Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the quality of life assessment in spina bifida for children (QUALAS-C-K)

References

• Copp AJ, Adzick NS, Chitty LS, et al. Spina bifida. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015;1:15007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawin KJ, Liu T, Ward E, et al. The national spina bifida patient registry: profile of a large cohort of participants from the first 10 clinics. J Pediatr. 2015;166(2):444–450.e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawin KJ, Brei TJ, Houtrow AJ. Quality of life: guidelines for the care of people with spina bifida. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2020;13(4):565–582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips LA, Burton JM, Evans SH. Spina bifida management. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2017;47(7):173–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi EK, Im YJ, Han SW. Bowel management and quality of life in children with spina bifida in South Korea. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2017;40(3):208–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fremion E, Madey R, Staggers KA, et al. Factors associated with self-management independence and quality of life for adolescents and young adults with spina bifida engaged in a guideline-based transition clinic. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2021;14(4):631–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szymanski KM, Cain MP, Whittam B, et al. Incontinence affects health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with spina bifida. J Pediatr Urol. 2018;14:279.e271–279.e278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churruca K, Pomare C, Ellis LA, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): a review of generic and condition-specific measures and a discussion of trends and issues. Health Expect. 2021;24(4):1015–1024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakaniene I, Prasauskiene A, Vaiciene-Magistris N. Health-related quality of life in children with myelomeningocele: a systematic review of the literature. Child Care Health Dev. 2016;42(5):625–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rofail D, Maguire L, Kissner M, et al. Health-related quality of life is compromised in individuals with spina bifida: results from qualitative and quantitative studies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;181:214–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cremeens J, Eiser C, Blades M. Factors influencing agreement between child self-report and parent proxy-reports on the pediatric quality of life inventory 4.0 (PedsQL) generic core scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanna D, Khadka J, Mpundu-Kaambwa C, et al. Are we agreed? Self- versus proxy-reporting of paediatric health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using generic preference-based measures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pharmacoeconomics. 2022;40(11):1043–1067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi EK, Jung E, Ji Y, et al. A 2-Step integrative education program and mHealth for self-management in Korean children with spina bifida: feasibility study. J Pediatr Nurs. 2019;49:e54–e62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan LR, Sawin KJ, Bellin MH, et al. Self-management and independence guidelines for the care of people with spina bifida. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2020;13(4):583–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawin KJ, Margolis RHF, Ridosh MM, et al. Self-management and spina bifida: a systematic review of the literature. Disabil Health J. 2021;14(1):100940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun HJ, Choi EK, Han SW. Parents’ perception of self-management behaviors for their children with spina bifida in South Korea: a qualitative study. Rehabil Nurs. 2021;46(2):73–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim SW, Lee HE, Davis M, et al. Perceived barriers and difficulties of intermittent catheterization: in Korean patients with spinal dysraphism and their parents. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35(3):395–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay S. A qualitative synthesis of adolescents’ experiences of living with spina bifida. Qual Health Res. 2014;24(9):1298–1309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szymanski KM, Misseri R, Whittam B, et al. Quality of life assessment in spina bifida for children (QUALAS-C): development and validation of a novel health-related quality of life instrument. Urology. 2016;87:178–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawahara T, Sugita Y, Momose H, et al. Development and validation of the Japanese version of quality of life assessment of spina bifida in children (QUALAS-C-J). Pediatr Int. 2021;63(4):423–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pompermaier J, Andrade MC, Cruz MLD, et al. Translation and validation of the Brazilian version of the "quality of life assessment in spina bifida" questionnaire for children and teenagers. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2021;39:e2019312.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang SH, Ji Y, Lee YS, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean modified version of the QUAlity of life assessment in spina bifida for young adults (QAULAS-YA-Km). Disabil Rehabil. 2022;8:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Choi EK, Ji Y, Han SW. Sexual function and quality of life in young men with spina bifida: could it be neglected aspects in clinical practice? Urology. 2017;108:225–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi EK, Kim SW, Ji Y, et al. Sexual function and qualify of life in women with spina bifida: are the women with spina bifida satisfied with their sexual activity? Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(5):1785–1793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravens-Sieberer U, Auquier P, Erhart M, et al. The KIDSCREEN-27 quality of life measure for children and adolescents: psychometric results from a cross-cultural survey in 13 European countries. Qual Life Res. 2007;16(8):1347–1356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong SD, Yang JW, Jang WS, et al. The KIDSCREEN-52 quality of life measure for children and adolescents (KIDSCREEN-52-HRQOL): reliability and validity of the Korean version. J Korean Med Sci. 2007;22(3):446–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy JJ, Zechmeister EB, Zechmeister JS. Research methods in psychology. Dubuque: Mcgraw-Hill Education; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Vispoel WP, Boo J, Bleiler T. Computerized and paper-and-pencil versions of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale: a comparison of psychometric features and respondent preferences. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2001;61(3):461–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikman A, WRneryd B. Measurement errors in survey questions: explaining response variability. Social Indic Res. 1990;22(2):199–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Wang M, Tynjälä J, et al. Test-retest reliability of selected items of health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) survey questionnaire in Beijing, China. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller PH, Baxter SD, Hitchcock DB, et al. Test-retest reliability of a short form of the children’s social desirability scale for nutrition and health-related research. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014;46(5):423–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mundfrom DJ, Shaw DG, Ke TL. Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. International Journal of Testing. 2005;5(2):159–168.
   Google Scholar
• Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally J, Jum N, Bernstein IH, et al. Psychometric theory. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill Companies, Incorporated; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF. Multivariate data analysis with readings. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling., 3rd ed. Guilford Publications; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, et al. Statistical power analyses using GPower 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(4):1149–1160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jj S. Statistical analysis method on SPSS/AMOS. 2nd ed. Paju: 21 Century Book Publisher; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser HF. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika. 1974;39(1):31–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szymański KM, Misseri R, Whittam B, et al. Validation of QUALAS-T, a health-related quality of life instrument for teenagers with spina bifida. Cent European J Urol. 2017;70:306–313.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar