The measurement of functioning using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: comparing qualifier ratings with existing health status instruments

References

• WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO); 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Salomon JA, Mathers CD, Chatterji S, et al. Quantifying individual levels of health: definitions, concepts, and measurement issues. In: WHO, editor. Health systems performance assessment debates, methods and empiricism. edn. Geneva: WHO; 2003. p. 301–318.
   Google Scholar
• Madden RH, Glozier N, Fortune N, et al. In search of an integrative measure of functioning. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12:5815–5832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Hilfiker R, Chatterji S, et al. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health could be used to measure functioning. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:899–911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prodinger B, Salzberger T, Stucki G, et al. Measuring functioning in people with fibromyalgia (FM) based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)—a psychometric analysis. Pain Pract. 2011;12:255–265.
   Google Scholar
• Grill E, Stucki G. Scales could be developed based on simple clinical ratings of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set categories. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:891–898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Algurén B, Bostan C, Christensson L, et al. A multidisciplinary cross-cultural measurement of functioning after stroke: Rasch analysis of the brief ICF Core Set for stroke. Top Stroke Rehab. 2011;18:573–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostan C, Oberhauser C, Cieza A. Investigating the dimension functioning from a condition-specific perspective and the qualifier scale of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health based on Rasch analyses. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91:S129–S140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberhauser C, Escorpizo R, Boonen A, et al. Statistical validation of the brief International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set for osteoarthritis based on a large international sample of patients with osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2013;65:177–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stucki G, Cieza A, Geyh S, et al. ICF Core Sets for rheumatoid arthritis. J Rehabil Med. 2004;Suppl.44:87–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreinhöfer K, Stucki G, Ewert T, et al. ICF Core Sets for osteoarthritis. J Rehabil Med. 2004;Suppl. 44:75–80.
   Google Scholar
• Geyh S, Cieza A, Schouten J, et al. ICF Core Sets for stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2004;36(Suppl.44):135–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Røe C, Sveen U, Geyh S, et al. Construct dimensionality and properties of the categories in the ICF Core Set for low back pain. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:429–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware Jr JE. SF-36 Health Survey Update. Spine. 2000;25:3130–3139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS2.0) [Internet]. [cited 2016 May 15]. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/whodasii/en/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Fayed N, Bickenbach J, et al. Refinements to the ICF Linking Rules to strengthen their potential for establishing comparability of health information. Disabil Rehabil. 2016 [cited Mar 17]; [10 p.]. DOI:10.3109/09638288.2016.1145258
   Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, et al. ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37:212–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danish National Institute for Educational Research; 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Andrich D. Rasch models for measurement. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences series no 07-068. Newbury Park (CA): Sage Publications; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Marais I, Andrich D. Effects of varying magnitude and patterns of local dependence in the unidimensional Rasch model. J Appl Meas. 2008;9:105–124.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wainer H, Kiely GL. Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: a case for testlets. JEM. 1987;24:185–201.
   Google Scholar
• Smith EVJ. Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. J Appl Meas. 2002;3:205–231.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• da Rocha NS, Chachamovich E, de Almeida Fleck MP, et al. An introduction to Rasch analysis for psychiatric practice and research. J Psychiatr Res. 2013;47:141–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennant A, Conaghan PG. The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: what is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57:1358–1362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrich D, Sheridan B, Luo G. Rasch models for measurement: RUMM2030. Western Australia: RUMM Laboratory Pty Ltd; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Masters GN. A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika. 1982;47:149–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badley EM. Enhancing the conceptual clarity of the activity and participation components of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66:2335–2345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney FI. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prodinger B, Tennant A, Stucki G, et al. Harmonizing routinely collected health information for strengthening quality management in health systems: requirements and practice. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2016;21:223–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennant A, Young CA. Coma to community: continuity in measurement. Phys Med Rehabil: State Art Rev. 1997;11:375–384.
   Google Scholar
• Tennant A, Penta M, Tesio L, et al. Assessing and adjusting for cross-cultural validity of impairment and activity limitation scales through differential item functioning within the framework of the Rasch model: the PRO-ESOR project. Med Care. 2004;42(Suppl 1):I37–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prodinger B, Reinhardt JD, Selb M, et al. Towards system-wide implementation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in routine practice: Developing simple, intuitive descriptions of ICF categories in the ICF Generic and Rehabilitation Set. J Rehabil Med. 2016;48:508–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selb M, Gimigliano F, Prodinger B, et al. Toward an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health clinical data collection tool: the Italian experience of developing simple, intuitive descriptions of the Rehabilitation Set categories. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;53:290–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar