Assessing engagement in rehabilitation: development, validity, reliability, and responsiveness to change of the Rehabilitation Observation Measure of Engagement (ROME)

References

• Novak I, Morgan C, Fahey M, et al. State of the evidence traffic lights 2019: systematic review of interventions for preventing and treating children with cerebral palsy. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2020;20(2). Doi:10.1007/s11910-020-1022-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleyenheuft Y, Dricot L, Gilis N, et al. Capturing neuroplastic changes after bimanual intensive rehabilitation in children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy: a combined DTI, TMS and fMRI pilot study. Res Dev Disabil. 2015;43-44:136–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakzewski L, Ziviani J, Abbott DF, et al. Randomized trial of constraint-induced movement therapy and bimanual training on activity outcomes for children with congenital hemiplegia. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(4):313–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friel KM, Ferre CL, Brandao M, et al. Improvements in upper extremity function following intensive training are independent of corticospinal tract organization in children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy: a clinical randomized trial. Front Neurol. 2021;12:660780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandão M, Gordon AM, Mancini MC. Functional impact of constraint therapy and bimanual training in children with cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Occup Ther. 2012;66(6):672–681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon AM, Hung Y-C, Brandao M, et al. Bimanual training and constraint-induced movement therapy in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a randomized trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25(8):692–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferre CL, Gordon AM. Coaction of individual and environmental factors: a review of intensive therapy paradigms for children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017;59(11):1139–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harbourne RT, Dusing SC, Lobo MA, et al. START-play physical therapy intervention impacts motor and cognitive outcomes in infants with neuromotor disorders: a multisite randomized clinical trial. Physical Therapy. 2021;101(2). DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan C, Novak I, Dale RC, et al. GAME (goals - activity - motor enrichment): protocol of a single blind randomised controlled trial of motor training, parent education and environmental enrichment for infants at high risk of cerebral palsy. BMC Neurol. 2014;14(1). DOI: 10.1186/s12883-014-0203-2
   Google Scholar
• Li Y, Bebiroglu N, Phelps E, et al. Out-of-school time activity participation, school engagement and positive youth development: findings from the 4-H study of positive youth development. JYD. 2008;3(3):22.
   Google Scholar
• Lee J. The relationship between student engagement and academic performance: is it a myth or reality? JEduc Res. 2014;107(3):177–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirin SR, Rogers-Sirin L. Components of school engagement among African American adolescents. Appl Dev Sci. 2005;9(1):5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Bright FA, Kayes NM, Worrall L, et al. A conceptual review of engagement in healthcare and rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(8):643–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschuren O, Wiart L, Hermans D, et al. Identification of facilitators and barriers to physical activity in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr. 2012;161(3):488–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2001. International classification of functioning, disability, and health: ICF. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42407
   Google Scholar
• Imms C, Granlund M, Wilson PH, et al. Participation, both a means and an end: a conceptual analysis of processes and outcomes in childhood disability. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017;59(1):16–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner EA, Kindermann TA, Furrer CJ. A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection. EducPsychol Meas. 2009;69(3):493–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G, Chiarello LA, Thompson L, et al. Development of an observational measure of therapy engagement for pediatric rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(1):86–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viruet H, Sobeih TM, Daraiseh N, et al. Questionnaires vs observational and direct measurements: a systematic review. Theor Issues Ergon Sci. 2006;7(3):261–284.
   Google Scholar
• Einola K, Alvesson M. Behind the numbers: questioning questionnaires. JManag Inq. 2021;30(1):102–114.
   Google Scholar
• Olswang LB, Bain B. Data collection. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1994;3(3):55–66.
   Google Scholar
• McWilliam RA, De Kruif REL. 1998. E-Qual III: Children’s engagement codes. Chapel Hill, NC: Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Kishida Y, Kemp C, Carter M. Revision and validation of the individual child engagement record: a practitioner-friendly measure of learning opportunities for children with disabilities in early childhood settings. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2008;33(2):158–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datavyu Team. 2014. Datavyu: A Video Coding Tool. Welcome! ǁ Datavyu: Video coding and data visualization tool. https://datavyu.org.
   Google Scholar
• Dancey CP, Reidy J. 2017. Statistics without maths for psychology. London: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med. 2012;22(3):276–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folk CL, Ester EF, Troemel K. How to keep attention from straying: get engaged!. Psychon Bull Rev. 2009;16(1):127–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan F, Hafner VV. The challenges of joint attention. IS. 2006;7(2):135–169.
   Google Scholar
• Ruble LA, Robson DM. Individual and environmental determinants of engagement in autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2007;37(8):1457–1468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kortte KB, Falk LD, Castillo RC, et al. The hopkins rehabilitation engagement rating scale: development and psychometric properties. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(7):877–884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretherton I. 1991. The roots and growing points of attachment theory. In C. M. Parkes, J. Stevenson-Hinde, & P. Marris (Eds.), Attachment across the life cycle. (pp. 9–32. Tavistock/Routledge, New York.
   Google Scholar
  Charles JR, Wolf SL, Schneider JA, et al. Efficacy of a child-friendly form of constraint-induced movement therapy in hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a randomized control trial. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;48(8):635–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottema-Beutel K, Yoder PJ, Hochman JM, et al. The role of supported joint engagement and parent utterances in language and social communication development in children with autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2014;44(9):2162–2174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghanouni P, Jarus T, Zwicker JG, et al. Perceived barriers and existing challenges in participation of children with autism spectrum disorders: “He did not understand and no one else seemed to understand him. J Autism Dev Disord. 2019;49(8):3136–3145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritoša A, Danielsson H, Sjöman M, et al. Assessing school engagement – adaptation and validation of “engagement versus disaffection with learning: teacher report” in the Swedish educational context. Front. Educ. 2020;5. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2020.521972
   Google Scholar
• Marsh AA, Elfenbein HA, Ambady N. Nonverbal “accents”: cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. Psychol Sci. 2003;14(4):373–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar