Expectations on Labour-Related CSR Reporting: Voices from Labour Unions in Indonesia and Thailand

References

• Abdulrazak, S., and A. Amran. 2018. Exploring consumer support for CSR from the perspective of moral legitimacy: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Global Responsibility 9, no. 1: 41–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abeysekera, I. 2006. The project of intellectual capital disclosure: Researching the research. Journal of Intellectual Capital 7, no. 1: 61–77.
   Google Scholar
• Adhariani, D., and E. du Toit. 2020. Readability of sustainability reports: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies 10, no. 4: 621–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alawi, N.A., and H.M. Belfaqih. 2019. Human resources disclosure: An exploratory study of the quality in Qatar. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development 15, no. 1: 84–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez, A. 2015. Corporate response to human resource disclosure recommendations. Social Responsibility Journal 11, no. 2: 306–23.
   Google Scholar
• Ariyanti, F. 2017. Hadapi Era Digitalisasi Industri, RI Butuh Tenaga Kerja Handal. https://www.liputan6.com/bisnis/read/3191750/hadapi-era-digitalisasi-industri-ri-butuh-tenaga-kerja-handal.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN. 2013. ASEAN comprehensive investment agreement (ACIA): A guidebook for businesses and investors. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat. http://investasean.asean.org/index.php/ajax/exec_ajax/file_download/824/newsid/973/asean-comprehensive-investment-agreement-a-guidebook-for-businesses-and-investors.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bank Rakyat Indonesia. 2017. BRI sustainability report 2016. http://ir-bri.com/misc/SR/BRI-SR-2016.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bartling, B., E. Fehr, and H. Herz. 2014. The intrinsic value of decision rights. Econometrica 82, no. 6: 2005–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BBC. 2018. Indonesian country profile. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-14921238.
   Google Scholar
• Belal, A.R. 2008. Corporate social responsibility reporting in developing countries: The case of Bangladesh. Hampshire: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Belal, A.R., S.M. Cooper, and N.A. Khan. 2015. Corporate environmental responsibility and accountability: What chance in vulnerable Bangladesh? Critical Perspectives on Accounting 33: 44–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belal, A.R., and D. Owen. 2007. The views of corporate managers on the current state of, and future prospects for, social reporting in Bangladesh. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 20, no. 3: 472–94.
   Google Scholar
• Bellucci, M., L. Simoni, D. Acuti, and G. Manetti. 2019. Stakeholder engagement and dialogic accounting: Empirical evidence in sustainability reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 32, no. 5: 1467–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowrin, A.R. 2018. Human resources disclosures by African and Caribbean companies. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies 8, no. 2: 244–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budd, J.W. 2014. Implicit public values and the creation of publicly valuable outcomes: The importance of work and the contested role of labor unions. Public Administration Review 74, no. 4: 506–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burritt, R.L., K.L. Christ, and A. Omori. 2016. Drivers of corporate water-related disclosure: Evidence from Japan. Journal of Cleaner Production 129: 65–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrch, C., M.J. Milne, R. Morgan, and K. Kearins. 2015. Seeds of hope? Exploring business actors’ diverse understandings of sustainable development. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 28, no. 5: 671–705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahaya, F.R., S.A. Porter, G. Tower, and A. Brown. 2012. Indonesia’s low concern for labour issues. Social Responsibility Journal 8, no. 1: 114–32.
   Google Scholar
• Cahaya, F.R., S. Porter, G. Tower, and A. Brown. 2015. The Indonesian government’s coercive pressure on labour disclosures: Conflicting interests or government ambivalence? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 6, no. 4: 475–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahaya, F.R., S. Porter, G. Tower, and A. Brown. 2017. Coercive pressures on occupational health and safety disclosures. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies 7, no. 3: 318–36.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, J., and A. Mukherjee. 2018. Foreign direct investment, unionised labour markets and welfare. International Review of Economics & Finance 58: 330–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christ, K.L., K.K. Rao, and R.L. Burritt. 2019. Accounting for modern slavery: An analysis of Australian listed company disclosures. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 32, no. 3: 836–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifton, D., and A. Amran. 2011. The stakeholder approach: A sustainability perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 98, no. 1: 121–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawkins, C. 2010. Beyond wages and working conditions: A conceptualization of labor union social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 95, no. 1: 129–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deegan, C. 2014. Financial accounting theory. 4th ed. Sydney: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Diouf, D., and O. Boiral. 2017. The quality of sustainability reports and impression management: A stakeholder perspective. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 30, no. 3: 643–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunphy, D., A. Griffiths, and S. Benn. 2003. Organizational change for corporate sustainability. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, M.J., and A.R. Buhovac. 2014. Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental, and economic impacts. 2nd ed. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Fernando, A. 2021. Buruh Boikot Produk Indomaret Hari Ini, Saham DNET Jatuh! https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/market/20210527102720-17-248655/buruh-boikot-produk-indomaret-hari-ini-saham-dnet-jatuh.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R.E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R.E. 2020. The stakeholder approach revisited. In Wirtschafts-und unternehmensethik, ed. T. Beschorner, A. Brink, B. Hollstein, M.C. Hübscher, and O. Schumann, 657–71. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, A.L., and S. Miles. 2001. Socially responsible investment and corporate social and environmental reporting in the UK: An exploratory study. The British Accounting Review 33, no. 4: 523–48.
   Google Scholar
• Frooman, J. 1999. Stakeholder influence strategies. The Academy of Management Review 24, no. 2: 191–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallego-Álvarez, I., and I.A. Quina-Custodio. 2016. Disclosure of corporate social responsibility information and explanatory factors. Online Information Review 40, no. 2: 218–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Sanchez, I., B. Cuadrado-Ballesteros, and J. Frias-Aceituno. 2016. Impact of the institutional macro context on the voluntary disclosure of CSR information. Long Range Planning 49, no. 1: 15–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Reporting Initiative. 2013. http://www.globalreporting.org.
   Google Scholar
• Global Reporting Initiative. 2018. http://www.globalreporting.org.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, R., D. Owen, and C. Adams. 1996. Accounting and accountability: Changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting. London: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Gunawan, J. 2015. Corporate social disclosures in Indonesia: Stakeholders’ influence and motivation. Social Responsibility Journal 11, no. 3: 535–52.
   Google Scholar
• Gunawan, J., and S. Tin. 2019. The development of corporate social responsibility in accounting research: Evidence from Indonesia. Social Responsibility Journal 15, no. 5: 671–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J., R. Petty, K. Yongvanich, and F. Ricceri. 2004. Using content analysis as a research method to inquire into intellectual capital reporting. Journal of Intellectual Capital 5, no. 2: 282–93.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, J.S., and R.E. Freeman. 1999. Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. The Academy of Management Journal 42, no. 5: 479–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, S., G. Peirson, and K. Harris. 2004. Financial accounting theory. Frenchs Forest: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, M.M., M.A. Momin, A.L. Rowe, and M. Quaddus. 2017. Corporate social and environmental reporting practices: A case of listed companies in Bangladesh. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 8, no. 2: 138–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Labour Organization. 2019. Triangle in ASEAN quarterly briefing note: Thailand. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—asia/—ro-bangkok/documents/genericdocument/wcms_735108.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Islam, M.A., and C. Deegan. 2008. Motivations for an organisation within a developing country to report social responsibility information: Evidence from Bangladesh. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 21, no. 6: 850–74.
   Google Scholar
• Islam, M., and S. Dellaportas. 2011. Perceptions of corporate social and environmental accounting and reporting practices from accountants in Bangladesh. Social Responsibility Journal 7, no. 4: 649–64.
   Google Scholar
• Islam, M.A., and C.J. van Staden. 2018. Social movement NGOs and the comprehensiveness of conflict mineral disclosures: Evidence from global companies. Accounting, Organizations and Society 65: 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Issarawornrawanich, P., and S. Wuttichindanon. 2019. Corporate social responsibility practices and disclosures in Thailand. Social Responsibility Journal 15, no. 3: 318–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, P. 2001. Corporate responsibility in employment standards in a global knowledge economy. In Perspectives on the new economy of corporate citizenship, ed. S. Zadek, N. Hojensgard, and P. Raynard, 43–7. Copenhagen: The Copenhagen Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Kamal, Y. 2021. Stakeholders expectations for CSR-related corporate governance disclosure: Evidence from a developing country. Asian Review of Accounting 29, no. 2: 97–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur, A., and S. Lodhia. 2018. Stakeholder engagement in sustainability accounting and reporting: A study of Australian local councils. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 31, no. 1: 338–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, P., R. McCormack, and T. Zunker. 2021. Employee disclosures in the grocery industry before the COVID-19 pandemic. Accounting & Finance 61, no. 3: 4833–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, P., and T. Zunker. 2013. Attaining legitimacy by employee information in annual reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 26, no. 7: 1072–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, H.Z., S. Bose, and R. Johns. 2020. Regulatory influences on CSR practices within banks in an emerging economy: Do banks merely comply? Critical Perspectives on Accounting 71: 102096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, M., J. Lockhart, and R. Bathurst. 2020. A multi-level institutional perspective of corporate social responsibility reporting: A mixed-method study. Journal of Cleaner Production 265: 121739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloppers, E., and L. Fourie. 2014. CSR communication in a South African agricultural company. Communicatio: South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research 40, no. 4: 305–22.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Z., and S. Haque. 2019. Corporate social responsibility employment narratives: A linguistic analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 32, no. 6: 1690–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodhia, S., and N. Martin. 2012. Stakeholder responses to the national greenhouse and energy reporting act: An agenda setting perspective. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 25, no. 1: 126–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh, C.M., C. Deegan, and R. Inglis. 2014. The changing trends of corporate social and environmental disclosure within the Australian gambling industry. Accounting & Finance 55, no. 3: 783–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahitthirook, A. 2015. Thai staff threaten strike action. https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/politics/774085/thai-staff-threaten-strike-action.
   Google Scholar
• Maji, S.G. 2022. Disclosure pattern of labour practices and decent work and its impact on corporate financial performance: Evidence from Asia. Global Business Review 23, no. 4: 1054–70.
   Google Scholar
• Medco Energi Internasional. 2015. Medco Energi Internasional sustainability report 2014. http://www.medcoenergi.com/en/subpagelist/view/36.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R.K., B.R. Agle, and D.J. Wood. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review 22, no. 4: 853–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momin, M. 2013. Social and environmental NGOs’ perceptions of corporate social disclosures: The case of Bangladesh. Accounting Forum 37, no. 2: 150–61.
   Google Scholar
• National News Bureau of Thailand. 2016. Four major Japanese automotive companies to use Thailand as car manufacturing base. https://www.thaivisa.com/forum/topic/901127-four-major-japanese-automotive-companies-to-use-thailand-as-car-manufacturing-base/.
   Google Scholar
• Odera, O., A. Scott, and J. Gow. 2018. Community perceptions of Nigerian oil companies commitment to social and environmental concerns. Journal of Global Responsibility 9, no. 1: 73–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer, B. 2002. Managerial perceptions of corporate social disclosure: An Irish story. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 15, no. 3: 406–36.
   Google Scholar
• O'Dwyer, B., J. Unerman, and J. Bradley. 2005. Perceptions on the emergence and future development of corporate social disclosure in Ireland: Engaging the voices of non-governmental organisations. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 18, no. 1: 14–43.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, N., and B. O’Dwyer. 2015. The structuration of issue-based fields: Social accountability, social movements and the equator principles issue-based field. Accounting, Organizations and Society 43: 33–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsa, S., I. Roper, M. Muller-Camen, and E. Szigetvari. 2018. Have labour practices and human rights disclosures enhanced corporate accountability? The case of the GRI framework. Accounting Forum 42, no. 1: 47–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petcharat, N., and M. Zaman. 2019. Sustainability reporting and integrated reporting perspectives of Thai-listed companies. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting 17, no. 4: 671–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petroleum Authority of Thailand. 2016. Petroleum Authority of Thailand sustainability report 2015. http://www.pttplc.com/en/Media-Center/Pages/PTT-Publications.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, R., R.E. Freeman, and A.C. Wicks. 2003. What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly 13, no. 4: 479–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinaldi, L., J. Unerman, and C. Tilt. 2014. The role of stakeholder engagement and dialogue within the sustainability accounting and reporting process. In Sustainability accounting and accountability, ed. J. Bebbington, J. Unerman, and B. O'Dwyer, 86–107. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, R.W. 1992. Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society 17, no. 6: 595–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, M., P. Lewis, and A. Thornhill. 2016. Research methods for business students. 7th ed. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Sekaran, U., and R. Bougie. 2016. Research methods for business: A skill-building approach. 7th ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Shabana, K.M., A.K. Buchholtz, and A.B. Carroll. 2017. The institutionalization of corporate social responsibility reporting. Business & Society 56, no. 8: 1107–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sian, S., F. Magli, A.A. Nobolo, and E. Guarini. 2020. Enacting accountability: The case of the Asili di Carità, 1913–1926. Accounting History 25, no. 2: 237–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, C. 2009. Social and environmental reporting and the corporate ego. Business Strategy and the Environment 18, no. 4: 254–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suhardjanto, D., G. Tower, and A. Brown. 2008. Indonesian stakeholders’ perceptions on environmental information. Journal of the Asia Pacific Centre for Environmental Accountability 14, no. 4: 2–11.
   Google Scholar
• Suttawet, C., and G.J. Bamber. 2018. International labour standards and decent work: A critical analysis of Thailand's experiences, with suggestions for theory, policy, practice and research. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources 56, no. 4: 539–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tambunan, T.H.T., and B. Purwoko. 2002. Social protection in Indonesia. In Social protection in southeast and east Asia, ed. E. Adam, M. Hauff, and M. John, 21–73. The Plaza Singapore: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Thai Union. 2017. Thai Union sustainability report 2016. http://www.thaiunion.com/en/sustainability/report.
   Google Scholar
• Ullman, A.A. 1985. Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationship among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of US firms. Academy of Management Review 10, no. 3: 540–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Laan, S. 2009. The role of theory in explaining motivation for corporate social disclosures: Voluntary disclosures vs ‘solicited’ disclosures. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal 3, no. 4: 15–29.
   Google Scholar
• Vithana, K., T. Soobaroyen, and C.G. Ntim. 2021. Human resource disclosures in UK corporate annual reports: To what extent do these reflect organisational priorities towards labour? Journal of Business Ethics 169, no. 3: 475–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, J.P. 2005. Book review essay: Taking stock of stakeholder management. The Academy of Management Review 30, no. 2: 426–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardhani, R., and Y. Rahadian. 2021. Sustainability strategy of Indonesian and Malaysian palm oil industry: A qualitative analysis. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 12, no. 5: 1077–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicaksono, A.P., and D. Setiawan. 2022. Water disclosure in the agriculture industry: Does stakeholder influence matter? Journal of Cleaner Production 337: 130605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicks, A.C., D.R. Gilbert, and R.E. Freeman. 1994. A feminist reinterpretation of the stakeholder concept. Business Ethics Quarterly 4, no. 4: 475–97.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B. 2015. The local government accountants’ perspective on sustainability. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 6, no. 2: 267–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, S.J., and C.A. Adams. 2013. Moral accounting? Employee disclosures from a stakeholder accountability perspective. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 26, no. 3: 449–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilmshurst, T.D. 2004. Stakeholder theory: Modelling stakeholder theories as a research tradition: Some Australian evidence. Journal of the Asian Pacific Centre for Environmental Accountability 10, no. 3: 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank. 2017. Indonesia's global workers: juggling opportunities and risks. http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/357131511778676366/Indonesias-Global-Workers-Juggling-Opportunities-Risks.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wuttichindanon, S. 2017. Corporate social responsibility disclosure – choices of report and its determinants: Empirical evidence from firms listed on the stock exchange of Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences 38, no. 2: 156–62.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, S., and A.L. Rowe. 2017. Emerging phenomenon of corporate social and environmental reporting in China. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 8, no. 3: 386–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar