Taboo metaphtonymy, gender, and impoliteness: how male and female Arab cartoonists think and draw

References

• Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed. 2020. “How To Do Things With Images: The Editor, the Cartoonist, and the Reader.” Intercultural Pragmatics 17 (1): 77–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed. 2021. “Where Covid Metaphors Come from: Reconsidering Context and Modality in Metaphor.” Social Semiotics. doi:10.1080/10350330.2021.1971493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed. 2022. “The “Menstruating” Muslim Brotherhood: Taboo Metaphor, Face Attack, and Gender in Egyptian Culture.” Social Semiotics. doi:10.1080/10350330.2022.2063714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed, and Mouna Goubaa. 2021. “Language and Cultural Cognition: The Case of Grammatical Gender in Arabic and Personified Gender in Cartoons.” Review of Cognitive Linguistics 19 (1): 111–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramo, Joseph Michael. 2011. “Gender Differences of Popular Music Production in Secondary Schools.” Journal of Research in Music Education 59 (1): 21–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agar, Michael. 2006. “Culture: Can You Take It Anywhere?” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5 (2), Article 11. Accessed 17 August 2022. https://sites.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/5_2/PDF/agar.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ahrens, Kathleen (ed.). 2009. Politics, Gender and Conceptual Metaphors. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave-MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ahrens, Kathleen. 2019. “First Lady, Secretary of State, and Presidential Candidate: A Comparative Study of the Roledependent Use of Metaphor in Politics.” In Variation in Political Metaphor, edited by Julien Perrez, Min Reuchamps, and Paul H. Thibodeau, 13–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Allan, Keith, ed. 2019. The Oxford Handbook of Taboo Words and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allan, Keith, and Kate Burridge. 2006. Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allan, Keith, and Kate Burridge. 2009. “Swearing.” In Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English, edited by Pam Peters, Peter Collins, and Adam Smith, 361–386. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Arndt, Horst, and Richard Wayne Janney. 1987. Intergrammar: Toward an Integrative Model of Verbal, Prosodic and Kinesic Choices in Speech. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Attardo, Salvatore, Lucy Pickering, Fofo Lomotey, and Shigehito Menjo. 2013. “Multimodality and Cognitive Linguistics.” Review of Cognitive Linguistics 11 (2): 402–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axtell, Roger E. 1998. Gestures: The DO’s and TABOOS of Body Language Around the World. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Barcan, Ruth. 2004. Nudity: A Cultural Anatomy. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, Roland. [1964]1986. “Rhetoric of the Image.” In The Responsibility of Forms, trans. by Richard Howard, 21–40. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bassiouney, Reem. 2009. Arabic Sociolinguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, John. 2014. Text and Image: A Critical Introduction to the Visual-Verbal Divide. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, John. 2022. “Multimodality, Where Next? Some Meta-Methodological Considerations.” Multimodality and Society 2 (1): 41–63.
   Google Scholar
• Bayton, Mavis. 1997. “Women and the Electric Guitar.” In Sexing the Groove: Popular Music and Gender, edited by Sheila Whiteley, 37–49. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bednarek, Monika. 2015. “‘Wicked’ Women in Contemporary Pop Culture: ‘Bad’ Language and Gender in Weeds, Nurse Jackie and Saving Grace.” Text and Talk 35 (4): 431–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednarek, Monika. 2019a. “‘Don’t Say Crap. Don’t Use Swear Words.’ – Negotiating the Use of Swear/Taboo Words in the Narrative Mass Media.” Discourse, Context, and Media 29: 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednarek, Monika. 2019b. “The Multifunctionality of Swear/Taboo Words in Television Series.” In Emotion in Discourse, edited by J. Lachlan Mackenzie and Laura Alba-Juez, 29–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Bernaisch, Tobias, ed. 2020. Gender in World Englishes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blake, Barry J. 2019. “Taboo Language as Source of Comedy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Taboo Words and Language, edited by Keith Allan, 353–371. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Botz-Bornstein, Thorsten. 2015. Veils, Nudity, and Tattoos: The New Feminine Aesthetics. Lanham: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Brodinsky, David M., and Janet Rubien. 1976. “Humor Production as a Function of Sex of Subject, Creativity and Cartoon Content.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 44: 597–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, Penelope. 1993. “Gender, Politeness, and Confrontation in Tenejapa.” In Gender and Conversational Interaction, edited by Deborah Tannen, 144–162. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Lucien, and Pilar Prieto. 2017. “Im)politeness: Prosody and Gesture.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, edited by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 357–379. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Lucien, Bodo Winter, Kaori Idemar, and Sven Grawunder. 2014. “Phonetics and Politeness: Perceiving Korean Honorific and Non-Honorific Speech Through Phonetic Cues.” Journal of Pragmatics 66: 45–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucholtz, Mary. 2004. “Changing Places: Language and Woman’s Place in Context.” In Language and Woman’s Place: Text and Commentaries, edited by Mary Bucholtz, 121–128. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, Deborah. 1985. Feminism and Linguistic Theory. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, Deborah. 1992. “‘Not Gender Difference But the Difference Gender Makes’ — Explanation in Research on Sex and Language.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 94: 13–26.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, Deborah, ed. 1998. The Feminist Critique of Language: A Reader. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, Deborah. 2007. The Myth of Mars and Venus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, Deborah, and Jennifer Coates. 1988. “Some Problems in the Sociolinguistic Explanation of Sex Differences.” In Women in Their Speech Communities: New Perspectives on Language and Sex, edited by Jennifer Coates and Deborah Cameron, 13–26. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Chaika, Elaine. 1982. Language: The Social Mirror. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Chalupnik, Malgorzata, Christine Christie, and Louise Mullany. 2017. “(Im)politeness and Gender.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, edited by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 517–537. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2009. “Metaphor and Gender in British Parliamentary Debates.” In Politics, Gender, and Conceptual Metaphors, edited by Kathleen Ahrens, 139–165. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Chiaro, Delia, and Raffaella Baccolini, eds. 2014. Gender and Humor: Interdisciplinary and International Perspectives. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clawson, Mary Ann. 1993. ““Not Just the Girl Singer”: Women and Voice in Rock Bands.” In Negotiating at the Margins: The Gendered Discourses of Power and Resistance, edited by Sue Fisher and Kathy Davis, 235–254. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clawson, Mary Ann. 1999. “When Women Play the Bass: Instrument Specialization and Gender Interpretation in Alternative Rock Music.” Gender and Society 13: 193–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates, Jennifer, and Deborah Cameron, eds. 1988. Women in Their Speech Communities: New Perspectives on Language and Sex. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Colville, Martin D. 1985. Signs of a Sexual Nature. Northwich: Cheshire Society for the Deaf.
   Google Scholar
• Corum, Claudia. 1975. “Basque, Particles and Baby-Talk: A Case for Pragmatics.” In Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 90–99. https://escholarship.org/content/qt36s7w2kd/qt36s7w2kd_noSplash_85a45a739690ff4faf0a5bef18013c6f.pdf?t=o8einw.
   Google Scholar
• Coser, Rose Laub. 1960. “Laughter Among Colleagues. A Study of Social Functions of Humor Among the Staff of a Mental Hospital.” Psychiatry 23: 81–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, Mary. 1995. Talking Difference: On Gender and Language. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Culpeper, Jonathan. 2005. “Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link.” Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 1: 35–72.
   Google Scholar
• Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Culpeper, Jonathan. 2019. “Taboo Language and Impoliteness.” In The Oxford Handbook of Taboo Words and Language, edited by Keith Allan, 28–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield, and Anne Wichmann. 2003. “Impoliteness Revisited: With Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1545–1579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culpeper, Jonathan, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, eds. 2017. “Introduction.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, edited by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 1–8. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Culpeper, Jonathan, and Oliver Holmes. 2013. “(Im)politeness and Exploitative TV in Britain and North America: The X Factor and American Idol.” In Real Talk: Reality Television and Discourse Analysis in Action, edited by N. Lorenzo-Dus and P. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, 169–198. Palgrave: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Deignan, Alice. 2005. Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• DeNora, Tia. 2000. Music in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diab, Khaled. 2010. “The Arab Myth of Western Women.” The Guardian, November 10. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/nov/10/arab-myth-of-western-women.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, Alice H., and Valerie J. Steffen. 1986. “Gender and Aggressive Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Social Psychological Literature.” Psychological Bulletin 100 (3): 309–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eder, Donna. 1993. ““Go get ya a French!”: Romantic and Sexual Teasing Among Adolescent Girls.” In Gender and Conversational Interaction, edited by Deborah Tannen, 17–30. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, Janis. 1997. Political Cartoons in the 1988 Presidential Campaign: Image, Metaphor, and Narrative. New York: Garland.
   Google Scholar
• Eggins, Suzanne, and Diana Slade. 1997. Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, Susan, Miriam Meyerhoff, and Janet Holmes. 2014. The Handbook of Language, Gender and Sexuality. 2nd ed. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• El Refaie, Elisabeth. 2011. “The Pragmatics of Humor Reception: Young People’s Responses to a Newspaper Cartoon.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research 24 (1): 87–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Refaie, Elisabeth, Alida Payson, Berit Bliesemann de Guevara, and Sofia Gameiro. 2020. “Pictorial and Spatial Metaphor in the Drawings of a Culturally Diverse Group of Women With Fertility Problems.” Visual Communication 19 (2): 257–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ervin-Tripp, Susan, and Martin Lampert. 1992. “Gender Differences in the Construction of Humorous Talk.” In Locating Power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference April 4 and 5 1992, Vol. 1, edited by Kira Hall, Mary Bucholtz, and Birch Moonwomon, 108–117. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley Women and Language Group.
   Google Scholar
• Figueroa, Esther. 2005. “Rude Sounds: Kiss Teeth and Negotiation of the Public Sphere.” In Politeness and Face in Caribbean Creoles, edited by Susanne Mühleisen and Bettina Migge, 73–99. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Forceville, Charles. 2009. “Metonymy in Visual and Audiovisual Discourse.” In The World Told and the World Shown: Issues in Multisemiotics, edited by Eija Ventola and Arseno J. Moya Guijarro, 56–74. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Forceville, Charles. 2020. Visual and Multimodal Communication. Applying the Relevance Principle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forceville, Charles, and Nataša van de Laar. 2019. “Metaphors Portraying Right-wing Politician Geert Wilders in Dutch Political Cartoons.” In Populist Discourse: Critical Approaches to Contemporary Politics, edited by Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio, MiguelÁngel Benítez-Castro, and Francesca De Cesare, 292–307. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fredsted, Elin. 2005. “Politeness in Denmark: Getting to the Point.” In Politeness in Europe, edited by Leo Hickey and Miranda Stewart, 159–173. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Gameiro, Sofia, Berit Bliesemann de Guevara, Elisabeth El Refaie, and Alida Payson. 2018. “DrawingOut – An Innovative Drawing Workshop Method to Support the Generation and Dissemination of Research Findings.” PLoS ONE 13 (9): e0203197. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0203197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P., N. Lorenzo-Dus, and P. Bou-Franch. 2013. “Identity and Impoliteness: The Expert in the Talent Show Idol.” Journal of Politeness Research 9 (1): 97–120.
   Google Scholar
• George, Johnny. 2011. Politeness in Japanese Sign Language (JSL): Polite JSL Expression as Evidence for Intermodal Language Contact Influence. Berkeley, CA: University of California doctoral dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, Cliff. 2015. ““Swear Words” and “Curse Words” in Australian (and American) English: At the Crossroads of Pragmatics, Semantics and Sociolinguistics.” Intercultural Pragmatics 12 (2): 189–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goossens, Louis. 1990. “Metaphtonymy: The Interaction of Metaphor and Metonymy in Expressions for Linguistic Action.” Cognitive Linguistics 1 (3): 323–342. doi:10.1515/cogl.1990.1.3.323.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, M. 1977. “All the Art That’s Fit to Befuddle.” New York 10 (11): 49–52.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, Sage L., and Claire Hardaker. 2017. “(Im)politeness in Digital Communication.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, edited by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 785–814. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Green, Lucy. 1997. Music, Gender, Education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greengross, Gil, Paul J. Silvia, and Emily C. Nusbaum. 2020. “Sex Differences in Humor Production Ability: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Research in Personality 84: 103886. . doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2019.103886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groth, Ruth. 1992. “Der kleine Unterschied im Lachverhalten von Frauen und Männern und seine großen Folgen.” In Die Geschlechter im Gespräch. Metzler, edited by S. Günthner, and H. Kotthoff, 33–55. Metzler: Stuttgart.
   Google Scholar
• Grotjahn, Martin. 1957. Beyond Laughter. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Haugh, Michael, Wei-Lin Melody Chang, and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2015. ““Doing Deference”: Identities and Relational Practices in Chinese Online Discussion Boards.” Pragmatics 25 (1): 73–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, Jennifer. 1994. “Jocular Abuse Patterns in Mixed-Group Interactions.” Wellington Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 26–55.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, Jennifer. 1995. “Gender and Humor: Beyond a Joke.” Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, Jennifer. 2000. “Functions of Humor in the Conversations of Men and Women.” Journal of Pragmatics 32 (6): 709–742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, Jennifer. 2002. “Male Cheerleaders and Wanton Women: Humour Among New Zealand Friends.” Te Reo 45: 3–36.
   Google Scholar
• Henley, Nancy M., and Sean Harmon. 1985. “The Nonverbal Semantics of Power and Gender: A Perceptual Study.” In Power, Dominance, and Nonverbal Behavior, edited by Steve L. Ellyson and John F. Dovidio, 151–164. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hirnstein, Marco, Sebastian Ocklenburg, Daniel Schneider, and Markus Hausmann. 2009. “Sex Differences in Left-Right Confusion Depend on Hemispheric Asymmetry.” Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior 45 (7): 891–899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, Janet. 1995. Women, Men, and Politeness. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, Janet. 2006. Gendered Talk at Work. Constructing Social Identity Through Workplace Interaction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, Janet, and Jennifer Hay. 1997. “Humour as an Ethnic Boundary Marker in New Zealand Interaction.” Journal of Intercultural Studies 18 (2): 127–151.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, Janet, and Brian W. King. 2017. “Gender and Sociopragmatics.” In The Routeldge Handbook of Pragmatics, edited by Anne Barron, Yueguo Gu, and Gerard Steen, 121–138. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, Janet, and Maria Stubbe. 2003. Power and Politeness in the Workplace: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Talk at Work. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, Susan E. 1992. “Expletives of Lower Working-Class Women.” Language in Society 21: 291–303. doi:10.1017/S004740450001530X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussey, Karen A., and Albert N. Katz. 2009. “Perception of the Use of Metaphor by an Interlocutor in Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol 24: 203–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hübscher, Iris, Laura Wagner, and Pilar Prieto. 2016. “Young Children's Sensitivity to Polite Stance Expressed through Audiovisual Prosody in Requests." In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 8, edited by J. Barnes, A. Brugos, S. Shattuck-Hufnagel, and N. Veilleux N, 897–901. Boston: International Speech Communication Association.
   Google Scholar
• Idemaru, Kaori, Bodo Winter, and Lucien Brown. 2019. “Cross-Cultural Multimodal Politeness: The Phonetics of Japanese Deferential Speech in Comparison to Korean.” Intercultural Pragmatics 16 (5): 517–555. doi:10.1515/ip-2019-0027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, Miko. 2004. “Politeness and Voice Quality—The Alternative Method to Measure Aspiration Noise.” In Proceedings of Speech Prosody, ed. by Bernard Bel and Isabelle Marlien, 213–216. Nara, Japan March 23–26, ISCA Archive, https://www.iscaspeech.org/archive_v0/sp2004/sp04_213.html.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, Timothy. 2019. “The Psychology of Expressing and Interpreting Linguistic Taboos.” In The Oxford Handbook of Taboo Words and Language, edited by Keith Allan, 54–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Keith. 2006. "Resonance in an Exemplar-based Lexicon: The Emergence of Social Identity and Phonology." Journal of Phonetics 34 (4): 485–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Kjerstin. 2009, November 25. "Hana Hajar: Saudi Arabia's Female Political Cartoonist." Bitch. Accessed on 10 August 2018. https://www.bitchmedia.org/post/hana-hajar-saudi-arabias-female-political-cartoonists.
   Google Scholar
• Jucker, Andreas H. 2020. Politeness in the History of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, Abby. 2016. Women Talk More Than Men. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kashanizadeh, Zahra, and Charles Forceville. 2020. "Visual and Multimodal Interaction of Metaphor and Metonymy A Study of Iranian and Dutch Print Advertisements." Cognitive Linguistic Studies 7 (1): 78–110.
   Google Scholar
• Keenan [Ochs], E. 1974. “Norm-Makers, Norm-Breakers: Uses of Speech by Men and Women in a Malagasy Community.” In Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking, edited by Richard Bauman and Joel Sherzer, 125–143. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keim, Inken, and Johannes Schwitalla. 1989. “Soziale Stile des Miteinander Sprechens: Beo-bachtungen zu Formen der Konfliktbearbeitung in zwei Frauengruppen.” [Social Styles of Speaking to Each Other: Observance of Forms of Conflict Management in Two Groups of Women]. In Stil und Stilisierung: Arbeiten zur interpretativen Soziolinguistik [Style and Stylization: Contributions to Interpretive Sociolinguistics], edited by Volker Hinnenkamp and Margret Selting, 83–125. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, Martha H. 2018. Drawn to Purpose: American Women Illustrators and Cartoonists. Jackson: The University Press of Mississippi.
   Google Scholar
• Kharraki, Abdennour. 2001. “Moroccan Sex-Based Linguistic Difference in Bargaining.” Discourse and Society 12 (5): 615–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kita, Sotaro, and James Essegbey. 2001. “Pointing Left in Ghana: How a Taboo on the Use of the Left Hand Influences Gestural Practice.” Gesture 1 (1): 73–95.
   Google Scholar
• Kita, Sotaro, and Sachiko Ide. 2007. “Nodding, Aizuchi, and Final Particles in Japanese Conversation: How Conversation Reflects the Ideology of Communication and Social Relationships.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7): 1242–1254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klotz, Peter. 1999. “Politeness and Political Correctness: Ideological Implications.” Pragmatics 9 (1): 155–161.
   Google Scholar
• Kotthoff, Helga. 2000. “Gender and Joking: On the Complexities of Women’s Image Politics in Humorous Narratives.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 55–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotthoff, Helga. 2006. “Gender and Humor: The State of the Art.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (1): 4–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kövecses, Zoltán. 1995. “Understanding the Statue of Liberty.” In New Approaches to American English, edited by Zoltán Kovecses, 129–138. Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University.
   Google Scholar
• Kyratzis, Aamy, and Jiansheng Guo. 1996. “‘Separate Worlds for Girls and Boys?’ Views from U.S. and Chinese Mixed-Sex Friendship Groups.” In Social Interaction, Social Context and Language: Essays in Honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp, edited by Dan Isaac Slobin, Julie Gerhardt, Amy Kyratzisand, and Jiansheng Guo, 555–577. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Labov, William. 1990. “The Intersection of Sex and Social Class in the Course of Linguistic Change.” Language Variation and Change 2: 205–225.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, Robin. 1975. Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Lampert, Martin D., and Susan M. Ervin-Tripp. 1998. “Exploring Paradigms: The Study of Gender and Sense of Humor Near the End of the 20th Century.” In The Sense of Humor: Explorations of a Personality Characteristic, edited by Willibald Ruch, 231–270. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. Richard, and Gary G. Koch. 1977. “The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data.” Biometrics 33: 159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Leech, Geoffrey N. 2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, H., J. T. Kwock-Ping, and J. Fon. 2006. “An Acoustic Study on the Paralinguistic Prosody in the Politeness Talk in Taiwan Mandarin.” In Proceedings from ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Experimental Linguistics, edited by Antonis Botinis, 173–176. Athens, Greece, August 28-30. ISCA Archive, https://www.isca-speech.org/archive_v0/exling_2006/exl6_173.html.
   Google Scholar
• Littlemore, Jeannette. 2015. Metonymy: Hidden Shortcuts in Language, Thought, and Communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Littlemore, Jeannette. 2020. Metaphors in the Mind: Sources of Variation in Embodied Metaphor. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Love, Anne Marie, and Lambert H. Deckers. 1989. “Humor Appreciation as a Function of Sexual, Aggressive, and Sexist Content.” Sex Roles 20: 649–654. doi:10.1007/BF00288077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loveday, Leo. 1981. Explorations in Japanese Sociolinguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Lunceford, Brett. 2012. Naked Politics: Nudity, Political Action, and the Rhetoric of the Body. New York: Lexington.
   Google Scholar
• Lutzky, Ursula, and Andrew Kehoe. 2016. ““Your Blog is (The) Shit”: A Corpus Linguistic Approach to the Identification of Swearing in Computer Mediated Communication.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21 (2): 165–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaulay, Ronald K. S. 2005. Talk That Counts: Age, Gender, and Social Class Differences in Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, Syreeta. 2015, April 13. "The Lack of Female Genitals on Statues Seems Thoughtless until You See it Repeated." The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/apr/13/absent-female-genitals-art-repeated.
   Google Scholar
• MacFarlane, Andrew Euan, and Jennifer Hay. 2015. “Connecting Linguistic Variation and Non-Linguistic Behavior.” Linguistics Vanguard 1 (1): 259–270.
   Google Scholar
• MacMahon, Barbara. 1998. “Review of “Women, Men and Politeness by Janet Holmes, 1995. London: Longman”.” Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 7 (3): 276–279.
   Google Scholar
• Major, Brenda. 1981. “Gender Patterns in Touching Behavior.” In Gender and Nonverbal Behavior, edited by Clara Mayo and Nancy M. Henley, 15–37. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Mapson, Rachel. 2014. “Polite Appearances: How Non-Manual Features Convey Politeness in British Sign Language.” Journal of Politeness Research 10 (2): 157–184.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Rod A. 2014. “Humor and Gender: An Overview of Psychological Research.” In Gender and Humor: Interdisciplinary and International Perspectives, edited by Delia Chiaro, and Raffaella Baccolini, 123–146. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mayo, C., and N. M. Henley, eds. 1981. Gender and Nonverbal Behavior. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• McGhee, Paul E., and Nelda Duffey. 1983. “The Role of Identity of the Victim in the Development of Disparagement Humor.” The Journal of General Psychology 108: 257–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinnon, Sean, and Pilar Prieto. 2014. “The Role of Prosody and Gesture in the Perception of Mock Impoliteness.” Journal of Politeness Research 10 (2): 185–219.
   Google Scholar
• McRobbie, Anegla. 2000. Feminism and Youth Culture. 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, Sara. 2003. Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, Sara. 2006. “Gender and Performance Anxiety at Academic Conferences.” In Speaking Out: The Female Voice in Public Contexts, edited by J. Baxter, 61–80. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, Sara. 2008. Language and Sexism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, Sara. 2009. “Impoliteness in a Cultural Context.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (5): 1047–1060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, Sara. 2012. Gender Matters: Feminist Linguistic Analysis. London: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, Sara. 2017. “Sociocultural Approaches to (Im)politeness.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, edited by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 41–60. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, Sara, and Louise Mullany. 2011. Language, Gender and Feminism: Theory, Methodology and Practice. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mirus, Gene, Jami Fisher, and Donna Jo Napoli. 2012. “Taboo Expressions in American Sign Language.” Lingua. International Review of General Linguistics. Revue internationale De Linguistique Generale 122 (9): 1004–1020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirza, Heidi Safia. 2013. “‘A Second Skin’: Embodied Intersectionality, Transnationalism and Narratives of Identity and Belonging Among Muslim Women in Britain.” Women’s Studies International Forum 36 (1): 5–15.
   Google Scholar
• Montry, Jill A. 2002. How to be Rude: A Training Manual for Mastering the Art of Rudeness. 2nd ed. Incline Village, NV: Stairwell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mullany, Louise. 2007. Gendered Discourse in the Professional Workplace. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, Bróna. 2011. “Gender Identities and Discourse.” In Pragmatics of Society, edited by Gisle Andersen and Karin Aijmer, 53–78. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Musolff, Andreas. 2016. Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Muto, Hiroyuki, Soyogu Matsushita, and Kazunori Morikawa. 2021. “Sex Differences in Mental Rotation Performance Through Holding Weights By the Hands.” Imagination, Cognition, and Personality 40 (4): 351–371.
   Google Scholar
• Nadeu, Marianna, and Pilar Prieto. 2011. “Pitch Range, Gestural Information, and Perceived Politeness in Catalan.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (3): 841–854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasaw, Daniel. 2012, February 6. “When Did the Middle Finger Become Offensive?” BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-16916263
   Google Scholar
• Nasri, Chourouq. 2017. “The Liberating Force of Art, Humor, and Social Media: Women Cartoonists of the Arab Spring.” In North African Women After the Arab Spring: In the Eye of the Strom, edited by Larbi Touaf, Soumia Boutkhil, and Chourouq Nasri, 53–76. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• O’Driscoll, Jim. 2020. Offensive Language: Taboo, Offence, and Social Control. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Ohara, Yumiko. 2004. “Prosody and Gender in Workplace Interaction: Exploring Constraints and Resoures in the Use of Japanese.” In Japanese Language, Gender, and Ideology: Cultural Models and Real People, edited by S. Okamoto and J. S. Shibamoto, 222–239. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ohara, Yumiko. 2019. “Gendered Speech.” In The Routledge Handbook of Japanese Sociolinguistics, edited by Patrick Heinrich and Yumiko Ohara, 279–296. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ola Orie, O. 2009. “Pointing the Yoruba Way.” Gesture 9 (2): 237–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neil, Robert Paul. 2002. “Sexual Profanity and Interpersonal Judgment.” Dissertation Abstracts International: The Humanities and Social Sciences 63 (2): 781.
   Google Scholar
• Orozco, Leonor. 2008. “Peticiones corteses y factores prosódicos.” In Fonología instrumental. Patrones fónicos y variación, edited by  Z. E. Herrera and P. Martín Butragueño, 335–355. México: El Colegio de México.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, Dilworth B. 1985. Constructing the Social Context of Communication: Terms of Address in Egyptian Arabic. Berlin: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Pedraza, Andrea Pizarro, ed. 2018. Linguistic Taboo Revisited: Novel Insights from Cognitive Perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Perek, Florent. 2016. “Using Distributional Semantics to Study Syntactic Productivity in Diachrony: A Case Study.” Linguistics 54 (1): 149–188. doi:10.1515/ling-2015-0043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perniss, Pamela. 2018. “Why We Should Study Multimodal Language.” Frontiers in Psychology 9: 1–5. Article 1109. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.0110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philips, Susan U., Susan Steele, and Christine Tanz, eds. 1987. Language, Gender and Sex in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radden, Günter, and Zoltán Kövecses. 1999. “Towards a Theory of Metonymy.” In Metonymy in Language and Thought, edited by Klaus-Uwe Panther and Günter Radden, 17–59. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Ruch, Willibald, and Franz-Josef Hehl. 1998. “A Two-Mode Model of Humor Appreciation: Its Relation to Aesthetic Appreciation and Simplicity-Complexity of Personality.” In The Sense of Humor: Explorations of a Personality Characteristic, edited by Willibald Ruch, 109–142. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Segel, Edward, and Lera Boroditsky. 2011. "Grammar in Art." Frontiers in Psychology 1: 244. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00244.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco J., and Olga I. Diez Velasco. 2002. “Patterns of Conceptual Interaction.” In Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast, edited by René Dirven and Ralf Porings, 489–532. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Sadiqi, Fatima. 2003. Women, Gender, and Language in Morocco. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Salami, L. Oladipo. 1991. “Diffusing and Focussing: Phonological Variation and Social Networks in Ife-lfe, Nigeria.” Language in Society 20 (2): 217–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samson, Andrea C., and Oswald Huber. 2007. “The Interaction of Cartoonist’s Gender and Formal Features of Cartoons.” Humor – International Journal of Humor Research 20 (1): 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saner, Emine. 2019. “‘God, I Was Disgusting!’– Ali Wong on Why Women’s Bodies are the Last Taboo.” The Guardian, October 17. https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2019/oct/17/god-i-was-disgusting-ali-wong-on-why-womens-bodies-are-the-last-taboo.
   Google Scholar
• Sapolsky, Barry, Daniel M. Shafer, and Barbara K. Kaye. 2011. “Rating Offensive Words in Three Television Program Contexts.” Mass Communication and Society 14 (1): 45–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheel, Tabea, and Christine Gockel. 2017. Humor at Work in Teams, Leadership, Negotiations, Learning and Health. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schwitalla, Johannes. 1995. Kommunikative Stilistik zweier sozialer Welten in Mannheim-Vogelstang [Communicative Stylistics of Two Social Worlds in Mannheim-Vogelstang], Kommunikation in der Stadt, Bd. 4. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Semino, Elena, and Veronika Koller. 2009. “Metaphor, Politics, Gender: A Case from Italy.” In Politics, Gender, and Conceptual Metaphors, edited by Kathleen Ahrens, 36–61. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, Suin. 2005. “Grammaticalization of Politeness: A Contrastive Study of German, English and Korean.” Ph.D. Dissertation. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Shormani, Mohammed Q. S., and Mohammed Ali Qarabesh. 2018. “Vocatives: Correlating the Syntax and Discourse at the Interface.” Cogent Arts and Humanities 5 (1): 1469388. doi:10.1080/23311983.2018.1469388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorlin, Sandrine. 2013. “The Power of Impoliteness: A Historical Perspective.” In Aspects of Linguistic Impoliteness, edited by Denis Jamet and Manuel Jobert, 45–58. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sorlin, Sandrine. 2017. “The Pragmatics of Manipulation: Exploiting Im/politeness Theories.” Journal of Pragmatics 121: 132–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer-Oatey, Helen D. M. 2008. Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport Through Talk Across Cultures. 2nd ed. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer-Oatey, Helen, and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2016. “The Bases of (Im)politeness Evaluations: Culture, the Moral Order and the East–West Debate.” East Asian Pragmatics 1 (1): 73–106.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer-Oatey, Helen, and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2021. Intercultural Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steffen, Valerie J., and Alice H. Eagly. 1985. “Implicit Theories About Influence Style: The Effect of Status and Sex.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 11 (2): 191–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterns, Olivia. 2009. “Female Cartoonist's Provocative Work Challenges Saudi Society.” CNN. Accessed on 1 August 2020. https://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/meast/10/27/hajjar.female.cartoonist/.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton-Spence, Rachel, and Bencie Woll. 1999. The Linguistics of British Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swim, Janet K., Robyn Mallett, and Charles Stangor. 2004. "Understanding Subtle Sexism: Detection and Use of Sexist Llanguage." Sex Roles 51: 117–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabacaru, Sabina. 2019. A Multimodal Study of Sarcasm in Interactional Humor. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Tannen, Deborah, ed. 1993. Gender and Conversational Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tannen, Deborah. 1994. Gender and Discourse. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Terkourafi, Mariana, and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2017. “Convention and Ritual (Im)politeness.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, edited by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 171–195. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Troutman, Denise. 2006. ““They Say That It’s a Man’s World, But You Can’t Prove That By Me”: African American Comediennes’ Construction of Voice in a Public Sphere.” In Speaking Out: The Female Voice in Public Contexts, edited by J. Baxter, 61–80. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Valdeón, Roberto A. 2015. “The (Ab)use of Taboo Lexis in Audiovisual Translation: Raising Awareness of Pragmatic Variation in English-Spanish.” Intercultural Pragmatics 12 (3): 363–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergriff, IIona. 2013. “Emotive Communication Online: A Contextual Analysis of Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) Cues.” Journal of Pragmatics 51 (May): 1–12. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037821661300057X.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, Teun. 2008. Discourse and Context: A Socio-Cognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, Teun. 2014. Discourse and Knowledge: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteley, Sheila. 2000. Women and Popular Music: Sexuality, Identity and Subjectivity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, Sally. 2013. "The Social Life of ‘Eugh’: Disgust as Assessment in Family Mealtimes." British Journal of Social Psychology 52 (3): 489–509. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02106.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, Bodo, and Sven Grawunder. 2012. “The Phonetic Profile of Korean Formal and Informal Speech Registers.” Journal of Phonetics 40 (6): 808–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar