Biopsychosocial factors associated with the state of disability after hemiparesis in the chronic phase of stroke: exploratory analysis based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

References

• [OMS] Organização Mundial da Saúde, CIF: Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade, Incapacidade e Saúde [Centro Colaborador da Organização Mundial da Saúde para a Família de Classificações Internacionais, org.; coordenação da tradução Cassia Maria Buchalla]. São Paulo: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo – EDUSP; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2016 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;133(4):e38–e360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vos T, Lim SS, Abbafati C, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204–1222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensenor IM, Goulart AC, Szwarcwald CL, et al. Prevalence of stroke and associated disability in Brazil: national health survey - 2013. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2015;73(9):746–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyewole OO, Ogunlana MO, Oritogun KS, et al. Post-stroke disability and its predictors among Nigerian stroke survivors. Disabil Health J. 2016;9(4):616–623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Shi YZ, Zhang N, et al. The disability rate of 5-year post-stroke and its correlation factors: a national survey in China. PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e0165341–e0165349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava A, Taly AB, Gupta A, et al. Post-stroke depression: prevalence and relationship with disability in chronic stroke survivors. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2010;13(2):123–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naidoo P, Sewpaul R, Nyembezi A, et al. The association between biopsychosocial factors and disability in a national health survey in South Africa. Psychol Health Med. 2018;23(6):653–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouffioulx E, Arnould C, Thonnard J-L. Satisfaction with activity and participation and its relationships with body functions, activities, or environmental factors in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(9):1404–1410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dos Santos HM, Pereira GS, Brandão TCP, et al. Impact of environmental factors on post-stroke disability: an analytical cross-sectional study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022;31(4):106305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malta M, Cardoso LO, Bastos FI, et al. STROBE initiative : guidelines on. Rev Saúde Pública. 2010;44(3):1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, et al. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49(12):1373–1379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller EL, Murray L, Richards L, et al. Comprehensive overview of nursing and interdisciplinary rehabilitation care of the stroke patient: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke. 2010;41(10):2402–2448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina Rueda F, Rivas Montero FM, Pérez de Heredia Torres M, et al. [Movement analysis of upper extremity hemiparesis in patients with cerebrovascular disease: a pilot study]. Neurologia. 2012;27(6):343–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolucci PHF, Brucki SMD, Campacci SR, et al. O Mini-Exame do Eestado Mental em uma população geral: impacto da escolaridade. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 1994;52(1):1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dos Santos HM, Pereira GS, de Oliveira LC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) to estimate disability after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2022:1–6. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2080876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer MLP, Perracini MR, Rebustini F, et al. WHODAS 2.0-BO: normative data for the assessment of disability in older adults. Rev Saude Publica. 2019;53(1):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Grou TC, Castro S D, Leite CF, et al. Validação da versão brasileira do World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 em idosos institucionalizados. Fisioter Pesqui. 2021;28(1):77–87..
   Google Scholar
• Castro SS, Leite CF. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule - WHODAS 2.0. Fisioter Pesqui. 2017;24(4):385–391.
   Google Scholar
• Lexell J, Brogårdh C. The use of ICF in the neurorehabilitation process. NeuroRehabilitation. 2015;36(1):5–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva SM, Corrêa FI, Pereira GS, et al. Construct validity of the items on the stroke specific quality of life (SS-QOL) questionnaire that evaluate the participation component of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(2):225–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organização Mudial de Saúde. Avaliação de Saúde e ­deficiência: WHODAS 2.0. Manual do WHO Disability Assessment Schedule; 2015 [accessed 2021 Aug 28]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43974/9789241547598_eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
   Google Scholar
• Faria-Fortini ID, Basílio ML, Sabine F, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and reproducibility of the measure of the quality of the environment in individuals with hemiparesis. Rev Ter Ocup Univ São Paulo. 2016;27(1):42–511.
   Google Scholar
• Arowoiya AI, Elloker T, Karachi F, et al. Using the World Health Organization’s Disability Assessment Schedule (2) to assess disability in community-dwelling stroke patients. S Afr J Physiother. 2017;73(1):343.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hu HY, Chi WC, Chang KH, et al. The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 can predict the institutionalization of patients with stroke. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;53(6):856–862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida OP, Almeida SA. Reliability of the Brazilian version of the geriatric depression scale (GDS) short form. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 1999;57(2B):421–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durmaz B, Soysal P, Ellidokuz H, et al. Validity and reliability of geriatric depression scale-15 (short form) in Turkish older adults. North Clin Istanb. 2018;5(3):216–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marc LG, Raue PJ, Bruce ML. Screening performance of the 15-item geriatric depression scale in a diverse elderly home care population. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008;16(11):914–921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira GS, Corrêa FI, Júlio CE, et al. Clinimetric properties of the SATIS-Stroke questionnaire in the Brazilian population: a satisfaction assessment measure addressing activities and participation after a stroke. Braz J Phys Ther. 2021;25(6):719–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira GS, Silva SM, Júlio CE, et al. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of SATIS-Stroke for use in Brazil: a satisfaction measure of activities and participation in stroke survivors. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:8054640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouffioulx E, Arnould C, Thonnard J-L. SATIS-Stroke: a satisfaction measure of activities and participation in the actual environment experienced by patients with chronic stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(10):836–843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino PR, Faria-Fortini I, Basílio ML, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation of the ABILOCO: a measure of locomotion ability for individuals with stroke. Acta Fisiátr. 2016;23(4):161–165.
   Google Scholar
• Avelino PR, Nascimento LR, Menezes KKP, et al. Validation of the telephone-based assessment of locomotion ability after stroke. Int J Rehabil Res. 2021;44(1):88–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basílio ML, de Faria-Fortini I, Magalhães L de C, et al. Cross-cultural validity of the Brazilian version of the ABILHAND questionnaire for chronic stroke individuals, based on Rasch analysis. J Rehabil Med. 2016;48(1):6–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino PR, Menezes KKP, Nascimento LR, et al. Validation of the telephone-based application of the ABILHAND for assessment of manual ability after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2020;44(4):256–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penta M, Tesio L, Arnould C, et al. The ABILHAND questionnaire as a measure of manual ability in chronic stroke patients: Rasch-based validation and relationship to upper limb impairment. Stroke. 2001;32(7):1627–1634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Torre G, Lia L, Francavilla F, et al. Factors that facilitate and hinder the return to work after stroke: an overview of systematic reviews. Med Lav. 2022;113(3):e2022029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochette A, Desrosiers J, Noreau L. Association between personal and environmental factors and the occurrence of handicap situations following a stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2001;23(13):559–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBGE. IBGE divulga o rendimento domiciliar per capita 2020. Diretoria de Pesquisas; 2020. Available from: https://ftp.ibge.gov.br/Trabalho_e_Rendimento/Pesquisa_Nacional_por_Amostra_de_Domicilios_continua/Renda_domiciliar_per_capita/Renda_domiciliar_per_capita_2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Avelino PR, Nascimento LR, Menezes KKP, et al. Walking confidence and perceived locomotion ability explain participation after stroke: a cross-sectional experimental study. Acta Neurol Scand. 2022;146(5):573–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blömer A-MV, van Mierlo ML, Visser-Meily JM, et al. Does the frequency of participation change after stroke and is this change associated with the subjective experience of participation? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(3):456–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg J. The participation pyramid: a response to “reconsideration ICF scheme” by Heerkens et al. 2017. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(1):123–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heerkens YF, de Weerd M, Huber M, et al. Reconsideration of the scheme of the international classification of functioning, disability and health: incentives from the Netherlands for a global debate. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(5):603–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettger JP, Zhao X, Bushnell C, et al. The association between socioeconomic status and disability after stroke: findings from the Adherence eValuation After Ischemic stroke Longitudinal (AVAIL) registry. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Addo J, Ayerbe L, Mohan KM, et al. Socioeconomic status and stroke: an updated review. Stroke. 2012;43(4):1186–1191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, et al. 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;140(11):e596–e646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker-Collo S, Bennett DA, Krishnamurthi RV, et al. Sex differences in stroke incidence, prevalence, mortality and disability-adjusted life years: results from the global burden of disease study 2013. Neuroepidemiology. 2015;45(3):203–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushnell CD, Chaturvedi S, Gage KR, et al. Sex differences in stroke: challenges and opportunities. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2018;38(12):2179–2191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushnell CD, Reeves MJ, Zhao X, et al. Sex differences in quality of life after ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2014;82(11):922–931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros GC, Roy D, Kontos N, et al. Post-stroke depression: a 2020 updated review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2020;66:70–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar