Utilisation of patient perspective to validate clinical measures of outcome following spinal cord injury

References

• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. World Health Organization, Geneva 2001
   Google Scholar
• Biering-Sorensen F, Scheuringer M, Baumberger M, Charlifue S W, Post M WM, Montero F, et al. Developing core sets for persons with spinal cord injuries based on the International classification of functioning, disability and health as a way to specify functioning. Spinal Cord 2006; 44: 541–546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stucki G, Ewert T, Cieza A. Value and applicatiom of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 628–634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stucki G. International classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF). Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 84: 733–740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widerstrom-Noga E G, Felipe-Cuervo E, Broton J E, Duncan R C, Yezierski R P. Perceived difficulty in dealing with consequences of spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 580–586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snoek G J, Ijzerman M J, Hermens H J, Maxwell D, Biering-Sorensen F. Survey of the needs of patients with spinal cord injury: impact and priority for improvement in hand function in tetraplegics. Spinal Cord 2004; 42: 526–532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasunda S, Wehman P, Targett P, Cifu D X, West M. Return to work after spinal cord injury: a review of recent research. Neurorehabilitation 2002; 17: 177–186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levins S M, Redenbach D M, Dyck I. Individual and societal influences on participation in physical activity following spinal cord injury: a qualitative study. Phys Ther 2004; 84: 496–509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers A R, Andresen E M, Hagglund K J. A model of outcomes research: spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81(Suppl 2)S81–S90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood-Dauphinee S, Exner G; SCI Consensus Group. Quality of life in patients with spinal cord injury – basic issues, assessment and recommendations. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2002; 20: 135–149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T, Amman E, Kollerits B, Chatterji S, et al. Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning disability and health. J Rehabil Med 2002; 34: 205–210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Ustun B, Stucki G. ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37: 212–218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard F M, Bracken M B, Creasy G, Ditunno J F, Donovan W H, Ducker T B, et al. International standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 1997; 35: 266–274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittuno J F. Functional assessment in CNS trauma. J Neurotrauma 1992; 9: S301–S305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zigmond A S, Snaith R P. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67: 361–370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy P, Frankel H L, Gardner B, Nuseibeh I. Factors associated with acute and chronic pain following traumatic spinal cord injuries. Spinal Cord 1997; 35: 814–817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen M E, Marino R J. The tools of disability outcomes research functional status measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81(Suppl 2)S21–S29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteneck G, Meade M A, Dijkers M, Tate D G, Bushnik T, Forchheimer M B. Environmental factors and their role in participation and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 1793–1803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware J E, Sherborne C D. The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473–483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause J S, Anson C A. Adjustment after spinal cord injury: relationship to gender and race. Rehabil Psychol 1997; 78: 651–657
   Google Scholar
• Dijkers M PJM, Whiteneck G, El-Jaroudi R. Measures of social outcomes in disability research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81(Suppl 2)S63–S80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware J E, Kosinski M, Bayliss M S, McHorney C A, Rogers W H, Raczek A E. Comparison of methods for scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care 1995; 33(Suppl)S264–S279
   Google Scholar
• Ware J E, Kosinski M, Keller S D. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996; 34: 220–233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Heinemann A W, Bode R K, Sliwa J, King R B. Spirituality, quality of life, and functional recovery after medical rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol 2000; 45: 365–385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post M WM, Van Dijk A J, Van Asbeck W A, Schrijvers A JP. Life satisfaction of persons with spinal cord injury compared to a population group. Scand J Rehabil Med 1998; 30: 23–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Post M WM, Ros W JG, Schrijvers A JP. Impact of social support on health status and life satisfaction in people with a spinal cord injury. Psychol Health 1999; 14: 679–695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post M WM, de Witte L P, van Asbeck W A, van Dijk A J, Schrijvers A JP. Predictors of health status and life satisfaction in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 78: 395–402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catz A, Itzkovich M, Agranov E, Ring H, Tamir A. SCIM – spinal cord independence measure: a new disability scale for patients with spinal cord lesions. Spinal Cord 1997; 35: 850–856
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catz A, Itzkovich M, Steinberg F, Philo O, Ring H, Ronen J, et al. The Catz-Itzkovich SCIM: a revised version of the spinal cord independence measure. Disabil Rehabil 2001; 23: 263–268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunkerley A L, Ashburn A, Stack E L. Deltoid triceps transfer and functional independence of people with tetraplegia. Spinal Cord 2000; 38: 435–441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C V Granger, Fielder, R C. The Measurement of Disability. Baltimore, Paul Brookes Publishing. 1997
   Google Scholar
• Marino R J, Huang M, Knight P, Herbison G J, Ditunno J FS. Assessing selfcare status in quadriplegia: comparison of the quadriplegia index of function (QIF) and the functional independence measure (FIM). Paraplegia 1993; 31: 225–233
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Middleton J W, Tate R L. Self-efficacy and spinal cord injury: psychometric properties of a new scale. Rehabil Psychol 2003; 48: 281–288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Tuijl J H, Janssen-Pollen Y JM, Seelen H AM. Evaluation of the upper extremity motor function tests in tetraplegics. Spinal Cord 2002; 40: 51–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall K M, Cohen M E, Wright J, Call M, Werner P. Characteristics of the functional independence measure in traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 1471–1476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton J W, Truman G, Geraghty T J. Neurological level effect on the discharge functional status of spinal cord injured persons after rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 1428–1432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen M E, Marino R J. The tools of disability outcomes research functional status measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81(Suppl 2)S21–S29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersten P, Mullee M A, Smith J AE, McLellan L, George S. Generic health measures are unsuitable for measuring health status in severely disabled people. Clin Rehabil 1999; 13: 219–228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catz A, Itzkovich M. Spinal cord independence measure: comprehensive ability rating scle for the spinal cord lesion patient. J Rehabil Res Dev 2007; 44: 65–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catz A, Itzkovich M, Tesio L, Biering-Sorensen F, Weeks C, Laramee M, et al. A multi-centre international study of the spinal cord independence measure, version III: rasch pyschometric validation. Spinal Cord 2007; 45: 275–291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirth B, van Hedel H, Kometer B, Dietz V, Curt A. Changes in activity after complete spinal cord injury as measured by the spinal cord independence measure II (SCIM II). Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008; 22: 145–153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahey M, Hutchinson D, Kozin S. Assessment of upper limb in tetraplegia: considerations in evaluation and outcomes research. J Rehabil Res Dev 2007; 44: 91–102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn J A, Sinnott K, Connolly S, Rothwell A. Measurement issues related to upper limb interventions in persons who have tetraplegia. Hand Clinics 2008; 24: 161–168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marino R, Shea J A, Stineman M G. The capabilities of upper extremity instrument: reliability and validity of a measure of functional limitation in tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 1512–1521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land N, Odding E, Duivenvoorden H, Bergen M, Stam H. Tetraplegia hand activity questionnaire (THAQ): the development, assessment of arm-hand-function-related activities in tetraplegic patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2004; 42: 294–301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy P, Lude P, Taylor N. Quality of life, social participation, appraisals and coping post spinal cord injury: a review of four community samples. Spinal Cord 2006; 44: 95–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar