Mispredictions and misrecollections: Challenges for subjective outcome measurement

References

• Kirwan J, Heiberg T, Hewlett S, et al. Outcomes from the patient perspective workshop at OMERACT 6. J Rheumatol 2003; 30: 868–872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvien T, Heiberg T. Patient perspective in outcome assessments-perceptions or something more?. J Rheumatol 2003; 30: 873–876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulsky D S, Rosenthal M. Quality of life measurement in rehabilitation medicine: Building an agenda for the future. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83(12 Suppl. 2)S1–S3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuhrer M J. Subjectifying quality of life as a medical rehabilitation outcome. Disabil Rehabil 2000; 22: 481–490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ubel P A, Loewenstein G, Schwarz N, Smith D. Misimagining the unimaginable: The disability paradox and healthcare decision making. Health Psychol 2005; 24(4 Suppl.)S57–S62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan P, Olsen J A, Menzel P, Richardson J. An inquiry into the different perspectives that can be used when eliciting preferences in health. Health Econom 2003; 12: 545–551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan P, Kahneman D. Interpretations of utility and their implications for the valuation of health, Working Paper
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus R S. Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1991
   Google Scholar
• McHorney C A, Ware J E, Lu J FR, Sherbourne C D. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994; 32: 40–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai C, Bayliss M S, Ware J E. SF-36 Health Survey annotated bibliography2nd edn. Health Assessment Lab, New England Medical Center, Boston, MA 1997, (1988 – 1996)
   Google Scholar
• Ware J E, Kosinski M, Keller S K. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A user's manual. The Health Institute, Boston, MA 1994
   Google Scholar
• Ware J E, Snow K K, Kosinski M. SF-36 Health Survey manual and interpretation guide. New England Medical Center, The Health Institute, Boston, MA 1993
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy N, Buchanan W W, Goldsmith C H, Campbell J, Stitt L W. Validation study of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988; 15: 1833–1840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz N, Strack F. Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications. Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology, D Kahneman, E Diener, N Schwarz, New York 1999
   Google Scholar
• Diener E, Suh E M, Lucas R E, Smith H L. Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psycholog Bull 1999; 125: 276–302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz N. Accessible content and accessibility experiences: The interplay of declarative and experimental information in judgment. Personality Social Psychol Rev 1998; 2: 87–99
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith D M, Schwarz N, Roberts T R, Ubel P A. Why are you calling me? How survey introductions change response patterns. Qual Life Res 2006; 15: 621–630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross M. Relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories. Psycholog Rev 1989; 96: 341–357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahomed N N, Liang M H, Cook E F, et al. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol 2002; 29: 1273–1279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen R J, Fredrickson B L. Measurement issues in emotion research. Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology, D Kahneman, E Diener, N Schwarz. Russell Sage Foundation, New York 1999
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz N, Clore G L. Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. J Personality Social Psychol 1983; 45: 513–523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiffman S, Stone A A. Ecological momentary assessment: A new tool for behavior medicine research. Technology and methods in behavioral medicine, D S Krants. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 1998; 117–131
   Google Scholar
• Robinson M D, Clore G L. Episodic and semantic knowledge in emotional self-report: Evidence for two judgment processes. J Personality Social Psychol 2002; 83: 198–215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Fredrickson B L, Schreiber C A, Redelmeier D A. When more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end. Psycholog Sci 1993; 4: 401–405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams D A, Gendreau M, Hufford M R, Groner K, Gracely R H, Clauw D J. Pain assessment in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome: A consideration of methods for clinical trials. Clin J Pain 2004; 20: 348–356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Krueger A B, Schkade D, Schwarz N, Stone A A. A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method (DRM). Science 2004; 306(5702)1776–1780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riis J, Loewenstein G, Baron J, Jepson C, Fagerlin A, Ubel P A. Ignorance of hedonic adaptation to hemo-dialysis: A study using ecological momentary assessment. J Exp Psychol: General 2005; 134: 3–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson T, Meyers J, Gilbert D. How happy was I anyway? A retrospective impact bias. Social Cognit 2003; 21: 407–432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert D T, Pinel E C, Wilson T D, Blumberg S J, Wheatley T P. Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. J Personality Social Psychol 1998; 75: 617–638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrickson B L, Kahneman D. Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes. J Personality Social Psychol 1993; 65: 45–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen L L. Evidence for a life span theory of socioemotional selectivity. Curr Directions Psycholog Sci 1995; 4: 151–156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng S-T. Age and subjective well-being revisited: A discrepancy perspective. Psychol Aging 2004; 19: 409–415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacey H P, Smith D M, Ubel P A. Hope I die before I get old: Mispredicting happiness across the lifespan. J Happiness Stud 2006; 7(2)167–182
   Google Scholar
• Smith D M, Sherriff R L, Damschroder L J, Loewenstein G, Ubel P A. Former patients give lower utility ratings for colostomy than do current patients: Evidence for theory driven recall bias. Health Psychol 2006; 25(6)688–694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Wakker P P, Sarin R. Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. The Q J Econom 1997; 112: 375–405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Krueger A, Schkade D, Schwarz N, Stone A A. Toward national well-being accounts. AEA Papers Proc 2004; 94: 429–434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar