Construct validity of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10)

References

• Kertscher B, Speyer R, Fong E, et al. Prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia in the Netherlands: a telephone survey. Dysphagia. 2015;30:114–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin LC, Wu SC, Chen HS, et al. Prevalence of impaired swallowing in institutionalized older people in taiwan. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50:1118–1123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma JC, Fletcher S, Vassallo M, et al. What influences outcome of stroke-pyrexia or dysphagia? Int J Clin Pract. 2001;55:17–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martino R, Foley N, Bhogal S, et al. Dysphagia after stroke: incidence, diagnosis, and pulmonary complications. Stroke. 2005;36:2756–2763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marik PE, Kaplan D. Aspiration pneumonia and dysphagia in the elderly. Chest. 2003;124:328–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley NC, Martin RE, Salter KL, et al. A review of the relationship between dysphagia and malnutrition following stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:707–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crary MA, Humphrey JL, Carnaby-Mann G, et al. Dysphagia, nutrition, and hydration in ischemic stroke patients at admission and discharge from acute care. Dysphagia 2013;28:69–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonilha HS, Simpson AN, Ellis C, et al. The one-year attributable cost of post-stroke dysphagia. Dysphagia. 2014;29:545–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekberg O, Hamdy S, Woisard V, et al. Social and psychological burden of dysphagia: its impact on diagnosis and treatment. Dysphagia. 2002;17:139–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belafsky PC, Mouadeb DA, Rees CJ, et al. Validity and reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008;117:919–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goncalves MI, Remaili CB, Behlau M. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Brazilian version of the Eating Assessment Tool - EAT-10. Codas. 2013;25:601–604.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schindler A, Mozzanica F, Monzani A, et al. Reliability and validity of the Italian Eating Assessment Tool. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2013;122:717–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farahat M, Mesallam TA. Validation and Cultural Adaptation of the Arabic Version of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2016;67:231–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moller R, Safa S, Ostberg P. Validation of the Swedish translation of eating assessment tool (S-EAT-10). Acta Otolaryngol 2016;136:749–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheney DM, Siddiqui MT, Litts JK, et al. The ability of the 10-item eating assessment tool (EAT-10) to predict aspiration risk in persons with dysphagia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2014;124:351–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbek JC, Robbins JA, Roecker EB, et al. A penetration-aspiration scale. Dysphagia. 1996;11:93–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambleton RK, Jones RW. An NCME instructional module on “Comparison of Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory and Their Applications to Test Development”. Educ Meas Issues Pract 1993;12:38–47.
   Google Scholar
• Speyer R, Cordier R, Kertscher B, et al. Psychometric properties of questionnaires on functional health status in oropharyngeal dysphagia: a systematic literature review. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:458678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss ME, Smith GT. Construct validity: advances in theory and methodology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2009;5:1–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. 2nd ed. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Tesio L. Measuring behaviours and perceptions: Rasch analysis as a tool for rehabilitation research. J Rehabil Med. 2003;35:105–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crary MA, Mann GD, Groher ME. Initial psychometric assessment of a functional oral intake scale for dysphagia in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1516–1520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velozo CA, Seel RT, Magasi S, et al. Improving measurement methods in rehabilitation: core concepts and recommendations for scale development. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:S154–S163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabari JS, Woodbury M, Velozo CA. Rasch analysis of a new hierarchical scoring system for evaluating hand function on the motor assessment scale for stroke. Stroke Res Treat. 2014;2014:730298.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Velozo CA, Woodbury ML. Translating measurement findings into rehabilitation practice: an example using Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity with patients following stroke. JRRD. 2011;48:1211–1222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baylor C, Hula W, Donovan NJ, et al. An introduction to item response theory and Rasch models for speech-language pathologists. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011;20:243–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Program Committee of the Institute for Objective Measurement. Definition of Objective Measurement 2000 [cited 2016 Dec 17]. Available from: http://www.rasch.org/define.htm. 2000.
   Google Scholar
• White LJ, Velozo CA. The use of Rasch measurement to improve the Oswestry classification scheme. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:822–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafari P, Bagheri Z, Ayatollahi SMT, et al. Using Rasch rating scale model to reassess the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the PedsQL(TM) 4.0 Generic Core Scales in school children. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012;10:27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrich D. A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika 1978;43:561–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters GN. A rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika 1982;47:149–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordier R, Joosten A, Clave P, et al. Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) using Rasch analysis. Dysphagia. 2017;32:250–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Harris B, Brodsky MB, Michel Y, et al. MBS measurement tool for swallow impairment–MBSImp: establishing a standard. Dysphagia. 2008;23:392–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6:1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve BB, Hays RD, Bjorner JB, et al. Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Med Care. 2007;45:S22–S31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York (NY): Guilford Publications; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Baghaei P. Local dependency and rasch measures. Rasch Meas Trans 2008;21:1105–1106.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. Data variance explained by measures. Rasch Meas Trans 2006;20:1045–1054.
   Google Scholar
• Author. Winsteps Rasch measurement [Computer software]. Chicago (IL): Winsteps.com; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. J Appl Meas. 2002;3:85–106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wright BD, Linacre JM. Reasonable mean-square fit values, rasch measurement transactions. Rasch Meas Trans 1994;8:370.
   Google Scholar
• Tennant A, Pallant JF. DIF matters: a practical DIF matters: a practical approach to test if differential item functioning makes a difference. Rasch Meas Trans 2007;20:1082–1084.
   Google Scholar
• McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res. 1995;4:293–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher W. Reliability, separation, strata statistics. Rasch Meas Trans 1992;6:238.
   Google Scholar
• Wright BD, Masters G. Rating scale analysis. Chicago (IL): Mesa Press; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. Reliability, separation and strata: percentage of sample in each level. Rasch Meas Trans 2013;24:1399.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. KR-20/Cronbach alpha or rasch person reliability: Which Tells the “Truth”? Rasch Meas Trans 1997;11:580–581.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny DA, Kaniskan B, McCoach DB. The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociol Methods Res. 2015;44:486–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocdor P, Siegel ER, Giese R, et al. Characteristics of dysphagia in older patients evaluated at a tertiary center. Laryngoscope. 2015;125:400–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnaby-Mann G, Crary M. Pill swallowing by adults with dysphagia. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;131:970–975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHorney CA, Martin-Harris B, Robbins J, et al. Clinical validity of the SWAL-QOL and SWAL-CARE outcome tools with respect to bolus flow measures. Dysphagia. 2006;21:141–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar