Psychometric properties of the Fonseca Anamnestic Index (FAI) for temporomandibular disorders: Turkish version, responsiveness, reliability, and validity study

References

• De Leeuw R, Klasser GD. Diagnosis and management of TMDs. Orofacial pain: guidelines for assessment, diagnosis, and management. 4th ed. Chicago, USA: quintessence; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Talmaceanu D, Lenghel LM, Bolog N, et al. Imaging modalities for temporomandibular joint disorders: an update. Clujul Med. 2018;91(3):280–287.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord. 1992;6:301–355.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, et al. Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) for clinical and research applications: recommendations of the international RDC/TMD consortium network and orofacial pain special interest group. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014;28(1):6–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace C, Klineberg IJ. Management of craniomandibular disorders. Part 1: a craniocervical dysfunction index. J Orofac Pain. 1993;7(1):83–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stegenga B, de Bont LG, de Leeuw R, et al. Assessment of mandibular function impairment associated with temporomandibular joint osteoarthrosis and internal derangement. J Orofac Pain. 1993;7(2):183–195.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fonseca D, Bonfante G, Valle A, et al. Diagnosis of craniomandibular dysfunction through anamnesis. Rev Gaúcha Odontol. 1994;42(1):23–28.
   Google Scholar
• Aggarwal VR, Lunt M, Zakrzewska JM, et al. Development and validation of the Manchester orofacial pain disability scale. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2005;33(2):141–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohrbach R, Larsson P, List T. The jaw functional limitation scale: development, reliability, and validity of 8-item and 20-item versions. J Orofac Pain. 2008;22(3):219–230.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Visscher CM, Ohrbach R, Wijk A, et al. The tampa scale for kinesiophobia for temporomandibular disorders (TSK-TMD). Pain. 2010;150(3):492–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Touche R, Pardo-Montero J, Gil-Martinez A, et al. Craniofacial pain and disability inventory (CF-PDI): development and psychometric validation of a new questionnaire. Pain Phys. 2014;17(1;17):95–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues-Bigaton D, de Castro EM, Pires PF. Factor and Rasch analysis of the Fonseca anamnestic index for the diagnosis of myogenous temporomandibular disorder. Braz J Phys Ther. 2017;21(2):120–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helkimo M. Studies on functional and dysfunction of the masticatory system II. Index for anamnestic and clinical dysfunction and occlusal state. Swed Dent J. 1974;67(2):101–121.
   Google Scholar
• Campos JADB, Carrascosa AC, Bonafé FSS, et al. Severity of temporomandibular disorders in women: validity and reliability of the Fonseca anamnestic ındex. Braz Oral Res. 2014;28(1):16–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang MJ, Yap AUJ, Lei J, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the fonseca anamnestic index for temporomandibular disorders. J Oral Rehabil. 2020;47(3):313–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alyessary AS, Yap AU, Almousawi A. The Arabic Fonseca anamnestic ındex: psychometric properties and use for screening temporomandibular disorders in prospective orthodontic patients (online ahead of print). CRANIO. 2020;:1–8. DOI: 10.1080/08869634.2020.1827627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Torrelo CM, Zagalaz-Anula N, Alonso-Royo R, et al. Transcultural adaptation and validation of the Fonseca anamnestic index in a Spanish population with temporomandibular disorders. JCM. 2020;9(10):3230.
   Google Scholar
• Yap AU, Marpaung C, Gunardi I. Psychometric properties of the Indonesian Fonseca anamnestic index and the presence/severity of temporomandibular disorders among Indonesian young adults (online ahead of print). CRANIO®. 2021;:1–8. DOI:10.1080/08869634.2021.1999615
   Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for the measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truelove E, Pan W, Look JO, et al. The research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. III: validity of axis I diagnoses. J Orofac Pain. 2010;24(1):35–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Look JO, Schiffman EL, Truelove EL, et al. Reliability and validity of axis I of the research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD) with proposed revisions. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37(10):744–759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan J, Akhter R, Hassan N, et al. Epidemiology of temporomandibular disorder in the general population: a systematic review. ADOH. 2019;10(3):555787.
   Google Scholar
• Campos JADB, Gonçalves DAG, Camparis CM, et al. Reliability of a questionnaire for diagnosing the severity of temporomandibular disorder. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2009;13(1):38–43.
   Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–3191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greghi SM, Dos Santos Aguiar A, Bataglion C, et al. Brazilian Portuguese version of the craniofacial pain and disability inventory: cross-cultural reliability, internal consistency, and construct and structural validity. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2018;32(4):389–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrar JT, Young JP, JrLaMoreaux L, et al. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001;94(2):149–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arikan H, Citaker S, Ucok C. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the craniofacial pain and disability ınventory (CF-PDI/T) for individuals with temporomandibular disorders. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;45(3):523–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayin YY, Akyolcu N. Comparison of pain scale preferences and pain intensity according to pain scales among Turkish patients: a descriptive study. Pain Manag Nurs. 2014; 45(3):15(1):156–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikmen PY, Bozdag M, Gunes M, et al. Reliability and validity of Turkish version of headache ımpact test (HIT-6) in patients with migraine. Arch Neuropsychiatry. 2020;58(4):300–307.
   Google Scholar
• Aslan E, Karaduman A, Yakut Y, et al. The cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of neck disability index in patients with neck pain: a Turkish version study. Spine. 2008;33(11):E362–E365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilcin N, Gurpinar B, Bayraktar D, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish version of the pain catastrophizing scale among patients with ankylosing spondylitis. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28(1):298–303.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Portney LG. Foundations of clinical research: applications to evidence-based practice. Philadelphia, USA: FA Davis; 2020.
   Google Scholar