Stakeholder perspectives for possible residual limb monitoring system for persons with lower-limb amputation

References

• Highsmith M, Kahle J, Klenow T, et al. Interventions to manage residual limb ulceration due to prosthetic use in individuals with lower extremity amputation: a systemtatic review of the literature. Technol Innov. 2016;18:115–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagberg K, Branemark R. Consequences of non-vascular trans-femoral amputation: a survey of quality of life, prosthetic use and problems. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2001;25:186–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klute GK, Huff E, Ledoux WR. Does activity affect residual limb skin temperatures? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:3062–3067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peery JT, Ledoux WR, Klute GK. Residual-limb skin temperature in transtibial sockets. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42:147–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meulenbelt HEJ, Dijkstra PU, Jonkman MF, et al. Skin problems in lower limb amputees: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:603–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner BJ, Sanders JE. Considerations for development of sensing and monitoring tools to facilitate treatment and care of persons with lower-limb loss: a review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51:1–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Varma P, Stineman MG, Dillingham TR. Epidemiology of limb loss. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2014;25:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathur N, Glesk I, Buis A. Skin temperature prediction in lower limb prostheses. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2016;20:158–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtney A, Orendurff MS, Buis A. Effect of alignment perturbations in a trans-tibial prosthesis user: a pilot study. J Rehabil Med. 2016;48:396–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safari MR, Tafti N, Aminian G. Socket interface pressure and amputee reported outcomes for comfortable and uncomfortable conditions of patella tendon bearing socket: a pilot study. Assist Technol. 2015;27:24–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiff A, Havey R, Carandang G, et al. Quantification of shear stresses within a transtibial prosthetic socket. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35:779–782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gholizadeh H, Osman NA, Eshraghi A, et al. Clinical implication of interface pressure for a new prosthetic suspension system. Biomed Eng Online. 2014;13:89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali S, Osman NA, Eshraghi A, et al. Interface pressure in transtibial socket during ascent and descent on stairs and its effect on patient satisfaction. Clin Biomech. 2013;28:994–999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Fakih EA, Osman NA, Eshraghi A, et al. The capability of fiber Bragg grating sensors to measure amputees’ trans-tibial stump/socket interface pressures. Sensors (Basel). 2013;13:10348–10357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutwell E, Stine R, Hansen A, et al. Effect of prosthetic gel liner thickness on gait biomechanics and pressure distribution within the transtibial socket. JRRD. 2012;49:227–240.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mak AFT, Zhang M, Boone DA. State-of-the-art research in lower-limb prosthetic biomechanics-socket interface: a review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2001;38:161–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laszczak P, Jiang L, Bader DL, et al. Development and validation of a 3D-printed interfacial stress sensor for prosthetic applications. Med Eng Phys. 2015;37:132–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laszczak P, McGrath M, Tang J, et al. A pressure and shear sensor system for stress measurement at lower limb residuum/socket interface. Med Eng Phys. 2016;38:695–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler J, Mazumdar A, Marron L, et al. A pressure and shear sensing liner for prosthetic sockets. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016;2016:2026–2029.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wheeler J, Mazumdar A, Marron L, et al. editors. Development and amputee validation of pressure and shear sensing liner for prosthetic sockets. Conference Proceedings of IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society; 2016 Aug 16–20; Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Youngblood RT, Allyn K, Sanders JE. Computer-manufactured inserts for prosthetic sockets: a new tool for long-term prosthesis sensing. In: Bhaskar MS, editor. The Academy Today. Vol. 13. Washington (DC): Western Media LLC; 2017; p. 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Kim DH, Lu N, Ma R, et al. Epidermal electronics. Science. 2011;333:838–843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klute GK, Kantor C, Darrouzet C, et al. Lower-limb amputee needs assessment using multistakeholder focus-group approach. JRRD. 2009;46:293–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwijsen SA, Niemeijer AR, Hertogh CM. Ethics of using assistive technology in the care for community-dwelling elderly people: an overview of the literature. Aging Ment Health. 2011;15:419–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigby M. Applying emergent ubiquitous technologies in health: the need to respond to new challenges of opportunity, expectation, and responsibility. Int J Med Inform. 2007;76:S349–S352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliot & Associates. Guidelines for Conducting a Focus Group (C). 2005 [cited 2018 Jan 15]. Available from: https://irep.olemiss.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/98/2016/05/Trinity_Duke_How_to_Conduct_a_Focus_Group.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Berkowitz S. Chapter 4: analyzing qualitative data. In: Frechtling J, Sharp Westat L, editors. User-friendly handbook for mixed method evaluations. Vol. 1. 1 ed. Arlington (VA): NSF, Directorate for Education and Human Resources, Division of Research, Evaluation, and Communication; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan R, Biklen SK. Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theory and methods. 3rd ed. Boston (MA): Allyn and Bacon; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Guest G, MacQueen KM, Namey EE. Applied thematic analysis. 1 ed. Los Angeles (CA): Sage Publications; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• DeCuir-Gunby JT, Marshall PL, McCulloch AW. Developing and using a codebook for the analysis of interview data: an example from a professional development research project. Field Methods. 2011;23:136–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacQueen KM, McLellan E, Kay K, et al. Codebook development for team-based qualitative analysis. Cult Anthropol Meth. 1998;10:31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña J. An introduction to codes and coding. 1 ed. Vol. 1. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Ghoseiri K, Safari MR. Prevalence of heat and perspiration discomfort inside prostheses: literature review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51:855–868.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li W, Liu X, Cai Z, et al. Effect of prosthetic socks on the frictional properties of residual limb skin. Wear. 2011;271:2804–2811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mak AFT, Zhang M, Tam EWC. Biomechanics of pressure ulcer in body tissues interacting with external forces during locomotion. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2010;12:29–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang M, Guo W, Yang C, et al. Mobile phone use and glioma risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0175136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miah T, Kamat D. Current Understanding of the Health Effects of Electromagnetic Fields. Pediatr Ann. 2017;46:e172–e174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest G, Namey E, McKenna K. How many focus groups are enough? Building an evidence base for nonprobability sample sizes. Field Methods. 2017;29:3–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Fakih EA, Osman NA, Mahmad-Adikan FR. Techniques for interface stress measurements within prosthetic sockets of transtibial amputees: a review of the past 50 years of research. Sensors. 2016;16:1119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone DA, Kobayashi T, Chou TG, et al. Influence of malalignment on socket reaction moments during gait in amputees with transtibial prostheses. Gait Posture. 2013;37:620–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi T, Orendurff MS, Zhang M, et al. Individual responses to alignment perturbations in socket reaction moments while walking in transtibial prostheses. Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon). 2014;29:590–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi T, Orendurff MS, Zhang M, et al. Socket reaction moments in transtibial prostheses during walking at clinically perceived optimal alignment. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2016;40:503–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteside SR, Allen MJ, Bick JA, et al. Practice analysis of certified practitioners in the discipline of orthotics and prosthetics. Alexandria (VA): American Board for Certification in Orthotics, Prosthetics & Pedorthics, Inc.; 2015.
   Google Scholar