References
- Moed, H. F. 2017. Applied Evaluative Informetrics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60522-7
- Bornmann, L., Haunschild, R., and Adams, J. Do altmetrics assess societal impact in a comparable way to case studies? An empirical test of the convergent validity of altmetrics based on data from the UK research excellence framework (REF). Journal of Informetrics 2019, 13(1), 325–340. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.01.008
- Forthmann, B., and Runco, M. A. An Empirical Test of the Inter-Relationships between Various Bibliometric Creative Scholarship Indicators. Publications 2020, 8(2), 34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/publications8020034
- Thelwall, M. Interpreting correlations between citation counts and other indicators. Scientometrics 2016, 108(1), 337–347. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1973-7
- Zou, C., and Peterson, J. B. Quantifying the scientific output of new researchers using the zp-index. Scientometrics 2016, 106(3), 901–916. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1807-z
- Prathap, G. Eugene Garfield: From the metrics of science to the science of metrics. Scientometrics 2018, 114(2), 637–650. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2525-5
- Glänzel, W., Thijs, B., and Schlemmer, B. A bibliometric approach to the role of author self-citations in scientific communication. Scientometrics 2004, 59(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000013299.38210.74
- Forthmann, B., Szardenings, C., and Holling, H. Understanding the confounding effect of fluency in divergent thinking scores: Revisiting average scores to quantify artifactual correlation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 2020, 14(1), 94–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000196
- Schneider, B., Rasch, D., Kubinger, K. D., and Yanagida, T. A sequential triangular test of a correlation coefficient’s null-hypothesis: 0< ρ≤ ρ 0. Statistical Papers 2015, 56(3), 689–699. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-014-0604-8
- Dehgani, L., Basirian Jahromi, R., and Ganjoo, M. Citations to highly-cited researchers by their co-authors and their self-citations: How these factors affect highly-cited researchers’ h-index in Scopus. Webology 2011, 8, 91.
- Garfield, E. Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation: Journals can be ranked by frequency and impact of citations for science policy studies. Science 1972, 178(4060), 471– 479. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.178.4060.471
- Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., van Leeuwen, T. N., Visser, M. S., & van Raan, A. F. Towards a new crown indicator: An empirical analysis. Scientometrics 2011, 87(3), 467-481. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0354-5
- R Core Team 2019. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
- Rosseel, Y. lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software 2012, 48(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
- Walters, G. D. (2016). Adding authorship order to the quantity and quality dimensions of scholarly productivity: Evidence from group- and individual-level analyses. Scientometrics 2016, 106(2), 769–785. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1803-3
- Hirsch, J. E. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2005, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
- Forthmann, B., Leveling, M., Dong, Y., and Dumas, D. Investigating the quantity–quality relationship in scientific creativity: an empirical examination of expected residual variance and the tilted funnel hypothesis. Scientometrics 2020, 124(3), 2497-2518. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03571-w