Challenges to implementing and enforcing California's Smoke-Free Workplace Act in bars

References

• Bero LA, Montini T. Implementation of California AB13: Smoking ban in bars. Poster presentation. TRDRP Annual Investigator Meeting, San Diego, CA
   Google Scholar
• Borland R, Yong H-H, Siahpush M, Hyland A, Campbell S, Hastings G, et al. Support for and reported compliance with smoke-free restaurants and bars by smokers in four countries: Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tobacco Control 2006; 15: iii34–iii41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite J. To punish or persuade: Enforcement of coal mine safety. State University of New York Press, New York 1985
   Google Scholar
• Brehm J, Gates S. Working, shirking, and sabotage. Bureaucratic responses to a democratic public. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI 1999
   Google Scholar
• Dexter L. Unintended consequences of purposive legislative action: Alternatives to implementation. Journal of Public Policy 1981; 4(4)250–264
   Google Scholar
• Fong GT, Hyland A, Borland R, Hammond D, Hastings G, McNeill A, et al. Reductions in tobacco smoke pollution and increases in support for smoke-free public places following the implementation of comprehensive smoke-free workplace legislation in the Republic of Ireland: Findings from the ITC Ireland/UK survey. British Medical Journal 2006; 15(Suppl. III)iii34–iii41
   Google Scholar
• Gerber ER, Lupia A, McCubbins MD. When does government limit the impact of voter initiatives? The politics of implementation and enforcement. Journal of Politics 2004; 66(1)43–68
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilpin EA, Lee L, Pierce JP. Changes in population attitudes about where smoking should not be allowed: California versus the rest of the USA. Tobacco Control 2004; 13: 38–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glantz SA, Balbach ED. Tobacco war: Inside the California battles. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA 2000
   Google Scholar
• Goodman P, Agnew M, McCaffrey M, Paul G, Clancy L. Effects of the Irish smoking ban on respiratory health of bar workers and air quality in Dublin pubs. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2007; 175(8)840–845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodsell CHT. Looking once again at human service bureaucracy. The Journal of Politics 1981; 43: 763–778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson GMB. That's not fog in San Francisco (smoking ban in California bars is largely ignored). Insight on the News 1999; 15(4)32
   Google Scholar
• Holder HD, Saltz RF, Grube JW, Treno AJ, Reynolds RI, Voas RB, et al. Summing up: Lessons from a comprehensive community prevention trial. Addiction 1997; 92(Suppl. 2)S293–S301
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Homel R, McIlwain G, Carvolth R. Creating safer drinking environments. Alcohol dependence and problems, N Heather, TJ Peters, T Stockwell. Wiley, Chichester, UK 2001
   Google Scholar
• Hood CC. The tools of government. Chatham House, Chatham, NJ 1986
   Google Scholar
• Ingram H, Schneider A. Improving implementation through framing smarter statutes. Journal of Public Policy 1990; 10(1)67–88
   Google Scholar
• Kiser D, Boschert T. Eliminating smoking in bars, restaurants, and gaming clubs in California: BREATH, the California smoke-free bar program. Journal of Public Health Policy 2001; 22: 81–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh HK, Joosens LX, Connolly GN. Making smoking history worldwide. The New England Journal of Medicine 2007; 356(15)1496–1498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JP, Moore RS, Antin TMJ. Social organization in bars: Implications for tobacco control policy. Contemporary Drug Problems, (in press)
   Google Scholar
• Lee JP, Moore RS, Martin SE. Unobtrusive observations of smoking in urban California bars. Journal of Drug Issues 2003; 33(4)983–999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky M. Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation, New York 1980
   Google Scholar
• Lowi T. American business, public policy, case studies, and political theory. World Politics 1964; 16(4)677–715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magzamen S, Glantz SA. The new battleground: California's experience with smoke-free bars. American Journal of Public Health 2001; 91(2)245–252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May P, Winter S. Reconsidering styles of regulatory enforcement: Patterns in Danish agro-environmental inspection. Law and Policy 2000; 22(2)143–173
   Google Scholar
• Maynard-Moody S, Musheno M, Palumbo D. Street-wise social policy: Resolving the dilemma of street-level influence and successful implementation. Western Political Quarterly 1990; 43(4)833–848
   Google Scholar
• Mazmanian D, Sabatier P. Implementation and public policy. University Press of America, Lantham, MD 1989
   Google Scholar
• Meier KJ. Policy implementation. Public Administration Review 1987; 47(4)353–354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier KJ. Politics and the bureaucracy: Policymaking in the fourth branch of government. Brooks/Cole Publishing, Monterey, CA 1993
   Google Scholar
• Meyers MK, Vorsanger S. Street-level bureaucrats and the implementation of public policy. The handbook of public administration, BG Peters, J Pierre. Sage, London 2003
   Google Scholar
• Mladenka KR. The urban bureaucracy and the Chicago political machine. American Political Science Review 1981a; 74(4)991–998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mladenka KR. Citizen demands and urban services: The distribution of bureaucratic response in Chicago and Houston. American Journal of Political Science 1981b; 25(4)693–714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore RS, Lee JP, Antin TJ, Martin SE. Tobacco free workplace policies and low socioeconomic status female bartenders in San Francisco. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2006; 60(Suppl. 2)ii51–ii56
   Google Scholar
• Nagami DK. Enforcement methods used in applying the California smoke-free workplace act to bars and taverns. Hastings West-Northwest Journal of Environmental Law and Policy 2001; 7: 159–173
   Google Scholar
• Nielson VL. Are street-level bureaucrats compelled or enticed to cope?. Public Administration 2006; 84: 861–889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nivola PS. Distributing a municipal service: A case study of housing inspection. Journal of Politics 1978; 40(1)59–81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry JL, Porter LW. Factors affecting the context for motivation in public organizations. Academy of Management Review 1982; 7(1)89–98
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier PA, Mazmanian DA. The conditions of effective implementation: A guide to accomplishing policy objectives. Policy Analysis 1979; 5(4)481–504
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scholz JT, Wei FH. Regulatory enforcement in a federalist system. American Political Science Review 1986; 80(4)1249–1270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockwell T, Gruenewald P. Controls on the physical availability of alcohol. Alcohol dependence and problems, N Heather, TJ Peters, T Stockwell. Wiley, Chichester, UK 2001
   Google Scholar
• Vago S. Law and society, (6th ed.). Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ 2000
   Google Scholar
• Weatherly R, Lipsky M. Street-level bureaucrats and institutional innovation: Implementing special education reform. Harvard Educational Review 1977; 47(2)171–197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber M. Economy and society. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA 1978
   Google Scholar
• Weber MD, Bagwell DA, Fielding JE, Glantz SA. Long term compliance with California's Smoke-Free Workplace Law among bars and restaurants in Los Angeles County. Tobacco Control 2003; 12(3)269–273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingo C, Kiser D, Boschert T, Hunting P, Buffington T, Wellman-Bensen J. Eliminating smoking in bars, restaurants, and gaming clubs in California: The California Smoke-Free Workplace Act. California Department of Health Services, Tobacco Control Section, Sacramento, CA 2001
   Google Scholar