Exploring farmers’ perspectives on collective action: a case study on co-operation in Dutch agri-environment schemes

References

• Ahnström, Johan, Jenny Höckert, Hanna L. Bergea, Charles A. Francis, Peter Skelton, and Lars Hallgren. 2008. “Farmers and Nature Conservation: What is Known about Attitudes, Context Factors and Actions Affecting Conservation?” Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 24 (1): 38–47. doi:10.1017/S1742170508002391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barghusen, Rena, Claudia Sattler, Richard Berner, and Bettina Matzdorf. 2022. “More than Spatial Co-ordination: How Dutch Agricultural Collectives Foster Social Capital for Effective Governance of Agri-Environmental Measures.” Journal of Rural Studies 96: 246–258. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.10.023.
   Google Scholar
• Barghusen, Rena, Claudia Sattler, Lisa Deijl, Carleen Weebers, and Bettina Matzdorf. 2021. “Motivations of Farmers to Participate in Collective Agri-Environmental Schemes: The Case of Dutch Agricultural Collectives.” Ecosystems and People 17 (1): 539–555. doi:10.1080/26395916.2021.1979098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulton, Alan, Richard Lockett, and Tony Seymour. 2013. A Review and Evaluation of Collaborative Landscape-Scale Management Initiatives. Stirling Scottish Natural Heritage.
   Google Scholar
• Bredemeier, Birte, Sylvia Herrmann, Claudia Sattler, Katrin Prager, Lenny G. van Bussel, and Julia Rex. 2022. “Insights into Innovative Contract Design to Improve the Integration of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Agricultural Management.” Ecosystem Services 55: 101430. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, Steven R. 1980. Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, Rob J., Carmen Kuczera, and Gerald Schwarz. 2008. “Exploring Farmers’ Cultural Resistance to Voluntary Agri-Environmental Schemes.” European Society for Rural Sociology 48 (1): 16–37. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00452.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, Rob J., and Upananda H. Paragahawewa. 2011. “Creating Culturally Sustainable Agri-Environmental Schemes.” Journal of Rural Studies 27 (1): 95–104. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, Robert B., Carl A. Kallgren, and Raymond R. Reno. 1991. “A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A Theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human Behavior.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 24: 201–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen, Paula, Mary Ryan, Cathal O’Donoghue, Stephen Hynes, Daire Ó. Uallacháin, and Helen Sheridan. 2020. “Impact of Farmer Self-Identity and Attitudes on Participation in Agri-Environment Schemes.” Land Use Policy 95: 104660. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Krom, Michiel P. M. M. 2017. “Farmer Participation in Agri-Environmental Schemes: Regionalisation and the Role of Bridging Social Capital.” Land Use Policy 60: 352–361. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, Jasper R., Eva van der Zee, Raoul Beunen, Rianne Kat, and Peter H. Feindt. 2019. “Trusting the People and the System. The Interrelation between Interpersonal and Institutional Trust in Collective Action for Agri-Environmental Management.” Sustainability 11 (24): 7022. doi:10.3390/su11247022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedeurwaerdere, Tom., Jeroen Admiraal, Almut Beringer, Flavia Bonaiuto, Lavinia Cicero, Paula Fernandez-Wulff, Janneke Hagens, et al. 2016. “Combining Internal and External Motivations in Multi-Actor Governance Arrangements for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.” Environmental Science & Policy 58: 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defrancesco, Edi., Paola Gatto, Ford Runge, and Samuele Trestini. 2008. “Factors Affecting Farmers? Participation in Agri-Environmental Measures: A Northern Italian Perspective.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 59 (1): 114–131. doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.2007.00134.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodsworth, Jennifer, Celine Dutilly, Simon Guéde, and Katrin Prager. 2020. “Complexities in Collective Approaches: Traditional Management and Agri-Environmental Contracting in the Pyrénées (France) And Northwest England (UK).” https://www.project-contracts20.eu/reports-publications/.
   Google Scholar
• Emery, Steven B. 2015. “Independence and Individualism: Conflated Values in Farmer Co-operation?” Agriculture and Human Values 32 (1): 47–61. doi:10.1007/s10460-014-9520-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emery, Steven B., and Jeremy R. Franks. 2012. “The Potential for Collaborative Agri-Environment Schemes in England: Can a Well-Designed Collaborative Approach Address Farmers’ Concerns with Current Schemes?” Journal of Rural Studies 28 (3): 218–231. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franks, Jeremy R. 2011. “The Collective Provision of Environmental Goods: A Discussion of Contractual Issues.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 54 (5): 637–660. doi:10.1080/09640568.2010.526380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franks, Jeremy R., and A. McGloin. 2007. “Joint Submissions, Output Related Payments and Environmental Co-operatives: Can the Dutch Experience Innovate UK Agri-Environment Policy?” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 50 (2): 233–256. doi:10.1080/09640560601156482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franks, Jeremy R., Steven, B. Emery, M. J. Whittingham, and Ailsa J. McKenzie. 2016. “Farmer Attitudes to Cross-Holding Agri-Environment Schemes and Their Implications for Countryside Stewardship.” International Journal of Agricultural Management 5 (4): 78–95.
   Google Scholar
• Greiner, Romy. 2015. “Motivations and Attitudes Influence Farmers’ Willingness to Participate in Biodiversity Conservation Contracts.” Agricultural Systems 137: 154–165. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2015.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häfner, Kati, and Annette Piorr. 2021. “Farmers’ Perception of Co-ordinating Institutions in Agri-Environmental Measures: The Example of Peatland Management for the Provision of Public Goods on a Landscape Scale.” Land Use Policy 107: 104947. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howley, Peter, Cathal Buckley, Cathal O Donoghue, and Mary Ryan. 2015. “Explaining the Economic ‘Irrationality’ of Farmers’ Land Use Behaviour: The Role of Productivist Attitudes and Non-Pecuniary Benefits.” Ecological Economics 109: 186–193. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Naomi, Yiying Cao, Hannah Adamson, Liz Lewis-Reddy, Andrew Crowe, and Ben Hockridge. 2020. Facilitation Fund Phase 2 Evaluation: Final Report. Accessed November 09, 2020. http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Default.aspx?Menu=Menu&Module=More&Location=None&ProjectID=20130&FromSearch=Y&Publisher=1&SearchText=LM0479&SortString=ProjectCode&SortOrder=Asc&Paging=10#Description.
   Google Scholar
• Karali, Eleni, Beat Brunner, Ruth Doherty, Anna Hersperger, and Mark Rounsevell. 2014. “Identifying the Factors That Influence Farmer Participation in Environmental Management Practices in Switzerland.” Human Ecology 42 (6): 951–963. doi:10.1007/s10745-014-9701-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleijn, D., R. A. Baquero, Y. Clough, M. Díaz, J. de Esteban, F. Fernández, D. Gabriel, et al. 2006. “Mixed Biodiversity Benefits of Agri-Environment Schemes in Five European Countries.” Ecology Letters 9 (3): 243–254. discussion 2547. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00869.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhfuss, Laure, Raphaële Préget, Sophie Thoyer, and Nick Hanley. 2015. “Nudging Farmers to Enrol Land into Agri-Environmental Schemes: The Role of a Collective Bonus.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 43 (4): 609–636. doi:10.1093/erae/jbv031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lastra-Bravo, Xavier B., Carmen Hubbard, Guy Garrod, and Alfredo Tolón-Becerra. 2015. “What Drives Farmers’ Participation in EU Agri-Environmental Schemes? Results from a Qualitative Meta-Analysis.” Environmental Science & Policy 54: 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maybery, Darryl, Lin Crase, and Chris Gullifer. 2005. “Categorising Farming Values as Economic, Conservation and Lifestyle.” Journal of Economic Psychology 26 (1): 59–72. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2003.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie, Ailsa J., Steven B. Emery, Jeremy R. Franks, Mark J. Whittingham, and Jos Barlow. 2013. “Landscape-Scale Conservation: Collaborative Agri-Environment Schemes Could Benefit Both Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, but Will Farmers Be Willing to Participate?” Journal of Applied Ecology 50: 1274–1280. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, Jane, David Gibbon, Julie Ingram, Matt Reed, Christopher Short, and Janet Dwyer. 2011. “Organising Collective Action for Effective Environmental Management and Social Learning in Wales.” The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 17 (1): 69–83. doi:10.1080/1389224X.2011.536356.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, Chi., Uwe Latacz-Lohmann, Nick Hanley, Steven Schilizzi, and Sayed Iftekhar. 2022. “Spatial Co-ordination Incentives for Landscape-Scale Environmental Management: A Systematic Review.” Land Use Policy 114: 105936. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, Johanna, Bettina Matzdorf, Rena Barghusen, Christoph Schulze, and Bart van Gorcum. 2021. “Viewpoints on Co-operative Peatland Management: Expectations and Motives of Dutch Farmers.” Land 10 (12): 1326. doi:10.3390/land10121326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. Providing Agri-Environmental Public Goods through Collective Action. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Olivieri, Matteo, Maria Andreoli, Daniele Vergamini, and Fabio Bartolini. 2021. “Innovative Contract Solutions for the Provision of Agri-Environmental Climatic Public Goods: A Literature Review.” Sustainability 13 (12): 6936. doi:10.3390/su13126936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prager, Katrin. 2015. “Agri-Environmental Collaboratives for Landscape Management in Europe.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 12: 59–66. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2014.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prager, Katrin, Mark Reed, and Alister Scott. 2012. “Encouraging Collaboration for the Provision of Ecosystem Services at a Landscape Scale: Rethinking Agri-Environmental Payments.” Land Use Policy 29 (1): 244–249. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.06.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, Mark, Heather Sangster, Hugh Smith, Richard Chiverrell, and John Boyle. 2018. “Will Farmers Work Together for Conservation? The Potential Limits of Farmers’ Co-operation in Agri-Environment Measures.” Land Use Policy 70: 635–646. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runhaar, H. A. C., Dick, C. P. Melman, F. G. Boonstra, J. W. Erisman, L. G. Horlings, G. R. de Snoo, Termeer, C. J. A. M, et al. 2017. “Promoting Nature Conservation by Dutch Farmers: A Governance Perspective.” International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 15 (3): 264–281. doi:10.1080/14735903.2016.1232015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebert, Rosemarie, Mark Toogood, and Andrea Knierim. 2006. “Factors Affecting European Farmers’ Participation in Biodiversity Policies.” European Society for Rural Sociology 46 (4): 318–340. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00420.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock, Paul V., and Jérémie Forney. 2014. “Farmer Autonomy and the Farming Self.” Journal of Rural Studies 36: 160–171. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudau, Manuel, Enrico Celio, and Adrienne Grêt-Regamey. 2022. “Application of Q-Methodology for Identifying Factors of Acceptance of Spatial Planning Instruments.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/09640568.2022.2043259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, Lee-Ann, Doreen Gabriel, Laura Hathaway-Jenkins, Unai Pascual, Ulrich Schmutz, Dan Rigby, Richard Godwin, et al. 2012. “The ‘Neighbourhood Effect’: A Multidisciplinary Assessment of the Case for Farmer Co-ordination in Agri-Environmental Programmes.” Land Use Policy 29 (3): 502–512. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tafel, Leopold, Edward Ott, Mario Brillinger, Christoph Schulze, and Barbara Schröter. 2022. “Attitudes of Administrative Decision-Makers towards Nature-Based Solutions for Flood Risk Management in Germany.” Sustainability Science 17 (1): 135–149. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-01072-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwan, Paul, Jan G. Deelen, Aard Mulders, and Eefke Peeters. 2016. “The Co-operative Approach under the New Dutch Agri-Environment-Climate Scheme: Background.” Procedures and Legal and Institutional Implications: Ministry of Economic Affairs NL.
   Google Scholar
• Uthes, Sandra, and Bettina Matzdorf. 2013. “Studies on Agri-Environmental Measures: A Survey of the Literature.” Environmental Management 51 (1): 251–266. doi:10.1007/s00267-012-9959-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, William F. A. 2016. “Factors Underlying Farmers’ Intentions to Perform Unsubsidised Agri-Environmental Measures.” Land Use Policy 59: 207–216. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, William F. A., Anne M. Lokhorst, Frank Berendse, and Geert R. de Snoo. 2015. “Collective Agri-Environment Schemes: How Can Regional Environmental Co-operatives Enhance Farmers’ Intentions for Agri-Environment Schemes.” Land Use Policy 42: 759–766. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Herzele, Ann., Anne Gobin, Peter Van Gossum, Lilibeth Acosta, Tom Waas, Nicolas Dendoncker, and Bruno Henry de Frahan. 2013. “Effort for Money? Farmers’ Rationale for Participation in Agri-Environment Measures with Different Implementation Complexity.” Journal of Environmental Management 131: 110–120. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.09.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio, Julian Sagebiel, and Roland Olschewski. 2019. “Bringing the Neighbors in: A Choice Experiment on the Influence of Co-ordination and Social Norms on Farmers’ Willingness to Accept Agro-Environmental Schemes across Europe.” Land Use Policy 48: 200–2015. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.006.
   Google Scholar
• Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio, Julian Sagebiel, Jens Rommel, and Roland Olschewski. 2021. “Types of Collective Action Problems and Farmers’ Willingness to Accept Agri-Environmental Schemes in Switzerland.” Ecosystem Services 50: 101304. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanner, Saskia, Dieter Mortelmans, Francis Turkelboom, Sven Defrijn, Marina García Llorente, and Inés Gutiérrez Briceño. 2020. Integrated Evaluation Report of Innovative/interesting Contracts. Accessed October 21, 2022. https://www.project-contracts20.eu/reports-publications/.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, Simon, and Paul Stenner. 2012. “Doing.” Q Methodological Research. Theory, Method and Interpretation London: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Webler, Thomas, Stentor Danielson, and Seth Tuler. 2009. Using Q Method to Reveal Social Perspectives in Environmental Research. Greenfield, MA: Social and Environmental Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Westerink, Judith, Roel Jongeneel, Nico Polman, Katrin Prager, Jeremy R. Franks, Pierre Dupraz, and Evy Mettepenningen. 2017. “Collaborative Governance Arrangements to Deliver Spatially Co-ordinated Agri-Environmental Management.” Land Use Policy 69: 176–192. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerink, Judith, Dick C. P. Melman, and Raymond A. M. Schrijver. 2014. “Scale and Self-Governance in Agri-Environment Schemes: Experiences with Two Alternative Approaches in The Netherlands.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 58 (8): 1490–1508. doi:10.1080/09640568.2014.932762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerink, Judith, Marcel Pleijte, Raymond Schrijver, Rosalie van Dam, Michiel de Krom, and Tineke de Boer. 2021. “Can a ‘Good Farmer’ Be Nature-Inclusive? Shifting Cultural Norms in Farming in The Netherlands.” Journal of Rural Studies 88: 60–70. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.10.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerink, Judith, Catrien Termeer, and Astrid Manhoudt. 2020. “Identity Conflict? Agri-Environmental Collectives as Self-Governing Groups of Farmers or as Boundary Organisations.” International Journal of the Commons 14 (1): 388–403. doi:10.5334/ijc.997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerink, Judith, T. A. de Boer, M. Pleijte, and Raymond A. M. Schrijver. 2019. Kan een goede boer natuurinclusief zijn?: De rol van culturele normen in een beweging richting natuurinclusieve landbouw. Wageningen. Accessed March 02, 2021. https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/e0b14d63-6719-4192-b73a-46953605f5db.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne-Jones, Sophie. 2017. “Understanding Farmer Co-operation: Exploring Practices of Social Relatedness and Emergent Affects.” Journal of Rural Studies 53: 259–268. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.02.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabala, Aiora. 2014. “Qmethod: A Package to Explore Human Perspectives Using Q Methodology.” The R Journal 6 (2): 163–173. doi:10.32614/RJ-2014-032.
   Google Scholar
• Zabala, Aiora, Chris Sandbrook, and Nibedita Mukherjee. 2018. “When and How to Use Q Methodology to Understand Perspectives in Conservation Research.” Conservation Biology: The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology 32 (5): 1185–1194. doi:10.1111/cobi.13123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar