213
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Information and communications technology access for people in prison: strategies to maximise the benefits and minimise the harms of communication with families and program workers

ORCID Icon
Pages 500-516 | Received 28 Aug 2022, Accepted 02 May 2023, Published online: 17 May 2023

References

  • Anthony, T., Bartels, L., Lachsz, A., Steven, C., & Gerry, F. (2022). Australia. In F. Dünkel, S. Harrendorf, & D. Van Zyl Smit (Eds.), The impact of COVID-19 on prison conditions and penal policy (pp. 7–25). Routledge Frontiers of Criminal Justice. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Bartlett, T. S., & Eriksson, A. (2019). How fathers construct and perform masculinity in a liminal prison space. Punishment & Society, 21(3), 275–294. doi:10.1177/1462474518757092
  • Béland, S., Dumont-Samson, O., & Hudon, C. (2022). Case management and telehealth: A scoping review. Telemedicine and E-Health, 28(1), 11–23. doi:10.1089/tmj.2021.0012
  • Besemer, K. L., & Dennison, S. (2019). Intergenerational social exclusion in Prisoners’ families. In M. Hutton, & D. Moran (Eds.), The palgrave handbook of prison and the family (pp. 479–501). Cham: Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Booker Loper, A., & Clarke, C. N. (2013). Attachment representations of imprisoned mothers as related to child contact and the caregiving alliance: The moderating effect of children’s placement with maternal grandmothers. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 78(3), 41–56.
  • Burton, P. R. S., Morris, N. P., & Hirschtritt, M. E. (2021). Mental health services in a U.S. Prison during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychiatric Services, 72(4), 458–460. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.202000476
  • Champion, N., & Edgar, K. (2013). Through the gateway: How computers Can transform rehabilitation. London: Prison Reform Trust.
  • Charles, Parijita, Poehlmann, Julie, Kerr, Margaret, Jensen, Sarah & Kaitlyn Pritzl. (2023). Supported remote video visits for children with incarcerated parents in the United States (*Note, this had originally been Poehlmann et al.). Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 35(4), https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2023.2209302
  • Collica-Cox, K. (2021). When ‘Inside-Out’ goes ‘Upside-Down’: Teaching students in a jail environment during the COVID pandemic and implications for the Use of correctional technology post-pandemic. Journal of Prison Education and Reentry, 7(1), 50–69. doi:10.25771/dhvk-bc68
  • Combessie, P. (2002). Marking the carceral boundary: Penal stigma in the long shadow of the prison. Ethnography, 3(4), 535–555. doi:10.1177/1466138102003004019
  • Comfort, M. L. (2002). ‘Papa’s House’: The prison as domestic and social satellite. Ethnography, 3(4), 467–499. doi:10.1177/1466138102003004017
  • Cornet, L. J. M., & Van Gelder, J.-L. (2020). Virtual reality: A use case for criminal justice practice. Psychology, Crime & Law, 26(7), 631–647. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2019.1708357
  • Dias, S., Ware, R. S., Kinner, S. A., & Lennox, N. G. (2013). Co-Occurring mental disorder and intellectual disability in a large sample of Australian prisoners. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 47(10), 938–944. doi:10.1177/0004867413492220
  • Digard, L., DiZehera, M., Yaroni, A., & Rinaldi, J. (2016). A new role for technology: Video visitation in prison. Vera.Org (blog). 2016. http://www.vera.org/publications/video-visitation-in-prison.
  • Duff, C. (2013). The social life of drugs. International Journal of Drug Policy, 24 (3), 167–72. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2012.12.009
  • Dünkel, F., Harrendorf, S., & Smit, D. V. Z., eds. (2022). The impact of COVID-19 on prison conditions and penal policy. Routledge Frontiers of Criminal Justice. Abingdon, O ; New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Ellem, K., Wilson, J., & Chui, W. H. (2012). Effective responses to offenders with intellectual disabilities: Generalist and specialist services working together. Australian Social Work, 65(3), 398–412. doi:10.1080/0312407X.2011.625433
  • Eriksson, A. (2021). Prisoners, mental health, and cognitive disability: Implications for post-release employment programs. In N. Boschi (Ed.), Programma 2121 (pp. 119–126). Milan: EGEA. http://unimib.medialibrary.it/media/scheda.aspx?id=150273763.
  • Esposito, J. (2000). Virtual freedom–physical confinement: An analysis of prisoner use of the internet comment. New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement, 1(26), 39–66.
  • Farmer, M. (2017). The importance of strengthening prisoners’ family ties to prevent reoffending and reduce intergenerational crime. Ministry of Justice. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/642244/farmer-review-report.pdf.
  • Feely, M. (2016). Disability studies after the ontological turn: A return to the material world and material bodies without a return to essentialism. Disability & Society, 31(7), 863–883. doi:10.1080/09687599.2016.1208603
  • Fitzgerald, B. (2020). Tablet computers have kept prisoners in touch with family during COVID-19. ABC News Online, 2020.
  • Flynn, C., Bartels, L., Dennison, S., Taylor, H., & Harrigan, S. (2021). Contact experiences and needs of children of prisoners before and during COVID-19: Findings from an Australian survey. Child & Family Social Work, n/a(n/a), 67–78. doi:10.1111/cfs.12873
  • Flynn, C., Harrigan, S., Bartels, L., & Dennison, S. (2020). Maintaining family contact during COVID-19: describing the experiences and needs of children with a family member in prison. Monash University, Australian National University, Griffith University. https://shineforkids.org.au/wp-content/uploads/COVID-19_PrisonVisiting_October2020.pdf.
  • Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.
  • Gill, N., Conlon, D., Moran, D., & Burridge, A. (2018). Carceral circuitry: New directions in carceral geography. Progress in Human Geography, 42(2), 183–204. doi:10.1177/0309132516671823
  • Grierson, M., Varghese, D., Bolton, M., & Olivier, P. (2022). Design considerations for a digital service to support prison leavers. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 504–516. Virtual Event Australia: ACM. doi:10.1145/3532106.3533567.
  • Halsey, M., & de Vel-Palumbo, M. (2020). Generations through prison: Experiences of intergenerational incarceration (1st ed.). Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge. 2020. |Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781351240574.
  • Harrison, L. (2014). Prisoners and their access to the internet in the pursuit of education. Alternative Law Journal, 39(3), 159–162. doi:10.1177/1037969X1403900304
  • Hart, A. (2016). Enacting heavy sessional drinking: A multi-sited ethnographic study of young adults’ drinking events and related epidemiology, policy and treatment. PhD, Perth: Curtin University. https://espace.curtin.edu.au/bitstream/handle/20.500.11937/2431/242457_HartA2016.pdf;jsessionid = 262FCB6348AEAD0856FEA9E01A2FC860?sequence = 2.
  • Helps, S. (2020). Doing remote systemic psychotherapy during a pandemic – learning from a speedy quality improvement project.” United Kingdom: The Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust. https://tavistockandportman.nhs.uk/about-us/news/stories/doing-remote-systemic-psychotherapy-during-pandemic-learning-speedy-quality-improvement-project/.
  • Johns, D. F. (2017). Being and becoming an ex-prisoner (1st ed). Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge. 2018. | Series: International series on desistance and rehabilitation; 11: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315619637.
  • Kashyap, K., Lulham, R., Klippan, T., Munro, K., Bradley, J., Fahey, D., … McKay, C. (2017). Court-custody audio visual links: Designing for equitable justice experiences in the use of court-custody video conferencing. UTS; Justice NSW - Designing Out Crime Research Centre. https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/bitstream/10453/129329/1/DOC-AVL Project Report_ISBN-web.pdf.
  • Kerr, A., & Willis, M. (2018). Prisoner use of information and communications technology. 560. Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice. Canberra, ACT: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-05/ti_560_021018.pdf.
  • Kotova, A. (2022). Using video-calls to ‘do Family’ across prison walls. University of Birmingham; Sir Halley Stewart Trust. https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/schools/social-policy/departments/social-policy-sociology-criminology/events/2022/using-video-calls.aspx.
  • Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Alberti, G., Perilli, V., … Turi, C. (2020). A tablet-based program to enable people with intellectual and other disabilities to access leisure activities and video calls. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 15(1), 14–20. doi:10.1080/17483107.2018.1508515
  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Clarendon Lectures in Management Studies. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. International Library of Sociology. New York: Routledge.
  • Lulham, R., Bradley, K., Wan, K., & McKay, C. (2022). Research and evaluation strategy for the transformation of prisoner rehabilitation through digital technology. Collaborative Reports. New South Wales: Corrective Services N.S.W. https://correctiveservices.dcj.nsw.gov.au/content/dam/dcj/corrective-services-nsw/documents/research-and-statistics/csnsw-researchstrategy-transform-rehabilitation-technology.pdf.
  • Ly, P. (2022, May). Prisons adopt high tech monitoring. San Quentin News.
  • McKay, C. (2016). Video links from prison: Permeability and the carceral world. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 5(1), 21–37. doi:10.5204/ijcjsd.v5i1.283
  • McKay, C. (2022). The carceral automaton: Digital prisons and technologies of detention. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 10(4), 100–119. doi:10.5204/ijcjsd.2137
  • McKenna, T. (2013). Call waiting: Barriers to effective telephone communication between incarcerated offenders and their families. Internship Report. Victoria, Australia: VACRO; The University of Melbourne.
  • McLean, S. A., Booth, A. T., Schnabel, A., Wright, B. J., Painter, F. L., & McIntosh, J. E. (2021). Exploring the efficacy of telehealth for family therapy through systematic, meta-analytic, and qualitative evidence. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 24(2), 244–266. doi:10.1007/s10567-020-00340-2
  • Melbourne Criminology Research and Evaluation Unit. (2003). Bridging the gap: A release transition support program for victorian prisoners: Final evaluation report. Melbourne: Office of the Correctional Services Commissioner, Department of Justice, State Government of Victoria. https://files.corrections.vic.gov.au/2021-06/bridging_the_gap_final_reportsmall.pdf?L_k3MG8PgIDs_3jDupE1HwavNIJL0gpW = .
  • Mirko, B., Nick, F., & Hunter, D. (2017). The hardship that is internet deprivation and what it means for sentencing: Development of the internet sanction and connectivity for prisoners. Akron Law Review, 51(2), 261–322.
  • Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Science and cultural theory. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Moran, D. (2013a). Carceral geography and the spatialities of prison visiting: Visitation, recidivism, and hyperincarceration. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 31(1), 174–190. doi:10.1068/d18811
  • Moran, D. (2013b). Between outside and inside? Prison visiting rooms as liminal carceral spaces. GeoJournal, 78(2), 339–351. doi:10.1007/s10708-011-9442-6
  • Moser, I. (2005). On becoming disabled and articulating alternatives: The multiple modes of ordering disability and their interferences. Cultural Studies, 19(6), 667–700. doi:10.1080/09502380500365648
  • O’Connor, A., Shen, L., & Manley, N. (2020). The Dilemma of prisoners on TikTok: An analysis of the implications of dark subcultures online. Masters of Media: New MEdia & Digital Culture M.A., University of Amsterdam 10/02/2020. https://mastersofmedia.hum.uva.nl/blog/2020/10/20/the-dilemma-of-prisoners-on-tiktok-an-analysis-of-the-implications-of-dark-subcultures-online/.
  • Pallas, T. (2022). Victorian budget 2022/23: Putting patients first - service delivery. Melbourne. https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/budgetfiles202223.budget.vic.gov.au/2022-23+State+Budget+-+Service+Delivery.pdf.
  • Phillips, S. (2012). Video visits for children whose parents are incarcerated: In whose best interest? Washington, D.C. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/video-visits-children-whose-parents-are-incarcerated-whose-best.
  • Pridmore, W., Levy, M. H., & McArthur, M. (2017). Slipping through the cracks: Examining the realities of a child-friendly prison system. Children and Youth Services Review, 83, 226–231. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.10.046
  • Reisdorf, B. C., & DeCook, J. R. (2022). Locked up and left out: Formerly incarcerated people in the context of digital inclusion. New Media & Society, 24(2), 478–495. doi:10.1177/14614448211063178
  • Reisdorf, B. C., & Rikard, R. V. (2018). Digital rehabilitation: A model of reentry into the digital Age. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(9), 1273–1290. doi:10.1177/0002764218773817
  • Ruyter, M. (2021). Tearing down walls, opening doors: Teaching an Art history college course in jail during COVID. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 40(4), 807–817. doi:10.1111/jade.12393
  • Saunders, V., & McArthur, M. (2013). Children of prisoners: Exploring the needs of children and young people Who have a parent incarcerated in the ACT. Canberra: Shine for Kids. https://www.shineforkids.org.au/documents/research/ChildrenofPrisoners_NeedsAnalysis_Oct2013.pdf.
  • Schwamm, L. H. (2014). Telehealth: Seven strategies To successfully implement disruptive technology And transform health care. Health Affairs, 33(2), 200–206. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1021
  • Skora Horgan, E., & Poehlmann-Tynan, J. (2020). In-home video chat for young children and their incarcerated parents. Journal of Children and Media, 14(3), 400–406. doi:10.1080/17482798.2020.1792082
  • Swanson, C., Lee, C.-B., Sansone, F. A., & Tatum, K. M. (2013). Incarcerated fathers and their children: Perceptions of barriers to their relationships. The Prison Journal, 93(4), 453–74.
  • Taylor, H., Flynn, C., Harrigan, S., Bartels, L., & Dennison, S. (2023). Carer views on father-child contact in the context of imprisonment during the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for the use of video visits. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 35(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2023.2225244
  • VACRO. (2020). Tarrengower prison family video visits pilot program: End of pilot review. Melbourne, Victoria: Myer Foundation, Campbell Edwards Foundation, Kimberley Foundation. https://www.vacro.org.au/Handlers/Download.ashx?IDMF=6e9db165-b11b-4e8d-89f8-747459260402.
  • Watson, A., Lupton, D., & Michael, M. (2020 October). Enacting intimacy and sociality at a distance in the COVID-19 crisis: The sociomaterialities of home-based communication technologies. Media International Australia, 1329878X20961568. doi:10.1177/1329878X20961568
  • Zoellner, S. (2023). Virtual playgroups: Supporting children and mothers at the Townsville Women's Correctional Centre. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 35(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2023.2202801

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.