3,107
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Unintended consequences of drug policies experienced by young drug users in contact with the criminal justice systems

, , ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 36-47 | Received 27 Jan 2020, Accepted 10 Sep 2020, Published online: 02 Mar 2021

References

  • Apel, R., Blokland, A. A. J., Nieuwbeerta, P., & van Schellen, M. (2010). The impact of imprisonment on marriage and divorce: A risk set matching approach. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26(2), 269–300.
  • Baert, P. (1991). Unintended consequences: A typology and examples. International Sociology, 6(2), 201–210.
  • Bretteville–Jensen, A. L., Mikulic, S., Bem, P., Papamalis, F., Harel-Fisch, Y., Sierosławski, J., Storti, C. C. (2017). Costs and unintended consequences of drug control policies (Report by the expert group on possible adverse effects and associated costs of drug control policies). Council of Europe.
  • Carlson, R. G., Falck, R. S., McCaughan, J. A., & Siegal, H. A. (2004). MDMA/Ecstasy use among young people in Ohio: Perceived risk and barriers to intervention. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 36(2), 181–189.
  • Cooper, H. L. F. (2015). War on drugs policing and police brutality. Substance Use & Misuse, 50(8–9), 1188–1194.
  • Costa, A. M. (2008). Making drug control ‘fit for the purpose’: Building on the UNGASS decade (Report by the Executive Director of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime). United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
  • de Andrade, D., Ritchie, J., Rowlands, M., Mann, E., & Hides, L. (2018). Substance use and recidivism outcomes for prison-based drug and alcohol interventions. Epidemiologic Reviews, 40(1), 121–133.
  • Department of Anti-Drug Policies. (2018). Relazione annual al Parlamento sul fenomeno delle tossicodipendenze in Italia anno 2018 (dati 2017). (Annual report to the Parliament on addictions).
  • DiNardo, J., & Lemieux, T. (2001). Alcohol, marijuana, and American youth: The unintended consequences of government regulation. Journal of Health Economics, 20(6), 991–1010.
  • Dodge, M., & Pogrebin, M. R. (2001). Collateral cost of imprisonment for women: Complications in reintegration. The Prison Journal, 81(1), 42–54.
  • Esposito, M. H., Lee, H., Hicken, M. T., Porter, L. C., & Herting, J. R. (2017). The consequences of contact with the criminal justice system for heath in the transition to adulthood. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 8(1), 57–74.
  • Frank, V. A., & Kolind, T. (2008). Dilemmas experienced in prison-based cannabis treatment - Drug policy in Danish prisons. In V. Asmussen Frank, B. Bjerge, & E. Houborg (Eds.), Drug policy - History, theory and consequences (pp. 61–86). Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
  • Frank, V. A., Dahl, H. V., Holm, K. E., & Kolind, T. (2015). Inmates’ perspectives on prison drug treatment. A qualitative study from three prisons in Denmark. Probation Journal, 62(2), 156–171.
  • Gusfield, J. (1986). Symbolic crusade: Status politics and the American temperance movement. University of Illinois Press.
  • Huebner, B. M. (2005). The effect of incarceration on marriage and work over the life course. Justice Quarterly, 22(3), 281–303.
  • Krajewski, K. (2007). Prawo karne wobec narkotyków i narkomanii: Ustawodawstwo polskie na tle modeli regulacji dotyczących narkotyków. Alkoholizm i Narkomania, 20(4), 425–437.
  • Kreager, D. A., Schaefer, D. R., Bouchard, M., Haynie, D. L., Wakefield, S., Young, J., & Zajac, G. (2016). Toward a criminology of inmate networks. Justice Quarterly, 33(6), 1000–1028.
  • Kurtovic, E., & Rovira, M. (2017). Contrast between Spain and the Netherlands in the hidden obstacles to re-entry into the labour market due to a criminal record. European Journal of Criminology, 14(5), 505–521.
  • Lambie, I., & Randell, I. (2013). The impact of incarceration on juvenile offenders. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(3), 448–459.
  • Lipsey, M. W. (2009). The primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic overview. Victims & Offenders, 4(2), 124–147.
  • Lozano, B. E., Stephens, R. S., & Roffman, R. A. (2006). Abstinence and moderate use goals in the treatment of marihuana dependence. Addiction, 101(11), 1589–1597.
  • MacCoun, R., & Reuter, P. (2001). RAND studies in policy analysis. Drug war heresies. Learning from other vices, times and places. Cambridge University Press.
  • McKeganey, N., Morris, Z., Neale, J., & Robertson, M. (2004). What are drug users looking for when they contact drug services: Abstinence or harm reduction? Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 11(5), 423–435.
  • Measham, F., & Newcombe, R. (2017). What’s so “new” about new psychoactive substances? Definitions, prevalence, motivations, user groups and a proposed new taxonomy. In T. Kolind, G. Hunt, & B. Thom (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of drug and alcohol studies (pp. 576–596). SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • Merton, R. K. (1936). The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review, 1(6), 894–904.
  • Miller, C. L., Firestone, M., Ramos, R., Burris, S., Ramos, M. E., Case, P., Brouwer, K. C., Fraga, M. A., & Strathdee, S. A. (2008). Injecting drug users’ experiences of policing practices in two Mexican-U.S. border cities: Public health perspectives. International Journal of Drug Policy, 19(4), 324–331.
  • Moore, T., McArthur, M., & Saunders, V. (2013). Young people talk about transitioning from youth detention to the community: Making Good. Australian Social Work, 66(3), 328–343.
  • Moore, K. E., & Tangney, J. P. (2017). Managing the concealable stigma of criminal justice system involvement: A longitudinal examination of anticipated stigma, social withdrawal, and post–release adjustment. Journal of Social Issues, 73(2), 322–430.
  • Mundt, A. P., & Baranyi, G. (2020). The unhappy mental health triad: Comorbid severe mental health illness, personality disorders, and substance use disorders in prison population. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 804.
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2014). Principles of drug abuse treatment for criminal justice population. A research based guide.
  • Newcomb, M. D., & Locke, T. (2005). Health, social, and psychological consequences of drug use and abuse. In Z. Sloboda (Ed.), Epidemiology of drug abuse. Springer.
  • Nieuwbeerta, P., & Piquero, A. R. (2008). Mortality rates and causes of death of convicted Dutch criminals 25 years later. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45(3), 256–286.
  • Paternoster, R., & Iovanni, L. (1989). The labelling perspective and delinquency: An elaboration of the theory and an assessment of the evidence. Justice Quarterly, 6(3), 359–394.
  • Patterson, Z. R., Young, M. M., & Vaccarino, F. J. (2017). Novel psychoactive substances: What educators need to know. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 101(2), 173–175.
  • Pennock, P. E., & Kerr, K. A. (2005). In the shadow of prohibition: Domestic American alcohol policy since 1933. Business History, 47(3), 383–400.
  • Piaggio, A., & Vidwans, P. (2019). The cost and consequences of the war on drugs (Report). Human Rights Foundation.
  • Polish Police HQ. (2019). Own calculations based on data from the Police HQ.
  • Reuter, P. (2009). The unintended consequences of drug policies (Report 5). RAND Corporation.
  • Reuter, P., & Pardo, B. (2017). Can new psychoactive substances be regulated effectively? An assessment of the British Psychoactive Substances Bill. Addiction, 112(1), 25–31.
  • Roca, J. S., García, M. J., Biarnés, A. V., & Rodríguez, M. (2009). Analysis of factors involved in the social inclusion process of young people fostered in residential care units. Children and Youth Services Review, 31(12), 1251–1257.
  • Rolando, S., Baccaria, F. (2019). Young people’s narratives: Drug use and criminal involvement trajectories (WP5 2nd Cross National Report). EPPIC.
  • Rolando, S., Frank, V. A., Duke, K., Kahlert, R., Pisarska, A., Graf, N., & Beccaria, F. (2020). I like money, I like many things’. The relationship between drugs and crime from the perspective of young people in contact with criminal justice systems. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy. Advance online publication.
  • Rumbaut, R. G. (2005). Turning points in the transition to adulthood: Determinants of educational attainment, incarceration, and early childbearing among children of immigrants. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28(6), 1041–1086.
  • Settersten, R. A., Furstenberg, F., & Rumbaut, R. G. (2005). On the frontier of adulthood: Theory, research and public policy. University of Chicago Press.
  • Simpson, M. (2003). The relationship between drug use and crime: A puzzle inside an enigma. International Journal of Drug Policy, 14(4), 307–319.
  • Simpura, J., & Moskalewicz, J. (2000). Alcohol policy in transitional Russia. Journal of Substance Use, 5(1), 39–46.
  • Statistics Denmark. (2017). Own calculations based on data from Statistics Denmark.
  • United Nations. (2013). The International Drug Control Conventions. https://www.unodc.org/documents/commissions/CND/Int_Drug_Control_Conventions/Ebook/The_International_Drug_Control_Conventions_E.pdf
  • United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime & Word Heath Organization. (2018). Treatment and care for people with drug use disorders in contact with the criminal justice system. Alternatives to conviction or punishment. https://www.unodc.org/documents/UNODC_WHO_Alternatives_to_Conviction_or_Punishment_2018.pdf
  • Western, B., Lopoo, L. M., & McLanahan, S. (2004). Incarceration and the bonds among parents in fragile families. In M. Patillo, D. F Weiman, & B. Western (Eds.), Imprisoning America: The social effects of mass incarceration (pp. 21–45). Russell Sage Foundation.