Utilizing Rasch measurement models to develop a computer adaptive self-report of walking, climbing, and running

References

• Bjorner J B, Kosinski M, Ware J E, Jr. Using item response theory to calibrate the Headache Impact Test (HIT) to the metric of traditional headache scales. Qual Life Res 2003; 12(8)981–1002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjorner J B, Kosinski M, Ware J E, Jr. Calibration of an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches: An application of item response theory to the headache impact test (HIT). Qual Life Res 2003; 12(8)913–933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu Y P, Fritz S L, Light K E, Velozo C A. Use of item response analysis to investigate measurement properties and clinical validity of data for the dynamic gait index. Phys Ther 2006; 86(6)778–787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley S M, McHorney C A, Ware J E, Jr. Evaluation of the MOS SF-36 physical functioning scale (PF-10): I. Unidimensionality and reproducibility of the Rasch item scale. J Clin Epidemiol 1994; 47(6)671–684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley S M, Coster W J, Andres P L, Ludlow L H, Ni P, Bond T L, Sinclair S J, Jette A M. Activity outcome measurement for postacute care. Med Care 2004; 42(1 Suppl.)I49–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosinski M, Bjorner J B, Ware J E, Jr, Batenhorst A, Cady R K. The responsiveness of headache impact scales scored using ‘classical’ and ‘modern’ psychometric methods: A re-analysis of three clinical trials. Qual Life Res 2003; 12(8)903–912
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHorney C A, Haley S M, Ware J E, Jr. Evaluation of the MOS SF-36 Physical Functioning Scale (PF-10): II. Comparison of relative precision using Likert and Rasch scoring methods. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50(4)451–461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHorney C A. Use of item response theory to link 3 modules of functional status items from the Asset and Health Dynamics among the Oldest Old study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83(3)383–394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stansbury J P, Ried L D, Velozo C A. Unidimensionality and bandwidth in the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale. J Pers Assess Feb, 2006; 86(1)10–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velozo C A, Magalhaes L C, Pan A W, Leiter P. Functional scale discrimination at admission and discharge: Rasch analysis of the Level of Rehabilitation Scale-III. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76(8)705–712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velozo C A, Kielhofner G, Lai J S. The use of Rasch analysis to produce scale-free measurement of functional ability. Am J Occup Ther 1999; 53(1)83–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velozo C A, Lai J S, Mallinson T, Hauselman E. Maintaining instrument quality while reducing items: application of Rasch analysis to a self-report of visual function. J Outcome Meas 2000; 4(3)667–680
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Velozo C A, Peterson E W. Developing meaningful Fear of Falling Measures for community dwelling elderly. Am J Phys Med Rehabil Sep, 2001; 80(9)662–673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook K F, O'Malley K J, Roddey T S. Dynamic assessment of health outcomes: Time to let the CAT out of the bag?. Health Serv Res 2005; 40(5 Pt 2)1694–1711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays R D, Morales L S, Reise S P. Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century. Med Care 2000; 38(9 Suppl.)II28–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jette A M, Haley S M. Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37(6)339–345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHorney C A. Generic health measurement: Past accomplishments and a measurement paradigm for the 21st century. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127(8 Pt 2)743–750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHorney C A. Ten recommendations for advancing patient-centered outcomes measurement for older persons. Ann Intern Med Sep, 2003; 139(5 Pt 2)403–409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHorney C A, Monahan P O. Postscript: Applications of Rasch analysis in health care. Med Care 2004; 42(1 Suppl.)I73–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware J E, Jr. Conceptualization and measurement of health-related quality of life: comments on an evolving field. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84(4 Suppl. 2)S43–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley S M, Coster W J, Andres P L, Kosinski M, Ni P. Score comparability of short forms and computerized adaptive testing: Simulation study with the activity measure for post-acute care. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85(4)661–666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley S M, Raczek A E, Coster W J, Dumas H M, Fragala-Pinkham M A. Assessing mobility in children using a computer adaptive testing version of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86(5)932–939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley S M, Fragala-Pinkham M, Ni P. Sensitivity of a computer adaptive assessment for measuring functional mobility changes in children enrolled in a community fitness programme. Clin Rehabil 2006; 20(7)616–622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart D L, Mioduski J E, Stratford P W. Simulated computerized adaptive tests for measuring functional status were efficient with good discriminant validity in patients with hip, knee, or foot/ankle impairments. J Clin Epidemiol 2005; 58(6)629–638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart D L, Cook K F, Mioduski J E, Teal C R, Crane P K. Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with shoulder impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59(3)290–298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart D L, Mioduski J E, Werneke M W, Stratford P W. Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with lumbar spine impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59(9)947–956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware J E, Jr, Kosinski M, Bjorner J B, Bayliss M S, Batenhorst A, Dahlof C G, Tepper S, Dowson A. Applications of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) to the assessment of headache impact. Qual Life Res 2003; 12(8)935–952
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambleton R K, Swaminathan H, Rogers H J. Fundamentals of item response theory. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California 1991
   Google Scholar
• Andrich D. Controversy and the Rasch model: A characteristic of incompatible paradigms?. Med Care 2004; 42(1 Suppl.)17–16
   Google Scholar
• Thurstone L L. The scoring of individual performance. J Educat Psychol 1926; 17: 446–457
   Google Scholar
• Thurstone L L. Attitudes can be measured. Am J Sociol 1928; 23: 529–554
   Google Scholar
• Thurstone L L. The measurement of social attitudes. J Abnormal Soc Psychol 1931; 26: 249–269
   Google Scholar
• Wright B D, Stone M H. Best Test Design: Rasch Measurement. MESA Press, Chicago 1979
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for industry: Patient-reported outcome measures; use in medical product development to support labeling claims; draft guidance. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006; 4: 79–99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. World Health Organization, Geneva 2001
   Google Scholar
• Stone M H. Steps in item construction. Rasch Measure Transact 1997; 11(2)559
   Google Scholar
• Linacre J M. WINSTEPS: Rasch computer program. MESA Press, Chicago 2004
   Google Scholar
• Wright B D, Linacre J M. Reasonable mean-square fit values, http://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt83b.htm. 1994. 9-15-2006
   Google Scholar
• Bassett D R, Vachon J A, Kirkland A O, Howley E T, Duncan G E, Johnson K R. Energy cost of stair climbing and descending on the college alumnus questionnaire. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997; 29(9)1250–1254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodbury M L, Velozo C A, Richards L G, Duncan P W, Studenski S, Lai S M. Dimensionality and construct validity of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the upper extremity. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2007; 88(6)715–723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wainer H, Dorans N, Green B, Mislevy R J, Steinberg L, Thissen D. Future challenges. Computerized adaptive testing: A primer. 2nd ed, H Wainer, N Dorans, D Eignor, R Flaugher, B Green, R Mislevy, L Steinberg, D Thissen. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ 2000; 231–270
   Google Scholar