Test–retest reliability of Antonovsky’s 13-item sense of coherence scale in patients with hand-related disorders

References

• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Rudolf KD, Kus S, Chung KC, et al. Development of the international classification of functioning, disability and health core sets for hand conditions–results of the World Health Organization International Consensus process. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:681–693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Sluis CK, Van Loenen JT, Wendt KW, et al. Outcomes after hand injuries. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2011;155:A3237
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cederlund RI, Ramel E, Rosberg HE, et al. Outcome and clinical changes in patients 3, 6, 12 months after a severe or major hand injury-can sense of coherence be an indicator for rehabilitation focus? BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:286–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonovsky A. The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Soc Sci Med. 1993;36:725–733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonovsky A. Unraveling the mystery of health: how people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain K, Petrie K, Azariah R. The role of optimism and sense of coherence in predicting recovery following surgery. Psychol Health. 1992;7:301–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen TKF, Johnsen TJ. Sundhedsfremme i teori og praksis: en lære-, debat- og brugsbog på grundlag af teori og praksisbeskrivelser. Aarhus: Philosophia; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson IK, Dahlin LB. Self-reported cold sensitivity in patients with traumatic hand injuries or hand-arm vibration syndrome - an eight year follow up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:83–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosberg HE. Disability and health after replantation or revascularisation in the upper extremity in a population in southern Sweden - a retrospective long time follow up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:73–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan LF, Pincus T. The sense of coherence scale in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 1995;8:28–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrie K, Azariah R. Health-promoting variables as predictors of response to a brief pain management program. Clin J Pain. 1990;6:43–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ristner G, Andersson R, Johansson LM, et al. Sense of coherence and lack of control in relation to outcome after orthopaedic injuries. Injury. 2000;31:751–756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldt T, Lintula H, Suominen S, et al. Structural validity and temporal stability of the 13-item sense of coherence scale: prospective evidence from the population-based HeSSup study. Qual Life Res. 2007;16:483–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindmark U, Stenstrom U, Gerdin EW, et al. The distribution of ''sense of coherence'' among Swedish adults: a quantitative cross-sectional population study. Scand J Public Health. 2010;38:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmefur M, Sundberg K, Wettergren L, et al. Measurement properties of the 13-item sense of coherence scale using Rasch analysis. Qual Life Res. 2015;24:1455–1463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenz AW, Carey MP, Jorgensen RS. Psychometric evaluation of Antonovsky's Sense of Coherence Scale. Psychol Assess. 1993;5:145–153.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson M, Lindstrom B. Validity of Antonovsky's sense of coherence scale: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2005;59:460–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson M, Gassne J, Hansson K. Do different scales measure the same construct? Three Sense of Coherence scales. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2009;63:166–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrikx T, Nilsson M, Westman G. Sense of coherence in three cross-sectional studies in Northern Sweden 1994, 1999 and 2004 – patterns among men and women. Scand J Public Health. 2008;36:340–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spadoti Dantas RA, Silva FS, Ciol MA. Psychometric properties of the Brazilian Portuguese versions of the 29- and 13-item scales of the Antonovsky's Sense of Coherence (SOC-29 and SOC-13) evaluated in Brazilian cardiac patients. J Clin Nurs. 2014;23:156–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sardu C, Mereu A, Sotgiu A, et al. Antonovsky's Sense of Coherence Scale: Cultural Validation of Soc Questionnaire and Socio-Demographic Patterns in an Italian Population. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2012;8:1–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Due EP, Holstein BE. “Sense of coherence”, social class and health in a Danish population study. Ugeskr Laeger. 1998;160:7424–7429.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nilsson KW, Leppert J, Simonsson B, et al. Sense of coherence and psychological well-being: improvement with age. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2010;64:347–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson G, Kallenberg K. Sense of coherence, socioeconomic conditions and health. Eur J Public Health. 1996;6:175–180.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson M. Salutogenes - om hälsans ursprung. Från forskning till praktisk tillämpning. Stockholm: Liber; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Schnyder U, Buchi S, Sensky T, et al. Antonovsky's sense of coherence: trait or state? Psychother Psychosom. 2000;69:296–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pakkala I, Read S, Sipila S, et al. Effects of intensive strength-power training on sense of coherence among 60-85-year-old people with hip fracture: a randomized controlled trial. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2012;24:295–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snekkevik H, Anke AG, Stanghelle JK, et al. Is sense of coherence stable after multiple trauma? Clin Rehabil. 2003;17:443–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, et al. Measurement in medicine: a practical guide. practical guides to biostatistics and epidemiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research. Applications to practice. New Jersey: Pearson Education; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Innes E, Straker L. Reliability of work-related assessments. Work. 1999;13:107–124.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kottner J, Audige L, Brorson S, et al. Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64: 96–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramel E, Rosberg HE, Dahlin LB, et al. Return to work after a serious hand injury. Work. 2013;44:459–469.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 4th ed. Oxford (NY): Oxford University Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar