Delivery of a quality improvement program in team-based rehabilitation for patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: a mixed methods study

References

• Cieza A, Causey K, Kamenov K, et al. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the global burden of disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet. 2021;396(10267):2006–2017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer T, Gutenbrunner C, Bickenbach J, et al. Towards a conceptual description of rehabilitation as a health strategy. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43(9):765–769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimigliano F, Negrini S. The world health organization rehabilitation 2030: a call for action. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;53(2):155–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade D. Rehabilitation-a new approach. Overview and part one: the problems. Clin Rehabil. 2015;29(11):1041–1050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwegian Directorate of Health. Clarification of responsibilities and tasks sharing between municipalities and the specialist health care in the rehabilitation area; no. IS -947. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian Directorate of Health, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Auditor General. The Office of the Auditor General’s investigation into rehabilitation in the health service. Document 3: 11(2011–2012). Norway: Office of the Auditor General; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Mainz J. Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvement. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003;15(6):523–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA. 1988;260(12):1743–1748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jesus TS, Hoenig H. Postacute rehabilitation quality of care: toward a shared conceptual framework. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(5):960–969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen I, Klokkerud M, Anke A, et al. A quality indicator set for use in rehabilitation team care of people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases; development and pilot testing. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):265.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu LH, Choden S, Yazdany J. Quality improvement initiatives in rheumatology: an integrative review of the last 5 years. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2019;31(2):98–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verburg AC, van Dulmen SA, Kiers H, et al. Patient-reported outcome-based quality indicators in Dutch primary care physical therapy for patients with nonspecific low back pain: a cohort study. Phys Ther. 2021;101(8):pzab118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker M, Breuing J, Nothacker M, et al. Guideline-based quality indicators-a systematic comparison of German and international clinical practice guidelines: protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2018;7(1):5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hagen KB, Smedslund G, Østerås N, et al. Quality of community-based osteoarthritis care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis Care Res. 2016;68(10):1443–1452. Oct
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmood S, van Oosterhout M, de Jong S, et al. Evaluating quality of care in rheumatoid arthritis: the patient perspective. RMD Open. 2017;3(1):e000411.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rademakers J, Delnoij D, de Boer D. Structure, process or outcome: which contributes most to patients’ overall assessment of healthcare quality? BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(4):326–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitaels D, Vankrunkelsven P, Grypdonck L, et al. Quality of care for knee osteoarthritis in primary care: a patient’s perspective. Arthritis Care Res. 2020;72(10):1358–1366. Oct
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toomey E, Matthews J, Hurley DA. Using mixed methods to assess fidelity of delivery and its influencing factors in a complex self-management intervention for people with osteoarthritis and low back pain. BMJ Open. 2017;7(8):​e015452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Los Angeles: Sage; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• US National Library of Medicine. 2017. The BRIDGE Rehabilitation Trial (BRIDGE) [cited 2020 Mar 20]. Available from: https://beta.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03102814?distance=50&term=the%20BRIDGE%20rehabilitation%20study&rank=1
   Google Scholar
• Berdal G, Sand-Svartrud AL, Linge AD, et al. Bridging gaps across levels of care in rehabiliation of patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: results from a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2023. Epub ahead of print. DOI:10.1177/02692155231153341
   Google Scholar
• Sand-Svartrud AL, Berdal G, Azimi M, et al. A quality indicator set for rehabilitation services for people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases demonstrates adequate responsiveness in a pre-post evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sand-Svartrud A-L, Berdal G, Azimi M, et al. Associations between quality of health care and clinical outcomes in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: a rehabilitation cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23(1):357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liamputtong P. 2011. Focus group methodology: principles and practice. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qual Res Psychol. 2021;18(3):328–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thirsk LM, Clark AM. Using qualitative research for complex interventions: the contributions of hermeneutics. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16(1):160940691772106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan HC, Provost LP, Froehle CM, et al. The model for understanding success in quality (MUSIQ): building a theory of context in healthcare quality improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(1):13–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of health care interventions: a theoretical framework and proposed research agenda. Br J Health Psychol. 2018;23(3):519–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles E, Anderson J, Maxwell M, et al. The influence of contextual factors on healthcare quality improvement initiatives: a realist review. Syst Rev. 2020;9(1):94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scobbie L, McLean D, Dixon D, et al. Implementing a framework for goal setting in community based stroke rehabilitation: a process evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallis M, Lee-Baggley D, Sampalli T, et al. Equipping providers with principles, knowledge and skills to successfully integrate behaviour change counselling into practice: a primary healthcare framework. Public Health. 2018;154:70–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scobbie L, Dixon D, Wyke S. Goal setting and action planning in the rehabilitation setting: development of a theoretically informed practice framework. Clin Rehabil. 2011;25(5):468–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scobbie L, Duncan EAS, Brady MC, et al. Facilitators and “deal breakers”: a mixed methods study investigating implementation of the goal setting and action planning (G-AP) framework in community rehabilitation teams. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Been-Dahmen JM, Walter MJ, Dwarswaard J, et al. What support is needed to self-manage a rheumatic disorder: a qualitative study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fairley JL, Seneviwickrama M, Yeh S, et al. Person-centred care in osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis: a scoping review of people’s needs outside of healthcare. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi-Lun-Chiao A, Chehata M, Broeker K, et al. Patients’ perceptions with musculoskeletal disorders regarding their experience with healthcare providers and health services: an overview of reviews. Arch Physiother. 2020;10:17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valaas HL, Klokkerud M, Hildeskår J, et al. Follow-up care and adherence to self-management activities in rehabilitation for patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: results from a multicenter cohort study. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44:8001–8010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergström M, Larsson Ranada Å, Sverker A, et al. A dyadic exploration of support in everyday life of persons with RA and their significant others. Scand J Occup Ther. 2021:1–12. Epub ahead of print. DOI:10.1080/11038128.2021.2007997
   Google Scholar
• Bergström M, Sverker A, Larsson Ranada Å, et al. Significant others’ influence on participation in everyday life–the perspectives of persons with early diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(3):385–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantoja T, Grimshaw JM, Colomer N, et al. Manually-generated reminders delivered on paper: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;12(12):CD001174.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arditi C, Rège-Walther M, Durieux P, et al. Computer-generated reminders delivered on paper to healthcare professionals: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;7(7):CD001175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar