Trading for survival: trade policy as a credible signal, alliance strategy, and public preferences in Taiwan

References

• Ashton, A. (2022). What to expect from the U.S.-Taiwan 21st century trade initiative. ASPI Note. Retrieved July 22, 2022, from https://asiasociety.org/policy-institute/aspi-note-what-expect-us-taiwan-21st-century-trade-initiative.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard-Rosa, C., Malik, M. A., Rickard, S. J., & Scheve, K. (2021). The economic origins of authoritarian values: Evidence from local trade shocks in the United Kingdom. Comparative Political Studies, 54(13), 2321–2353. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211024296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnegie, A., & Gaikwad, N. (2022). Public opinion on geopolitics and trade: Theory and evidence. World Politics, 74(2), 167–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887121000265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F.-Y., & Yen, W.-T. (2017). Who supports the sunflower movement? An examination of nationalist sentiments. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 52(8), 1193–1212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909616645372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, I. T-y. (2022). The prospects of the U.S.-Taiwan initiative on 21st-century trade. Prospects & Perspectives. Retrieved July 22, 2022, from https://www.pf.org.tw/en/pfen/33-9516.html.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-N K. (2011). Meiguo niurou jinkou taiwan weijizhong de meijie shiyong, zhengzhi xinren yu fengxian ganzhi de guanxi [The relationship among media use, political trust, and risk perception during the US beef imports crisis in Taiwan]. Communication & Society, (17), 31–59.
   Google Scholar
• Dellmuth, L. M., & Tallberg, J. (2021). Elite communication and the popular legitimacy of international organizations. British Journal of Political Science, 51(3), 1292–1313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123419000620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. J., Plattner, M. F., & Walker, C. (2016). Authoritarianism goes global: The challenge to democracy. Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2014). Why parties politicise international institutions: On globalisation backlash and authority contestation. Review of International Political Economy, 21(6), 1275–1312. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2013.839463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, S., & Maestas, C. (2010). Risk orientation, risk exposure, and policy opinions: The case of free trade. Political Psychology, 31(5), 657–684. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00774.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazal, T. M. (2007). State death: The politics and geography of conquest, occupation, and annexation. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fearon, J. D. (1994). Domestic political audiences and the escalation of international disputes. American Political Science Review, 88(3), 577–592. https://doi.org/10.2307/2944796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaubatz, K. T. (1996). Democratic states and commitment in international relations. International Organization, 50(1), 109–139. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300001685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidron, N., & Hall, P. A. (2017). The politics of social status: Economic and cultural roots of the populist right. The British Journal of Sociology, 68(S1), S57–S84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowa, J., & Mansfield, E. D. (1993). Power politics and international trade. American Political Science Review, 87(2), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.2307/2939050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowa, J., & Mansfield, E. D. (2004). Alliances, imperfect markets, and major-power trade. International Organization, 58(04), 775–805. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830404024X
   Google Scholar
• Guisinger, A., & Saunders, E. N. (2017). Mapping the boundaries of elite cues: How elites shape mass opinion across international issues. International Studies Quarterly, 61(2), 425–441. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqx022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, J., & Hiscox, M. J. (2006). Learning to love globalization: Education and individual attitudes toward international trade. International Organization, 60(02), 469–498. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818306060140
   Google Scholar
• Hass, R. (2021). Taiwan voters should look before they leap on pork referendum. Order from Chaos: Foreign Policy in a Troubled World. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2021/07/12/taiwan-voters-should-look-before-they-leap-on-pork-referendum/.
   Google Scholar
• Hays, J., Lim, J., & Spoon, J.-J. (2019). The path from trade to right-wing populism in Europe. Electoral Studies, 60, 102038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2019.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, M-s. (2015). Occupy Congress in Taiwan: Political opportunity, threat, and the sunflower movement. Journal of East Asian Studies, 15(1), 69–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1598240800004173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, A. (2013, July 27). Publishers criticize trade pact. Taipei Times, 3. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2013/07/27/2003568277.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, S. P. (2010). Between identity quest and risk aversion: Lessons from the Chen Shui-bian presidency for maintaining cross-strait stability. Journal of Contemporary China, 19(66), 693–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2010.485405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsueh, C-w A. (2022). Bandwagoning, hedging, balancing, or isolationism? Probing Taiwanese public opinion toward these four China policy alternatives. Taiwan Democracy Quarterly, 19(1), 83–133.
   Google Scholar
• Jedinger, A., & Burger, A. M. (2020). The ideological foundations of economic protectionism: Authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and the moderating role of political involvement. Political Psychology, 41(2), 403–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, R. (2010). Taiwan blocks US beef imports, strains trade ties. Reuters. Retrieved July 21, 2022, from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-taiwan-usa-idUSTRE6041K220100105.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. (2011). Guilt by association: The Link between States’ influence and the legitimacy of intergovernmental organizations. The Review of International Organizations, 6(1), 57–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-010-9088-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadercan, B. (2013). Making sense of survival: refining the treatment of state preferences in neorealist theory. Review of International Studies, 39(4), 1015–1037. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210512000538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1973). Power and interdependence. Survival, 15(4), 158–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396337308441409
   Google Scholar
• Ker, C.-M. (2015). Daju chengdan: ke Jianming de guohui zhechong yu guanjian chengdan. [The mediator: Ker Chien-Ming’s contributions to and key role in Taiwan’s legislature]. Green Futures Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Labs, E. J. (1992). Do weak states bandwagon? Security Studies, 1(3), 383–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636419209347476
   Google Scholar
• Lai, Y.-C. (2022). The reaction of Taiwan civil society towards cross-strait integration during the period from 2008 to 2016: Spillover or politicization? Pacific Focus, 37(1), 36–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/pafo.12203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeds, B. A. (1999). Domestic Political institutions, credible commitments, and international cooperation. American Journal of Political Science, 43(4), 979–1002. https://doi.org/10.2307/2991814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, J. (1989). The causes of war: A review of theories and evidence. In P. E. Tetlock, J. L. Husbands, R. Jervis, P. Stern, & C. Tilly (Eds.), Behavior, society, and nuclear war (Vol. 1, pp. 209–333). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, B-h., & Lin, J-M (2021, December 15). Wancheng 70 chang xuanjiang su dazhuanji pangongtou guofangbu aihong luhua [Completed 70 speeches, Su took a privilege flight to fight for the referendum, and the Ministry of National Defense was criticized as leaning toward the DPP]. China Times (Taiwan). https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20211215000504-260118?chdtv.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, S-y. (2021, November 24). Fan laizhu gongtou ruoguo, Ge Laiyi: Taimei jiang zhonghui meiyou TIFA zhuangtai [If the anti-pork containing ractopamine referendum passes, Bonnie Glaser: Taiwan and the US will return to a state without TIFA]. Central News Agency (Taiwan). https://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/202111240335.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Lohmann, S. (1997). Linkage politics. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41(1), 38–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002797041001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E. D., & Mutz, D. C. (2009). Support for free trade: Self-interest, sociotropic politics, and out-group anxiety. International Organization, 63(3), 425–457. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818309090158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maoz, Z., & Russett, B. (1993). Normative and structural causes of democratic peace, 1946–1986. American Political Science Review, 87(3), 624–638. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayda, A. M., & Rodrik, D. (2005). Why are some people (and countries) more protectionist than others? European Economic Review, 49(6), 1393–1430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics. International Organization, 51(4), 513–553. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081897550447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C., & Kim, E. (2017). The impact of in-group favoritism on trade preferences. International Organization, 71(4), 827–850. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818317000327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muyard, F. (2012). Taiwanese national identity, cross-strait economic interaction, and the integration paradigm. In P. C. Y. Chow (Ed.), National identity and economic interest: Taiwan’s competing options and their implications for regional stability (pp. 153–186). Palgrave Macmillan US.
   Google Scholar
• Naoi, M., & Urata, S. (2013). Free trade agreements and domestic politics: The case of the trans-pacific partnership agreement. Asian Economic Policy Review, 8(2), 326–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/aepr.12035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poast, P. (2013). Issue linkage and international cooperation: An empirical investigation. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 30(3), 286–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894213484030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhoads, B., & Standing, J. S. (2012, June 1). Taiwan President Ma says hopeful about China’s next leader. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-taiwan-president-idUKBRE8500DF20120601
   Google Scholar
• Rho, S., & Tomz, M. (2017). Why don’t trade preferences reflect economic self-interest? International Organization, 71(S1), S85–S108. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818316000394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogowski, R. (1987). Political cleavages and changing exposure to trade. American Political Science Review, 81(4), 1121–1137. https://doi.org/10.2307/1962581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, R. L. (1968). Alliances and small powers. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shih, H-c. (2012a, February 1). AIT chairman links beef to trade talks and TPP accession. Taipei Times, 2. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2012/02/01/2003524404.
   Google Scholar
• Shih, H-c. (2012b, January 28). US beef is political hostage: AIT boss. Taipei Times, 3. http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2012/06/28/2003536452.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (1998). International crises and domestic politics. American Political Science Review, 92(3), 623–638. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spilker, G., Bernauer, T., & Umaña, V. (2018). What kinds of trade liberalization agreements do people in developing countries want? International Interactions, 44(3), 510–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2018.1436316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toft, M. D. (2003). The geography of ethnic violence: Identity, interests, and the indivisibility of territory. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, C-h., & Chen, L-h (2015). China factor or civic disobedience? Explaining support for the sunflower movement with panel data. Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy, 27(4), 573–603.
   Google Scholar
• Walt, S. M. (1987). The origins of alliances. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
   Google Scholar