Being like everybody else: the personal meanings of being a prosthesis user

References

• Gallagher P, MacLachlan M. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Scales (TAPES). Rehabil Psychol 2000; 45(2)130–154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoury S A. Evaluation of amputees. Int J Rehabil Res 1983; 6(4)449–454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolezal J M, Vernick S H, Khan N, Lutz D, Tyndall C. Factors associated with use and nonuse of an AK prosthesis in a rural, southern, geriatric population. Int J Rehabil Health 1998; 4(4)245–251
   Google Scholar
• Williamson G M, Schulz R, Bridges M W, Behan A M. Social and psychological factors in adjustment to limb amputation. J Soc Behav Pers 1994; 9: 249–268
   Google Scholar
• Bilodeau S, Herbert R, DesRosiers J. Lower limb utilisation by elderly amputees. Prosthetic limbs Orthotics Int 2000; 24(2)126–132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NASDAB. National Amputation Statistical Database Annual Report. The Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety, http://www.nasdab.co.uk/publications.asp 2002. Accessed 3 March 2007
   Google Scholar
• Rommers G M, Vos L DW, Groothoff J W, Eisma W H. Mobility of people with lower limb amputations: scales and questionnaires: a review. Clin Rehabil 2001; 15(1)1–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher P, MacLachlan M. Adjustment to an artificial limb: a qualitative perspective. J Health Psychol 2001; 6(1)85–100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delehanty R, Traschell L. Effects of short-term group treatment on rehabilitation outcome of adults with amputations. Int J Rehabil Health 1995; 1(2)61–73
   Google Scholar
• Ham R O, Cotton L T. Limb amputation: from aetiology to rehabilitation. Chapman and Hall, London 1991
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann L W. The psychological rehabilitation of the amputee. Charles C. Thomas Publisher, Springfield, Illinois, USA 1978
   Google Scholar
• Millstein S G, Heger H, Hunter G A. Prosthetic limb use in adult and upper limb amputees: a comparison of the body powered and electrically powered prostheses. Prosthetic limbs Orthotics Int 1986; 10: 27–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein R B, Walley O T. Functional comparison of upper extremity amputees using myoelectric and conventional prostheses. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983; 64: 243–248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balance R, Wilson B, Harder J A. Factors affecting myoelectric prosthetic limb use and wearing patterns in the juvenile unilateral below-elbow amputee. Can J Occup Ther 1989; 56(3)132–137
   Google Scholar
• Waters R L, Perry J, Antonelli D, Hislop H. Energy cost of walking of amputees: The influence of level of amputation. J Bone Joint Surg A 1976; 58(Pt 1)42–46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dise-Lewis J E. Psychological adaptation to limb loss. Comprehensive management of the upper-limb amputee, D J Atkins, R H Meyer. Springer-Verlag, New York 1989; 65–172
   Google Scholar
• Murray C D. The social meanings of prosthesis use. J Health Psychol 2005; 10(3)425–441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank G. Beyond stigma: Visibility and self-empowerment of persons with congenital limb deficiencies. J Soc Issues 1988; 44(1)95–115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank G. On embodiment: a case of congenital limb deficiency in American culture. Culture Med Psychiatr 1986; 10: 189–219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray C D, Sixsmith J. E-mail: a qualitative research medium for interviewing. Int J Soc Res Methodol Theory Practice 1998; 1(2)103–121
   Google Scholar
• Sixsmith J, Murray C D. Ethical issues in the documentary analysis of e-mail posts and archives. Qual Health Res 2001; 11(3)423–432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith J A. Towards a relational self: social engagement during pregnancy and psychological preparation for motherhood. Br J Soc Psychol 1999; 38(4)409–426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith J A, Jarman M, Osborn M. Doing interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative health psychology: Theories and methods, M Murray, K Chamberlain. Sage, London 1999; 218–240
   Google Scholar
• Phillips M J. “Try harder”: The experience of disability and the dilemma of normalization. Soc Sci J 1985; 22(4)45–47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser S B, Freeman C M, Wingate S B. Stigmata and negotiated outcomes: Management of appearance by persons with physical disabilities. Deviant Behav 1985; 6(2)205–224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser S B, Wingate S B, Freeman C M, Chandler J L. Acceptance of physical disability and attitudes toward personal appearance. Rehabil Psychol 1987; 32(1)51–58
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar