Item analysis of the Functional Status Assessment of Seniors in the Emergency Department

References

• Breton M, Camirand F. Évolution de la situation dans les salles d'urgence. Ministère de la santé et des services sociaux, Québec 1997
   Google Scholar
• Lee V, Ross B, Tracy B. Functional assessment of older adults in an emergency department. Can J Occup Ther (Revue Canadienne d Ergotherapie) 2001; 68(2)121–129
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aminzadeh F, Dalziel W B. Older adults in the emergency department: a systematic review of patterns of use, adverse outcomes, and effectiveness of interventions. Ann Emerg Med 2002; 39(3)238–247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah M N, Glushak C, Karrison T G, Mulliken R, Walter J, Friedmann P D, Hayley D C, Chin M H. Predictors of emergency medical services utilization by elders. Acad Emerg Med 2003; 10(1)52–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centre de coordination nationale des urgences. Guide de gestion de l'unité d'urgence, clientèle particulière: personnes âgées. Ministère de la santé et des services sociaux, Québec 2004
   Google Scholar
• McCusker J, Bellavance F, Cardin S, Trepanier S, Verdon J, Ardman O. Detection of older people at increased risk of adverse health outcomes after an emergency visit: the ISAR screening tool. J Am Geriatr Soc 1999; 47(10)1229–1237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCusker J, Verdon J, Tousignant P, de Courval LP, Dendukuri N, Belzile E. Rapid emergency department intervention for older people reduces risk of functional decline: results of a multicenter randomized trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001; 49(10)1272–1281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowns I, Challis D, Tong M S. Case finding in elderly people: validation of a postal questionnaire. Br J Gen Pract 1991; 41(344)100–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beland F, Zunzunegui M V. Predictors of functional status in older people living at home. Age Ageing 1999; 28(2)153–159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denman S J, Ettinger W H, Zarkin B A, Coon P J, Casani J A. Short-term outcomes of elderly patients discharged from an emergency department. J Am Geriatr Soc 1989; 37(10)937–943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCusker J, Bellavance F, Cardin S, Belzile E, Verdon J. Prediction of hospital utilization among elderly patients during the 6 months after an emergency department visit. Ann Emerg Med 2000; 36(5)438–445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.S.S.S. Les urgences au Québec 1990–1997; Bilan, perspectives et normes. Gouvernement du Québec, Québec 1998
   Google Scholar
• Runciman P, Currie C T, Nicol M, Green L, McKay V. Discharge of elderly people from an accident and emergency department: evaluation of health visitor follow-up. J Adv Nurs 1996; 24(4)711–718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCusker J, Karp I, Cardin S, Durand P, Morin J. Determinants of emergency department visits by older adults: a systematic review. Acad Emerg Med 2003; 10(12)1362–1370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mion L C, Palmer R M, Meldon S W, Bass D M, Singer M E, Payne S M, Lewicki L J, Drew B L, Connor J T, Campbell J W, others. Case finding and referral model for emergency department elders: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Emerg Med 2003; 41(1)57–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan G A, Williams A J, Daly B, Abraham K. A randomized, controlled trial of comprehensive geriatric assessment and multidisciplinary intervention after discharge of elderly from the emergency department–the DEED II study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004; 52(9)1417–1423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O.M.S. Classification internationale du fonctionnement, du handicap et de la santé. Organisation mondiale de la santé, Genève 2001; 304
   Google Scholar
• Veillette N, Demers L, Dutil E, McCusker J. Development of a functional status assessment of seniors visiting emergency department. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2008, Available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2008.01.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auger C, Demers L, Swaine B. Making sense of pragmatic criteria for the selection of geriatric rehabilitation measurement tools. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2006; 43(1)65–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers L, Monette M, Lapierre Y, Arnold D L, Wolfson C. Reliability, validity, and applicability of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24(1–3)21–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crocker L, Algina J. Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Wadsworth Group/Thomson Learning, Belmont, CA 1986; 527
   Google Scholar
• Streiner D, Norman G. Health measurement scales; a practical guide to their development and use2nd ed. Oxford medical publications, OxfordUK 1995; 231
   Google Scholar
• DeVellis R F. Scale development theory and applications. Sage, Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi 2003; 171
   Google Scholar
• Andresen E M. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81(12 Suppl 2)S15–S20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicchetti D V, Feinstein A R. High agreement but low κ. II. Resolving the paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 1990; 43(6)551–558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinstein A R, Cicchetti D V. High agreement but low κ. I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 1990; 43(6)543–549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Routhier F, Desrosiers J, Vincent C, Nadeau S. Reliability and construct validity studies of an obstacle course assessment of wheelchair user performance. Int J Rehabil Res 2005; 28(1)49–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkimer J C, Brown J H. Back to basics: percentage agreement measures are adequate, but there are easier ways. J Appl Behav Anal 1979; 12(4)535–543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin L M, Wakefield J A. Percentage agreement and phi: a conversion table. J Appl Behav Anal 1979; 12(2)299–301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleiss J. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Wiley, New York 1981
   Google Scholar
• Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. Item analysis of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST). Assistive Technology 2000; 12(2)96–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley S M, Coster W J, Andres P L, Ludlow L H, Ni P, Bond T L, Sinclair S J, Jette A M. Activity outcome measurement for postacute care. Med Care 2004; 42(1 Suppl)I49–I61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havens D S, Vasey J. The staff nurse decisional involvement scale: report of psychometric assessments. Nurs Res 2005; 54(6)376–383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millos R T, Gordon D L, Issenberg S B, Reynolds P S, Lewis S L, McGaghie W C, Petrusa E R. Development of a reliable multimedia, computer-based measure of clinical skills in bedside neurology. Acad Med 2003; 78(10 Suppl)S52–S54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratford P W, Binkley J M. Measurement properties of the RM-18. A modified version of the Roland-Morris Disability Scale. Spine 1997; 22(20)2416–2421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccaro A R, Baron E M, Sanfilippo J, Jacoby S, Steuve J, Grossman E, DiPaola M, Ranier P, Austin L, Ropiak R, others. Reliability of a novel classification system for thoracolumbar injuries: the Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Score. Spine 2006; 31(11 Suppl)S62–S69, discussion S104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriksen H, Harrison R A. Occupational therapy in accident and emergency departments: a randomized controlled trial. J Adv Nurs 2001; 36(6)727–732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meldon S W, Mion L C, Palmer R M, Drew B L, Connor J T, Lewicki L J, Bass D M, Emerman C L. A brief risk-stratification tool to predict repeat emergency department visits and hospitalizations in older patients discharged from the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2003; 10(3)224–232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veillette N, Demers L, Dutil E. L'évaluation du statut fonctionnel des personnes âgées en visite à l'urgence: une recension des écrits. Association canadienne de gerontology, TorontoCanada 2003; 48
   Google Scholar
• Hebert R, Carrier R, Bilodeau A. The Functional Autonomy Measurement System (SMAF): description and validation of an instrument for the measurement of handicaps. Age Aging 1988; 17(5)293–302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hébert R, Guilbeault J, Desrosiers J, Dubuc N. Le système de mesure de l'autonomie fonctionnelle (SMAF). Autonomie et vieillissementSt-Hyacinthe, Canada, Edisem, 1999; 86–101
   Google Scholar