13,045
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

The diffusion deficit in scientific and technological power: re-assessing China’s rise

References

  • Alexopoulos, M. (2011). Read all about it!! What happens following a technology shock? American Economic Review, 101(4), 1144–1179. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.4.1144
  • Alibaba Research Institute. (2019). From connected to empowered: Smart + assisting the high-quality development of China’s economy [从连接到赋能:‘智能+’助力中国经济高质量发展]. http://www.cbdio.com/BigData/2019-03/18/content_6049452.htm.
  • Allison, G. (2017). Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap?. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
  • Allison, G., & Schmidt, E. (2020). Is China beating the U.S. to AI supremacy?. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.
  • Alnuaimi, T., Singh, J., & George, G. (2012). Not with my own: Long-term effects of cross-country collaboration on subsidiary innovation in emerging economies versus advanced economies. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(5), 943–968. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbs025
  • Amann, R., Cooper, J., & Davies, R. W. (1977). Ronald Amann, Julian Cooper, & R. W. Davies, with the Assistance of Hugh Jenkins (Eds.), The technological level of Soviet Industry. Yale University Press.
  • American Academy of Arts and Sciences. (2020). The perils of complacency: America at a tipping point in science & engineering. American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
  • Andrews, D., Criscuolo, C., & Gal, P. N. (2015). Frontier firms, technology diffusion, and public policy: Micro evidence from OECD countries. OECD.
  • Beckley, M. (2012). China’s century? Why America’s edge will endure. International Security, 36(3), 41–78. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00066
  • Beckley, M. (2018). The power of nations: Measuring what Matters. International Security, 43(2), 7–44. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00328
  • Berliner, J. S. (1973). Some international aspects of Soviet technological progress. South Atlantic Quarterly, 72(3), 340–350.
  • Biden, J. (2021). Remarks as prepared for delivery by President Biden – Address to a joint session of congress. The U.S. Capitol Building.
  • Bolt, J., & Luiten van Zanden, J. (2020). Maddison style estimates of the evolution of the world economy. A new 2020 update. Maddison Project Working Paper.
  • Breznitz, D., & Murphree, M. (2011). Run of the Red Queen: Government, innovation, globalization, and economic growth in China (1st ed.). Yale University Press.
  • Broadberry, S. (2006). Market services and the productivity race. 1850–2000: British performance in international perspective. Cambridge studies in economic history - Second series. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495748
  • Brooks, S. G., & Wohlforth, W. C. (2016). The rise and fall of the great powers in the twenty-first century: China’s rise and the fate of America’s global position. International Security, 40(3), 7–53. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00225
  • Central Intelligence Agency. (1969). The technological gap: The USSR vs the US and Western Europe.
  • Chen, J., Yin, X., Fu, X., & McKern, B. (2021). Beyond catch-up: Could China become the global innovation powerhouse? China’s innovation progress and challenges from a holistic innovation perspective. Industrial and Corporate Change, 30(4), 1037–1064. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtab032
  • Cheung, T. M. (2013). Fortifying China: The struggle to build a modern defense economy. Cornell University Press.
  • Cocka, Paul M. (1980). Science policy: USA/USSR. Volume II: Science policy in the Soviet Union. National Science Foundation.
  • Cohen, I. B. (1976). Science and the growth of the American Republic. The Review of Politics, 38(3), 359–398. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500014455
  • Comin, D., & Hobijn, B. (2010). An exploration of technology diffusion. American Economic Review, 100(5), 2031–2059. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.5.2031
  • Comin, D., & Mestieri, M. (2014). Chapter 2 - Technology Diffusion: Measurement, Causes, and Consequences. In Handbook of Economic Growth., edited by Philippe Aghion and Steven N. Durlauf, 2:565–622. Handbook of Economic Growth. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53540-5.00002-1
  • Comin, D., & Mestieri, M. (2018). If technology has arrived everywhere, why has income diverged? American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 10(3), 137–178. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20150175
  • Crawford, B. (1993). Economic vulnerability in international relations: The case of East-West Trade, investment, and finance. Columbia University Press.
  • de La Bruyère, E. & Picarsic, N. (2020). Beijing’s innovation strategy: Threat-informed acquisition for an era of great power competition. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Acquisition Research Symposium, April 28.
  • Dupree, A. H. (1964). Science in the federal government: A history of policies and activities to 1940. Harper & Row.
  • Edgerton, D. (1999). From innovation to use: Ten eclectic theses on the historiography of technology. History and Technology, 16(2), 111–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/07341519908581961
  • Edquist, C., & Lundvall, B.-A. (1993). Comparing the Danish and Swedish Systems of Innovation. In R. R Nelson (Ed.), National innovation systems: a comparative analysis (pp. 265–298). Oxford University Press.
  • Evangelista, M. (1988). Innovation and the arms race: How the United States and the Soviet Union develop new military technologies. Ithaca. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015009973317.
  • Fadly, D., & Fontes, F. (2019). Geographical proximity and renewable energy diffusion: An empirical approach. Energy Policy, 129, 422–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.034
  • Freeman, C., & Young, A. (1965). The research and development effort in Western Europe, North America and the Soviet Union: An experimental international comparison of research expenditures and manpower in 1962. OECD.
  • Geisler, E. (2000). The metrics of science and technology. Quorum Books.
  • Gerschenkron, A. (1962). Economic backwardness in historical perspective. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Gilady, L. (2017). The price of prestige. University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/P/bo25338548.html.
  • Gilpin, R. (1968). France in the age of the scientific state. Princeton University Press.
  • Gilpin, R. (1981). War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge University Press.
  • Gordin, M. D. (2014). The Soviet science system. The Point. https://thepointmag.com/politics/soviet-science-system/.
  • Graham, L. (2013). Lonely ideas: Can Russia compete? Illustrated edition. The MIT Press.
  • Gries, T., Grundmann, R., Palnau, I., & Redlin, M. (2017). Innovations, growth and participation in advanced economies – A review of major concepts and findings. International Economics and Economic Policy, 14(2), 293–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-016-0371-1
  • Guédon, J-c. (1980). Conceptual and institutional obstacles to the emergence of unit operations in Europe. In William F. Furter (Ed.), History of chemical engineering (pp. 45–75). American Chemical Society.
  • Höhn, K. H. (2011). Geopolitics and the measurement of national power. Hamburg University.
  • Hwang, K. (2010). Measuring geopolitical power in India: A review of the National Security Index (NSI)
  • International Telecommunications Union. (2017) Measuring the Information Society Report 2017. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/mis2017.aspx.
  • Kaiser, D. (2006). The physics of spin: Sputnik politics and American Physicists in the 1950s. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 73(4), 1225–1252. https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2006.0030
  • Keller, W. (2004). International technology diffusion. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(3), 752–782. https://doi.org/10.1257/0022051042177685
  • Kelley, J. G., & Simmons, B. A. (2019). Introduction: The power of global performance indicators. International Organization, 73(3), 491–510. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818319000146
  • Kennedy, A. (2018). The conflicted superpower America’s collaboration with China and India in global innovation. Columbia University Press.
  • Kennedy, A. B. (2015). Powerhouses or pretenders? Debating China’s and India’s emergence as technological powers. The Pacific Review, 28(2), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2014.995126
  • Kennedy, A. B. (2016). Slouching Tiger, Roaring Dragon: Comparing India and China as late innovators. Review of International Political Economy, 23(1), 65–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2015.1105845
  • Kennedy, A. B., & Lim, D. J. (2018). The innovation imperative: Technology and US–China rivalry in the twenty-first century. International Affairs, 94(3), 553–572. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiy044
  • Kennedy, P. M. (1987). The rise and fall of the great powers: Economic change and military conflict from 1500 to 2000. Random House.
  • Kennedy, S. (2017). The fat tech dragon: Benchmarking China’s innovation drive. Center for Strategic and International Studies.
  • Kevles, D. J., Sturchio, J. L., & Carroll, P. T. (1980). The sciences in America, Circa 1880. Science (New York, N.Y.), 209(4452), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.209.4452.27
  • Kontorovich, V. (1990). The long-run decline in Soviet R&D productivity. The impoverished superpower: Perestroika and the burden of Soviet military spending (pp. 255–270). Institute for Contemporary Studies Press.
  • Krige, J. (2000). NATO and the strengthening of western science in the Post-Sputnik Era. Minerva, 38(1), 81–108. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026549723657
  • Lan, X., & Forbes, N. (2006). Will China become a science and technology superpower by 2020? An assessment based on a national innovation system framework. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(4), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1162/itgg.2006.1.4.111
  • Layne, C. (2018). The US–Chinese power shift and the end of the Pax Americana. International Affairs, 94(1), 89–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix249
  • Little, A. D. (1933). Twenty-five years of chemical engineering progress (Silver anniversary volume). American Institute of Chemical Engineers.
  • Macleod, R. M. (1971). The support of Victorian Science: The endowment of research movement in Great Britain, 1868-1900. Minerva, 9(2), 197–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01553156
  • Madsen, J. B. (2007). Technology spillover through trade and TFP convergence: 135 years of evidence for the OECD Countries. Journal of International Economics, 72(2), 464–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.12.001
  • Malkin, A. (2020). The made in China challenge to US structural power: Industrial policy, intellectual property and multinational corporations. Review of International Political Economy, 29(2), 538–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1824930
  • Maloney, W. F., & Caicedo, F. V. (2017). Engineering growth: Innovative capacity and development in the Americas. CESifo Working Paper Series. CESifo Working Paper Series. CESifo, 2017. https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_6339.html.
  • McCarthy, D. P. (2015). Information Technology, and International Relations Theory: The Power and Politics of US Foreign Policy and the Internet. Springer.
  • MIT Committee to Evaluate the Innovation Deficit. (2015). The future postponed: Why declining investment in basic research threatens a U.S. innovation deficit. MIT.
  • Modelski, G., & Thompson, W. R. (1996). Leading sectors and world powers: The coevolution of global politics and economics. University of South Carolina Press.
  • Mokyr, J. (1998). The second industrial revolution, 1870-1914. In V. Castronono (Ed.), Storia dell’economia Mondiale (pp. 219–245). Laterza.
  • Mowery, D. C., & Rosenberg, N. (1993). The U.S. National Innovation System. In Richard R. Nelson (Ed.) National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press.
  • Moyer, J. D., & Markle, A. (2017). Relative national power codebook. Diplometrics. Frederick S. Pardee Center for International Futures.
  • Murmann, P. (2003). Chemical Industries after 1850. In Oxford Encyclopedia of Economic History (pp. 398–406). Oxford University Press.
  • Nahm, J., & Steinfeld, E. S. (2014, February 1). Scale-up Nation: China’s specialization in innovative manufacturing. World Development, 54, 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.09.003
  • National Intelligence Council. (2012). Global trends 2030: Alternative worlds. Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
  • National Science Board. (1987). Science & engineering indicators – 1987. National Science Foundation.
  • National Science Board. (1993). Science & engineering indicators – 1993. U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Nye, J. S. (1990). The changing nature of world power. Political Science Quarterly, 105(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.2307/2151022
  • Paarlberg, R. L. (2004). Knowledge as power: Science, military dominance, and U.S. security. International Security, 29(1), 122–151. https://doi.org/10.1162/0162288041762959
  • Perkins, R., & Neumayer, E. (2005). The international diffusion of new technologies: A multitechnology analysis of latecomer advantage and global economic integration. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95(4), 789–808. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00487.x
  • Pillsbury, M. (2000). China debates the future security environment. National Defense University Press.
  • Poznanski, K. Z. (1983). International diffusion of steel technologies: Time-lag and the speed of diffusion. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 23(4), 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(83)90034-3
  • Pulkki-Brännström, A.-M K. (2009). International diffusion of new technology (Phd). University of Warwick. http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/record=b2334510∼S15.
  • Rapkin, D., & Thompson, W. (2003). Power transition, challenge and the (re)emergence of china. International Interactions, 29(4), 315–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/714950652
  • Ray, G. F., Håkanson, S., Ehrlich, R., Oppenländer, K. H., Lacci, L., & Aujac, H. (1969). The diffusion of new technology: A study of ten processes in nine industries. National Institute Economic Review, 48(1), 40–83.
  • Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the black box: Technology and economics. Cambridge University Press.
  • Rosenberg, N. (1998). Chemical engineering as a general purpose technology. In Elhanan Helpman (Ed.) Chemical engineering as a general purpose technology (pp. 167–192). MIT Press.
  • Rosenberg, N., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2013). Engineering knowledge. Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(5), 1129–1158. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dts053
  • Rowland, H. A. (1883). A plea for pure science. Science, 2(29), 242–250.
  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Harvard Economic Studies, Harvard University Press.
  • Shapira, P., & Youtie, J. (2017). The next production revolution and institutions for technology diffusion. The next production revolution: Implications for governments and business. OECD.
  • Shryock, R. H. (1966). Medicine in America: Historical essays. Johns Hopkins Press.
  • Slichter, Charles S. (1902). Recent criticism of American scholarship. Transactions of the Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts and Letters, 14, 1–15. https://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/WI/WI-idx?type=turn&id=WI.WT1902&entity=WI.WT1902.p0017&isize=text.
  • Snyder, C. (1902). America’s inferior position in the scientific world. The North American Review, 174(542), 59–72.
  • Starrs, S. (2013). American economic power hasn’t declined—It globalized! summoning the data and taking globalization seriously. International Studies Quarterly, 57(4), 817–830. https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12053
  • Suttmeier, R. P. (2008). The discourse on China as science and technology superpower: Assessing the arguments. International Symposium on China as a Science and Technology Superpower (pp. 9–10).
  • Synced. (2020). Market research report on supply and demand for digital intelligentization solutions for China’s small and medium enterprises [中国中小企业数智化解决方案供应市场研究报告2020].
  • Taylor, M. Z. (2012). Toward an international relations theory of national innovation rates. Security Studies, 21(1), 113–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2012.650596
  • Taylor, M. Z. (2016). The politics of innovation: Why some countries are better than others at science and technology (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
  • Techxcope. (2020). Innovation is more than invention: Detailed explanation of the German industry-university-research systems’ Big Four [创新不止于发明:德国产学研体系四大金刚详解].
  • Teitelbaum, M. S. (2014). Falling behind?: Boom, bust, and the global race for scientific talent. Princeton University Press. https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691154664/falling-behind.
  • Thackray, A., Sturchio, J. L., Carroll, P. T., & Bud, R. F. (1985). Chemistry in America 1876–1976: Historical indicators (1985th ed.). Springer.
  • The New York Times. (1860). Scientific Progress and Prospects of Science in America. The Recent Congress at Newport Resume of Results. Archives. https://www.nytimes.com/1860/08/25/archives/scientific-progress-and-prospects-of-science-in-america-the-recent.html.
  • Trachtenberg, M. (2018). Assessing Soviet economic performance during the Cold War: A failure of intelligence? Texas National Security Review, 1(2), 76–101.
  • Wang, J., & Chen, X. Information security: A comparative study on cloud security in China and the United States, what gaps exist in Chinese Cloud security? [信息安全:中美云安全产业对比研究, 国内云安全公司空间几何?]. DongXing Securities (blog), June 29, 2020. http://www.xcf.cn/article/2a6265f3bc2f11eabf3cd4c9efcfdeca.html.
  • Walsh, K. A. (2014). China’s emerging defense innovation system: making the wheels turn. In Tai Ming Cheung (Ed.) Forging China’s Military Might : A New Framework for Assessing Innovation. Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Weber, S. (2004). The success of open source. Harvard University Press.
  • World Intellectual Property Organization. (2020). Global innovation index 2020 https://www.wipo.int/global_innovation_index/en/2020/.