Rebuilding the fortress? Europe in a changing world economy

References

• Alami, I., & Dixon, A. (2020). State capitalism(s) redux? Competition & Change, 24(1), 70–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024529419881949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ban, C., & Gabor, D. (2016). The political economy of shadow banking. Review of International Political Economy, 23(6), 901–914. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2016.1264442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie (BDI). (2019). China – Partner and Systemic Competitor. https://english.bdi.eu/publication/news/china-partner-and-systemic-competitor
   Google Scholar
• Bickenbach, F., & Liu, W. H. (2018). Chinese direct investment in Europe. CESifo Forum, 19(4), 15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi). (2019). Industrial strategy 2030. Berlin. https://www.bmwk.de/Redaktion/EN/Publikationen/Industry/industrial-strategy-2030.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=7
   Google Scholar
• BMWi and Ministère de l’Économie et des Finances (MEF). (2019). A Franco-German Manifesto for a European industrial policy fit for the 21st Century. https://www.bmwk.de/Redaktion/DE/Downloads/F/franco-german-manifesto-for-a-european-industrial-policy.pdf%3F__blob%3DpublicationFile%26v%3D2#:∼:text=The%20choice%20is%20simple%20when,its%20economic%20sovereignty%20and%20independence.
   Google Scholar
• Bohle, D. (2006). Neoliberal hegemony, transnational capital and the terms of the EU’s eastward expansion. Capital & Class, 30(1), 57–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/030981680608800104
   Google Scholar
• Braun, B. (2020). Central banking and the infrastructural power of finance. Socio-Economic Review, 18(2), 395–418. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mourlon-Druol, E. (2018). The international use of the euro. https://www.bruegel.org/blog-post/international-use-euro-what-can-we-learn-past-examples-currency-internationalisation
   Google Scholar
• Buch-Hansen, H., & Wigger, A. (2010). Revisiting 50 years of market-making: The neoliberal transformation of European competition policy. Review of International Political Economy, 17(1), 20–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290903014927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzan, B., & Lawson, G. (2015). The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, B. (2017). The IPE of money revisited. Review of International Political Economy, 24(4), 657–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2016.1259119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copelovitch, M., Hobolt, S. B., & Walter, S. (2020). Challenges to the contemporary global order. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(7), 1114–1125. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1678666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R. (1987). Production, power, and world order: Social forces in the making of history. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Graaff, N. (2020). China Inc. goes global. Review of International Political Economy, 27(2), 208–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1675741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ville, F., & Siles-Brügge, G. (2018). The role of ideas in legitimating EU trade policy. In S. Khorana & M. García (Eds.), Handbook on the EU and international trade (pp. 243–262). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, K. (1968). Political community and the North American area. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DG Grow – Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs. (2022). Industrial alliances. https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/industry/strategy/industrial-alliances_en
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Auditors (ECA). (2020). The EU’s response to China’s state-driven investment strategy. https://www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/ECADocuments/RW20_03/RW_EU_response_to_China_EN.pdf&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1665680990671472&usg=AOvVaw2Z30m7c6KAlyAAWca_jxV6
   Google Scholar
• Eichengreen, B. (2005). The European Economy since 1945: Coordinated capitalism and beyond. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eurometaux. (2020). Consultation on the White Paper on Foreign Subsidies. https://eurometaux.eu/media/2095/em-submission_consultation_onforeign_subsidies.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2009). Preparing for our future: Developing a common strategy for key enabling technologies in the EU. COM(2009) 512 final. https://www.eumonitor.eu/9353000/1/j9vvik7m1c3gyxp/vikqhnv1gvzd
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011). High Level Working Group on Key Enabling Technologies: Final Report. https://www.kowi.de/Portaldata/2/Resources/fp7/hlg_kets_final_report_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2017). Welcoming Foreign Direct Investment while Protecting Essential Interests. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52017DC0494&from=EN
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2020). A new industrial strategy for Europe. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0102
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2020). White Paper on levelling the playing field as regards foreign subsidies. https://competition-policy.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-06/foreign_subsidies_white_paper_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2021a). Trade policy review - An open, sustainable and assertive trade policy. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:5bf4e9d0-71d2-11eb-9ac9-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format=PDF
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2021b). EU strengthens protection against economic coercion. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_21_6642
   Google Scholar
• Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ). (2017). Wir müssen unser Schicksal wirklich in die eigene Hand nehmen. 28 May 2017. https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/angela-merkel-zweifelt-an-zuverlaessigkeit-von-donald-trump-15036287.html
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira-Pereira, L. C., & Smith, M. (Eds.) (2021). The European Union’s strategic partnerships: global diplomacy in a contested world. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, G. W. (2018). Exporting assets. New Political Economy, 23(2), 174–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2017.1370444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabor, D. (2021). The Wall Street consensus. Development and Change, 52(3), 429–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germann, J. (2022). Global rivalries, corporate interests and Germany’s ‘National Industrial Strategy 2030. Review of International Political Economy, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2022.2130958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, S. (1998). European governance and new constitutionalism. New Political Economy, 3(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563469808406330
   Google Scholar
• Gilpin, R. (1987). The political economy of international relations. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, C. (1981). The New Protectionism. North Western Journal of International Law and Business, 3(1), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. (2020). The political economy of the special relationship. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (2018). The postnational constellation: Political essays. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, T., & Held, D. (2012). Gridlock and innovation in global governance. Global Policy, 3(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00128.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, P. (2020). Speech by Commissioner Phil Hogan at launch of public consultation for EU Trade Policy Review. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2019-2024/hogan/announcements/speech-commissioner-phil-hogan-launch-public-consultation-eu-trade-policy-review-hosted-eui-florence_en
   Google Scholar
• Hopewell, K. (2022). Beyond US-China rivalry. AJIL Unbound, 116, 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2022.3
   Google Scholar
• Hopkin, J., & Blyth, M. (2019). The global economics of European populism. Government and Opposition, 54(2), 193–225. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2018.43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabko, N. (2012). Playing the market: A political strategy for uniting Europe, 1985–2005. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, T., Gheyle, N., De Ville, F., & Orbie, J. (2023). The hegemonic politics of ‘strategic autonomy’ and ‘resilience’: COVID-19 and the dislocation of EU trade policy. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 61(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, A. (2016). From convergence to crisis: Labor markets and the instability of the Euro. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahler, M. (1985). European protectionism in theory and practice. World Politics, 37(4), 475–502. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, P. J. (2005). A world of regions: Asia and Europe in the American imperium. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krippner, G. R. (2011). Capitalizing on crisis: The political origins of the rise of finance. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• LeBaron, G., Mügge, D., Best, J., & Hay, C. (2021). Blind spots in IPE. Review of International Political Economy, 28(2), 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1830835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes-Valença, H. (2022). University of Sheffield The return of industrial policy in the European Union: The political economy of state aid to ‘Important Projects of Common European Interest’. Unpublished PhD thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Lundestad, G. (2005). The United States and Western Europe since 1945: From ‘empire’ by invitation to transatlantic drift. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macron, E. (2017). Initiative for Europe. Speech given at the Sorbonne University, Paris, 26 September 2017. https://www.dfa.ie/media/English-version-transcript–-Initiative-for-Europe–-Speech-by-the-President-of-the-French-Republic.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Malkin, A. (2022). The made in China challenge to US structural power: Industrial policy, intellectual property and multinational corporations. Review of International Political Economy, 29(2), 538–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1824930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandel, E. (1970). Europe versus America: Contradictions of imperialism. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, K. R. (2008). A rivalry in the making? The Euro and international monetary power. Review of International Political Economy, 15(3), 439–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290801931347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNally, C. A. (2020). Chaotic mélange: Neo-liberalism and neo-statism in the age of Sino-capitalism. Review of International Political Economy, 27(2), 281–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1683595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meunier, S., & Nicolaidis, K. (2019). The geo-politicisation of European trade and investment policy. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(S1), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12932
   Google Scholar
• Monnet, J. (1963). A ferment of change. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 1(3), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1963.tb01060.x
   Google Scholar
• Nölke, A., ten Brink, T., Claar, S., & May, C. (2015). Domestic structures, foreign economic policies and global economic order. European Journal of International Relations, 21(3), 538–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066114553682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panitch, L., & Gindin, S. (2013). The making of global capitalism: The political economy of American empire. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, J. (2005). Globalization theory: A post mortem. International Politics, 42(1), 2–74. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800098
   Google Scholar
• Ryner, M., & Cafruny, A. (Eds.) (2003). A ruined fortress? Neoliberal hegemony and transformation in Europe. Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Sbragia, A. (2008). Comparative regionalism. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 46, 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2008.00809.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz, L., & Seidl, T. (2023). As open as possible, as autonomous as necessary. Journal of Common Market Studies, 61, 834–852. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13428
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, E. (2023). Germany’s Industrial strategy 2030, EU competition policy and the crisis of New Constitutionalism: (Geo) political economy of a contested paradigm shift. New Political Economy, 28(2), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2022.2091535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider-Petsinger, M. (2019). US–EU trade relations in the Trump era: Which way forward? Chatham House. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/publications/research/2019-03-08US-EUTradeRelations2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Servan-Schreiber, J.-J. (1967). The American challenge. Avon.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, A. (2021). Understanding the ‘crisis of the institution’ in the liberal trade order at the WTO. International Affairs, 97(5), 1521–1540. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiab109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strange, S. (1987). The persistent myth of lost hegemony. International Organization, 41(4), 551–574. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A., & Thatcher, M. (Eds.) (2013). Resilient liberalism in Europe’s political economy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, H. (2016). Enduring capital flow constraints and the 2007–2008 financial and eurozone crises. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18(1), 216–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148115612791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, H. (2022). Disorder: Hard times in the 21st century. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tooze, A. (2018). Crashed: How a decade of financial crises changed the world. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Van Apeldoorn, B. (2003). Transnational capitalism and the struggle over European integration. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Apeldoorn, B., de Graaff, N., & Overbeek, H. (2012). The reconfiguration of the global state–capital nexus. Globalizations, 9(4), 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2012.699915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdun, A. (1999). The role of the Delors Committee in the creation of EMU. Journal of European Public Policy, 6(2), 308–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/135017699343739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, S. (2019). America v China. New Left Review, 115, 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1949). The methodology of the social sciences. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, L., & Thurbon, E. (2018). Power paradox: how the extension of US infrastructural power abroad diminishes state capacity at home. Review of International Political Economy, 25(6), 779–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2018.1486875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, A., Börzel, T., & Risse, T. (2019). European integration theory. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wigger, A. (2019). The new EU industrial policy. Globalizations, 16(3), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2018.1502496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigger, A. (2023). The new EU industrial policy and deepening structural asymmetries. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 61(1), 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar