1,064
Views
29
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Using the refined ICF Linking Rules to compare the content of existing instruments and assessments: a systematic review and exemplary analysis of instruments measuring participation

, , , &
Pages 584-600 | Received 22 Dec 2015, Accepted 02 Jun 2016, Published online: 14 Jul 2016

References

  • United Nations. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. United Nations [Internet]; [cited 2014 May 11]. Available from: http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml.
  • Benka J, Nagyova I, Rosenberger J, et al. Social participation in early and established rheumatoid arthritis patients. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38:1172–1179.
  • Yi TI, Han JS, Lee KE, et al. Participation in leisure activity and exercise of chronic stroke survivors using community-based rehabilitation services in Seongnam city. Ann Rehabil Med. 2015;39:234–242.
  • Skidmore ER, Whyte EM, Holm MB, et al. Cognitive and affective predictors of rehabilitation participation after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:203–207.
  • Hoffman JM, Pagulayan KF, Zawaideh N, et al. Understanding pain after traumatic brain injury: impact on community participation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86:962–969.
  • Berges IM, Seale GS, Ostir GV. The role of positive affect on social participation following stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:2119–2123.
  • Choi YI, Park JH, Jung MY, et al. Psychosocial predictors of participation restriction poststroke in Korea: a path analysis. Rehabil Psychol. 2015;60:286–294.
  • van Leeuwen CM, Post MW, Westers P, et al. Relationships between activities, participation, personal factors, mental health, and life satisfaction in persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:82–89.
  • Craig A, Nicholson Perry K, Guest R, et al. Adjustment following chronic spinal cord injury: determining factors that contribute to social participation. Br J Health Psychol. 2015;20:807–823.
  • Peter C, Muller R, Post MW, et al. Psychological resources, appraisals, and coping and their relationship to participation in spinal cord injury: a path analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:1662–1671.
  • Yang SY, Kong KH. Level and predictors of participation in patients with stroke undergoing inpatient rehabilitation. Singapore Med J. 2013;54:564–568.
  • Sveen U, Mongs M, Roe C, et al. Self-rated competency in activities predicts functioning and participation one year after traumatic brain injury. Clin Rehabil. 2008;22:45–55.
  • Gagnon C, Mathieu J, Jean S, et al. Predictors of disrupted social participation in myotonic dystrophy type 1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:1246–1255.
  • Sweet SN, Noreau L, Leblond J, et al. Peer support need fulfillment among adults with spinal cord injury: relationships with participation, life satisfaction and individual characteristics. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38:558–565.
  • Fallahpour M, Kottorp A, Nygard L, et al. Participation after acquired brain injury: associations with everyday technology and activities in daily life. Scand J Occup Ther. 2015;22:366–376.
  • Zhang L, Yan T, You L, et al. Barriers to activity and participation for stroke survivors in rural China. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:1222–1228.
  • Bier N, Dutil E, Couture M. Factors affecting leisure participation after a traumatic brain injury: an exploratory study. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009;24:187–194.
  • Desrosiers J, Rochette A, Noreau L, et al. Long-term changes in participation after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2006;13:86–96.
  • Rice IM, Wong AW, Salentine BA, et al. Differences in participation based on self-esteem in power and manual wheelchair users on a university campus: a pilot study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10:102–107.
  • de Groot S, Post MW, Bongers-Janssen HM, et al. Is manual wheelchair satisfaction related to active lifestyle and participation in people with a spinal cord injury? Spinal Cord 2011;49:560–565.
  • Egan M, Kubina LA, Dubouloz CJ, et al. Very low neighbourhood income limits participation post stroke: preliminary evidence from a cohort study. BMC Publ Health. 2015;15:528.
  • Husak L, Krumholz HM, Lin ZQ, et al. Social support as a predictor of participation in cardiac rehabilitation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2004;24:19–26.
  • Cardol M, de Jong BA, van den Bos GA, et al. Beyond disability: perceived participation in people with a chronic disabling condition. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16:27–35.
  • Yeung P, Towers A. An exploratory study examining the relationships between the personal, environmental and activity participation variables and quality of life among young adults with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:63–73.
  • Barker RN, Kendall MD, Amsters DI, et al. The relationship between quality of life and disability across the lifespan for people with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2009;47:149–155.
  • Huebner RA, Johnson K, Bennett CM, et al. Community participation and quality of life outcomes after adult traumatic brain injury. Am J Occup Ther. 2003;57:177–185.
  • Bourassa KJ, Memel M, Woolverton C, et al. Social participation predicts cognitive functioning in aging adults over time: comparisons with physical health, depression, and physical activity. Aging Ment Health. 2015. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2015.1081152.
  • LaPlante MP. Key goals and indicators for successful aging of adults with early-onset disability. Disabil Health J. 2014;7:S44–S50.
  • Minagawa Y, Saito Y. Active social participation and mortality risk among older people in Japan: results from a nationally representative sample. Res Aging. 2015;37:481–499.
  • WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO); 2001.
  • Eyssen IC, Steultjens MP, Dekker J, et al. A systematic review of instruments assessing participation: challenges in defining participation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:983–997.
  • Seekins T, Shunkamolah W, Bertsche M, et al. A systematic scoping review of measures of participation in disability and rehabilitation research: a preliminary report of findings. Disabil Health J. 2012;5:224–232.
  • Noonan VK, Kopec JA, Noreau L, et al. A review of participation instruments based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31:1883–1901.
  • Chang F-H, Coster WJ, Helfrich CA . Community participation measures for people with disabilities: a systematic review of content from an international classification of functioning, disability and health perspective. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:771–781.
  • Magasi S, Post MW. A comparative review of contemporary participation measures’ psychometric properties and content coverage. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:S17–S28.
  • Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T, et al. Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. J Rehabil Med. 2002;34:205–210.
  • Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, et al. ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37:212–218.
  • Cieza A, Fayed N, Bickenbach J, et al. Refinements of the ICF Linking Rules to strengthen their potential for establishing comparability of health information. Disabil Rehabil. 2016. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2016.1145258.
  • Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174.
  • Stewart G, Sara G, Harris M, et al. A brief measure of vocational activity and community participation: development and reliability of the activity and participation questionnaire. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2010;44:258–266.
  • Fougeyrollas P, Noreau L, Bergeron H, et al. Social consequences of long term impairments and disabilities: conceptual approach and assessment of handicap. Int J Rehabil Res. 1998;21:127–142.
  • Berry HL, Rodgers B, Dear KBG. Preliminary development and validation of an Australian community participation questionnaire: types of participation and associations with distress in a coastal community. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64:1719–1737.
  • Willer B, Rosenthal M, Kreutzer JS, et al. Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1993;8:75–87.
  • Resnik L, Plow M, Jette A. Development of CRIS: measure of community reintegration of injured service members. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46:469–480.
  • Holbrook M, Skilbeck CE. An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age Ageing. 1983;12:166–170.
  • Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD, et al. The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:127–132.
  • Ostir GV, Granger CV, Black T, et al. Preliminary results for the PAR-PRO: a measure of home and community participation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:1043–1051.
  • Cardol M, de Haan RJ, van den Bos GA, et al. The development of a handicap assessment questionnaire: the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA). Clin Rehabil. 1999;13:411–419.
  • Wilkie R, Peat G, Thomas E, et al. The Keele Assessment of Participation: a new instrument to measure participation restriction in population studies. Combined qualitative and quantitative examination of its psychometric properties. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:1889–1899.
  • Haley SM, Jette AM, Coster WJ, et al. Late life function and disability instrument II. Development and evaluation of the function component. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002;57:M217–M222.
  • Jette AM, Haley SM, Coster WJ, et al. Late life function and disability instrument I. Development and evaluation of the disability component. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002;57:M209.
  • Harwood RH, Rogers A, Dickinson E, et al. Measuring handicap: the London Handicap Scale, a new outcome measure for chronic disease. Qual Health Care. 1994;3:11–16.
  • Godelief MJ, Kempen GIJM, Post MWM, et al. The Maastricht social participation profile: development and clinimetric properties in older adults with a chronic physical illness. Qual Life Res. 2009;18:1207–1218.
  • Malec JF, Kragness M, Evans RW, et al. Further psychometric evaluation and revision of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory in a national sample. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2003;18:479–492.
  • Baecke J, Burema J, Frijters J. A short questionnaire for the measurement of habitual physical activity in epidemiological studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 1982;36:936–942.
  • Brandt A, Löfqvist C, Jónsdottir I, et al. Towards an instrument targeting mobility-related participation: Nordic cross-national reliability. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40:766–772.
  • Bushnik T. Norwegian Function Assessment Scale. Encyclopedia of clinical neuropsychology. New York: Springer; 2011. p. 1796–1797.
  • Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, et al. The Nottingham Health Profile: subjective health status and medical consultations. Soc Sci Med A. 1981;15:221–229.
  • Bogner J, Bellon K, Kolakowsky-Hayner SA, et al. Participation assessment with recombined tools-objective (PART-O). J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2013;28:337–339.
  • Heinemann AW, Lai J-S, Magasi S, et al. Measuring participation enfranchisement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:564–571.
  • Gandek B, Sincalir SJ, Jette AM, et al. Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the Participation Measure for Post-Acute Care (PM-PAC). Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86:57–71.
  • Brown M, Dijkers MP, Gordon WA, et al. Participation objective, participation subjective: a measure of participation combining outsider and insider perspectives. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2004;19:459–481.
  • Van Brakel WH, Anderson AM, Mutatkar R, et al. The Participation Scale: measuring a key concept in public health. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:193–203.
  • Gray DB, Hollingsworth HH, Stark SL, et al. Participation survey/mobility: psychometric properties of a measure of participation for people with mobility impairments and limitations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:189–197.
  • Rejeski WJ, Ip EH, Marsh AP, et al. Measuring disability in older adults: the International Classification System of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2008;8:48–54.
  • Pallant JF, Misajon R, Bennett E, et al. Measuring the impact and distress of health problems from the individual’s perspective: development of the Perceived Impact of Problem Profile (PIPP). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:36.
  • Sandström M, Lundin-Olsson L. Development and evaluation of a new questionnaire for rating perceived participation1. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21:833–845.
  • van Bennekom CA, Jelles F, Lankhorst G. Rehabilitation Activities Profile: the ICIDH as a framework for a problem-oriented assessment method in rehabilitation medicine. Disabil Rehabil. 1995;17:169–175.
  • Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI. Reintegration to normal living as a proxy to quality of life. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:491–499.
  • Post MW, de Witte LP, Reichrath E, et al. Development and validation of IMPACT-S, an ICF-based questionnaire to measure activities and participation. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40:620–627.
  • Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;473–483.
  • McHorney CA, Ware JE, Jr, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;247–263.
  • Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, et al. The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care. 1981;787–805.
  • Huxley P, Evans S, Madge S, et al. Development of a social inclusion index to capture subjective and objective life domains (Phase II): psychometric development study. Health Technol Assess. 2012;16:I–248.
  • Hébert R, Carrier R, Bilodeau A. The Functional Autonomy Measurement System (SMAF): description and validation of an instrument for the measurement of handicaps. Age Ageing. 1988;17:293–302.
  • Hebert R, Desrosiers J, Dubuc N, et al. The functional autonomy measurement system (SMAF). Revue Geriatr. 2003;28:323–336.
  • Densley K, Davidson S, Gunn JM. Evaluation of the Social Participation Questionnaire in adult patients with depressive symptoms using Rasch analysis. Qual Life Res. 2013;22:1987–1997.
  • Harris M, Gladman B, Hennessy N, et al. Reliability and validity of a measure of role functioning among people with psychiatric disabilities. Aust Occup Ther J. 2011;58:203–208.
  • Tate RL, Simpson GK, Soo CA, et al. Participation after acquired brain injury: clinical and psychometric considerations of the Sydney Psychosocial Reintegration Scale (SPRS). J Rehabil Med. 2011;43:609–618.
  • Rosenblum S. Validity and reliability of the Time Organisation and Participation Scale (TOPS). Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2012;22:65–84.
  • Post MW, van der Zee CH, Hennink J, et al. Validity of the utrecht scale for evaluation of rehabilitation-participation. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:478–485.
  • van der Zee CH, Priesterbach AR, van der Dussen L, et al. Reproducibility of three self-report participation measures: the ICF Measure of Participation and Activities Screener, the Participation Scale, and the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42:752–757.
  • Üstün TB, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, et al. Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88:815–823.
  • The WHOQoL Group Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med. 1998;28:551–558.
  • Mader L, Ballert CS, Brinkhof MW, et al. Metric properties of the USER-P. J Rehabil Med. 2016;48:165–174.
  • Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:539–549.
  • Jette AM, Haley SM, Kooyoomjian JT. Are the ICF activity and participation dimensions distinct? J Rehabil Med. 2003;35:145–149.
  • Whiteneck G, Dijkers MP. Difficult to measure constructs: conceptual and methodological issues concerning participation and environmental factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:S22–S35.
  • Dijkers MP. Issues in the conceptualization and measurement of participation: an overview. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:S5–S16.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.