The impact of communication disability on interdisciplinary discussion in rehabilitation case conferences

References

• Arboix A, Marti-Vilata J L. Lacunar infarctions and dysarthria (letter). Arch Neurol 1990; 47: 127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelter S T, Gostynski M, Papa S, Frei M, Born C, Ajdacic-Gross V, Gutzwiller F, Lyrer P A. Epidemiology of aphasia attributable to first ischemic stroke: Incidence, severity fluency, etiology, and thrombolysis. Stroke 2006; 37: 1379–1384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urban P P, Wicht S, Vukurevic G, Fitzek C, Fitzek S, Stoeter P, Massinger C, Hopf H C. Dysarthria in acute ischemic stroke: lesion topography, clinicoradiologic correlation, and etiology. Neurology 2001; 56: 1021–1027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Code C, Herrmann M. The relevance of emotional and psychosocial factors in aphasia to rehabilitation. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2003; 13: 109–132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Code C, Herrmann M. Clinical guidelines for stroke rehabilitation and recovery. National Stroke Foundation, Melbourne, (available from www.strokefoundation.com.au, accessed 31 May 2006); 2005
   Google Scholar
• Worrall L. The influence of professional values on the functional communication approach in aphasia. Neurogenic communication disorders: A functional approach, L E Worrall, C M Frattali. Thieme, New York 2000; 191–205, Chapter 11
   Google Scholar
• Worrall L. Professionalism and functional outcomes. J Commun Disord 2006; 39: 320–327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland A J, Halper A S. Talking to individuals with aphasia: A challenge for the rehabilitation team. Top Stroke Rehabil 1996; 2: 27–37
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, Szekeres S F, Feeney T J. Cognitive rehabilitation: Executive function. Traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: Children and adolescents, M Ylvisaker. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston 1998; 221–269, Chapter 12
   Google Scholar
• Critchley M. Aphasiology. Edward Arnold, London 1970; 288–295
   Google Scholar
• Enderby P. The testamentary capacity of dysphasic patients. Med Leg J 1994; 62: 70–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kagan A, Kimelman M DZ. Informed consent in aphasia research: Myth or reality?. Clin Aphasiol 1995; 23: 65–75
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson A, Worrall L, McPhee J, Buskell R, Armstrong E, Togher L. Testamentary capacity and aphasia: a descriptive case report with implications for clinical practice. Aphasiology 2003; 17: 965–980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffield G, Ferguson A, Worrall L. Legal issues and aphasia: Critical incidents for speech pathologists. Sydney, May, 27–312007
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson A, Worrall L, McPhee J, Buskell R, Armstrong E, Togher L. Autonomy in life decisions for people with aphasia: Issues for speech pathologists. Brisbane, 29 August to 2 September, 2004
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson A, Worrall L, Sherratt S. What goes on in rehabilitation case conferences?. Stroke 2008 Conference – combined meeting of the Stroke Society of Australasia 2008 Annual Scientific Meeting and the Smart Strokes 4th Australasian Nursing and Allied Health Stroke Conference. Star City Hotel, Sydney, August, 13–152008
   Google Scholar
• Gibbon B. An investigation of interprofessional collaboration in stroke rehabilitation team conferences. J Clin Nurs 1999; 8: 246–252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman E. Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Harper & Row, New York 1974
   Google Scholar
• Maseide P. Medical talk and moral order: social interaction and collaborative clinical work. Text 2003; 23: 369–403
   Google Scholar
• Gair G, Hartery T. Medical dominance in multidisciplinary teamwork: A case study of discharge decision-making in a geriatric assessment unit. J Nurs Managet 2001; 9: 3–11
   Google Scholar
• Tempest S, McIntyre A. Using the ICF to clarify team roles and demonstrate clinical reasoning in stroke rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28: 663–667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough N. Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman, London 1995
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson A. Expert practice: A critical discourse. Plural Publishing, San Diego, CA 2008
   Google Scholar
• Engestrom Y, Engestrom R, Keruso H. The discursive construction of collaborative care. Appl Linguist 2003; 24: 286–315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook-Gumperz J, Messerman L. Local identities and institutional practices: Constructing the record of professional collaboration. Talk, work and institutional order: discourse in medical, mediation and management settings, S Sarangi, C Roberts. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin 1999; 145–181
   Google Scholar
• Hayward D H, Tresolini C P, Davis W A. Can participation in a health affairs interdisciplinary case conference improve medical students' knowledge and attitudes?. Acad Med 2006; 81: 257–261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munoz K, Jeris L. Learning to be interdisciplinary: An action research approach to boundary spanning. Health Educ J 2005; 64: 5–12
   Google Scholar
• WHO. ICF: International classification of functioning, disability and health. World Health Organisation, Geneva 2001
   Google Scholar
• WHO. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health. World Health Organization, Geneva 2002
   Google Scholar
• Salter K, Jutai J W, Teasell R, Foley N C, Bitensky J, Bayley M. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF participation. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 507–528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stucki G, Ustun B, Melvin J. Applying the ICF for the acute hospital and early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 349–352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penney J, MacKay-Lyons M J, McDonald A. Evidence-based stroke rehabilitation: Case analysis using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Framework. Physiother Can 2007; 59: 22–36
   Google Scholar
• Wynia K, Middel B, Van Dijk J P, de Ruiter H, Lok W, de Keyser J H, Reijneveld S A. Broadening the scope on health problems among the chronically neurologically ill with the International Classification of Functioning (ICF). Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28: 1445–1454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall C, Sarangi S, Slembrouck S. The legitimation of the client and the profession: Identities and roles in social work discourse. Talk, work and institutional order: Discourse in medical, mediation and management settings, S Sarangi, C Roberts. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin 1999; 293–322
   Google Scholar
• Marson D C, Dreer L E, Krzywanski S, Huthwaite J S, DeVivo M J, Novack T A. Impairment and partial recovery of medical decision-making capacity in traumatic brain injury: A 6-month longitudinal study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 889–895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener B L, Bischof-Rosario J A. Determining decision-making capacity in individuals with severe communication impairments after stroke: The role of augmentative-alternative communication (AAC). Top Stroke Rehabil 2004; 11: 84–88
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Competency Based Occupational Standards for Speech Pathologists - entry level. Melbourne, VIC, 1994, Speech Pathology Australia (formerly Australian Association of Speech and Hearing)
   Google Scholar
• Bornman J, Murphy J. Using the ICF in goal setting: Clinical application using Talking Mats(P). Disabil Rehabil 2006; 1: 145–154
   Google Scholar
• Kagan A. Supported conversation for adults with aphasia: Methods and resources for training conversation partners. Aphasiology 1998; 12: 811–864, With introduction by R.C. Marshall, commentary by S. Byng, A. Holland, S. Parr, C. Penn, and N. Simmons-Mackie
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worrall L, Hersh D, Howe T, Davidson B, Ferguson A, Sherratt S. What people with aphasia want: Toward person-centered goal-setting in aphasia rehabilitation. , TorontoCanada, September, 19–202007
   Google Scholar
• Worrall L, Davidson B, Ferguson A, Hersh D, Howe T, Sherratt S. What people with aphasia want: Towards person-centered goal-setting in aphasia rehabilitation. Boston, Massachusetts, November, 15–172007
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert J, Davidson B, Howe T, Worrall L, Sherratt S, Hersh D, Brown K, Ferguson A. What family members of people with aphasia want: Their goals and how they are represented with the ICF. International Aphasia Rehabilitation Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, June 30 to July 3, 2008
   Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie N, Damico J S. Qualitative methods in aphasia research: Ethnography. Aphasiology 1999; 13: 681–687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hymes D. Foundations in sociolinguistics: an ethnographic approach. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia 1974
   Google Scholar
• Lindley R I. Invited commentary: stroke rehabilitation. Brain Impair 2008; 9: 97–102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroke Unit Triallists' Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001; 3, (Art. No.: Cd000197. Doi:10.1002/ 14651858.Cd000197)
   Google Scholar
• Cadilhac D A, Ibrahim J, Pearce D C, Ogden K J, McNeill J, Davis S M, Donnan G A. Multicenter comparison of processes of care between stroke units and conventional care wards in Australia. Stroke 2004; 35: 1035–1040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read S J, Levy J. Differences in stroke care practices between regional and metropolitan hospitals. Intern Med J 2005; 35: 447–450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumperz J J. On interactional sociolinguistic method. Talk, work and institutional order: Discourse in medical, mediation and management settings, S Sarangi, C Roberts. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin 1999; 453–471
   Google Scholar
• Milroy L. Observing and analysing natural language: A critical account of sociolinguistic method. Basil Blackwell, Oxford 1987
   Google Scholar
• Milroy L, Gordon M. Sociolinguistics: Method and interpretation. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA 2003
   Google Scholar
• QSR. NVivo Version 1.3: QSR International (www.qsrinternational.com); 1999–2001
   Google Scholar
• Richards L. Using NVivo in qualitative research. QSR, Bundoora, VIC 2000
   Google Scholar
• Creswell J W. Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks 2003
   Google Scholar
• Duggan C H, Albright K J, Lequerica A. Using the ICF to code and analyse women's disability narratives. Disabil Rehabil 2008; 30: 978–900
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schepers V PM, Ketelaar M, Van de Port I GL, Visser-Meily J MA, Lindeman E. Comparing contents of functional outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29: 221–230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AIHW. ICF Australian user guide, Version 1.0 Disability Series, AIHW Cat. No. DIS 33. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra 2003
   Google Scholar
• Lupton D. Content analysis. Handbook for research methods in health sciences, V Minichiello, G Sullivan, K Greenwood, R Axford. Addison Wesley Longman, Sydney 1999; 449–462, Chapter 21
   Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Pollock A. What are the components of effective stroke unit care?. Age and Ageing 2002; 31: 365–371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maseide P. The deep play of medicine: Discursive and collaborative processing of evidence in medical problem solving. Commun Med 2006; 3: 43–54
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kovarsky D, Kimbarow M, Kastner D. The construction of incompetence during group therapy with traumatically brain injured adults. Constructing (in)competence: Disabling evaluations in clinical and social interaction, D Kovarsky, J F Duchan, M Maxwell. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 1999; 291–312, Chapter 13
   Google Scholar