Untangling the Gossamer Web: Policy Learning and Informal Networks in Croatia and Serbia

References

• ADE (2019) Ex-post Evaluation of EU Assistance to Croatia in the Period 2007–2013: Final Report, FWC COM 2015 (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2019-07/ex_post_eval_croatia_-final_report_vol_ii-annexes.pdf, accessed 30 September 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Ágh, A. (1994) The Emergence of East Central European Parliaments: The First Steps (Budapest, Hungarian Centre of Democracy Studies).
   Google Scholar
• Ágh, A. (1996) ‘The Young East Central European Democracies and the “Transition Fatigue”’, Társadalom és Gazdaság Közép- és Kelet-Európában/Society and Economy in Central and Eastern Europe, 18, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Alber, J., Hotlmann, A. C. & Marquardt, S. (2011) ‘Are There Visible Accession Effects? Comparing Some Key Indicators of the Trajectories of Central and Eastern European Countries Inside and Outside the EU Since the 1990s’, Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review, 47, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastasakis, O. (2005) ‘The Europeanization of the Balkans’, Brown Journal of World Affairs, 12, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Baez-Camargo, C. & Ledeneva, A. (2017) ‘Where Does Informality Stop and Corruption Begin? Informal Governance and the Public/Private Crossover in Mexico, Russia and Tanzania’, Slavonic and East European Review, 95, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastian, M., Heymann, S. & Jacomy, M. (2009) ‘Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks’, paper presented at the International AAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, San Jose, CA, USA, 17–20 May.
   Google Scholar
• Bideleux, R. (1999) ‘“Europeanization” Versus “Democratization” in East-Central Europe, Ten Years On’, Társadalom és gazdaság Közép- és Kelet-Európában / Society and Economy in Central and Eastern Europe, 21, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Bliznakovski, J., Gjuzelov, B. & Popovikj, M. (2017) The Informal Life of Political Parties in the Western Balkan Societies, Working Paper D2.1 (Skopje, Institute for Democracy ‘Societas Civilis’).
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. (2010) ‘European Governance: Negotiation and Competition in the Shadow of Hierarchy’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castaldo, A. (2020) ‘Back to Competitive Authoritarianism? Democratic Backsliding in Vučić’s Serbia’, Europe-Asia Studies, 72, 10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čepo, D. (2020) ‘Structural Weakness and the Role of the Dominant Political Party: Democratic Backsliding in Croatia Since EU Accession’, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 20, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csaba, L. (2004) ‘Transition In and Towards Europe: Economic Development and EU Accession of Post-Communist States’, Zeitschrift für Staats- und Europawissenschaften (ZSE)/Journal for Comparative Government and European Policy, 2, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Dąbrowski, M. (2008) ‘Structural Funds as a Driver for Institutional Change in Poland’, Europe-Asia Studies, 60, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrova, A. (2002) ‘Enlargement, Institution-Building and the EU’s Administrative Capacity Requirement’, West European Politics, 25, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrova, A. & Dragneva, R. (2009) ‘Constraining External Governance: Interdependence with Russia and the CIS as Limits to the EU’s Rule Transfer in the Ukraine’, Journal of European Public Policy, 16, 6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobovšek, B. & Meško, G. (2008) ‘Informal Networks in Slovenia’, Problems of Post-Communism, 55, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragoljović, M. (2018) ‘Vucic “Responsible” for an Assault Against Opposition Leader’, Independent Balkan News Agency, 26 November, available at: https://balkaneu.com/vucic-responsible-for-an-assault-against-opposition-leader/, accessed 14 November 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlop, C. A., James, S. & Radaelli, C. M. (2020) ‘Can’t get no Learning: The Brexit Fiasco Through the Lens of Policy learning’, Journal of European Public Policy, 27, 5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlop, C. A. & Radaelli, C. M. (2013) ‘Systematising Policy Learning: From Monolith to Dimensions’, Political Studies, 61, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlop, C. A. & Radaelli, C. M. (2018) ‘The Lessons of Policy Learning: Types, Triggers, Hindrances and Pathologies’, Policy & Politics, 46, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlop, C. A., Radaelli, C. M. & Trein, P. (2018) Learning in Public Policy Analysis, Modes and Outcomes (Cham, Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Đurđević, M. (2019) ‘Afera Krušik: “Izmišljanje” ili prikrivanje’, Radio Slobodna Evropa, 21 October, available at: https://www.slobodnaevropa.org/a/afera-krusik-izmisljanje-ili-prikrivanje/30228308.html, accessed 14 November 2020.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2002a) Commission Staff Working Paper: Croatia—Stabilisation and Association Report, SEC(2002) 341 Final (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://www.esiweb.org/pdf/croatia_croatia_sap_report_2002.pdf, accessed 22 April 2021.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2002b) The Stabilisation and Association Process for South East: Europe First Annual Report, COM(2002) 163 Final (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri = CELEX:52002DC0163&from = EN, accessed 20 March 2019.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2005) Commission Staff Working Document: Croatia 2005 Progress Report, COM(2005) 556 Final (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/912708c7-81c4-4aef-9c9b-3aeb83ff47b1/language-en/format-HTML/source-211845519, accessed 6 July 2020.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2008) Commission Staff Working Document: Serbia 2008 Progress Report, SEC(2008) 2698 Final (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://primarysources.brillonline.com/browse/human-rights-documents-online/communication-from-the-commission-to-the-european-parliament-and-the-council;hrdhrd46790058, accessed 14 June 2020.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2009) Commission Staff Working Document: Serbia 2009 Progress Report, SEC(2009) 1339 (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://primarysources.brillonline.com/browse/human-rights-documents-online/communication-from-the-commission-to-the-european-parliament-and-the-council;hrdhrd46790058, accessed 14 June 2020.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2010a) Commission Staff Working Document: Croatia 2010 Progress Report, SEC(2010) 1326 Final (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/81fa44da-1590-486e-b6d8-c759a2d01b4d/language-en/format-PDF/source-211845519, accessed 7 July 2020.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2010b) Standard EB 72 (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/831, accessed 20 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2010c) Standard EB 73 (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/831, accessed 20 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2011a) Commission Staff Working Document: Croatia 2011 Progress Report, SEC(2011) 1200 Final (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/cca53551-5bcb-45eb-be6f-37e0bfce005e/language-en/format-PDF/source-211882192, accessed 6 July 2020.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2011b) Standard Eurobarometer 75: Public Opinion in the European Union (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/1019, accessed 20 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2012) Commission Staff Working Document: Comprehensive Monitoring Report on Croatia, SWD(2012) 338 Final (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/key_documents/2012/package/hr_analytical_2012_en.pdf, accessed 7 July 2020).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2013a) Commission Staff Working Document: Serbia 2013 Progress Report, SWD(2013) 412 Final (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/key_documents/2013/package/brochures/serbia_2013.pdf, accessed 18 September 2019).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2013b) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council: Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2013–2014, COM(2013) 700 Final (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://primarysources.brillonline.com/browse/human-rights-documents-online/communication-from-the-commission-to-the-european-parliament-and-the-council;hrdhrd46790058, accessed 26 June 2020.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2014a) Standard Eurobarometer 81: Tables of Results (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2040, accessed 20 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2014b) Standard Eurobarometer 82: Tables of Results (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2041, accessed 20 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2015a) Commission Staff Working Document Serbia 2015 Report, SWD(2015) 211 Final (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/key_documents/2015/20151110_report_serbia.pdf, accessed 23 September 2019.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2015b) Standard Eurobarometer 83: Tables of Results (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2099, accessed 20 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2015c) Standard Eurobarometer 84: Annex (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2098, accessed 20 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2016a) Commission Staff Working Document: Serbia 2016 Report, SWD(2016) 361 Final (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/key_documents/2016/20161109_report_serbia.pdf, accessed 23 September 2019.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2016b) Standard Eurobarometer 85: Annex (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2130, accessed 20 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2016c) Standard Eurobarometer 86: Annex (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2137, accessed 20 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2017a) Standard Eurobarometer 87: Annex (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2142, accessed 20 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2017b) Standard Eurobarometer 88: Annex (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2143, accessed 20 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2018a) Commission Staff Working Document: Serbia 2018 Report, SWD(2018) 152 Final (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/20180417-serbia-report.pdf, accessed 18 September 2019.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2018b) Standard Eurobarometer 89: Annex (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2180, accessed 20 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2018c) Standard Eurobarometer 90: Annex (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2215, accessed 20 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2019a) Commission Staff Working Document: Serbia 2019 Report (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://www.mei.gov.rs/upload/documents/eu_dokumenta/godisnji_izvestaji_ek_o_napretku/Serbia_2019_Report.pdf, accessed 10 September 2020.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2019b) Standard Eurobarometer 91: Annex (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2253, accessed 20 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2019c) Standard Eurobarometer 92: Annex (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2255, accessed 20 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2020a) Commission Staff Working Document: Serbia 2020 Report, SWD(2020) 352 Final (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/serbia_report_2020.pdf, accessed 24 June 2021.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2020b) Standard Eurobarometer 93: Annex (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2262, accessed 20 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Europska Komisija (2007a) Eurobarometer 67: Hrvatska (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/617, accessed 20 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Europska Komisija (2007b) Eurobarometer 68: Hrvatska (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/664, accessed 20 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Europska Komisija (2008a) Eurobarometer 69: Hrvatska (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/742, accessed 20 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Europska Komisija (2008b) Eurobarometer 70: Hrvatska (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/832, accessed 20 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Europska Komisija (2009) Eurobarometer 71: Hvatska (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/829, accessed 20 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Europska Komisija (2011) Eurobarometer 74: Hrvatska (Brussels, European Union), available at: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/918, accessed 20 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Gąsior-Niemiec, A. (2003) ‘Traces of Europeanization: Poland’, Polish Sociological Review, 141.
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, A. & Taylor, A. (2016) ‘Those Who Knock on Europe’s Door Must Repent? Bilateral Border Disputes and EU Enlargement’, Political Studies, 64, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzina, D. (2003) ‘Socialist Serbia’s Narratives: From Yugoslavia to a Greater Serbia’, International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 17, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, P. M. (1992) ‘Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination’, International Organization, 46, 1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner-Burton, E. M., Kahler, M. & Montgomery, A. H. (2009) ‘Network Analysis for International Relations’, International Organization, 63, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimbach, H. (2011) ‘The European Union’s Promotion of Minority Protection in Serbia—Effectiveness of the EU in External Democratization in Sandžak’, Sicherheit & Frieden, 29, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Helmke, G. & Levitsky, S. (2004) ‘Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda’, Perspectives on Politics, 2, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. & Marks, G. (2009) ‘A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science, 39, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Horvat, S. (2015) ‘Why the EU Needs Croatia More Than Croatia Needs the EU’, in Žižek, S. & Horvat, S. (eds) What Does Europe Want? (New York, NY, Columbia University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Ikeda, K. & Richey, S. E. (2005) ‘Japanese Network Capital: The Impact of Social Networks on Japanese Political Participation’, Political Behavior, 27, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iusmen, I. (2014) Children’s Rights, Eastern Enlargement and the EU Human Rights Regime (Manchester, Manchester University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Jachtenfuchs, M. (2001) ‘The Governance Approach to European Integration’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 39, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamkhaji, J. C. & Radaelli, C. M. (2017) ‘Crisis, Learning and Policy Change in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy, 24, 5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, S. (2018) ‘The Business of State Capture and the Rise of Authoritarianism in Kosovo, Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia’, Southeastern Europe, 42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klumbytė, N. (2011) ‘Europe and its Fragments: Europeanization, Nationalism, and the Geopolitics of Provinciality in Lithuania’, Slavic Review, 70, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kmezić, M. (2020) ‘Recalibrating the EU’s Approach to the Western Balkans’, European View, 19, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Kostovicova, D. (2004) ‘Post-Socialist Identity, Territoriality and European Integration: Serbia’s Return to Europe After Milošević’, GeoJournal, 61, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Larrabee, F. S. (1990) ‘Long Memories and Short Fuses: Change and Instability in the Balkans’, International Security, 15, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Ledeneva, A. (2009) ‘From Russia with “Blat”: Can Informal Networks Help Modernize Russia?’, Social Research, 76, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledeneva, A. (2013) ‘Russia’s Practical Norms and Informal Governance: The Origins of Endemic Corruption’, Social Research, 80, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledeneva, A., Bratu, R. & Köker, P. (2017) ‘Corruption Studies for the Twenty-First Century: Paradigm Shifts and Innovative Approaches’, Slavonic and East European Review, 95, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, J. S. (1994) ‘Learning and Foreign Policy: Sweeping a Conceptual Minefield’, International Organization, 48, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (1971) ‘Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method’, American Political Science Review, 65, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstrom, N. (2003) ‘Between Europe and the Balkans: Mapping Slovenia and Croatia’s “Return to Europe” in the 1990s’, Dialectical Anthropology, 27, 3/4.
   Google Scholar
• Łodziński, S. (2009) ‘Between History and Europe Europeanization of Post-1989 National Minority Policy in Poland’, Polish Sociological Review, 168.
   Google Scholar
• Lomnitz, L. A. (1988) ‘Informal Exchange Networks in Formal Systems: A Theoretical Model’, American Anthropologist, 90, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majstorović, D. (2007) ‘Construction of Europeanization in the High Representative’s Discourse in Bosnia and Herzegovina’, Discourse & Society, 18, 5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mencinger, U. (2016) ‘Nedelo izbira: Restavracija Kukuriku, Kastav, Hrvaška’, Delo, 25 March, available at: https://old.delo.si/prosti-cas/kulinarika/nedelo-izbira-restavracija-kukuriku-kastav-hrvaska.html, accessed 14 April 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Mesarovich, A. (2023) ‘Obstructing in the Name of the People: Populism, Euroscepticism, and European Union Accession in South-Eastern Europe’, in Dajč, H. & Styczyńska, N. (eds) Faces of Populism in Central and South-Eastern Europe (Krakow, Jagellonian University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Mizruchi, M. S. (1994) ‘Social Network Analysis: Recent Achievements and Current Controversies’, Acta Sociologica, 37, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odera, L. C. (2019) ‘The Role of Trust as an Informal Institution in the Informal Sector in Africa’, Africa Development, 38, 3/4.
   Google Scholar
• Perković, A. J. (2014) ‘The European Union and the Democratization Process of the Western Balkans’, Southeastern Europe, 38.
   Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. M. (1999) ‘The Public Policy of the European Union: Whither Politics of Expertise?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 6, 5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, H., Irwin, A., Yearley, S. & McCarthy, E. (1999) ‘Regulatory Science, Europeanization, and the Control of Agrochemicals’, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 24, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudic, F. (2018) ‘US Won’t Oppose Serbia–Kosovo Border Changes—Bolton’, Balkan Insight, 24 August, available at: https://balkaninsight.com/2018/08/24/us-will-not-weigh-in-on-serbia-kosovo-partition-08-24-2018/, accessed 15 February 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Šabić, SŠ (2019) ‘(Ir)relevance of Croatian Experience for Further EU Enlargement’, Insight Turkey, 21, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvini, A. (2010) ‘Symbolic Interactionism and Social Network Analysis: An Uncertain Encounter’, Symbolic Interaction, 33, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. (2005) ‘Strategic Calculation and International Socialization: Membership Incentives, Party Constellations, and Sustained Compliance in Central and Eastern Europe’, International Organization, 59, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. & Scholtz, H. (2008) ‘EU Democracy Promotion in the European Neighbourhood: Political Conditionality, Economic Development and Transnational Exchange’, European Union Politics, 9, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. & Sedelmeier, U. (2005) The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe (Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (1988) ‘Trend Report Social Network Analysis’, Sociology, 22, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Šeperić, D. (2011) ‘To Europe and Back—the Croatian EU Accession Process and its Outcomes’, SEER: Journal for Labour and Social Affairs in Eastern Europe, 14, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Sigér, F. (2014) ‘Europeanization with a Detour: The Case of Croatia’, in Benczes, I. (ed.) Deficit and Debt in Transition (Budapest, Central European University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E. & Torfing, J. (2005) ‘Network Governance and Post-Liberal Democracy’, Administrative Theory & Praxis, 27, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Stojanović, D. (2011) ‘Value Changes in the Interpretations of History in Serbia’, in Listhaug, O., Ramet, S. & Dulić, D. (eds) Civic and Uncivic Values: Serbia in the Post-Milošević Era (Budapest, Central European University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Stojanović, D. (2017) Populism the Serbian Way (Belgrade, Peščanik).
   Google Scholar
• Subotić, J. (2013) ‘Stories States Tell: Identity, Narrative, and Human Rights in the Balkans’, Slavic Review, 7, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Trenz, H.-J. (2007) ‘Reconciling Diversity and Unity: Language Minorities and European Integration’, Ethnicities, 7, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlahutin, R. (2004) ‘The Croatian Exception’, in Batt, J. (ed.) The Western Balkans: Moving On (Paris, European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS)).
   Google Scholar
• Wedel, J. R. (2003) ‘Dirty Togetherness: Institutional Nomads, Networks, and the State–Private Interface in Central and Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union’, Polish Sociological Review, 142.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, B. (1988) ‘Structural Analysis: From Method and Metaphor to Theory and Substance’, in Wellman, B. & Berkowitz, S. D. (eds) Social Structures: A Network Approach (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, C. R. (2009) ‘Informal Institutions Rule: Institutional Arrangements and Economic Performance’, Public Choice, 139, 3–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zito, A. R. & Schout, A. (2009) ‘Learning Theory Reconsidered: EU Integration Theories and Learning’, Journal of European Public Policy, 16, 8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar