References
- Jonsen A, Toulmin S. The Abuse of Casuistry. University of Berkeley Press, Berkeley 1988
- Walter, G, Rey, J, Dekker, F. The humble case report. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2001; 35: 240–245.
- Jenicek M. Clinical Case Reporting in Evidence-based Medicine. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford 1999
- Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of Biomedical Ethics5th edn. Oxford University Press, New York 2001
- Jonsen, A. Casuistry, In: J Sugarman, Sulmasy, D. Methods in Medical Ethics. New York: Georgetown University Press, 2002; 104–125.
- Jonsen, A. Casuistry as methodology in clinical ethics. Theoretical Medicine 1991; 12: 295–307.
- Jonsen, A. Case analysis in clinical ethics. The Journal of Clinical Ethics 1990; 1: 63–65.
- Robertson, M, Walter, G. An overview of psychiatric ethics II: virtue ethics and the ethics of care. Australasian Psychiatry 2007; 15: 207–211.
- Bray, A. Moral responsibility and borderline personality disorder. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 2003; 37: 270–276.
- Miller R. Casuistry and Modern Ethics. University of Chicago Press, London 1996
- Ross W. The Foundation of Ethics. Clarendon Press, Oxford 1939
- Tallmon, J. Casuistry. In:. T Sloane. Encyclopaedia of Rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001; 83–88.
- Pascal, B.. The Provincial Letters. T M'Crie, (trans). http://philosophy.eserver.org/pascal-provincial-letters.txt, (1656)(accessed 22 March 2007).
- Engelhardt H. The Foundations of Bioethics2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York 1996
- Clouser K. Common morality as an alternative to principlism. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1995; 5: 219–236
- Gert B. Morality: Its Nature and Justification. Oxford University Press, New York 1998
- Turner L. Zones of consensus and zones of conflict: questioning the “common morality” presumption in bioethics. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 2003; 13: 193–218
- Arras, J. Getting down to cases: the revival of casuistry in bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1991; 16: 29–51.
- Wexler D. Patients, therapist, and third parties: The victimological virtues of Tarasoff. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 1979; 2: 1–28
- Stone, A. The Tarasoff case and some of its progeny: suing psychotherapists to safeguard society. In:. Law, Psychiatry and Morality: Essays and Analysis. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1984; 161–190.
- Tarasoff v Regents of the University of California. 1976, 551 P2d 334.