Examination of the relevance of the ICF cores set for stroke by comparing with the Stroke Impact Scale

References

• Vanhook P. The domains of stroke recovery: a synopsis of the literature. J Neurosci Nurs. 2009;41:6–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norrving B, Davis SM, Feigin VL, et al. Stroke prevention worldwide – what could make it work? Neuroepidemiology. 2015;45:215–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glassel A, Coenen M, Kollerits B, et al. Validation of the extended ICF core set for stroke from the patient perspective using focus groups. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:157–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jörgensen H, Nakayama H, Raaschou H, et al. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part 1: outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:399–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alguren B, Lundgren-Nilsson A, Sunnerhagen KS. Functioning of stroke survivors – a validation of the ICF core set for stroke in Sweden. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32:551–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok T, Lo RS, Wong E, et al. Quality of life of stroke survivors: a 1-year follow-up study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:1177–1182; quiz 287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carod-Artal FJ, Egido JA. Quality of life after stroke: the importance of a good recovery. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;27 Suppl 1:204–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalina-Romero C, Ruilope LM, Sánchez-Chaparro MA, et al. Factors influencing return-to-work after cerebrovascular disease: the importance of previous cardiovascular risk. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015;22:1220–1227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kankeu HT, Saksena P, Xu K, et al. The financial burden from non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: a literature review. Health Res Policy Syst. 2013;11:31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, et al. Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet. 2006;367:1747–1757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee D, Patil CG. Epidemiology and the global burden of stroke. World Neurosurg. 2011;76:S85–S90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2163–2196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh ME, Galvin R, Loughnane C, et al. Community re-integration and long-term need in the first five years after stroke: results from a national survey. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:1834–1838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva (Switzerland): WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data; 2001. p. 299.
   Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Ewert T, Ustun TB, et al. Development of ICF core sets for patients with chronic conditions. J Rehabil Med. 2004;36:9–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickenbach J, Cieza A, Rauch A, et al. ICF core sets: manual for clinical practice for the ICF research branch, in cooperation with the WHO Collaborating Centre for the Family of International Classifications in Germany (DIMDI). Göttingen (Germany): Hogrefe Publishing; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Weigl M, Cieza A, Andersen C, et al. Identification of relevant ICF categories in patients with chronic health conditions: a Delphi exercise. J Rehabil Med. 2004;36:12–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geyh S, Cieza A, Schouten J, et al. ICF core sets for stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2004;36:135–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riberto M, Lopes KA, Chiappetta LM, et al. The use of the comprehensive international classification of functioning, disability and health core set for stroke for chronic outpatients in three Brazilian rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:367–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHI and World Bank World report on disability; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Prigatano GP. The importance of the patient's subjective experience in stroke rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18:30–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumsfeld JS, Alexander KP, Goff DC, et al. Cardiovascular health: the importance of measuring patient-reported health status: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;127:2233–2249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Wallace D, Studenski S, et al. Conceptualization of a new stroke-specific outcome measure: the stroke impact scale. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2001;8:19–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geyh S, Cieza A, Kollerits B, et al. Content comparison of health-related quality of life measures used in stroke based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF): a systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2007;16:833–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vellone E, Savini S, Fida R, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the stroke impact scale 3.0. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2015;30:229–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Bode RK, Min Lai S, et al. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:950–963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan PF, Hays BJ. The Kappa statistic for establishing interrater reliability in secondary analysis of qualitative data. Res Nurs Health. 1992;15:153–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peoples H, Satink T, Steultjens E. Stroke survivors' experiences of rehabilitation: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Scand J Occup Ther. 2011;18:163–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tistad M, Ytterberg C, Tham K, et al. Poor concurrence between disabilities as described by patients and established assessment tools three months after stroke: a mixed methods approach. J Neurol Sci. 2012;313:160–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumathipala K, Radcliffe E, Sadler E, et al. Identifying the long-term needs of stroke survivors using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Chronic Illn. 2012;8:31–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McKevitt C, Fudge N, Redfern J, et al. Self-reported long-term needs after stroke. Stroke. 2011;42:1398–1403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holliday RC, Cano S, Freeman JA, et al. Should patients participate in clinical decision making? An optimised balance block design controlled study of goal setting in a rehabilitation unit. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78:576–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holliday RC, Ballinger C, Playford ED. Goal setting in neurological rehabilitation: patients' perspectives. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:389–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luker J, Lynch E, Bernhardsson S, et al. Stroke survivors' experiences of physical rehabilitation: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:1698–1708.e10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash V, Ganesan M, Vasanthan R, et al. Do commonly used functional outcome measures capture activities that are relevant for people with stroke in India? Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017;24:200–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallahpour M, Tham K, Joghataei MT, et al. Perceived participation and autonomy: aspects of functioning and contextual factors predicting participation after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43:388–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carod-Artal FJ, Trizotto DS, Coral LF, et al. Determinants of quality of life in Brazilian stroke survivors. J Neurol Sci. 2009;284:63–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostan C, Oberhauser C, Cieza A. Investigating the dimension functioning from a condition-specific perspective and the qualifier scale of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health based on Rasch analyses. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91:S129–SS40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar