From concept to practice: a scoping review of the application of AI to aphasia diagnosis and management

References

• Pedersen PM, Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, et al. Aphasia in acute stroke: incidence, determinants, and recovery. Ann Neurol. 1995;38(4):659–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie N, Cherney LR. Aphasia in North America: highlights of a white paper. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(10):e117.
   Google Scholar
• Code C, Herrmann M. The relevance of emotional and psychosocial factors in aphasia to rehabilitation. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2003;13(1-2):109–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahim S, Barer D, Nouri F. Affective illness after stroke. Br J Psychiatry. 1987;151:52–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelter ST, Gostynski M, Papa S, et al. Epidemiology of aphasia attributable to first ischemic stroke: incidence, severity, fluency, etiology, and thrombolysis. Stroke. 2006;37(6):1379–1384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gainotti G. Emotional, psychological and psychosocial problems of aphasic patients: an introduction. Aphasiology. 1997;11(7):635–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laska AC, Hellblom A, Murray V, et al. Aphasia in acute stroke and relation to outcome. J Intern Med. 2001;249(5):413–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Pratesi L, et al. Functional outcome in stroke inpatient rehabilitation: predicting no, low and high response patients. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1998;8(4):228–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilling K, Sterne JAC, Rudd AG, et al. A new method for predicting recovery after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32(12):2867–2873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis C, Simpson AN, Bonilha H, et al. The one-year attributable cost of post stroke aphasia. Stroke. 2012;43(5):1429–1431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Gaag A, Brooks R. Economic aspects of a therapy and support service for people with long-term stroke and aphasia. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2008;43(3):233–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose M, Ferguson A, Power E, et al. Aphasia rehabilitation in Australia: current practices, challenges and future directions. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014;16(2):169–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repetto C, Paolillo MP, Tuena C, et al. Innovative technology-based interventions in aphasia rehabilitation: a systematic review. Aphasiology. 2021;35(12):1623–1646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weidner K, Lowman J. Telepractice for adult speech-language pathology services: a systematic review. Perspect ASHA SIGs. 2020;5(1):326–338.
   Google Scholar
• Nichol L, Hill AJ, Wallace SJ, et al. Self-management of aphasia: a scoping review. Aphasiology. 2019;33(8):903–942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichol L, Pitt R, Wallace SJ, et al. “There are endless areas that they can use it for”: speech-language pathologist perspectives of technology support for aphasia self-management. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022;0:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan N, Deutsch A. Why and how to demonstrate the value of rehabilitation services. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022;103(7S):S172–S177.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harvey SR, Carragher M, Dickey MW, et al. Treatment dose in post-stroke aphasia: a systematic scoping review. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2021;31(10):1629–1660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watila MM, Balarabe B. Factors predicting post-stroke aphasia recovery. J Neurol Sci. 2015;352:12–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• What is Power BI | Microsoft Power BI. What is Power BI | Microsoft Power BI; 2022. Available from: https://powerbi.microsoft.com/en-us/what-is-power-bi/.
   Google Scholar
• An efficient deep learning based method for speech assessment of Mandarin-speaking aphasic patients | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore; 2022. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9146149.
   Google Scholar
• Qin Y, Lee T, Feng S, et al. Automatic speech assessment for people with aphasia using TDNN-BLSTM with multi-task learning. Interspeech. 2018. DOI:10.21437/Interspeech.2018-1630
   Google Scholar
• Fraser KC, Meltzer JA, Graham NL, et al. Automated classification of primary progressive aphasia subtypes from narrative speech transcripts. Cortex. 2014;55:43–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin Y, Wu Y, Lee T, et al. An end-to-End approach to automatic speech assessment for Cantonese-speaking people with aphasia. J Sign Process Syst. 2020;92(8):819–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasemann U, Peñaloza C, Dekhtyar M, et al. Predicting language treatment response in bilingual aphasia using neural network-based patient models. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):10497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbera DS, Huckvale M, Fleming V, et al. NUVA: a naming utterance verifier for aphasia treatment. Comput Speech Lang. 2021;69:101221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aishwarya J, Kundapur PP, Kumar S, et al. Kannada speech recognition system for aphasic people. In: 2018 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), Bangalore, India. 2018. p. 1753–1756.
   Google Scholar
• Le D, Licata K, Mercado E, et al. Automatic analysis of speech quality for aphasia treatment. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Florence, Italy. 2014. p. 4853–4857.
   Google Scholar
• Egaji O, Asghar I, Griffiths M, et al. Digital speech therapy for the aphasia patients: challenges, opportunities and solutions. 2019. p. 85–88.
   Google Scholar
• Gu Y, Bahrani M, Billot A, et al. A machine learning approach for predicting post-stroke aphasia recovery: a pilot study. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments [Internet]. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2020. p. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Hm G. Studies in artificial aphasia: experiments in processing change. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1986;22(1):43–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright JF, Ahmad K. The connectionist simulation of aphasic naming. Brain Lang. 1997;59(2):367–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaghan P, Shillcock R. Connectionist modelling of the separable processing of consonants and vowels. Brain Lang. 2003;86(1):83–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jrvelin A, Juhola M, Laine M. Applying machine learning methods to aphasic data: academic dissertation. Tampere: department of Computer Sciences, University of Tampere; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Westermann G, Ruh N. A neuroconstructivist model of past tense development and processing. Psychol Rev. 2012;119(3):649–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvelin A, Juhola M, Laine M. A neural network model for the simulation of word production errors of finnish nouns. Int J Neural Syst. 2006;16(4):241–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigley HM, Duffy JR. The contriubtion of clinical intelligence and artificial aphasiology to clinical aphasiology and artificial intelligence. In: Clinical Aphasiology: Proceedings of the Conference, BRK Publishers; 1982. p. 170–177.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Kimberg DY, Coslett HB, et al. Multivariate lesion-symptom mapping using support vector regression. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014;35(12):5861–5876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinelli EG, Mandelli ML, Miller ZA, et al. Typical and atypical pathology in primary progressive aphasia variants. Ann Neurol. 2017;81(3):430–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan B, Zhang N, Yan J, et al. Resting-state functional connectivity predicts individual language impairment of patients with left hemispheric gliomas involving language network. Neuroimage Clin. 2019;24:102023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristinsson S, Zhang W, Rorden C, et al. Machine learning-based multimodal prediction of language outcomes in chronic aphasia. Hum Brain Mapp. 2021;42(6):1682–1698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matias-Guiu JA, Díaz-Álvarez J, Cuetos F, et al. Machine learning in the clinical and language characterisation of primary progressive aphasia variants. Cortex. 2019;119:312–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Álvarez JD, Matias-Guiu JA, Cabrera-Martín MN, et al. An application of machine learning with feature selection to improve diagnosis and classification of neurodegenerative disorders. BMC Bioinf. 2019;20(1):491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landrigan J-F, Zhang F, Mirman D. A data-driven approach to post-stroke aphasia classification and lesion-based prediction. Brain. 2021;144(5):1372–1383.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kulkarni P, Duffy O, Synnott J, et al. Speech and language practitioners’ experiences of commercially available voice-assisted technology: web-based survey study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022;9(1):e29249.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seghier ML, Patel E, Prejawa S, et al. The PLORAS database: a data repository for predicting language outcome and recovery after stroke. NeuroImage. 2016;124(Pt B):1208–1212.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Code C, Petheram B. Delivering for aphasia. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011;13(1):3–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constant therapy’s neuroperformance engine. Constant Therapy Health; 2022. Available from: https://constanttherapyhealth.com/science/technology/
   Google Scholar
• Dadgar-Kiani E, Anantha V. Continuously-encoded deep recurrent networks for interpretable knowledge tracing in Speech-Language and cognitive therapy. medRxiv; 2020;2020-11. DOI:10.1101/2020.11.08.20206755
   Google Scholar
• Katz RC. Intelligent computerized treatment or artificial aphasia therapy? Aphasiology. 1990;4(6):621–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menahemi-Falkov M, Breitenstein C, Pierce JE, et al. A systematic review of maintenance following intensive therapy programs in chronic post-stroke aphasia: importance of individual response analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(20):5811–5826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Introducing ChatGPT [Internet]; 2023. Available from: https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt.
   Google Scholar
• Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, et al. Attention is all you need. arXiv; 2017. http://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762.
   Google Scholar
• Nichol L, Wallace SJ, Pitt R, et al. People with aphasia share their views on self-management and the role of technology to support self-management of aphasia. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;0:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Kauhanen ML, Korpelainen JT, Hiltunen P, et al. Aphasia, depression, and non-verbal cognitive impairment in ischaemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2000;10(6):455–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie S, Laures-Gore J, Moore E, et al. Identification of affective state change in adults with aphasia using speech acoustics. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018;61(12):2906–2916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adikari A, Gamage G, de Silva D, et al. A self-structuring artificial intelligence framework for deep emotions modeling and analysis on the social web. Future Gener Comput Syst. 2021;116:302–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashaie SA, Cherney LR. Eye tracking as a tool to identify mood in aphasia: a feasibility study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2020;34(5):463–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rožanec JM, Novalija I, Zajec P, et al. Human-centric artificial intelligence architecture for industry 5.0 applications. arXiv; 2022. http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.10794.
   Google Scholar
• Hassani H, Huang X, MacFeely S. Impactful digital twin in the healthcare revolution. BDCC. 2022;6(3):83.
   Google Scholar
• Menger F, Morris J, Salis C. Aphasia in an internet age: wider perspectives on digital inclusion. Aphasiology. 2016;30:112–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galliers J, Wilson S, Roper A, et al. Words are not enough: empowering people with aphasia in the design process. In: Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference Research Papers, Vol 1. 2012; New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. p. 51–60.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson S, Roper A, Marshall J, et al. Codesign for people with aphasia through tangible design languages. CoDesign. 2015;11(1):21–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar