Effects of introducing an allied health assessment pro forma on the management of acute stroke patients

References

• Evans A, Perez I, Harraf F, Melbourn A, Steadman J, Donaldson N, Kalra L. Can difference in management processes explain different outcomes between stroke unit and stroke-team care?. Lancet 2001; 358: 1586–1592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology. First scientific forum on assessment of healthcare quality in cardiovascular disease and stroke. Circulation 2000; 101: 1483–1493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim J E. Performance indicators for acute stroke. Final Report. National stroke unit program phase 1 supplement Report 2002. National Stroke Foundation. MelbourneAustralia, Available at: http://www.strokefoundation.com.au/component/option,com_docman/Itemid,174/task,doc_view/gid, 67/ (Accessed 6 January 2007)
   Google Scholar
• Weir N, Dennis M S. Towards a national system for monitoring the quality of hospital based stroke serves. Stroke 2001; 32: 1415–1412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton H, McPherson K, Taylor W, Weatherall M. Relationship between process and outcome in stroke care. Stroke 2003; 34: 713–717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Pollock A. What are the components of effective stroke unit care?. Age Ageing 2002; 31: 365–371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCOPES Study Group Health Services Unit. Stroke care outcomes: providing effective services (SCOPES) – an evaluation of Victorian stroke services. National Stroke Foundation. MelbourneAustralia 2002
   Google Scholar
• Duncan P W, Horner R D, Reker D M, Samsa G P, Hoenig H, Hamilton B, LaClair B J, Dudley T K. Adherence to post acute rehabilitation guidelines is associated with functional recovery in stroke. Stroke 2002; 33: 167–178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadilhac D A, Ibrahim J, Pearce D C, Ogden K J, McNeill J, Davis S M, Donnan G A. Multicenter comparison of process of care between stroke units and conventional care wards in Australia. Stroke 2004; 35: 1035–1040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation. National clinical guidelines for acute stroke management, 2003. MelbourneAustralia, Available at: http://www.strokefoundation.com.au/component/option,com_docman/Itemid,0/task,doc_view/gid,57/ (Accessed 6 January 2007)
   Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation. Clinical guidelines for stroke rehabilitation and recovery, 2005. MelbourneAustralia, Available at: http://www.strokefoundation.com.au/component/option,com_docman/Itemid,0/task,doc_view/gid,58/ (Accessed 6 January 2007)
   Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation. Clinical guidelines for acute stroke management, 2007. MelbourneAustralia, Available at: http://www.strokefoundation.com.au/images/stories/healthprofessionals/clinical%20guidelines%20for%20acute%20stroke%20management.pdf (Accessed 27 October 2007)
   Google Scholar
• Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National clinical guidelines for stroke, 2004. Royal college of physicians clinical effectiveness and evaluation unit. London, Available at: http://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/pubs/contents/78ba394c-c09a-4fce-bdf4-bcd49b33e650.pdf (Accessed 6 January 2007)
   Google Scholar
• Stroke Foundation New Zealand Inc. Life after stroke. New Zealand guideline for management of stroke, 2003. Wellington, New Zealand, Available at: http://www.nzgg.org.nz/guidelines/0037/ACF291F.pdf (Accessed 10 January 2008)
   Google Scholar
• The Canadian Stroke Strategy. Canadian best practice recommendations for stroke care, 2006. Canadian stroke network and the heart and stroke foundation of Canada. Ottawa, Canada, Available at: http://www.strokecenter.org/prof/CSSManualENG_WEB_Sept07.pdf (Accessed 10 January 2008)
   Google Scholar
• Hammond R, Lennon S, Walker M F, Hoffman A, Irwin P, Lowe D. Changing occupational and physiotherapy practice through guidelines and audit in the United Kingdom. Clin Rehabil 2005; 19: 365–371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation. National stroke audit organisational report acute services, 2007. MelbourneAustralia, Available at: http://www.strokefoundation.com.au/component/ option,com_docman/Itemid,39/task,doc_view/gid,90/ (Accessed 27 October 2007)
   Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation. National stroke audit clinical report acute services, 2007. MelbourneAustralia, Available at: http://www.strokefoundation.com.au/component/option,com_docman/Itemid,0/task,doc_view/gid,111/ (Accessed 27 November 2007)
   Google Scholar
• Scurrah A. The allied health management of acute stroke patients at Cairns base hospital. Clinical Practice Improvement Centre Stoke Collaborative Forum V, BrisbaneAustralia 2006
   Google Scholar
• Grimshaw J M, Thomas R E, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Ramsay C R, Vale L, Whitty P, Eccles M P, Matowe L, Shirran L, Wensing M, Dijkstra R, Donaldson C. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 2004; 8: 1–72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bero L A, Grilli R, Grimshaw J M, Harvey E, Oxman A D, Thomson M A. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic review of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. BMJ 1998; 317: 465–468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin G L, Frommer M S, Vincent N C, Phillips P A, Leeder S R. Getting new evidence into medicine. Med J Aust 2000; 172: 180–183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamoto K, Houlihan C A, Balas E A, Lobach D F. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 2005; 330: 765–772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson S D, Goulart-Fisher D, Lee T H. Critical pathways as a strategy for improving care: problems and potential. Ann Intern Med 1995; 123: 947–948
   Google Scholar
• Kwan J, Sandercock P. In-hospital care pathways for stroke, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; Art. No.: CD002924. DOI: 10.1002/14651858. CD002924.pub2. The Cochrane Library. Available at: http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/clsysrev/articles/CD002924/pdf_fs.html (Accessed 5 January 2007)
   Google Scholar
• Sulch D, Kalra L. Integrated care pathways in stroke management: a systematic review. Age Ageing 2000; 29: 349–352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport R J, Dennis M S, Warlow C P. Improving the recording of the clinical assessment of stroke patients using a clerking pro form. Age Ageing 1995; 24: 43–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr J H, Shepherd R B, Nordholm L, Lynne D. A motor assessment scale for stroke. Phys Ther 1985; 65: 175–180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward E C, Conroy A L. Validity, reliability and responsivity of the Royal Brisbane hospital outcome measure for swallowing. Asia Pac J Speech, Lang Hear 1999; 4: 109–129
   Google Scholar
• John A, Enderby P. Reliability of speech and language therapists using therapy outcome measures. Int J Lang Comm Dis 2000; 35: 287–302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simondson J, Goldie P, Brock K, Nosworthy J. The mobility scale for acute stroke patients: intra-rater and inter-rater reliability. Clin Rehabil 1996; 10: 295–300
   Google Scholar
• Simondson J, Goldie P, Greenwood K. The mobility scale for acute stroke patients: concurrent validity. Clin Rehabil 2003; 17: 558–564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams J. The balance scale: reliability assessment with elderly patients with an acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 85: 227–233
   Google Scholar
• Dodds T A, Matrin D P, Stolov W C, Deyo R A. A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 531–536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detsky A S, McLaughlin J R, Baker J P, Johnston N, Whittaker S, Mendelson R A, Jeejeebhoy K N. What is subjective global assessment of nutritional status?. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1987; 11: 8–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikander B, Ekelund P, Milson I. An evaluation of multidisciplinary intervention governed by Functional Independence Measure (FIM) in incontinent stroke patients. Scand J Rehabil Med 1998; 30: 15–21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar