Study on the vibration evaluation method and allowable differential settlement of road-bridge transition section with full-car model

References

• Abdelrahman, A, Tawfik, M, and El-Saify, A, 2018. Investigation on the performance of bridge approach slab[C]//MATEC Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences, 162, 04014.
   Google Scholar
• Al-abboodi, Ihsan, Al-salih, Osamah, and Dakhil, Ammar, 2021. Dynamic modelling of bridge approach slabs under moving loads. Journal of King Saud University – Engineering Sciences, 33 (1), 30–36.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmari, Saeed, Yang, Mijia, and Zhong, Hai, 2015. Dynamic interaction between vehicle and bridge deck subjected to support settlement. Engineering Structures, 84, 172–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asghari, Khosrow, Sotoudeh, Saeed, and Zakeri, Jabbar-Ali, 2021. Numerical evaluation of approach slab influence on transition zone behavior in high-speed railway track. Transportation Geotechnics, 28, 100519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahumdain, A, 2019. Multi-segment pole-supported bridge approach slabs for control of deferential settlement. Thesis (PhD). University of Wisconsin.
   Google Scholar
• Benmebarek, Sadok, and Djabri, Mohamed, 2017. FEM to investigate the effect of overlapping-reinforcement on the performance of back-to-back embankment bridge approaches under self-weight. Transportation Geotechnics, 11, 17–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Sugong, Zhang, Yong, and Tian, Hao, 2020. Drive comfort and safety evaluation for vortex-induced vibration of a suspension bridge based on monitoring data. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 204, 104266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Hsieh-Ching, et al., 2009. Whole-body vibration exposure experienced by motorcycle riders–An evaluation according to ISO 2631-1 and ISO 2631-5 standards. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39 (5), 708–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Qiming, and Abu-Farsakh, Murad, 2016. Mitigating the bridge end bump problem: A case study of a new approach slab system with geosynthetic reinforced soil foundation. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 44 (1), 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y, and Fan, S, 2018. Simulation of bridge approach slabs in bridge construction: a case study. International Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, 12 (1), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Keren, He, Shuilong, and Xu, Enyong, 2020. Research on passenger comfort analysis and hierarchical optimization of heavy vehicles with coupled nonlinear dynamics of suspension. Measurement, 165, 108142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dezi, Francesca, et al., 2012. Higher order model for the seismic response of bridge embankments. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 43, 186–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, L, Gong, Y, and Zhang, Y, 2019. Numerical simulation analysis of rigid permeable plate embedded in abutment back[C]//E3S Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences, 136, 04060.
   Google Scholar
• GB/T 13441.1-2011. Chinese Standard. Mechanical vibration and shock-Evaluation of human expose to whole-body vibration.
   Google Scholar
• Gorini, Davide Noè, Callisto, Luigi, and Whittle, Andrew J., 2021. Dominant responses of bridge abutments. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 148, 106723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassona, F, et al., 2017. Bumps at bridge approaches: two case studies for bridges at El-minia governorate, Egypt[C]//International congress and exhibition sustainable Civil Infrastructures: innovative Infrastructure geotechnology. Cham: Springer: 265–280.
   Google Scholar
• Long, J. H., et al., 1998. Differential movement at embankment-bridge structure interface in Illinois. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1633 (1), 53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Mulian, Zheng, Jiandang, Meng, and Shiduo, Zhang, 2012. Evaluation method of human comfort in vehicle at transition section between bridge abutment and embankment. Journal of Chang’an University(Natural Science Edition), 32 (2), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Nam, Moon S, Cheol, Park Min, and JongNam, Do, 2017. Evaluation of abutment types on highway in terms on driving comfort. Advances in Transportation Geo-Technics 3, 13 (1), 43–61.
   Google Scholar
• Nkomo, Lihle I., Dove, Albert, and Mohlalakoma, T, 2017. Heaviside based optimal control for passenger comfort and actuation energy optimization in half-car suspension systems. International Federation of Automatic Control, 50 (2), 259–264.
   Google Scholar
• Peduto, Dario, Giangreco, Claudio, and Venmans, Arjan A.M., 2020. Differential settlements affecting transition zones between bridges and road embankments on soft soils: numerical analysis of maintenance scenarios by multi-source monitoring data assimilation. Transportation Geotechnics, 24, 100369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phalke, Trupti P., and Mitra, Anirban C., 2017. Analysis of passenger comfort and road holding of Quarter car model by SIMULINK. Materials Today: Proceedings Part A, 4 (2), 2425–2430.
   Google Scholar
• Puppala, Anand J., and Ruttanaporamakul, Pinit, 2019. Surya Sarat Chandra Congress. Design and construction of lightweight EPS geofoam embedded geomaterial embankment system for control of settlements. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 47 (3), 295–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short, T H, Wierschem, N E, and Denavit, M D, 2018. Bump at the end of the bridge: review and analysis of rider discomfort. Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports.
   Google Scholar
• Su, M M, and Zhang, H L, 2017. Evaluation method of asphalt pavement roughness based on full car model. Journal of Jiangsu University(Natural Science Edition), 38 (3), 362–366.
   Google Scholar
• Xiang, Y Q, and Sun, Y, 2010. Dynamic response of road- bridge transition section treated with deep-seated concrete slab. Journal of Zhengjiang University (Engineering Science), 44 (10), 1864–1869.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, D., et al., 2018. Influence of cement-fly ash-gravel pile-supported approach embankment on abutment piles in soft ground. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 10 (5), 977–985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, Wangchen, Deng, Lu, and Yin, Xinfeng, 2016. Allowable slope change of approach slabs based on the interacted vibration with passing vehicles. Journal of Civil Engineering, 20, 2469–2482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yongfeng, Deng, Fei, Jing, and Qi, Feng, 2017. Design method of bridge approach improved by deep mixing methods in highway engineering. Procedia Engineering, 189, 365–371.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, HL, 2010. Determination of allowable differential settlement between bridge abutment and approach embankment with five degree of freedom vehivle. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 3 (6), 311–319.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J, Zheng, J J, and Ye, Li, 2014. Evaluation of new technique of geogrid reinforced and pile supported embankment at bridge approach. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 19 (4), 482–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong, Hai, and Yang, Mijia, 2017. Dynamic effect of foundation settlement on bridge-vehicle interaction. Engineering Structures, 135, 149–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J L, et al., 2016. Mechanical analysis of vehicle bumping at bridge approach without slab. In: Advances of transportation: infrastructure and Material, in Proceedings of 2016 International conference on Transportation Infrastructure and materials, USA: DEStrch, 407–414.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Juanlan, et al., 2017. Dynamic response analysis of road-bridge transition section without slab. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 10 (6), 526–535.
   Google Scholar