Flood susceptibility mapping using ANNs: a case study in model generalization and accuracy from Ontario, Canada

References

• Abedi R, Costache R, Shafizadeh-Moghadam H, Pham QB. 2021. Flash-flood susceptibility mapping based on XGBoost, random forest and boosted regression trees. Geocarto Int. 37(19):5479–5496. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2021.1920636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadlou M, Al-Fugara A, Al-Shabeeb AR, Arora A, Al-Adamat R, Pham QB, Al-Ansari N, Linh NTT, Sajedi H. 2021. Flood susceptibility mapping and assessment using a novel deep learning model combining multilayer perceptron and autoencoder neural networks. J Flood Risk Manage. 14(1):e12683. doi: 10.1111/jfr3.12683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed N, Hoque MAA, Arabameri A, Pal SC, Chakrabortty R, Jui J. 2021. Flood susceptibility mapping in Brahmaputra floodplain of Bangladesh using deep boost, deep learning neural network, and artificial neural network. Geocarto Int. 37(25):8770–8791. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2021.2005698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akay H. 2021. Flood hazards susceptibility mapping using statistical, fuzzy logic, and MCDM methods. Soft Comput. 25(14):9325–9346. doi: 10.1007/s00500-021-05903-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Abadi AM. 2018. Mapping flood susceptibility in an arid region of southern Iraq using ensemble machine learning classifiers: a comparative study. Arab J Geosci. 11(9):1–19. doi: 10.1007/S12517-018-3584-5/TABLES/7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Abadi AM, Pradhan B. 2020. In flood susceptibility assessment, is it scientifically correct to represent flood events as a point vector format and create flood inventory map? J Hydrol. 590:125475. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Juaidi AEM, Nassar AM, Al-Juaidi OEM. 2018. Evaluation of flood susceptibility mapping using logistic regression and GIS conditioning factors. Arab J Geosci. 11(24):1–10. doi: 10.1007/S12517-018-4095-0/FIGURES/7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali SA, Parvin F, Pham QB, Vojtek M, Vojteková J, Costache R, Linh NTT, Nguyen HQ, Ahmad A, Ghorbani MA. 2020. GIS-based comparative assessment of flood susceptibility mapping using hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach, naïve Bayes tree, bivariate statistics and logistic regression: a case of Topľa basin, Slovakia. Ecol Indic. 117:106620. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An NN, Song Nhut H, Anh Phuong T, Quang Huy V, Cao Hanh N, Thi Phuong Thao G, Chi Minh H, Pham The Trinh V, The Trinh P, Viet Hoa P, et al. 2022. Groundwater simulation in Dak Lak province based on MODFLOW model and climate change scenarios. FEBE. 2(1):55–67. doi: 10.1108/FEBE-11-2021-0055.
   Google Scholar
• Andaryani S, Nourani V, Haghighi AT, Keesstra S. 2021. Integration of hard and soft supervised machine learning for flood susceptibility mapping. J Environ Manage. 291:112731. doi: 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2021.112731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asadi H, Shahedi K, Jarihani B, Sidle RC. 2019. Rainfall-runoff modelling using hydrological connectivity index and artificial neural network approach. Water. 11(2):212. doi: 10.3390/w11020212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batista G, Prati RC, Monard MC. 2004. A study of the behavior of several methods for balancing machine learning training data. SIGKDD Explor Newsl. 6(1):20–29. doi: 10.1145/1007730.1007735.
   Google Scholar
• Bera A, Meraj G, Kanga S, Farooq M, Singh SK, Sahu N, Kumar P. 2022. Vulnerability and risk assessment to climate change in Sagar Island, India. Water. 14(5):823. doi: 10.3390/w14050823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui QT, Nguyen QH, Nguyen XL, Pham VD, Nguyen HD, Pham VM. 2020. Verification of novel integrations of swarm intelligence algorithms into deep learning neural network for flood susceptibility mapping. J Hydrol. 581:124379. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunmi Mudashiru R, Sabtu N, Abdullah R, Saleh A, Abustan I. 2022. Optimality of flood influencing factors for flood hazard mapping: an evaluation of two multi-criteria decision-making methods. J Hydrol. 612:128055. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabrera JS, Lee HS. 2020. Flood risk assessment for Davao Oriental in the Philippines using geographic information system-based multi-criteria analysis and the maximum Entropy model. J Flood Risk Manage. 13(2):e12607. doi: 10.1111/jfr3.12607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabortty R, Chandra Pal S, Rezaie F, Arabameri A, Lee S, Roy P, Saha A, Chowdhuri I, Moayedi H. 2021. Flash-flood hazard susceptibility mapping in Kangsabati River Basin, India. Geocarto Int. 37(23):6713–6735. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2021.1953618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawla NV, Bowyer KW, Hall LO, Kegelmeyer WP. 2002. SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. arXiv:1106.1813. 16:321–357. doi: 10.1613/jair.953.
   Google Scholar
• Chen J, Huang G, Chen W. 2021. Towards better flood risk management: assessing flood risk and investigating the potential mechanism based on machine learning models. J Environ Manage. 293:112810. doi: 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2021.112810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng M, Fang F, Kinouchi T, Navon IM, Pain CC. 2020. Long lead-time daily and monthly streamflow forecasting using machine learning methods. J Hydrol. 590:125376. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choubin B, Moradi E, Golshan M, Adamowski J, Sajedi-Hosseini F, Mosavi A. 2019. An ensemble prediction of flood susceptibility using multivariate discriminant analysis, classification and regression trees, and support vector machines. Sci Total Environ. 651(Pt 2):2087–2096. doi: 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2018.10.064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache R, Ngo PTT, Bui DT. 2020. Novel ensembles of deep learning neural network and statistical learning for flash-flood susceptibility mapping. Water. 12(6):1549. doi: 10.3390/w12061549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache R, Pham QB, Avand M, Thuy Linh NT, Vojtek M, Vojteková J, Lee S, Khoi DN, Thao Nhi PT, Dung TD. 2020. Novel hybrid models between bivariate statistics, artificial neural networks and boosting algorithms for flood susceptibility assessment. J Environ Manage. 265:110485. doi: 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2020.110485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache R, Țîncu R, Elkhrachy I, Pham QB, Popa MC, Diaconu DC, Avand M, Costache I, Arabameri A, Bui DT. 2020. New neural fuzzy-based machine learning ensemble for enhancing the prediction accuracy of flood susceptibility mapping. Hydrol Sci J. 65(16):2816–2837. doi: 10.1080/02626667.2020.1842412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache R, Trung Tin T, Arabameri A, Crăciun A, Ajin RS, Costache I, Reza Md. Towfiqul Islam A, Abba SI, Sahana M, Avand M, et al. 2022. Flash-flood hazard using deep learning based on H2O R package and fuzzy-multicriteria decision-making analysis. J Hydrol. 609:127747. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahri N, Yousfi R, Bouamrane A, Abida H, Pham QB, Derdous O. 2022. Comparison of analytic network process and artificial neural network models for flash flood susceptibility assessment. J Afr Earth Sci. 193:104576. doi: 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2022.104576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das S. 2020. Flood susceptibility mapping of the Western Ghat coastal belt using multi-source geospatial data and analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Remote Sens Appl. 20:100379. doi: 10.1016/j.rsase.2020.100379.
   Google Scholar
• Dilts T. 2015. Topography Tools for ArcGIS 10.3 and earlier - Overview. [accessed 2021 Dec 19]. https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=b13b3b40fa3c43d4a23a1a09c5fe96b9.
   Google Scholar
• Farhadi H, Najafzadeh M, Mohammadi B, Zhang Y. 2021. Flood risk mapping by remote sensing data and random forest technique. Water. 13(21):3115. doi: 10.3390/w13213115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giovannettone J, Copenhaver T, Burns M, Choquette S. 2018. A statistical approach to mapping flood susceptibility in the lower connecticut river valley region. Water Resour Res. 54(10):7603–7618. doi: 10.1029/2018WR023018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudiyangada Nachappa T, Tavakkoli Piralilou S, Gholamnia K, Ghorbanzadeh O, Rahmati O, Blaschke T. 2020. Flood susceptibility mapping with machine learning, multi-criteria decision analysis and ensemble using Dempster Shafer Theory. J Hydrol (Amst). 590:125275. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Z, Moosavi V, Leitão JP. 2022. Data-driven rapid flood prediction mapping with catchment generalizability. J Hydrol. 609:127726. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammami S, Zouhri L, Souissi D, Souei A, Zghibi A, Marzougui A, Dlala M. 2019. Application of the GIS based multi-criteria decision analysis and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in the flood susceptibility mapping (Tunisia). Arab J Geosci. 12(21):1–16. doi: 10.1007/S12517-019-4754-9/TABLES/7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H, Tsangaratos P, Ilia I, Liu J, Zhu AX, Chen W. 2018. Application of fuzzy weight of evidence and data mining techniques in construction of flood susceptibility map of Poyang County, China. Sci Total Environ. 625:575–588. doi: 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2017.12.256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• How Does TRCA Define Flood Risk? 2023. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. [accessed 2023 Jul 10]. https://trca.ca/conservation/flood-risk-management/defining-flood-risk/.
   Google Scholar
• Hu P, Zhang Q, Shi P, Chen B, Fang J. 2018. Flood-induced mortality across the globe: spatiotemporal pattern and influencing factors. Sci Total Environ. 643:171–182. doi: 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2018.06.197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBI Group. 2019. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Flood Risk Assessment and Ranking Project. Report No.: 114571.
   Google Scholar
• Islam ARMT, Bappi MMR, Alqadhi S, Bindajam AA, Mallick J, Talukdar S. 2023. Improvement of flood susceptibility mapping by introducing hybrid ensemble learning algorithms and high-resolution satellite imageries. Nat Hazards. 119(1):1–37. doi: 10.1007/s11069-023-06106-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahangir MH, Mousavi Reineh SM, Abolghasemi M. 2019. Spatial predication of flood zonation mapping in Kan River Basin, Iran, using artificial neural network algorithm. Weather Clim Extrem. 25:100215. doi: 10.1016/j.wace.2019.100215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janizadeh S, Avand M, Jaafari A, Van Phong T, Bayat M, Ahmadisharaf E, Prakash I, Pham BT, Lee S. 2019. Prediction success of machine learning methods for flash flood susceptibility mapping in the tafresh watershed, Iran. Sustainability. 11(19):5426. doi: 10.3390/su11195426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalantar B, Ueda N, Saeidi V, Janizadeh S, Shabani F, Ahmadi K, Shabani F. 2021. Deep neural network utilizing remote sensing datasets for flood hazard susceptibility mapping in Brisbane, Australia. Remote Sens. 13(13):2638. doi: 10.3390/rs13132638.
   Google Scholar
• Khan UT, He J, Valeo C. 2018. River flood prediction using fuzzy neural networks: an investigation on automated network architecture. Water Sci Technol. 2017(1):238–247. doi: 10.2166/WST.2018.107.
   Google Scholar
• Khosravi K, Pourghasemi HR, Chapi K, Bahri M. 2016. Flash flood susceptibility analysis and its mapping using different bivariate models in Iran: a comparison between Shannon’s Entropy, statistical index, and weighting factor models. Environ Monit Assess. 188(12):656. doi: 10.1007/S10661-016-5665-9/FIGURES/6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HII, Han KY. 2020. Urban flood prediction using deep neural network with data augmentation. Water. 12(3):899. doi: 10.3390/w12030899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latifi M, Rakhshandehroo G, Nikoo MR, Sadegh M. 2019. A game theoretical low impact development optimization model for urban storm water management. J Clean Prod. 241:118323. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin L, Tang C, Liang Q, Wu Z, Wang X, Zhao S. 2023. Rapid urban flood risk mapping for data-scarce environments using social sensing and region-stable deep neural network. J Hydrol. 617:128758. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Wang J, Xiong J, Cheng W, Li Y, Cao Y, He Y, Duan Y, He W, Yang G. 2022. Assessment of flood susceptibility mapping using support vector machine, logistic regression and their ensemble techniques in the Belt and Road region. Geocarto Int. 37(25):9817–9846. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2022.2025918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoody Vanolya N, Jelokhani-Niaraki M. 2021. The use of subjective–objective weights in GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis for flood hazard assessment: a case study in Mazandaran, Iran. GeoJournal. 86(1):379–398. doi: 10.1007/S10708-019-10075-5/FIGURES/8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malekinezhad H, Sepehri M, Pham QB, Hosseini SZ, Meshram SG, Vojtek M, Vojteková J. 2021. Application of entropy weighting method for urban flood hazard mapping. Acta Geophys. 69(3):841–854. doi: 10.1007/S11600-021-00586-6/TABLES/4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudashiru RB, Sabtu N, Abustan I. 2021a. Quantitative and semi-quantitative methods in flood hazard/susceptibility mapping: a review. Arab J Geosci. 14(11):1–24. doi: 10.1007/s12517-021-07263-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudashiru RB, Sabtu N, Abustan I, Balogun W. 2021b. Flood hazard mapping methods: a review. J Hydrol. 603:126846. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ontario GeoHub. 2019a. Provincial digital elevation model (PDEM). [accessed 2023 Aug 3]. https://geohub.lio.gov.on.ca/maps/mnrf::provincial-digital-elevation-model-pdem/explore?location=45.644126%2C-79.315587%2C4.58.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario GeoHub. 2019b. Soil Survey Complex | Soil Survey Complex. [accessed 2023 Aug 3]. https://geohub.lio.gov.on.ca/datasets/ontarioca11::soil-survey-complex/explore?location=43.785026%2C-79.392323%2C9.84.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario GeoHub. 2019c. Southern Ontario Land Resource Information System (SOLRIS) 3.0. [accessed 2023 Aug 3]. https://geohub.lio.gov.on.ca/documents/0279f65b82314121b5b5ec93d76bc6ba/about.
   Google Scholar
• Open Government Portal. 2017. Topographic Data of Canada - CanVec Series. [accessed 2023 Aug 3]. https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/8ba2aa2a-7bb9-4448-b4d7-f164409fe056.
   Google Scholar
• Park S, Choi C, Kim B, Kim J. 2013. Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, analytic hierarchy process, logistic regression, and artificial neural network methods at the Inje area, Korea. Environ Earth Sci. 68(5):1443–1464. doi: 10.1007/S12665-012-1842-5/TABLES/7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Phong TV, Nguyen HD, Qi C, Al-Ansari N, Amini A, Ho LS, Tuyen TT, Yen HPH, Ly HB, et al. 2020. A comparative study of kernel logistic regression, radial basis function classifier, multinomial naïve bayes, and logistic model tree for flash flood susceptibility mapping. Water. 12(1):239. doi: 10.3390/w12010239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priscillia S, Schillaci C, Lipani A. 2021. Flood susceptibility assessment using artificial neural networks in Indonesia. Artif Intell Geosci. 2:215–222. doi: 10.1016/j.aiig.2022.03.002.
   Google Scholar
• Raei E, Reza Alizadeh M, Reza Nikoo M, Adamowski J. 2019. Multi-objective decision-making for green infrastructure planning (LID-BMPs) in urban storm water management under uncertainty. J Hydrol. 579:124091. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmati O, Darabi H, Panahi M, Kalantari Z, Naghibi SA, Ferreira CSS, Kornejady A, Karimidastenaei Z, Mohammadi F, Stefanidis S, et al. 2020. Development of novel hybridized models for urban flood susceptibility mapping. Sci Rep. 10(1):12937. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69703-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmati O, Pourghasemi HR, Zeinivand H. 2015. Flood susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence models in the Golastan Province, Iran. Geocarto Int. 31(1):42–70. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2015.1041559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Zhang L, Suganthan PN. 2016. Ensemble classification and regression-recent developments, applications and future directions. IEEE Comput Intell Mag. 11(1):41–53. doi: 10.1109/MCI.2015.2471235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rincón D, Khan UT, Armenakis C. 2018. Flood risk mapping using gis and multi-criteria analysis: a greater Toronto area case study. Geosciences. 8(8):275. doi: 10.3390/geosciences8080275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. 1988. What is the analytic herarchy process? In: Mitra G, Greenberg HJ, Lootsma FA, Rijkaert MJ, Zimmermann HJ, editors. Mathematical models for decision support. vol 48. Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer; p. 109–121.
   Google Scholar
• Seleem O, Ayzel G, de Souza ACT, Bronstert A, Heistermann M. 2022. Towards urban flood susceptibility mapping using data-driven models in Berlin, Germany. Geomatics Nat Haz Risk. 13(1):1640–1662. doi: 10.1080/19475705.2022.2097131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafizadeh-Moghadam H, Valavi R, Shahabi H, Chapi K, Shirzadi A. 2018. Novel forecasting approaches using combination of machine learning and statistical models for flood susceptibility mapping. J Environ Manage. 217:1–11. doi: 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2018.03.089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahabi H, Shirzadi A, Ronoud S, Asadi S, Pham BT, Mansouripour F, Geertsema M, Clague JJ, Bui DT. 2021. Flash flood susceptibility mapping using a novel deep learning model based on deep belief network, back propagation and genetic algorithm. Geosci Front. 12(3):101100. doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siahkamari S, Haghizadeh A, Zeinivand H, Tahmasebipour N, Rahmati O. 2017. Spatial prediction of flood-susceptible areas using frequency ratio and maximum Entropy models. Geocarto Int. 33(9):927–941. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2017.1316780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonovic SP, Schardong A, Srivastav R, Sandink D. 2015. IDF_CC web-based tool for updating intensity-duration-frequency curves to changing climate – ver 6.5. Western University Facility for Intelligent Decision Support and Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction. [accessed 2021 Nov 21]. https://www.idf-cc-uwo.ca.
   Google Scholar
• Snieder E, Abogadil K, Khan UT. 2021. Resampling and ensemble techniques for improving ANN-based high-flow forecast accuracy. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 25(5):2543–2566. doi: 10.5194/hess-25-2543-2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snieder E, Shakir R, Khan UT. 2020. A comprehensive comparison of four input variable selection methods for artificial neural network flow forecasting models. J Hydrol. 583:124299. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souissi D, Zouhri L, Hammami S, Msaddek MH, Zghibi A, Dlala M. 2019. GIS-based MCDM – AHP modeling for flood susceptibility mapping of arid areas, southeastern Tunisia. Geocarto Int. 35(9):991–1017. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2019.1566405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany MS, Jones S. 2017. Evaluating the variations in the flood susceptibility maps accuracies due to the alterations in the type and extend of the flood inventory. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci. XLII-4/W5(4W5):209–214. doi: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W5-209-2017.
   Google Scholar
• Tehrany MS, Kumar L. 2018. The application of a Dempster–Shafer-based evidential belief function in flood susceptibility mapping and comparison with frequency ratio and logistic regression methods. Environ Earth Sci. 77(13):1–24. doi: 10.1007/S12665-018-7667-0/TABLES/3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Jebur MN. 2014. Flood susceptibility mapping using a novel ensemble weights-of-evidence and support vector machine models in GIS. J Hydrol. 512:332–343. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TRCA Open Data Portal. 2020. Watercourses TRCA | Watercourses TRCA. [accessed 2023 Aug 3]. https://trca-camaps.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/5a9254bf984949cca546a5ca64e2aff1/explore.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1986. Urban hydrology for small watersheds. Chapter 2, Estimating runoff; p. 2–1–2-11.
   Google Scholar
• Vidyarthi VK, Jain A, Chourasiya S. 2020. Modeling rainfall-runoff process using artificial neural network with emphasis on parameter sensitivity. Model Earth Syst Environ. 6(4):2177–2188. doi: 10.1007/s40808-020-00833-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilasan RT, Kapse VS. 2022. Evaluation of the prediction capability of AHP and F-AHP methods in flood susceptibility mapping of Ernakulam district (India). Nat Hazards. 112(2):1767–1793. doi: 10.1007/s11069-022-05248-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vojtek M, Vojteková J. 2019. Flood susceptibility mapping on a national scale in Slovakia using the analytical hierarchy process. Water. 11(2):364. doi: 10.3390/w11020364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vojtek M, Vojteková J, Costache R, Pham QB, Lee S, Arshad A, Sahoo S, Linh NTT, Anh DT. 2021. Comparison of multi-criteria-analytical hierarchy process and machine learning-boosted tree models for regional flood susceptibility mapping: a case study from Slovakia. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk. 12(1):1153–1180. doi: 10.1080/19475705.2021.1912835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Fang Z, Hong H, Costache R, Tang X. 2021. Flood susceptibility mapping by integrating frequency ratio and index of entropy with multilayer perceptron and classification and regression tree. J Environ Manage. 289:112449. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Fang Z, Hong H, Peng L. 2020. Flood susceptibility mapping using convolutional neural network frameworks. J Hydrol. 582:124482. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydol.2019.124482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Wu X, Chen Z, Ren F, Feng L, Du Q. 2019. Optimizing the predictive ability of machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility mapping using SMOTE for Lishui City in Zhejiang Province, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 16(3):368. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang W, Xu K, Lian J, Ma C, Bin L. 2018. Integrated flood vulnerability assessment approach based on TOPSIS and Shannon entropy methods. Ecol Indic. 89:269–280. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.02.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaseen A, Lu J, Chen X. 2022. Flood susceptibility mapping in an arid region of Pakistan through ensemble machine learning model. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 36(10):3041–3061. doi: 10.1007/s00477-022-02179-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao G, Pang B, Xu Z, Cui L, Wang J, Zuo D, Peng D. 2021. Improving urban flood susceptibility mapping using transfer learning. J Hydrol. 602:126777. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao G, Pang B, Xu Z, Peng D, Zuo D. 2020. Urban flood susceptibility assessment based on convolutional neural networks. J Hydrol. 590:125235. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao G, Pang B, Xu Z, Yue J, Tu T. 2018. Mapping flood susceptibility in mountainous areas on a national scale in China. Sci Total Environ. 615:1133–1142. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang G, Wang M, Liu K. 2021. Deep neural networks for global wildfire susceptibility modelling. Ecol Indic. 127:107735. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar