Unequal Geographic Representation in a Mixed-Member Electoral System: Evidence from the German Bundestag

References

• André, Audrey, and Sam Depauw. 2018. “Looking Beyond the District: The Representation of Geographical sub-Constituencies Across Europe.” International Political Science Review 39 (2): 256–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apfeld, Brendan. 2019. Spatial and Temporal University Database. Working Paper, University of Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, Markus, Marc Debus, and Jochen Müller. 2015. “Personal Characteristics of MPs and Legislative Behavior in Moral Policy Making.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 40 (2): 179–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceyhan, Sara. 2018. “Who Runs at the Top of Party Lists? Determinants of Parties’ List Ranking in the 2013 German Bundestag Election.” German Politics 27 (1): 66–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffé, Hilde. 2018. “MPs’ Representational Focus in MMP Systems. A Comparison Between Germany and New Zealand.” Representation 54 (4): 367–389.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer, Katherine J. 2016. The Politics of Resentment - Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, Brian F., and Scott W. Desposato. 2004. “Constituency Building in Multimember Districts: Collusion or Conflict?” Journal of Politics 66 (1): 136–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Däubler, Thomas. 2017. “Das Einstimmen-Mischwahlsystem bei baden-württembergischen Landtagswahlen: Wie fehlende Listen zur ungleichen deskriptiven Repräsentation von Stadt und Land in den Fraktionen beitragen.” Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 48 (1): 141–156.
   Google Scholar
• De Maesschalck, Filip. 2011. “The Suburbanisation of Political Representation in a Context of Proportional Representation: The Case of Belgium.” Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie 102: 72–87.
   Google Scholar
• Elsässer, Lea. 2018. Wessen Stimme zählt? Soziale und politische Ungleichheit in Deutschland. Frankfurt: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Elsässer, Lea, Svenja Hense, and Armin Schäfer. 2018. Government of the People, by the Elite, for the Rich: Unequal Responsiveness in an Unlikely Case. MPIfG Discussion Paper 18/5.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, Jorge M., Miguel Won, and Bruno Martins. 2020. “Speechmaking and the Selectorate: Persuasion in Nonpreferential Electoral Systems.” Comparative Political Studies 53 (5): 667–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiva, Jon H., Askill H. Halse, and Daniel M. Smith. 2019. Does Local Representation Matter? Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Folke, Olle, Linna Marten, Johanna Rickne, and Matz Dahlberg. 2021. Politicians’ neighbourhoods: Where do they live and does it matter? NICEP Working Paper: 2021-03.
   Google Scholar
• Gimpel, James G., Frances E. Lee, and Rebecca U. Thorpe. 2011. “The Wellsprings of Candidate Emergence: Geographic Origins of Statewide Candidacies in the United States.” Political Geography 30 (1): 25–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimpel, James G., Nathan Lovin, Bryant Moy, and Andrew Reeves. 2020. “The Urban-Rural Gulf in American Political Behavior.” Political Behavior 42: 1343–1368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gschwend, Thomas, and Thomas Zittel. 2015. “Do Constituency Candidates Matter in German Federal Elections? The Personal Vote as an Interactive Process.” Electoral Studies 39: 338–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gschwend, Thomas, and Thomas Zittel. 2018. “Who Brings Home the Pork? Committee Assignments Under Germany’s Mixed System.” Party Politics 24: 488–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazan, Reuven Y., and Gideon Rahat. 2010. Democracy Within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and Their Political Consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heinz, Dominic. 2010. “Mandatstypen und Ausschussmitgliedschaften der Mitglieder des Deutschen Bundestags – Eine empirische Untersuchung von 1949 bis 2005.” Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 41 (3): 518–527.
   Google Scholar
• Höhne, Benjamin. 2010. “Strukturmuster, Selektionsprämissen und Resultate von Kandidatenaufstellungen zu Bundestags- und Europawahlen in Deutschland Eine längsschnitt- und querschnittanalytische Objektivierung subjektiver Anreiz- und Verteilungsstrukturen.” In Parteien als fragmentierte Organisationen: Erfolgsbedingungen und Veränderungsprozesse, edited by Uwe Jun, and Benjamin Höhne, 85–121. Opladen: Barbara Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Huijsmans, Twan, Eelco Harteveld, Wouter van der Brug, and Bram Lancee. 2020. The Urban-Rural Divide in Political Attitudes in the Netherlands. Paper presented at the Council for European Studies Conference 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Iversen, Torben, and David Soskice. 2019. Democracy and Prosperity. Reinventing Capitalism Through a Turbulent Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, Will, and Gerry Stoker. 2016. “The Bifurcation of Politics: Two Englands.” Political Quarterly 87 (3): 372–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauder, Björn, and Niklas Potrafke. 2019. “Conservative Politicians and Voting on Same-sex Marriage.” German Economic Review 20 (4): 600–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kedar, Orit, Liran Harsgor, and Raz A. Sheinerman. 2016. “Are Voters Equal under Proportional Representation?” American Journal of Political Science 60 (3): 676–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latner, Michael, and Anthony McGann. 2005. “Geographical Representation under Proportional Representation: The Cases of Israel and the Netherlands.” Electoral Studies 24: 709–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manow, Philip. 2012. “Wahlkreis- oder Listenabgeordneter, Typus oder Episode? Eine Sequenzanalyse der Wege inden Bundestag.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 53 (1): 53–78.
   Google Scholar
• Manow, Philip. 2013. “Mixed Rules, Different Roles? An Analysis of the Typical Pathways Into the Bundestag and of MPs’ Parliamentary Behaviour.” Journal of Legislative Studies 19 (3): 287–308.
   Google Scholar
• Manow, Philip. 2015. Mixed Rules, Mixed Strategies. Candidates and Parties in Germany’s Electoral System. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manow, Philip, and Peter Flemming. 2012. “Der Kandidat / die Kandidatin – das gar nicht mehr so unbekannte Wesen.” Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 43 (4): 766–784.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, Rahsaan. 2019. “Cosmopolitan Immigration Attitudes in Large European Cities: Contextual or Compositional Effects?” American Political Science Review 113 (2): 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monroe, Burt L., and Amanda G. Rose. 2002. “Electoral Systems and Unimagined Consequences: Partisan Effects of Districted Proportional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 67–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodden, Jonathan A. 2019. Why Cities Lose: The Deep Roots of the Urban-Rural Political Divide. New York: BasicBooks.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés. 2017. “The Revenge of the Places That Don’t Matter.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11 (1): 189–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shugart, Matthew S., and Martin P. Wattenberg. 2001. Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sieberer, Ulrich. 2010. “Behavioral Consequences of Mixed Electoral Systems: Deviating Voting Behavior of District and List MPs in the German Bundestag.” Electoral Studies 29 (3): 484–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieberer, Ulrich, and Tamaki Ohmura. 2019. “Mandate type, electoral safety, and defections from the party line: The conditional mandate divide in the German Bundestag, 1949–2013.” Party Politics Online First.
   Google Scholar
• Siefken, Sven T. 2013. “Repräsentation vor Ort: Selbstverständnis und Verhalten von Bundestagsabgeordneten bei der Wahlkreisarbeit.” Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 44 (3): 486–506.
   Google Scholar
• Siefken, Sven T. 2016. “At the Grassroots of Representation: District Work of MPs in Germany.” French Politics 14 (4): 469–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spies, Dennis C., and André Kaiser. 2012. “Does the Mode of Candidate Selection Affect the Representativeness of Parties?” Party Politics 20 (4): 576–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steg, Christian. 2016. Die Kandidatenaufstellung zur Bundestagswahl. Analyse der Nominierungen von CDU und SPD in Baden-Württemberg zur Bundestagswahl 2009. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Stoffel, Michael F. 2014. “MP Behavior in Mixed-Member Electoral Systems.” Electoral Studies 35: 78–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratmann, Thomas, and Martin Baur. 2002. “Plurality Rule, Proportional Representation, and the German Bundestag: How Incentives to Pork-Barrel Differ Across Electoral Systems.” American Journal of Political Science 46: 506–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zittel, Thomas. 2014. “Patterns of Personal Vote Seeking in Mixed Electoral Systems: The Politics of Retrenchment in German Defence Policy.” Representation 50 (1): 41–53.
   Google Scholar
• Zittel, Thomas. 2018. “Electoral Systems in Context: Germany.” In The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems, edited by Erik S. Herron, Robert Pekkanen, and Matthew Soberg Shugart, 781–801. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zittel, Thomas, Dominic Nyhuis, and Markus Baumann. 2019. “Geographic Representation in Party-Dominated Legislatures: A Quantitative Text Analysis of Parliamentary Questions in the German Bundestag.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 44 (4): 681–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar