Video parameters for action observation training in stroke rehabilitation: a scoping review

References

• Takechi U, Matsunaga K, Nakanishi R, et al. Longitudinal changes of motor cortical excitability and transcallosal inhibition after subcortical stroke. Clin Neurophysiol. 2014;125(10):2055–2069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarkson AN, Carmichael ST. Cortical excitability and post-stroke recovery. London: Portland Press Ltd.; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Yan Y, Sun Z, et al. Coaching-Based teleoccupational guidance for Home-Based stroke survivors and their family caregivers: study protocol for a superior randomized controlled trial. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022;2022:9123498.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buccino G. Action observation treatment: a novel tool in neurorehabilitation. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2014;369(1644):20130185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoykov ME, Madhavan S. Motor priming in neurorehabilitation. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2015;39(1):33–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng TH, Zhu JD, Chen CC, et al. Action observation therapy for improving arm function, walking ability, and daily activity performance after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(8):1277–1285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan D, Fullen B, Rio E, et al. C. Effect of action observation therapy in the rehabilitation of neurologic and musculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Trans. 2021;3(1):100106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arksey H, O’Malley L. L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGowan J, Straus S, Moher D, et al. Reporting scoping reviews—PRISMA ScR extension. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;123:177–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, et al. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adhikari SP, Tretriluxana J, Chaiyawat P, et al. Enhanced upper extremity functions with a single session of action-observation-execution and accelerated skill acquisition program in subacute stroke. Stroke Res Treat. 2018;2018:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bae S, Kim KY. Dual-afferent sensory input training for voluntary movement after stroke: a pilot randomized controlled study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;40(3):293–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang DH, Shin WS, Kim SY, et al. The effects of action observational training on walking ability in chronic stroke patients: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2013;27(12):1118–1125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celnik P, Webster B, Glasser DM, et al. Effects of action observation on physical training after stroke. Stroke. 2008;39(6):1814–1820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho H, Kim K. Effects of action observation training with auditory stimulation on static and dynamic balance in chronic stroke patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;29(5):104775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertelt D, Small S, Solodkin A, et al. Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke. Neuroimage. 2007;36: t164–T173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franceschini M, Ceravolo MG, Agosti M, et al. Clinical relevance of action observation in upper-limb stroke rehabilitation: a possible role in recovery of functional dexterity. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26(5):456–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu J, Zeng M, Shen F, et al. Effects of action observation therapy on upper extremity function, daily activities and motion evoked potential in cerebral infarction patients. Medicine. 2017;96(42):e8080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmsen WJ, Bussmann JB, Selles RW, et al. A mirror therapy–based action observation protocol to improve motor learning after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015;29(6):509–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh YW, Lin YH, Zhu JD, et al. Treatment effects of upper limb action observation therapy and mirror therapy on rehabilitation outcomes after subacute stroke: a pilot study. Behav Neurol. 2020;2020:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J-S, Kim K. Clinical feasibility of action observation based on mirror neuron system on walking performance in post stroke patients. J Phys Ther Sci. 2012;24(7):597–599.
   Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Chung EJ, Lee BH. A study of analysis of the brain wave with respected to action observation and motor imagery: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Phys Ther Sci. 2013;25(7):779–782.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim T, Kim S, Lee B. Effects of action observational training plus brain–computer interface-based functional electrical stimulation on paretic arm motor recovery in patient with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Occup Ther Int. 2016;23(1):39–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JC, Lee HM. The effect of action observation training on balance and sit to walk in chronic stroke: a crossover randomized controlled trial. J Motor Behav. 2018;50(4):373–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Lee BH. Action observation training for functional activities after stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabilitation. 2013;33(4):565–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleynen M, Jie LJ, Theunissen K, et al. The immediate influence of implicit motor learning strategies on spatiotemporal gait parameters in stroke patients: a randomized within-subjects design. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(4):619–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuk EJ, Kim JM, Oh DW, et al. Effects of action observation therapy on hand dexterity and EEG-based cortical activation patterns in patients with post-stroke hemiparesis. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016;23(5):318–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HJ, Kim YM, Lee DK. The effects of action observation training and mirror therapy on gait and balance in stroke patients. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017;29(3):523–526.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mancuso M, Tondo SD, Costantini E, et al. Action observation therapy for upper limb recovery in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Brain Sci. 2021;11(3):290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao H, Li Y, Tang L, et al. Effects of mirror neuron system-based training on rehabilitation of stroke patients. Brain Behav. 2020;10(8):e01729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noh JS, Lim JH, Choi TW, et al. Effects and safety of combined rTMS and action observation for recovery of function in the upper extremities in stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2019;37(3):219–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park CS, Kang KY. The effects of additional action observational training for functional electrical stimulation treatment on weight bearing, stability and gait velocity of hemiplegic patients. J Phys Ther Sci. 2013;25(9):1173–1175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park EC, Hwangbo G. The effects of action observation gait training on the static balance and walking ability of stroke patients. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(2):341–344.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park HJ, Oh DW, Choi JD, et al. Action observation training of community ambulation for improving walking ability of patients with post-stroke hemiparesis: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(8):1078–1086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park HR, Kim JM, Lee MK, et al. Clinical feasibility of action observation training for walking function of patients with post-stroke hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2014;28(8):794–803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sale P, Ceravolo MG, Franceschini M. Action observation therapy in the subacute phase promotes dexterity recovery in right-hemisphere stroke patients. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son YL, Kim JW. The effects of mirror neuron system-based self-observation training on lower limb muscle activity and dynamic balance in patients with chronic stroke. J Phys Ther Sci. 2018;30(10):1241–1244.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang X, Wong W, Wa Sun R, et al. Differentiated effects of robot hand training with and without neural guidance on neuroplasticity patterns in chronic stroke. Front Neurol. 2018;9:810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh SJ, Lee JH, Kim DH. The effects of functional action-observation training on gait function in patients with post-stroke hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial. Technol Health Care. 2019;27(2):159–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon Y, Bae Y. The effect of backward walking observational training on gait parameters and balance in chronic stroke: randomized controlled study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2022;58(1):9–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamsi F, Nami M, Aligholi H, et al. The effect of action observation training on gait and balance of patients with neurological and musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. Br J Occup Ther. 2022;85(11):842–858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu JA, Park J. The effect of first-person perspective action observation training on upper extremity function and activity of daily living of chronic stroke patients. Brain Behav. 2022;12(5):e2565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanabe J, Morishita M. Effects of action observation therapy with limited visual attention on walking ability in stroke patients. J Mot Behav. 2022;54(1):27–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamili A, Hassani Mehraban A, Azad A, et al. Effects of meaningful action observation therapy on occupational performance, upper limb function, and corticospinal excitability poststroke: a Double-Blind randomized control trial. Neural Plast. 2022;2022:5284044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi H, Lim H, Kim JW, et al. Brain computer interface-based action observation game enhances mu suppression in patients with stroke. Electronics. 2019;8(12):1466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchigami T, Morioka S. Differences between the influence of observing one’s own movements and those of others in patients with stroke. Stroke Res Treat. 2019;2019:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison KA, Aziz-Zadeh L, Wong SW, et al. Modulating the motor system by action observation after stroke. Stroke. 2013;44(8):2247–2253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hioka A, Tada Y, Kitazato K, et al. Action observation treatment improves gait ability in subacute to convalescent stroke patients. J Clin Neurosci. 2020;75:55–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang J, Wang D, Duan Y, et al. Evaluation of motor function rehabilitation for stroke patients based on magnetic resonance DTI technology. IEEE Access. 2020;8:77850–77864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Lee B, Lee HS, et al. Differences in brain waves of normal persons and stroke patients during action observation and motor imagery. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26(2):215–218.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim E, Kim K. Effects of purposeful action observation on kinematic patterns of upper extremity in individuals with hemiplegia. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(6):1809–1811.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim E, Kim K. Effect of purposeful action observation on upper extremity function in stroke patients. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(9):2867–2869.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee D, Roh H, Park J, et al. Drinking behavior training for stroke patients using action observation and practice of upper limb function. J Phys Ther Sci. 2013;25(5):611–614.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liepert J, Greiner J, Dettmers C. Motor excitability changes during action observation in stroke patients. J Rehabil Med. 2014;46(5):400–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liew SL, Garrison KA, Ito KL, et al. Laterality of poststroke cortical motor activity during action observation is related to hemispheric dominance. Neural Plast. 2018;2018:3524960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marangon M, Priftis K, Fedeli M, et al. Lateralization of motor cortex excitability in stroke patients during action observation: a TMS study. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:251041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsubara M, Kayanuma H, Ono Y, et al. Determination of appropriate imagery task to discriminate ERD of “pinch” and “hold” movements in healthy participants and stroke patients. In: 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). Piscataway (NJ): IEEE; 2015 Aug 25. p. 4598–601.
   Google Scholar
• Sugg K, Müller S, Winstein C, et al. Does action observation training with immediate physical practice improve hemiparetic upper-limb function in chronic stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015;29(9):807–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tani M, Ono Y, Matsubara M, et al. Action observation facilitates motor cortical activity in patients with stroke and hemiplegia. Neurosci Res. 2018;133:7–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu JD, Cheng CH, Tseng YJ, et al. Modulation of motor cortical activities by action observation and execution in patients with stroke: an MEG study. Neural Plast. 2019;2019:8481371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner IC, Skouen JS, Ersland L, et al. Plasticity and response to action observation: a longitudinal FMRI study of potential mirror neurons in patients with subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014;28(9):874–884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motaqhey M, Ghanjal A, Farahani RM, et al. Sex differences in neuroanatomy of the human mirror neuron system: impact on functional recovery of ischemic hemiparetic patients. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015;17(8):e28363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubart AA, Leibovitz AI, Peleg LD, et al. Action observation of motor skills followed by immediate sleep enhances the motor rehabilitation of older adults with stroke. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2017. DOI: 10.1519/jpt.0000000000000136
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roberts M, Lietz NH, Portelli NA, et al. Implementing technology enhanced real-time action observation therapy in persons with chronic stroke: a pilot study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2021;38:2665–2676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JC, Lee HM. EEG-based evidence of mirror neuron activity from app-mediated stroke patient observation. Medicina. 2021;57(9):979.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jung YG, Oh DW, Park HJ, et al. Comparison of the effects of action observation training of community ambulation with different observational views on walking function in patients with chronic stroke: single-subject experimental study. Eur J Physiother. 2021;23(2):79–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rungsirisilp N, Wongsawat Y. Applying combined action observation and motor imagery to enhance classification performance in a Brain-Computer interface system for stroke patients. IEEE Access. 2022;10:73145–73155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim M, Park J, Leigh JH, et al. Exploring user perspectives on a robotic arm with brain-machine interface: a qualitative focus group study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101(36):e30508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Lin M, Fu J, et al. An immersive motor imagery training system for Post-Stroke rehabilitation combining VR and EMG-based Real-Time feedback. 2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC). Piscataway (NJ): IEEE; 2021 Nov 1. p. 7590–3.
   Google Scholar
• Franceschini M, Agosti M, Cantagallo A, et al. Mirror neurons: action observation treatment as a tool in stroke rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010;46(4):517–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenkel-Toledo S, Bentin S, Perry A, et al. Mirror-neuron system recruitment by action observation: effects of focal brain damage on mu suppression. Neuroimage. 2014;87:127–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SS, Kim TH, Lee BH. Effects of action observational training on cerebral hemodynamic changes of stroke survivors: a fTCD study. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26(3):331–334.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hsieh YW, Lee MT, Chen CC, et al. Development and user experience of an innovative multi-mode stroke rehabilitation system for the arm and hand for patients with stroke. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):1868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franceschini M, Ottaviani M, Romano P, et al. The reaching phase of feeding and Self-Care actions optimizes action observation effects in chronic stroke subjects. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2022;36(9):574–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Zhang X, Ye JX, et al. C. Mirror neuron therapy for hemispatial neglect patients. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Xia N, He C, et al. Action observation treatment-based exoskeleton (AOT-EXO) for upper extremity after stroke: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021;22(1):1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Behrendt F, Schuster-Amft C. Using an interactive virtual environment to integrate a digital action research arm test, motor imagery and action observation to assess and improve upper limb motor function in patients with neuromuscular impairments: a usability and feasibility study protocol. BMJ Open. 2018;8(7):e019646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertelt D, Hemmelmann C, Dettmers C, et al. Observation and execution of upper-limb movements as a tool for rehabilitation of motor deficits in paretic stroke patients: protocol of a randomized clinical trial. BMC Neurol. 2012;12(1):1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shih T, Yu Wu C, Yi Lin K, et al. Effects of action observation therapy and mirror therapy after stroke on rehabilitation outcomes and neural mechanisms by MEG: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017;18(1):1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Errante A, Saviola D, Cantoni M, et al. Effectiveness of action observation therapy based on virtual reality technology in the motor rehabilitation of paretic stroke patients: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Neurol. 2022;22(1):1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang X, Yang Y, Liu Q, et al. Prognostic characteristics of patients with colorectal cancer who have benign mesenteric lymph node enlargement: a multi-institutional cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2022;65(6):804–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan S, Geary U, Gallagher SE. Online videos promote brain health literacy. Health Promot Int. 2021;36(5):1243–1252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto M, Kumashiro M, Miyake S. Effects of screen size and task difficulty on vigilance performance of older adults. J UOEH. 2003;25(4):375–386.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sakamoto K, Asahara S, Yamashita K, et al. Influence of viewing distance and size of TV on visual fatigue and feeling of involvement. J Hum Ergol. 2012;41(1–2):17–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harasawa M, Sawahata Y, Komine K, et al. Effects of content and viewing distance on the preferred size of moving images. J Vis. 2020;20(3):6–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bove M, Tacchino A, Pelosin E, et al. Spontaneous movement tempo is influenced by observation of rhythmical actions. Brain Res Bull. 2009;80(3):122–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriuchi T, Matsuda D, Nakamura J, et al. Changing artificial playback speed and real movement velocity do not differentially influence the excitability of primary motor cortex during observation of a repetitive finger movement. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017;11:546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeRouge C, Garfield MJ, Hevner AR. Quality attributes in telemedicine video conferencing. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; Big Island, HI. Piscataway (NJ): IEEE; 2002; p. 2050–2059.
   Google Scholar
• Cermak G, Pinson M, Wolf S. The relationship among video quality, screen resolution, and bit rate. IEEE Trans Broadcast. 2011;57(2):258–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarasso E, Gemma M, Agosta F, et al. Action observation training to improve motor function recovery: a systematic review. Arch Physiother. 2015;5(1):1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar