Changes in return to work among patients in vocational rehabilitation: a self-determination theory perspective

References

• IA-avtalen. Intensjonsavtale om et mer inkluderende arbeidsliv. [IA-agreement: Agreement of intention towards a more including worklife] 1. mars 2010 - 31. desember 2013 (IA-avtalen). Oslo, Norway; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ytterborg H. Utvikling i sykefraværet, 3. kvartal 2013 [Development of absence from work, 3rd quarter 2013]. Oslo, Norway: Arbeids- og velferdsdirektoratet/seksjon for statistikk; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Mykletun A, Eriksen HR, Røed K, et al. Tiltak for reduksjon i sykefravær: Aktiviserings- og nærværsreform. Ekspertgrupperapport til Arbeidsdepartementet 01.02.2010 i følge mandat 27.11.2009. [Initiatives for reducing sickness absence: Reform for increasing engagement and presence. An expert report to The Ministry of Labour] Oslo, Norway; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• NOU 2000:27. Sykefravær og uførepensjonering. Et inkluderende arbeidsliv [Sickness absence and disability rehabilitation. An including worklife]. Oslo, Norwegian: Statens trykkingstjeneste; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Ose SO, Jensberg H, Reinertsen RE, et al. Sykefravær: Kunnskapsstatus og problemstillinger [Sickness absence: status of knowledge and issues]. Sintef 2006; Report No.: A325. Norwegian
   Google Scholar
• Gjesdal S, Ringdal PR, Haug K, et al. Predictors of disability pension in long-term sickness absence: results from a population-based and prospective study in Norway 1994–1999. Eur J Public Health. 2004;14:398–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimäki M, Forma P, Wikström J, et al. Sickness absence as a risk marker of future disability pension: the 10-town study [short report]. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58:710–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund T, Kivimäki M, Labriola M, et al. Using administrative sickness absence data as a marker of future disability pension: the prospective DREAM study of Danish private sector employees. Occup Environ Med. 2008;65:28–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuoppala J, Lamminpää A. Rehabilitation and work ability: a systematic literature review. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40:796–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55:68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Labour Office. ILO Vocational rehabilitation and employment (disabled persons) conventions (No. 159) and recommendation (No. 168): United Nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Geneva: ILO; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Braathen TN, Veiersted KB, Heggenes J. Improved work ability and return to work following vocational multidisciplinary rehabilitation of subjects on long-term sick leave. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39:493–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hlobil H, Staal JB, Spoelstra M, et al. Effectiveness of a return-to-work intervention for subacute low-back pain. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2005;31:249–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer EM, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH. Evaluation of effective return-to-work treatment programs for sick-listed patients with non-specific musculoskeletal complaints: a systematic review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2005;78:523–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norlund A, Ropponen A, Alexanderson K. Multidisciplinary interventions: review of studies of return to work after rehabilitation for low back pain. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:115–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selander J, Marnetoft SU, Bergroth A, et al. Return to work following vocational rehabilitation for neck, back and shoulder problems: risk factors reviewed. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24:704–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlgren Å, Bergroth A, Ekholm J, et al. Work resumption after vocational rehabilitation: a follow-up two years after completed rehabilitation. Work. 2007;28:343–354.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marnetoft SU, Selander J, Bergroth A, et al. Factors associated with successful vocational rehabilitation in a Swedish rural area. J Rehabil Med. 2001;33:71–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lydell M, Grahn B, Månsson J, et al. Predictive factors of sustained return to work for persons with musculoskeletal disorders who participated in rehabilitation. Work. 2009;33:317–328.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marnetoft SU, Selander J, Bergroth A, et al. Vocational rehabilitation-early versus delayed. The effect of early vocational rehabilitation compared to delayed vocational rehabilitation among employed and unemployed, long-term sick-listed people. Int J Rehabil Res. 1999;22:161–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marnetoft SU, Selander J. Long-term effects of early versus delayed vocational rehabilitation-a four-year follow-up. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24:741–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen A, Edlund C, Henningsson M. Factors relevant to a return to work: a multivariate approach. Work. 2006;26:179–190.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Øyeflaten I, Hysing M, Eriksen HR. Prognostic factors associated with return to work following multidisciplinary vocational rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40:548–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selander J, Marnetoft SU, Åsell M. Predictors for successful vocational rehabilitation for clients with back pain problems. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:215–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng JYY, Ntoumanis N, Thøgersen-Ntoumani C, et al. Self-determination theory applied to health contexts: a meta-analysis. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012;7:325–340.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams GC, Halvari H, Niemiec CP, et al. Managerial support for basic psychological needs, somatic symptom burden and work-related correlates: a self-determination theory perspective. Work Stress. 2014;28:404–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• deCharms R. Personal causation: the internal affective determinants of behavior. New York: Academic Press; 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM. Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life's domain. Can Psychol. 2008;49:14–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq. 2000;11:227–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baard PP, Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic need satisfaction: a motivational basis of performance and well-being in two work settings. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2004;34:2045–2068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stebbings J, Taylor IM, Spray CM, et al. Antecedents of perceived coach interpersonal behaviors: the coaching environment and coach psychological well- and ill-being. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2012;34:481–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis HT, Sheldon KM, Gable SL, et al. Daily well-being: the role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2000;26:419–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon KM, Ryan R, Reis HT. What makes for a good day? Competence and autonomy in the day and in the person. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1996;22:1270–1279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adie JW, Duda JL, Ntoumanis N. Autonomy support, basic need satisfaction and the optimal functioning of adult male and female sport participants: a test of basic needs theory. Motiv Emot. 2008;32:189–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson PM, Longley K, Muon S, et al. Examining the contribution of perceived psychological need satisfaction to well-being in exercise. J Appl Biobehav Res. 2006;11:243–264.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson PM, Mack DE, Blanchard CM, et al. The role of perceived psychological need satisfaction in exercise-related affect. Hellenic J Psychol. 2009;6:183–206.
   Google Scholar
• Biddle SJH, Fox KR, Boutcher SH. Physical activity and psychological well-being. London: Routledge; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Fox KR. The influence of physical activity on mental well-being. Public Health Nutr. 1999;2:411–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams GC, Freedman ZR, Deci EL. Supporting autonomy to motivate patients with diabetes for glucose control. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:1644–1651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams GC, Grow VM, Freedman ZR, et al. Motivational predictors of weight loss and weight-loss maintenance. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;70:115–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlachopoulos SP, Michailidou S. Development and initial validation of a measure of autonomy, competence, and relatedness in exercise: the basic psychological needs in exercise scale. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2006;10:179–201.
   Google Scholar
• Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54:1063–1070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Frederick C. On energy, personality, and health: subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. J Pers. 1997;65:529–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-15: validity of a new measure for evaluating the severity of somatic symptoms. Psychosom Med. 2002;64:258–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:1381–1395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidelines for data processing and analysis of the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) – Short and long forms [Internet]. IPAQ – International Physical Activity Questionnaire 2005 Nov; [cited 2015 Oct 21]. Available from: www.ipaq.ki.se
   Google Scholar
• van Sluijs EMF, van Poppel MNM, Twisk JWR, et al. The positive effect on determinants of physical activity of a tailored, general practice-based physical activity intervention. Health Educ Res. 2005;20:345–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. Boston (MA): Pearson Education; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Morris SB, Deshon RP. Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychol Methods. 2002;7:105–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little TD, Cunningham WA, Shahar G, et al. To parcel or not to parcel: exploring the question, weighing the merits. Struct Equ Modeling. 2002;9:151–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6:1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park (CA): Sage; 1993. p. 136–162.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen KA. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Palmeira AL, Teixeira PJ, Branco TL, et al. Predicting short-term weight loss using four leading health behavior change theories. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007;4:14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira PJ, Carraça EV, Markland D, et al. Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2012;9:78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortier MS, Sweet SN, O'Sullivan TL, et al. A self-determination process model of physical activity adoption in the context of a randomized controlled trial. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2007;8:741–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar