Rasch validation of the German version of the Prosthesis Embodiment Scale for lower limb amputees and proposal of a revised version

References

• Murray C. An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the embodiment of artificial limbs. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(16):963–973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffalitzky E, Gallagher P, MacLachlan M, et al. Developing consensus on important factors associated with lower limb prosthetic prescription and use. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(24):2085–2094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekrater-Bodmann R. Factors associated with prosthesis embodiment and its importance for prosthetic satisfaction in lower limb amputees. Front Neurorobot. 2020;14:604376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekrater-Bodmann R, Reinhard I, Diers M, et al. Relationship of prosthesis ownership and phantom limb pain: results of a survey in 2383 limb amputees. Pain. 2021;162(2):630–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imaizumi S, Asai T, Koyama S. Embodied prosthetic arm stabilizes body posture, while unembodied one perturbs it. Conscious Cogn. 2016;45:75–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canzoneri E, Marzolla M, Amoresano A, et al. Amputation and prosthesis implantation shape body and peripersonal space representations. Sci Rep. 2013;3:2844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch A, Lenggenhager B, Bekrater-Bodmann R. Prosthesis embodiment and attenuation of prosthetic touch in upper limb amputees – a proof-of-concept study. Conscious Cogn. 2021;88:103073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell PM, Scott RN, Dickison J, et al. Do artificial limbs become part of the user? New evidence. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1989;26(2):17–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosén B, Ehrsson HH, Antfolk C, et al. Referral of sensation to an advanced humanoid robotic hand prosthesis. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2009;43(5):260–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zbinden J, Lendaro E, Ortiz-Catalan M. Prosthetic embodiment: systematic review on definitions, measures, and experimental paradigms. J NeuroEng Rehabil. 2022;19:37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekrater-Bodmann R. Perceptual correlates of successful body–prosthesis interaction in lower limb amputees: psychometric characterisation and development of the prosthesis embodiment scale. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):14203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo MR, Schüür F, Kammers MPM, et al. What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. Cognition. 2008;107(3):978–998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond TG, Yan Z, Heene M. Applying the Rasch model – fundamental measurement in the human sciences. 4th ed. New York: Routledge; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Bekrater-Bodmann R, Schredl M, Diers M, et al. Post-amputation pain is associated with the recall of an impaired body representation in dreams—results from a nation-wide survey on limb amputees. PLOS One. 2015;10(3):e0119552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. A user’s guide to Winsteps Ministep. Rasch-model computer programs. Program Manual 4.8.0 [Internet]; 2021 [cited 2022 Mar 6]. Available from: https://www.winsteps.com/a/Winsteps-Manual.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Boone WJ, Staver JR, Ms Y. Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Dordrecht: springer; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen KB, Makransky G, Horton M. Critical values for Yen’s Q 3 : identification of local dependence in the Rasch model using residual correlations. Appl Psychol Meas. 2017;41(3):178–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrillo J, Bressler NM, Lamoureux E, et al. Development of a new Rasch-based scoring algorithm for the national eye institute visual functioning questionnaire to improve its interpretability. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):157.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cano S, Chrea C, Salzberger T, et al. Development and validation of a new instrument to measure perceived risks associated with the use of tobacco and nicotine-containing products. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16(1):192.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linacre JM. Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. J Appl Meas. 2002;3:85–106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolfe EW, Smith EV.Jr. Instrument development tools and activities for measure validation using Rasch models: part II – validation activities. J Appl Meas. 2007;8:204–234.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linacre JM. Dichotomous equivalents to rating scales. Rasch Meas Trans. 2006;20(1):1052.
   Google Scholar
• Franchignoni F, Horak F, Godi M, et al. Using psychometric techniques to improve the balance evaluation systems test: the mini-BESTest. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42(4):323–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger H, Giordano A, Bavec A, et al. The prosthetic mobility questionnaire, a tool for assessing mobility in people with lower-limb amputation: validation of PMQ 2.0 in Slovenia. Int J Rehabil Res. 2019;42(3):263–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe EW, Smith EV. Instrument development tools and activities for measure validation using Rasch models: part I – instrument development tools. J Appl Meas. 2007;8:97–123.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linacre JM. Misfit statistics for rating scale categories. Rasch Meas Trans. 1995;9:450.
   Google Scholar
• Nadler JT, Weston R, Voyles EC. Stuck in the middle: the use and interpretation of mid-points in items on questionnaires. J Gen Psychol. 2015;142(2):71–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrich D, de Jong JH, Sheridan BE. Diagnostic opportunities with the Rasch model for ordered response categories. In: Rost J, Langeheine R, editors. Applications of latent trait and latent class models in the social sciences. New York: Waxmann Publishing Co.; 1997. p. 59–72.
   Google Scholar
• Hong S, Kim BSK, Wolfe MM. A psychometric revision of the European American Values Scale for Asian Americans using the Rasch model. Meas Eval Couns Dev. 2005;37(4):194–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger H, Giordano A, Mlakar M, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and Rasch validation of the Slovene version of the orthotics and prosthetics users’ survey (OPUS) client satisfaction with device (CSD) in upper-limb prosthesis users. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2019;62(3):168–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franchignoni F, Giordano A, Rocca B, et al. A further Rasch analysis of the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire in adults with chronic low back pain suggests the revision of its rating scale. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2021;57(1):110–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsakiris M, Carpenter L, James D, et al. Hands only illusion: multisensory integration elicits sense of ownership for body parts but not for non-corporeal objects. Exp Brain Res. 2010;204(3):343–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehman LA, Sindhu BS, Johnson J, et al. Creating a clinically useful data collection form for the DASH questionnaire. Am J Occup Ther. 2011;65(1):45–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodbury ML, Velozo CA, Richards LG, et al. Rasch analysis staging methodology to classify upper extremity movement impairment after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(8):1527–1533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velozo CA, Woodbury ML. Translating measurement findings into rehabilitation practice: an example using Fugl-Meyer Assessment-upper extremity with patients following stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(10):1211–1222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woodbury ML, Anderson K, Finetto C, et al. Matching task difficulty to patient ability during task practice improves upper extremity motor skill after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(11):1863–1871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Franchignoni F, Godi M, Guglielmetti S, et al. Enhancing the usefulness of the Mini-BESTest for measuring dynamic balance: a rasch validation study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015;51:429–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. Sample size and item calibration or person measure stability. Rasch Meas Trans. 1994;7:328.
   Google Scholar
• Moxey PW, Hofman D, Hinchliffe RJ, et al. Epidemiological study of lower limb amputation in England between 2003 and 2008. Br J Surg. 2010;97(9):1348–1353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott NW, Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, et al. A simulation study provided sample size guidance for differential item functioning (DIF) studies using short scales. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(3):288–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belzak WCM. Testing differential item functioning in small samples. Multivariate Behav Res. 2020;55(5):722–747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soloukey S, Harhangi B, Prins AW, et al. Diagnosing embodiment should become part of our repertoire: a response to “it’s not a part of me, but it is what it is”: the struggle of becoming en-wheeled after spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43(17):2530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar