Ther 1991; 45(4)300–309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M. Participation in the occupations of everyday life. Am J Occupational Ther 2002; 56(6)640–649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly M. An explanation of play. Play as exploratory learning, M Reilly. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA 1974; 117–149
   Google Scholar
• Barris R. Activity: the interface between person and environment. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr 1986; 5(2)39–49
   Google Scholar
• Bielecki A KA, Holas P. Dynamic systems theory approach to consciousness. Int J Neurosci 2000; 104(1 – 4)29–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fougeyrollas P CR, Bergeron H. The Quebec classification: Disability creation process. NDCP/CSICIDH, Lac St-Charles, Quebec 1999
   Google Scholar
• Kopec K A. Concepts of disability: the activity space model. Soc Sci Med 1995; 40(5)649–656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minaire P. Disease, illness and health: theoretical models of the disablement process. Bull WHO 1992; 70(3)373–379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagi S Z. Disability concepts revisited: Implications for prevention. National Academy Press, Washington, DC 1991; 309–327
   Google Scholar
• Stineman M G. Medical humanism and empowerment medicine. Disabil Stud Q 2000; 20(1)11–16
   Google Scholar
• Stineman M G. A model of health environmental integration. Top Stroke Rehabil 2001; 8(2)34–45
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flake A W. The conceptual application of systems theory to stem cell biology: a matter of context. Blood Cells Mol Dis 2004; 32(1)58–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman A M. The biopsychosocial paradigm and the future of psychiatry. Comp Psychiatry 1995; 36(6)397–406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stineman M G. Medical humanism and empowerment in medicine. Disabil Stud Q 2000; 20(1)11–16
   Google Scholar
• Turmusani M, Vreede A, Wirz S L. Some ethical issues in community-based rehabilitation initiatives in developing countries. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24(10)558–564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz S, Ford A B, Moskowitz R W, Jackson B A, Jaffe M W. Studies of illness in the aged: The index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. J Am Med Assoc 1963; 185(12)914–919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton M P, Brody E M. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 1969; 9(3)179–186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Health Statistics. Data file documentation, national health interview survey on disability, Phase I, adult file 1994. National Center for Health Statistics, Hayattsville, MD 1996
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Health Statistics. Data file documentation, national health interview survey on disability, phase II, adult file 1995. National Center for Health Statistics, Hayattsville, MD 1998
   Google Scholar
• Todorov A, Kirchner C. Bias in proxies' reports of disability: data from the National Health Interview Survey on disability. Am J Public Health 2000; 90(8)1248–1253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stineman M G, Ross R N, Maislin G, Iezzoni L. Estimating health-related quality of life in populations through cross-sectional surveys. Med Care 2004; 42(6)569–578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Mueller C W. Factor analysis statistical methods and practical issures: Series: Quantitative applications in social sciences. E M Uslaner. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA 1978
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach L J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16: 385–397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrell F E, Lee K L, Mark D B. Tutorial in biostatistics: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 1996; 15: 361–387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosmer D LS. Applied logistic regression. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY 1989
   Google Scholar
• Hanley J A, McNeil B J. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143(1)29–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS. SAS Software 6.12. SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC 1996
   Google Scholar
• Shah B V, Barnwell B G, Bieler G S. SUDAAN User's manual: Software for the statistical analysis of correlated data. Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC 1995
   Google Scholar
• Inouye S K, Peduzzi P N, Robison J T, Hughes J S, Horwitz R I, Concato J. Importance of functional measures in predicting mortality among older hospitalized patients. J Am Med Assoc 1998; 279(15)1187–1193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narain P, Rubenstein L Z, Wieland G D, Rosbrook B, Strome L S, Pietruszka F, Morley J E. Predictors of immediate and 6-month outcomes in hospitalized elderly patients. The importance of functional status. J Am Geriatr Soc 1988; 36(9)775–783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolaus T, Bach M, Oster P, Schlierf G. Prospective value of self-report and performance-based tests of functional status for 18-month outcomes in elderly patients. Aging (Milano) 1996; 8(4)271–276
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 2002 November 8, 2002. Details of Executive Order 13217. <http://www.cms.hhs.gov/newfreedom/ec061801.asp>. Accessed 2002 November 8, 2002
   Google Scholar
• Greaves D. Reflections on a new medical cosmology. J Med Ethics 2002; 28(2)81–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner R R. Rehabilitation. Quality of life assessment in clinical trials, B Spilker. Raven, New York 1990; 247–267
   Google Scholar
• Stineman M, Lollar D J, Ustun T B. The international classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF empowering rehabilitation through an operational bio-psychosocial model. (Chapter 49). Physical medicine and rehabilitation: Principles and practice, J GB DeLisa, N Walsh. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA 2005; 1099–1108
   Google Scholar
• Blascovich J, Mendes W B, Hunter S B, Salomon K. Social ‘facilitation’ as challenge and threat. J Pers Soc Psychol 1999; 77(1)68–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuipers P, Foster M, Carlson G, Moy J. Classifying client goals in community-based ABI rehabilitation: a taxonomy for profiling service delivery and conceptualizing outcomes. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25(3)154–162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkenflugel H, Wolffers I, Huijsman R. The evidence base for community-based rehabilitation: a literature review. Int J Rehabil Res 2005; 28(3)187–201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anonymous. From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence of disabilities and associated health conditions among adults – United States, 1999. J Am Med Assoc 2001; 285(12)1571–1572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar