NATO’s Approach to Multi-Domain Operations: From the Perspective of the Economics of Alliances

References

• Alozious, J. 2022. “Nato’s Two Percent Guideline: A Demand for Military Expenditure Perspective.” Defence and Peace Economics 33 (4): 475–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2021.1940649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balcaen, P., C. Du Bois, and C. Buts. 2023. “Sharing the Burden of Hybrid Threats: Lessons from the Economics of Alliances.” Defence and Peace Economics 34 (2): 142–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2021.1991128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogers, M., R. Beeres, and M. Bollen. 2022. “NATO Burden Sharing Research Along Three Paradigms.” Defence and Peace Economics 33 (5): 534–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2020.1819135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E., and P. Milgrom. 2013. “Complementarity in Organizations.” In The Handbook of Organizational Economics, edited by R. Gibbons and J. Roberts, 11–55. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400845354-003.
   Google Scholar
• Conybeare, J. A. C., J. C. Murdoch, and T. Sandler. 1994. “Alternative Collective-Goods Models of Military Alliances: Theory and Empirics.” Economic Inquiry 32 (4): 525–542. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1994.tb01349.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornes, R., and T. Sandler. 1984. “Easy Riders, Joint Production, and Public Goods.” The Economic Journal 94 (375): 580–598. https://doi.org/10.2307/2232704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornes, R., and T. Sandler. 1996. The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174312.
   Google Scholar
• De la Rochère, D., J.-M. J. Ghislain, and Y. Rocaboy. 2014. “SDI, NATO, and the Social Composition Function.” Defence and Peace Economics 25 (2): 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2013.774772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Rovchère, D., J.-M. J. Ghislain, and Y. Rocaboy. 2011. “The Role of Aggregation Technologies in the Provision of Supranational Public Goods: A Reconsideration of Nato’s Strategies.” The Review of International Organizations 6 (1): 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-010-9098-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaibulloev, K., T. Sandler, and H. Shimizu. 2009. “Demands for UN and Non-UN Peacekeeping: Nonvoluntary versus Voluntary Contributions to a Public Good.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 53 (6): 827–852. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002709338509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, J., and T. Sandler. 2018. “Demand for Military Spending in NATO, 1968–2015: A Spatial Panel Approach.” European Journal of Political Economy 53 (July): 222–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2017.09.002.
   Google Scholar
• George, J., and T. Sandler. 2021. “EU Demand for Defense, 1990–2019: A Strategic Spatial Approach.” Games 12 (1): 13. Article 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/g12010013.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, R. A., and S. L. Mehay. 1991. “Burden Sharing in the NATO Alliance: An Empirical Test of Alternative Views.” Public Choice 68 (1): 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00173822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haesebrouck, T. 2022. “NATO Burden Sharing After the Wales Summit: A Generalized Set Qualitative Analysis.” Defence and Peace Economics 33 (6): 637–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2021.1928435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, L., J. C. Murdoch, and T. Sandler. 1990. “On Distinguishing the Behavior of Nuclear and Non‐Nuclear Allies in NATO.” Defence Economics 1 (1): 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10430719008404649.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, K., and T. Sandler. 1999. “NATO Burden-Sharing: Past and Future.” Journal of Peace Research 36 (6): 665–680. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343399036006004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer, J. 1983. “From Weakest-Link to Best-Shot: The Voluntary Provision of Public Goods.” Public Choice 41 (3): 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00141070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Japan Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2022. “NATO Asia-Pacific Partners (AP4) Leaders’ Meeting.” June 29. https://www.mofa.go.jp/a_o/ocn/ki/page1e_000413.html.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. 2018. Shared Problems: The Lessons of AirLand Battle and the 31 Initiatives for Multi-Domain Battle. RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/10.7249/PE301.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. A., and J. D. de Leon. 2020. “Multi-Domain Operations.” The Three Sword Magazine 36 (November): 38–41.
   Google Scholar
• Khanna, J., and T. Sandler. 1996. “Nato Burden Sharing: 1960–1992.” Defence and Peace Economics 7 (2): 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/10430719608404846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanna, J., T. Sandler, and H. Shimizu. 1998. “Sharing the Financial Burden for U.N. and NATO Peacekeeping, 1976-1996.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (2): 176–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002798042002003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, W., and T. Sandler. 2020. “NATO at 70: Pledges, Free Riding, and Benefit-Burden Concordance.” Defence and Peace Economics 31 (4): 400–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2019.1640937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimäki, T. 2019. “Power, Contribution and Dependence in NATO Burden Sharing.” European Security 28 (1): 66–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2019.1578750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leon, J. D. D. 2021. “Understanding Multi-Domain Operations in NATO.” The Three Sword Magazine 37 (October): 91–94.
   Google Scholar
• Milgrom, P., and J. Roberts. 1990a. “The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization.” The American Economic Review 8 (3): 511–528.
   Google Scholar
• Milgrom, P., and J. Roberts. 1990b. “Rationalizability, Learning, and Equilibrium in Games with Strategic Complementarities.” Econometrica 58 (6): 1255–1277. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdoch, J. C., and T. Sandler. 1982. “A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of NATO.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 26 (2): 237–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002782026002003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdoch, J. C., T. Sandler, and L. Hansen. 1991. “An Econometric Technique for Comparing Median Voter and Oligarchy Choice Models of Collective Action: The Case of the NATO Alliance.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 73 (4): 624–631. https://doi.org/10.2307/2109401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagawa, S., M. Sejima, and S. Fujimoto. 2010. “Alliance Formation and Better-Shot Global Public Goods: Theory and Simulation.” Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review 6 (2): 201–225. https://doi.org/10.14441/eier.6.201.
   Google Scholar
• NATO. 1991. “The Alliance’s New Strategic Concept (1991).” November 7. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_23847.htm.
   Google Scholar
• NATO. 1999. “The Alliance’s Strategic Concept (1999).” April 24. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_27433.htm.
   Google Scholar
• NATO. 2002. “The Prague Summit and Nato’s Transformation.” June 25. https://www.nato.int/docu/rdr-gde-prg/rdr-gde-prg-eng.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• NATO. 2006. Interoperability for Joint Operations. Brussels: NATO Public Diplomacy Division.
   Google Scholar
• NATO. 2010. Strategic Concept: Active Engagement, Modern Defence. Brussels: NATO Public Diplomacy Division.
   Google Scholar
• NATO. 2021a. “Multi-Domain Exercise on Norwegian Coast.” August 19. https://ac.nato.int/archive/2021/NATO_NOR_US_MDE.
   Google Scholar
• NATO. 2021b. “Nato’s Approach to Space.” December 2. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_175419.htm.
   Google Scholar
• NATO. 2022a. “Cyber Defence.” March 23. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_78170.htm.
   Google Scholar
• NATO. 2022b. “Multi-Domain Operations: Enabling NATO to Out-Pace and Out-Think Its Adversaries.” July 29. https://www.act.nato.int/articles/multi-domain-operations-out-pacing-and-out-thinking-nato-adversaries.
   Google Scholar
• NATO. 2022c. NATO 2022 Strategic Concept. https://www.nato.int/strategic-concept/.
   Google Scholar
• NATO. 2022d. The Secretary General’s Annual Report 2021. https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2022/3/pdf/sgar21-en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nikolaidou, E. 2008. “The Demand for Military Expenditure: Evidence from the EU15 (1961–2005).” Defence and Peace Economics 19 (4): 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242690802166533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odehnal, J., J. Neubauer, A. Olejníček, J. Boulaouad, and L. Brizgalová. 2021. “Empirical Analysis of Military Expenditures in NATO Nations.” Economies 9 (3): 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9030107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, M., Jr., and R. Zeckhauser. 1966. “An Economic Theory of Alliances.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 48 (3): 266–279. https://doi.org/10.2307/1927082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oma, I. M. 2012. “Explaining States’ Burden-Sharing Behaviour within NATO.” Cooperation and Conflict 47 (4): 562–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836712462856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oneal, J. R., and M. A. Elrod. 1989. “NATO Burden Sharing and the Forces of Change.” International Studies Quarterly 33 (4): 435–456. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plümper, T., and E. Neumayer. 2015. “Free-Riding in Alliances: Testing an Old Theory with a New Method.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 32 (3): 247–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894214522916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringsmose, J. 2010. “NATO Burden-Sharing Redux: Continuity and Change After the Cold War.” Contemporary Security Policy 31 (2): 319–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2010.491391.
   Google Scholar
• Robison, R. R. 2020. “NATO Burden-Sharing: A Comprehensive Framework for Member Evaluation.” Comparative Strategy 39 (3): 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2020.1740574.
   Google Scholar
• Russett, B. M. 1970. What Price Vigilance?: The Burdens of National Defense. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, T. 1993. “The Economic Theory of Alliances: A Survey.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 37 (3): 446–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002793037003003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, T. 1999. “Alliance Formation, Alliance Expansion, and the Core.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 43 (6): 727–747. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002799043006003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, T. 2006. “Hirshleifer’s Social Composition of Function in Defense Economics.” Defence and Peace Economics 17 (6): 645–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242690601025583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, T., and J. Cauley. 1975. “On the Economic Theory of Alliances.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 19 (2): 330–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200277501900207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, T., J. Cauley, and J. F. Forbes. 1980. “In Defense of a Collective Goods Theory of Alliances.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 24 (3): 537–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200278002400308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, T., and J. F. Forbes. 1980. “Burden Sharing, Strategy, and the Design of NATO.” Economic Inquiry 18 (3): 425–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1980.tb00588.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, T., and K. Hartley. 1999. The Political Economy of NATO: Past, Present, and into the 21st Century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, T., and K. Hartley. 2001. “Economics of Alliances: The Lessons for Collective Action.” Journal of Economic Literature 39 (3): 869–896. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.39.3.869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, T., and J. C. Murdoch. 1990. “Nash-Cournot or Lindahl Behavior?: An Empirical Test for the NATO Allies.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 105 (4): 875–894. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, T., and J. C. Murdoch. 2000. “On Sharing NATO Defence Burdens in the 1990s and Beyond.” Fiscal Studies 21 (3): 297–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2000.tb00026.x.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, O. 2022. “Policy Statement by Olaf Scholz, Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany and Member of the German Bundestag, 27 February 2022 in Berlin.” https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-en/news/policy-statement-by-olaf-scholz-chancellor-of-the-federal-republic-of-germany-and-member-of-the-german-bundestag-27-february-2022-in-berlin-2008378.
   Google Scholar
• Shimizu, H., and T. Sandler. 2002. “Peacekeeping and Burden-Sharing, 1994-2000.” Journal of Peace Research 39 (6): 651–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343302039006001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimizu, H., and T. Sandler. 2010. “Recent Peacekeeping Burden Sharing.” Applied Economics Letters 17 (15): 1479–1484. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850903049593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siqueira, K., and T. Sandler. 2001. “Models of Alliances: Internalizing Externalities and Financing.” Defence and Peace Economics 12 (3): 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/10430710108404987.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. P. 1989. “Models of Military Expenditure.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 4 (4): 345–359. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.3950040404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tammen, J. W. 2021. “Nato’s Warfighting Capstone Concept: Anticipating the Changing Character of War.” NATO Review, July 9. https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2021/07/09/natos-warfighting-capstone-concept-anticipating-the-changing-character-of-war/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Topkis, D. M. 1998. Supermodularity and Complementarity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UK Ministry of Defence. 2020. Joint Concept Note 1/20, Multi-Domain Integration. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/950789/20201112-JCN_1_20_MDI.PDF.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Army. 2018. The U.S. Army in Multi-Domain Operations 2028. https://www.army.mil/article/243754/the_u_s_army_in_multi_domain_operations_2028.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Defense. 2012. Capstone Concept for Joint Operations: Joint Force 2020. https://www.ndu.edu/Portals/59/Documents/Incoming/ccjo_2012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Joint Chief of Staff. 2016. Cross-Domain Synergy in Joint Operations. https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/concepts/cross_domain_planning_guide.pdf?ver=2017-12-28-161956-230.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K. 2000. Hierarchy Amidst Anarchy: Transaction Costs and Institutional Choice. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zannella, A. 2020. “An Analysis of Burden Sharing in NATO and the Problem of Free Riding.” Political Analysis 21: 1–19.
   Google Scholar