Evaluation of scoliosis today: Examination, X-rays and beyond

References

• Stokes I AF, Burwell R G, Dangerfield P H. Biomechanical spinal growth modulation and progressive adolescent scoliosis – a test of a ‘vicious cycle’ pathogenetic hypothesis: Summary of an electronic focus group debate of the IBSE. Scoliosis 2006; 1: 16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hawes M C, O'Brien J O. The transformation of spinal curvature into spinal deformity: Pathological processes and implications for treatment. Scoliosis 2006; 1: 3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scoliosis Research Society: Definitions of Scoliosis Terms. Accessed 15 September 2007 from the website: http://www.srs.org
   Google Scholar
• Dubousset J. Premier examen d'un enfant scoliotic. Ortho-pediatrie 1, J Duparc. Expansion Scientifique Francaise, Paris 1991; 1–11
   Google Scholar
• Negrini S, Grivas T B, Kotwicki T, Maruyama T, Rigo M, Weiss H R. Why do we treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? What we want to obtain and to avoid for our patients. SOSORT 2005 Consensus Paper. Scoliosis 2006; 1: 4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ware J E, Sherbourne C D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473–483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbank J C, Couper J, Davies J B, O'Brien J P. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 1980; 66: 271–273
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Danielsson A J, Wiklund I, Pehrsson K, Nachemson A L. Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A matched follow-up at least 20 years after treatment with brace or surgery. Eur Spine J 2001; 10: 278–288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haher T R, Gorup J M, Shin T M, Homel P, Merola A A, Grogan D P, Pugh L, Lowe T G, Murray M. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A multicenter study of 244 patients. Spine 1999; 24: 1435–1440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asher M A, Min Lai S, Burton D C. Further development and validation of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcomes instrument. Spine 2000; 25: 2381–2386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasiliadis E, Grivas T B, Gkoltsiou K. Development and preliminary validation of Brace Questionnaire (BrQ): A new instrument for measuring quality of life of brace treated scoliotics. Scoliosis 2006; 1: 7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Botens-Helmus C, Klein R, Stephan C. The reliability of the Bad Sobernheim Stress Questionnaire (BSSQbrace) in adolescents with scoliosis during brace treatment. Scoliosis 2006; 1: 22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kotwicki T, Kinel E, Stryla W, Szulc A. Estimation of the stress related to conservative scoliosis therapy: An analysis based on BSSQ questionnaires. Scoliosis 2007; 2: 1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weiss H R, Werkmann M, Stephan C. Brace related stress in scoliosis patients – comparison of different concepts of bracing. Scoliosis 2007; 2: 10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lenke L G, Bridwell K H, Blanke K, Baldus C. Analysis of pulmonary function and chest cage dimension changes after thoracoplasty in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1995; 20: 1343–1350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner J M. Growth and endocrinology of the adolescent. Endocrine and genetic diseases of childhood, L Gardner. WB Saunders, Philadelphia 1975
   Google Scholar
• Stagnara P. Spinal deformity. Butterworths, London 1988
   Google Scholar
• Zaina F, Atanasio S, Negrini S. Clinical evaluation of scoliosis during growth: description and reliability. The conservative scoliosis treatment. SOSORT ICL book, T B Grivas. IOS Press, Amsterdam 2008; 125–138
   Google Scholar
• Adams W. Lectures on the pathology and treatment of lateral and other forms of curvature of the spine. Churchill, London 1882
   Google Scholar
• Grosso C, Negrini S, Boniolo A, Negrini A. The validity of clinical examination in adolescent spinal deformities. Stud Health Technol Inform 2002; 91: 123–125
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krawczynski A, Kotwicki T, Szulc A, Samborski W. Clinical and radiological assessment of vertebral rotation in idiopathic scoliosis. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2006; 8: 602–607
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grivas T B, Vasiliadis E S, Mihas K. The effect of growth on the correlation between the spinal and rib cage deformity. Implications on idiopathic scoliosis pathogenesis. Scoliosis 2007; 2: 11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grivas T B, Vasiliadis E S, Koufopoulos G, Segos D, Triantafilopoulos G, Mouzakis V. Study of trunk asymmetry in normal children and adolescents. Scoliosis 2006; 1: 19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bunnell W P. An objective criterion for scoliosis screening. J Bone Joint Surg 1984; 66-A: 1381–1387
   Google Scholar
• Pruijs J EH, Hageman M APE, Keessen W, Meer R van der, Wieringen J C. Spinal rotation meter; development and comparison of a new device. Acta Orthop Belg 1995; 61: 107–112
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DeSmet A A. Radiology of spinal curvature. Mosby, St Louis 1985
   Google Scholar
• Horton W C, Brown C W, Bridwell K H, Glassman S D, Suk Se-Il, Cha C W. Is there an optimal patient stance for obtaining a lateral 36″ radiograph? A critical comparison of three techniques. Spine 2005; 30: 427–433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenke L G, Betz R R, Harms J, Bridwell K H, Clements D H, Lowe T G, Blanke K. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg 2001; 83-A: 1169–1181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb J R. Outline for the study of scoliosis. AAOS Instr Course Lect 1948; 5: 261–275
   Google Scholar
• DeSmet A A, Goin J E, Asher M A, Scheuch H G. Clinical study of the differences between the scoliotic angles measured on posteroanterior and anteroposterior radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg 1982; 64-A: 489–493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruijs J EH, Hageman M APE, Keessen W, Meer R van der, Wieringen JC van. Variation in Cobb angle measurements in scoliosis. Skel Radiol 1994; 23: 517–520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards B S, Bernstein R M, D'Amato C R, Thompson G H. Standardization of criteria for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis brace studies. Spine 2005; 30: 2068–2075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash C, Moe J. A study of vertebral rotation. J Bone Joint Surg 1969; 51-A: 223–229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdriolle R. La scoliose. Maloine SA, Paris 1979
   Google Scholar
• Drerup B. Principles of measurement vertebral rotation from frontal projections of the pedicles. J Biomech 1984; 17: 923–935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss H R. Measurement of vertebral rotation: Perdriolle versus Raimondi. Eur Spine J 1995; 4: 34–38
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fon G T, Pitt M J, Thies A C. Thoracic kyphosis: Range in normal subjects. Am J Roentgenol 1980; 134: 979–983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotwicki T. Sagittal and transversal plane deformity in thoracic scoliosis. Stud Health Technol Inform 2002; 91: 251–256
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bridwell K H, Betz R, Capelli A M, Huss G, Harvey C. Sagittal plane analysis in idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Spine 1990; 15: 921–926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiel A W, Burwell R G, Moulton A, Purdue M, Webb J K, Wojcik A S. Segmental patterns of sagittal spinal curvatures in children screened for scoliosis: Kyphotic angulation at the thoracolumbar region and the mortice joint. Clin Anat 1992; 5: 353–371
   Google Scholar
• Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J, Benaim C, Mitulescu A, Marty C, Prat-Pradal D, Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Pelissier J. Anatomical reliability of two fundamental radiological and clinical pelvic parameters: Incidence and thickness. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2005; 15: 197–204
   Google Scholar
• Grivas T B, Dangas S, Polyzois B D, Samelis P. The double rib contour sign (drcs) in lateral spinal radiographs. Aetiological implications for scoliosis. Stud Health Technol Inform 2002; 88: 38–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greulich W W, Pyle S I. Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist2nd ed. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA 1959
   Google Scholar
• Dimeglio A. La puberte: Un tournant decisive. La scoliose idiopathic, A Dimeglio, C Herisson, L Simon. Masson, Paris 1996; 155–162
   Google Scholar
• Risser J C. The iliac apophysis: An invaluable sign in the management of scoliosis. Clin Orthop 1958; 11: 111–120
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bitan F D, Veliskakis K P, Campbell B C. Differences in the Risser grading systems in the United States and France. Clin Orthop 2005; 436: 190–195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta M H. The rib-vertebral angle in the early diagnosis between resolving and progressive infantile scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 1972; 54-B: 230–243
   Google Scholar
• Grivas T B, Burwell G R, Vasiliadis E S, Webb J K. A segmental radiological study of the spine and rib cage in children with progressive infantile idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis 2006; 1: 17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suh C H. The fundamentals of computer aided X-rays analysis of the spine. J Biomechanics 1974; 7: 161–169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown R H, Burstein A H, Nash C L, Schock C C. Spinal analysis using a three-dimensional radiographic technique. J Biomechanics 1976; 9: 355–365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh J, Larsson J, Mattsson P. Analysis of changes in the scoliotic spine using a three-dimensional radiographic technique. J Biomechanics 1980; 13: 279–290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Aziz Y I, Karara H M. Direct linear transformation from comparator coordinates into object space coordinates in close-range photogrammetry. Symposium of American Society of Photogrammetry. Falls Church, 1971
   Google Scholar
• Graf H, Hecquet J, Dubousset J. Aproche tridimensionelle des deformations rachidiennes. Aplication a l'etude du pronostic des scolioses infantiles. Rev Chir Orthop 1983; 69: 407–416
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kotwicki T, Pietrzak S, Szulc A. Three-dimensional action of Cheneau brace on thoracolumbar scoliosis. Stud Health Technol Inform 2002; 88: 226–229
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kotwicki T, Dubousset J, Padovani J P. Correction of flexible thoracic scoliosis below 65 degrees – a radiological comparison of anterior versus posterior segmental instrumentation applied to similar curves. Eur Spine J 2006; 15: 972–981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labelle H, Dansereau J, Bellefleur C, Poitras B, Rivard C H, Stokes I A, De Guise J. Comparison between preoperative and postoperative three-dimensional reconstructions of idiopathic scoliosis with the Cotrel-Dubousset procedure. Spine 1995; 20: 2487–2492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labelle H, Dansereau J, Bellefleur C, Poitras B. Three-dimensional effect of the Boston brace on the thoracic spine and the rib cage. Spine 1996; 21: 59–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asher M A, Manna B J. Optimizing surgical improvement of trunk asymmetry from idiopathic scoliosis: A preliminary report. Stud Health Technol Inform 1999; 59: 250–253
   Google Scholar
• Petit Y, Aubin C-E, Labelle H. Three-dimensional imaging for the surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents. Can J Surg 2002; 45: 453–458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thulborne T, Gillespie R. The rib hump in idiopathic scoliosis. Measurements, analysis and response to treatment. J Bone Joint Surg 1976; 58-B: 64–71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackenberg L. Evaluation of three-dimensional correction of idiopathic scoliosis by Zielke instrumentation surface measurement using videorasterstereography. Stud Health Technol Inform 1999; 59: 258–261
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg C J, Kaliszer M, Moore D P, Fogarty E E, Dowling F E. Surface topography, Cobb angles, and cosmetic change in scoliosis. Spine 2001; 26: E55–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frobin W, Hierholzer E. Analysis of human back shape using surface curvatures. J Biomech 1982; 15: 379–390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frobin W, Hierholzer E. Video rasterstereography: A method for on-line measurement of body surfaces. Photogr Eng Rem Sens 1991; 57: 1341–1345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takasaki J. Moire topography. Appl Optics 1970; 9: 1457–1472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki N, Inami K, Ono T, Kohno K, Asher M. Analysis of Posterior Trunk Symmetry Index (POTSI) in scoliosis. Part 1. Stud Health Technol Inform 1999; 59: 81–84
   Google Scholar
• Inami K, Suzuki N, Ono T, Yamashita Y, Kohno K, Morisue H. Analysis of Posterior Trunk Symmetry Index (POTSI) in scoliosis. Part 2. Stud Health Technol Inform 1999; 59: 85–88
   Google Scholar
• Hill D L, Mahood J K, Moreau M J, Raso V J, Durdle N G. The scoring of trunk distortion in scoliosis. Stud Health Technol Inform 1997; 37: 289–292
   Google Scholar
• Kotwicki T, Chowanska J, Kinel E, Lorkowska M, Stryla W, Szulc A. Sitting forward bending position versus standing position for studying the back shape in scoliotic children. Presented at the 4th International Conference on Conservative Management of Spinal Deformities, Boston, May, 13–162007, Published in Scoliosis. Accessed 15 October 2007 from the website: http://www.scoliosisjournal.com
   Google Scholar
• Asher M, Lai S M, Burton D, Manna B. Maintenance of trunk deformity correction following posterior instrumentation and arthrodesis for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2004; 29: 1782–1788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asher M, Lai S M, Burton D, Manna B. The influence of spine and trunk deformity on preoperative idiopathic scoliosis patients' health related quality of life questionnaire responses. Spine 2004; 29: 861–868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigo M. Three-dimensional correction of trunk deformity in patients with idiopathic scoliosis using Chęneau brace. Stud Health Technol Inform 1999; 59: 362–365
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg C J, Groves D, Moore D P, Fogarty E E, Dowling F E. Surface topography and vectors: A new measure for the three dimensional quantification of scoliotic deformity. Stud Health Technol Inform 2006; 123: 449–455
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Minguez M F, Buendia M, Cibrian R M, Salvador R, Laguia M, Martin A, Gomar F. Quantifier variables of the back surface deformity obtained with a noninvasive structured light method: Evaluation of their usefulness in idiopathic scoliosis diagnosis. Eur Spine J 2007; 16: 73–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler R, Cottalorda J, Garin C, Lecante P, Rolet G. Analyse de la forme externe du tronc par prise d'empreinte optique: Ses applications a la confection des corsets et a la surveillance clinique des scoliosis. La scoliose idiopathique, A Dimeglio, C Herrison, L Simon. Masson, Paris 1996; 238–244
   Google Scholar
• Poncet P, Delorme S, Dudley R, Ronsky J L, Dansereau J, Harder J, Dewar R D, Labelle H, Gu P H, Zernicke R F. 3D reconstructions of the external and internal geometries of the trunk using laser and stereo-radiographic imaging techniques. Stud Health Technol Inform 1999; 59: 21–24
   Google Scholar
• Kirby A S, Burwell R G, Cole A A, Pratt R K, Webb J K, Moulton A. Evaluation of a new real time ultrasound method for measuring segmental rotation of vertebrae and ribs in scoliosis. Stud Health Technol Inform 1999; 59: 316–320
   Google Scholar
• Burwell R G, Aujla R K, Kirby A S, Moulton A, Webb J K. The early detection of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in three positions using the scoliometer and real time ultrasound: Should the prone position also be used?. Stud Health Technol Inform 2002; 88: 74–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kotwicki T, Napiontek M. Intra-vertebral deformation in idiopathic scoliosis. A transverse plane CT study. J Pediatr Orthop 2008, (in press)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaro S, Dahlborn M. Estimation of vertebral rotation and spinal rib cage deformity in scoliosis by computer tomography. Spine 1981; 6: 460–467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessberg P, Danielson B I, Willen J. Comparison of Cobb angles in idiopathic scoliosis on standing radiograph and supine axially loaded MRI. Spine 2006; 31: 3039–3044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar