A simple bedside test for upper extremity impairment after stroke: Validation of the Utrecht Arm/Hand Test

References

• Broeks J G, Lankhorst G J, Rumping K, Prevo A JH. The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study. Disabil Rehabil 1999; 21: 357–364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller A., Wade D T, Wood V A, Sunderland A. Arm Function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987; 50: 714–719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Twisk J. The impact of time on improvement of outcome after stroke. Stroke 2006; 37: 2348–2363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croarkin E, Danoff J, Barnes C. Evidence-based rating of upper-extremity motor function tests used for people following a stroke. Phys Ther 2004; 84: 62–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade D T. Measurements in neurological rehabilitation. Oxford University Press. 1992
   Google Scholar
• Wade D T, Langton-Hewer R, Wood V A, Skilbeck C E, Ismail H M. The hemiplegic arm after stroke: measurement and recovery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983; 46: 521–524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugl-Meyer A R, Jaasko L. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient: a method for evaluation of the physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975; 7: 13–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Twitchell T E. The restoration of motor function following hemiplegia. Brain 1954; 74: 443–480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowland C A. Staging motor impairment after strok. Stroke 1990; 21: 19–21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanford J, Moreland J, Swanson L R, Stratford P W, Gowland C. Reliability of the Fugl Meyer Assessment for testing Motor Performance in patients following stroke. Phys Ther 1993; 73: 447–454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraro M, Ferraro M, Demaio J H, Krol J, Trudell C, Rannekleiv K, Edelstein L, Christos P, Aisen M, England J, Fasoli S, Krebs H I, Hogan N, Volpe B T. Asssessing the Motor Status Scale: a scale for the evaluation of upper limb motor outcomes in patients after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002; 16: 283–289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demeurisse G, Demol O, Robaye E. Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. Euro Neurol 1980; 19: 382–389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katrak P, Bowring G, Conroy P, Chilvers M, Poulos R, McNeil D. Predicting upper limb recovery after stroke: the place of early shoulder and hand movement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 758–761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barreca S R, Stratford P W, Lambert C L, Masters L M, Streiner D L. Test–retest reliability, validity and sensitivity of the Chedoke arm and hand activity inventory: a new measure of upper-limb function for survivors of stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 16–22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winckel van de A, Feys H, Lincoln N, De Weerdt W. Can quality of movement be measured? Rasch analysis and inter-rater-reliability of the Motor Evaluation Scale for Upper Extremity in Stroke Patients (MESUPES). Clin Rehabil 2006; 20: 871–884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr J H, Shepherd R B, Nordholm L, Lynne D. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther 1985; 2: 175–180
   Google Scholar
• Lannin N. Reliability, validity and factor structure of the upper limb subscale of the Motor Assessment Scale (UL0MAS) in adults following stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26: 109–116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabari J S, Lim A L, Velozo C A, Lehman L, Kieran O, Lai J S. Assessing arm and hand function after stroke: a validity test of the hierarchical scoring system used in the motor assessment scale for stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 1609–1615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyle R C. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation and treatment research. Int J Rehabil Res 1981; 4: 483–492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh C L, Hsueh I P, Chiang F M, Lin P H. Inter-rater reliability and validity of the action research arm test in stroke patients. Age Ageing 1998; 27: 107–113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsueh I P, Hsieh C L. Responsiveness of two upper extremity instruments for stroke inpatients receiving rehabilitation. Clin Rehabilitation 2002; 16: 617–624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook L, Smith D S, Truman G. Using functional independence measure profiles as an index of outcome in the rehabilitation of brain-injured patients. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1994; 75: 390–393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith R A, Granger C V, Hamiltob B B. The functional Independence Measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil 1987; 1: 6–18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DeSouza L H, Langton Hewer R, Miller S. Assessment of recovery of arm control in hemiplegic stroke patients. Int Rehab Med 1980; 2: 3–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Revalidatie na een beroerte: richtlijnen en aanbevelingen voor zorgverleners (Rehabilitation after Stroke). Heugten van CM, Franke EAM, Redactie 2001, Den Haag, the Netherlands
   Google Scholar
• Gladstone D J, Danells C J, Black S E. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke: A critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002; 16: 232–240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh Y W, Hsueh M A. Development and validation of a short form of the Fugl-Meyer Motor scale in patients with stroke. Stroke 2007; 38: 3053–3054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar