Continuity, transition and participation: Preparing clients for life in the community post-stroke

References

• Cott C A. Client-centred rehabilitation: Client perceptions. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26: 1411–1422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams S, Harrison K. Physiotherapeutic interactions: A review of the power dynamic. Phys Ther Rev 1999; 4: 184–204
   Google Scholar
• Wottrich A W, Stenstrom C H, Engardt M, Tham K, von K L. Characteristics of physiotherapy sessions from the patient's and therapist's perspective. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26: 1198–1205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health (DoH). ‘Now I Feel Tall’: What a patient-led NHS feels like. Department of Health, London 2005
   Google Scholar
• Hafsreinsdottir T, Grypndonck M. Being a stroke patient: A review of the literature. J Advanced Nursing 1997; 26: 580–588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill C. Biographical disruption, narrative and identity in stroke: personal experience in acquired chronic illness. Auto/Biography 1997; 5: 131–144
   Google Scholar
• Burton C R. Living with stroke: A phenomenological study. J Advanced Nursing 2000; 32: 301–309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiles R, Ashburn A, Payne S, Murphy C. Patients' expectations of recovery following stroke: A qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 841–850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiles R, Ashburn A, Payne S, Murphy C. Discharge from physiotherapy following stroke: The management of disappointment. Soc Sci Med 2004; 59: 1263–1273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhogal S K, Teasell R W, Foley N C, Speechley M R. Community reintegration after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2003; 10: 107–129
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stone S D. Reactions to invisible disability: The experiences of young women survivors of hemorrhagic stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 293–304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agahi N, Ahacic K, Parker M G. Continuity of leisure participation from middle age to old age. J Gerontol 2006; 61B: S340–346
   Google Scholar
• Becker G. Disrupted lives: How people create meaning in a chaotic world. University of California Press, Berkeley 1997
   Google Scholar
• Rittman M, Faircloth C, Boylstein C, Gubrium J F, Williams C, Van Puymbroeck M, Ellis C. The experience of time in the transition from hospital to home following stroke. J Rehabil Res Develop 2004; 41: 259–268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doolittle N D. A clinical ethnography of stroke recovery. Interpretive phenomenology: Embodiment, caring and ethics in health and illness, P Benner. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 1994; 211–229
   Google Scholar
• Ellis-Hill C, Payne S, Ward C. Self-body split: Issues of identify in physical recovery following a stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2000; 22: 725–733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secrest J A, Thomas S P. Continuity and discontinuity: The quality of life following stroke. Rehabil Nursing 1999; 24: 240–246
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Corbin J M, Strauss A. Unending work and care: Managing chronic illness at home. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco 1988
   Google Scholar
• Bury M. Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociol Health Illness 1982; 4: 167–182
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyson S, Turner G. Discharge and follow-up for people with stroke: What happens and why. Clin Rehabil 2000; 14: 381–392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Playford E D, Dawson L, Limbert V, Smith M, Ward C, Wells R. Goal setting in rehabilitation: Report of a workshop to explore professionals' perceptions of goal setting. Clin Rehabil 2000; 14: 491–496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart E. Evaluating a pilot community stroke service using insights from medical anthropology. J Adv Nursing 1998; 27: 1177–1183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp F. Communication problems preventing stroke patients participating in physiotherapy treatment plans [dissertation]. University of Southampton. 2006
   Google Scholar
• Bendz M. Rules of relevance after stroke. Soc Sci Med 2000; 51: 165–187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull M J. Managing the transition from hospital to home. Qualitative Health Res 1992; 2: 27–41
   Google Scholar
• Cott C, Jaglal S, McKillop I, Brown A, Blackstein-Hirsch P, Canizares M, Daniel I, Levinton C, MacKay C, McGillis Hall L, Pink G, Porcellato C, Soever L, Tyas J. Hospital Report 2005: Rehabilitation. Joint Initiative of the Ontario Hospital Association and the Government of Ontario. Hospital Report Research Collaborative, University of Toronto, Toronto 2005
   Google Scholar
• Glaser B, Strauss A. Status passage. Aldine, Chicago 1971
   Google Scholar
• Teasell R, Foley N, Salter K, Bhogal S, Bayona N, Jutai J, Speechley M. Evidence-based review of stroke rehabilitation. Outpatient Stroke Rehabilitation. LondonCanada 2005
   Google Scholar
• Early Supported Discharge Trialists. Services for reducing duration of hospital care for acute stroke patients. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD000443. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000443.pub2.; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Fjaertoft H, Inredavik B, Lyersen S. Stroke unit care combined with early supported discharge. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Stroke 2003; 34: 2687–2692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huijbregts M PJ, Teasell R W, Streiner D L, Myers A M. The Stroke Self-Management Program is associated with increased participation in community-dwelling stroke survivors. Stroke 2005; 36: 476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry C, Coleman E A, Smith J D, Frank J, Kramer A M. The Care Transitions Intervention: A patient-centered approach to ensuring effective transfers between sites of geriatric care. Home Health Care Services Quart 2003; 22: 1–17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burton C R. An exploration of the stroke co-coordinator role. J Clin Nursing 1999; 8: 535–541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver M. Theories of disability in health practice and research. BMJ 1998; 317: 1446–1449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegert R J, Ward T, Levack W MM, McPherson K M. A Good Lives Model of clinical and community rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29(20 – 21)1604–1615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patston P. Constructive Functional Diversity: A new paradigm beyond disability and impairment. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29(20 – 21)1625–1633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McColl M A, Law M, Stewart D. Theoretical basis of occupational therapy. SLACK Incorporated, Thorofare, NJ 1993
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. WHO, Geneva 2001
   Google Scholar
• Fougeyrollas P, Noreau L, Bergeron H, Cloutier R, Dion S A, St Michel G. Social consequences of long-term impairments and disabilities: Conceptual approaches and assessment of handicap. Int J Rehabil Res 1998; 21: 127–141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willer B, Linn R, Allen K. Community integration and barriers to integration for individuals with brain injury. Brain injury rehabilitation: Clinical considerations, M Alan, A J Finlayson, S H Garner. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1994
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (CAOT). Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. CAOT Publications ACE, Ottawa, ON 1997
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton H, McPherson K, Falkner E, Taylor W. Impairment, disability, handicap and participation in post-poliomyelitis subjects. Int J Rehabil Res 2001; 24: 133–136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurst R. The international disability rights movement and the ICF. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 24: 572–576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider M, Hurst R, Miller J, Ustün B. The role of environment in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil 2003; 24: 588–595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jette A M, Haley S M, Kooyoomijan J T. Are the ICF activity and participation dimensions distinct?. J Rehabil Med 2003; 35: 145–149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jette A, Haley S. Late Life FDI: Disability component. Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston University 2002
   Google Scholar
• Fougeyrollas P. Documenting environmental factors for preventing the handicap creation process: Quebec contributions relating to ICIDH and social participation of people with functional differences. Disabil Rehabil 1995; 17: 145–153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). ICF Australian User Guide.Version 1.0 Disability Series. AIHW Cat. No. DIS 33. AIWH, Canberra 2003
   Google Scholar
• Fougeyrollas P, Noreau L, Boschen K A. Interaction of the environment on social participation among individuals with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Injury Rehabil 2002; 7: 56–72
   Google Scholar
• Galvin R D. Researching the disabled identity: Contextualising the identity transformations which accompany the onset of impairment. Sociol Health Illness 2005; 27: 393–413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McColl M. Measuring community integration and social support. Measuring occupational performance: Supporting best practice in occupational therapy, M Law, C Baum, W Dunn. SLACK, Thorofare, NJ 2001
   Google Scholar
• Dijkers M. Community integration: Conceptual issues and measurement approaches in rehabilitation research. Top Spinal Cord Injury Rehabil 1998; 4: 1–15
   Google Scholar
• Willer B, Rosenthal M, Kreutzer J S, Gordon W A, Rempel R. Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1993; 8: 75–87
   Google Scholar
• McColl M A, Carlson P, Johnston J, Minnes P, Shue K, Davies D, Karlovits T. The definition of community integration: Perspectives of people with brain injuries. Brain Injury 1998; 12: 15–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart D. The new ICF: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Concepts and implementation issues for occupational therapists. Occupat Ther Now July/August, 2002; 17–21
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Abreu B C, Gonzales V, Masel B, Ottenbacher K J. Comparison of the Community Integration Questionnaire, the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique, and the Disability Rating Scale in traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2002; 17: 497–509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteneck G G. Measuring what matters: Key rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 1073–1076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, Baum C, Dunn W. Measuring occupational performance: Supporting best practice in occupational therapy. SLACK, Thorofare, NJ 2001
   Google Scholar
• McPherson K M, Brander P, Taylor W J, McNaughton H K. Living with arthritis – what is important?. Disabil Rehabil 2001; 23: 706–721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leplege A, Gzil F, Cammelli M, Lefeve C, Pachoud B, Ville I. Person-centredness: Conceptual and historical perspectives. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29(20 – 21)1555–1565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteneck G. Outcome analysis in spinal cord injury rehabilitation. Rehabilitation outcomes, analysis and measurement, M Fuhrer. Paul H. Brooks, Baltimore 1987
   Google Scholar
• Doig E, Fleming J, Tooth L. Patterns of community integration 2 – 5 years post-discharge from brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Injury 2001; 15: 747–762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall K M, Bushnik T, Lakisic-Kazazic B, Wright J, Cantagallo A. Assessing traumatic brain injury outcome measures for long-term follow-up of community-based individuals. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 367–374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perenboom R JM, Chorus A MJ. Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil 2003; 24: 577–587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkinson C, Mant J, Carter J, Wade D, Winner S. The London Handicap Scale: A re-evaluation of its validity using standard scoring and simple summation. J Neurol, Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 68: 365–367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwood R, Gompertz P, Ebrahim S. Handicap one year after stroke: Validity of a new scale. J Neurol, Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994; 57: 825–829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardol M, de Haan R J, de Jong B A, van den Bos G AM, Groot I JM. Psychometric properties of the impact on participation and autonomy questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 210–216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardol M, De Haan R J, Van Den Bos G AM, De Jong B, De Groot I JM. The development of a handicap assessment questionnaire: The Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire (IPAQ). Clin Rehabil 1999; 13: 411–419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood-Dauphinee S L, Opzoomer A, Williams J I, Marchand B, Spitzer W O. Assessment of global function: The Reintegration to Normal Living Index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 69: 583–590
   Google Scholar
• Noreau L, Desrosiers J, Robichaud L, Fougeyrollas P, Rochette A, Viscogliosi C. Measuring social participation: Reliability of the LIFE-H in older adults with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26: 346–352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noreau L, Fougeyrollas P, Vincent C. The LIFE-H: Assessment of the Quality of social participation. Technol Disabil 2002; 14: 113–118
   Google Scholar
• McColl M A, Patterson M, Davies D, Law M. Validity and utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Can J Occupat Ther 2000; 67: 22–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McColl M A, Davies D. Psychometric properties of the Community Integration Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 82: 429–434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secrest J A, Zeller R. Replication and Extension of the Continuity and Discontinuity of Self Scale (CDSS). J Nursing Scholarship 2006; 38: 154–158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein J G. The cult of efficiency. House of Anansi Press Limited, Toronto 2001
   Google Scholar