1,593
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Factors impacting positive and negative participation of young people with cerebral palsy: a Delphi study of consumers and health professionals

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1330-1338 | Received 03 Nov 2022, Accepted 19 Mar 2023, Published online: 05 May 2023

References

  • Bjornson K, Kobayashi A, Zhou C, et al. Relationship of therapy to postsecondary education and employment in young adults with physical disabilities. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2011;23(2):179–186.
  • Jacobson D, Löwing K, Hjalmarsson E, et al. Exploring social participation in young adults with cerebral palsy. J Rehabil Med. 2019;51(3):167–174.
  • Reddihough DS, Jiang B, Lanigan A, et al. Social outcomes of young adults with cerebral palsy. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2013;38(3):215–222.
  • Rožkalne Z, Mukāns M, Vētra A. Transition-age young adults with cerebral palsy: level of participation and the influencing factors. Medicina. 2019;55(11):737.
  • Schmidt AK, van Gorp M, van Wely L, et al. Autonomy in participation in cerebral palsy from childhood to adulthood. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020;62(3):363–371.
  • Badawi N, Honan I, Finch-Edmondson M, et al. The Australian & New Zealand cerebral palsy strategy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020;62(8):885.
  • Imms C, Granlund M, Wilson PH, et al. Participation, both a means and an end: a conceptual analysis of processes and outcomes in childhood disability. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017;59(1):16–25.
  • World Health Organization. ICF: international classification of functioning, disability and health/World health organization. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
  • Imms C, Adair B, Keen D, et al. “Participation”: a systematic review of language, definitions, and constructs used in intervention research with children with disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016;58(1):29–38.
  • Maxwell G, Alves I, Granlund M. Participation and environmental aspects in education and the ICF and the ICF-CY: findings from a systematic literature review. Dev Neurorehabil. 2012;15(1):63–78.
  • Gorter J, Roebroeck M. Transition to adulthood: enhancing health and quality of life for emerging adults with neurological and developmental conditions. In: Ronen GM, Rosenbaum PL, editors. Life quality outcomes in children and young people with neurological and developmental conditions. London: Mac Keith Press; 2013. p. 302–313.
  • Imms C. Children with cerebral palsy participate: a review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(24):1867–1884.
  • Moll LR, Cott CA. The paradox of normalization through rehabilitation: growing up and growing older with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(15):1276–1283.
  • Arnett JJ. Emerging adulthood. A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. Am Psychol. 2000;55(5):469–480.
  • Sandström K. The lived body - experiences from adults with cerebral palsy. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21(5):432–441.
  • van Gorp M, Roebroeck E, van Eck M, et al. Childhood factors predict participation of young adults with cerebral palsy in domestic life and interpersonal relationships: a prospective cohort study. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(22):3162–3171.
  • Sienko S. Understanding the factors that impact the participation in physical activity and recreation in young adults with cerebral palsy (CP). Disabil Health J. 2019;12(3):467–472.
  • Shahin S, Reitzel M, Di Rezze B, et al. Environmental factors that impact the workplace participation of Transition-Aged young adults with Brain-Based disabilities: a scoping review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(7):2378.
  • Boucher N, Dumas F, Maltais DB, et al. The influence of selected personal and environmental factors on leisure activities in adults with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(16):1328–1338.
  • van Wely L, van Gorp M, Tan SS, et al. Teenage predictors of participation of adults with cerebral palsy in domestic life and interpersonal relationships: a 13-year follow-up study. Res Dev Disabil. 2020;96:103510.
  • Hidecker MJC, Paneth N, Rosenbaum PL, et al. Developing and validating the communication function classification system for individuals with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(8):704–710.
  • Raji P, Hassani Mehraban A, Aliabadi F, et al. Content validity of the comprehensive ICF core set for children with cerebral palsy aged 0-6 years: iranian occupational therapists perspective. Iran J Child Neurol. 2018;12(3):40–58.
  • Vargus-Adams JN, Martin LK. Measuring what matters in cerebral palsy: a breadth of important domains and outcome measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(12):2089–2095.
  • McIntyre S, Novak I, Cusick A. Consensus research priorities for cerebral palsy: a delphi survey of consumers, researchers, and clinicians. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52(3):270–275.
  • Murry JW, Jr, Hammons JO. Delphi: a versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research. Rev High Educ. 1995;18(4):423–436.
  • Heinemann AW, Tulsky D, Dijkers M, et al. Issues in participation measurement in research and clinical applications. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(9 Suppl):S72–S76.
  • Donohoe H, Stellefson M, Tennant B. Advantages and limitations of the e-Delphi technique. Am J Health Educ. 2013;43(1):38–46.
  • Quartermaine J, Rose T, Auld M, et al. Participation measures that evaluate attendance and involvement for young people aged 15 to 25 years with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2023. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2207042
  • Qualtrics. Qualtrics software. UT, USA: 2019.
  • Graneheim UH, Lindgren BM, Lundman B. Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: a discussion paper. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;56:29–34.
  • Koch T. Establishing rigour in qualitative research: the decision trail. J Adv Nurs. 2006;53(1):91–100.
  • Sinha IP, Smyth RL, Williamson PR. Using the delphi technique to determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trials: recommendations for the future based on a systematic review of existing studies. PLOS Med. 2011;8(1):e1000393.
  • Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105–112.
  • Diamond IR, Grant RC, Feldman BM, et al. Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of delphi studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(4):401–409.
  • De Meyer D, Kottner J, Beele H, et al. Delphi procedure in core outcome set development: rating scale and consensus criteria determined outcome selection. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;111:23–31.
  • Towns M, Lindsay S, Arbour-Nicitopoulos K, et al. Balance confidence and physical activity participation of independently ambulatory youth with cerebral palsy: an exploration of youths” and parents” perspectives. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(11):2305–2316.
  • Anaby D. Towards a new generation of participation-based interventions for adolescents with disabilities: the impact of the environment and the need for individual-based designs. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018;60(8):735–736.
  • King G, Rigby P, Batorowicz B. Conceptualizing participation in context for children and youth with disabilities: an activity setting perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(18):1578–1585.
  • United Nations. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2006. Available from https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html.
  • Reddihough DS, Meehan E, Stott NS, et al. The national disability insurance scheme: a time for real change in Australia. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016;58:66–70.
  • Piskur B, Daniels R, Jongmans MJ, et al. Participation and social participation: are they distinct concepts? Clin Rehabil. 2014;28(3):211–220.
  • de Villiers MR, de Villiers PJ, Kent AP. The delphi technique in health sciences education research. Med Teach. 2005;27(7):639–643.
  • Rosenbaum P, Gorter JW. The “F-words” in childhood disability: i swear this is how we should think!. Child Care Health Dev. 2012;38(4):457–463.
  • Rosenbaum PL. The F-words for child development: functioning, family, fitness, fun, friends, and future. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022;64(2):141–142.