Dermatological Toxicity of Hexavalent Chromium

REFERENCES

• Allenby C. F., Goodwin B. F. Influence of detergent washing powders on minimal eliciting patch test concentrations of nickel and chromium. Contact Dermatitis 1983; 9(6)491–499
   Google Scholar
• Andersen P. H., Nangia A., Bjerring P., Maibach H. I. Chemical and pharmacologic skin irritation in man: A reflectance spectroscopic study. Contact Dermatitis 1991; 25(5)283–289
   Google Scholar
• Anderson R. A., Kozlovsky A. S. Chromium intake, absorption and excretion of subjects consuming self-selected diets. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1985; 41(6)1177–1183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagdon R. E., Hazen R. E. Skin permeation and cutaneous hypersensitivity as a basis for making risk assessments of chromium as a soil contaminant. Environ. Health Perspect. 1991; 92: 111–119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basketter D., Horev L., Slodovnik D., Merimes S., Trattner A., Ingber A. Investigation of the threshold for allergic reactivity to chromium. Contact Dermatitis 2001; 44(2)70–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basketter D. A., Briatico-Vangosa G., Kaestner W., Lally C., Bontinck W. J. Nickel, cobalt and chromium in consumer products: A role in allergic contact dermatitis?. Contact Dermatitis 1993; 28(1)15–25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belsito D. V. Allergic Contact dermatitis. Fitzpatrick's dermatology in general medicine, 6th ed., I. M. Freedberg, et al. McGraw-Hill, New York 2003; 1164–1177
   Google Scholar
• Belsito D. V. The diagnostic evaluation, treatment, and prevention of allergic contact dermatitis in the new millennium. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2000; 105(3)409–420
   Google Scholar
• Breit R., Turk R. B. The medical and social fate of the dichromate allergic patient. Br. J. Dermatol. 1976; 94(3)349–350
   Google Scholar
• Burrows D. Adverse chromate reactions on the skin. Chromium: Metabolism and toxicity, D. Burrows. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL 1983; 137–163
   Google Scholar
• Calnan C. D. Cement dermatitis. Symposium Dermatologorum. Universitas Carolina, Prague 1962; 232–238
   Google Scholar
• Christophersen J., Menne T., Tanghoj P., Andersen K. E., Brandrup F., Kaaber K., Osmundsen P. E., Thestrup-Pedersen K., Veien N. K. Clinical patch test data evaluated by multivariate analysis. Danish Contact Dermatitis Group. Contact Dermatitis 1989; 21(5)291–299
   Google Scholar
• Cohen D. E., Brancaccio R. Response to “Patch testing for chromium sensitivity.”. Am. J. Contact Dermatitis 2000; 11(2)123–125
   Google Scholar
• Cuadra J., Latasa J. M., Botella R., Hidalgo F. [Histopathological aspects of chromium ulcers]. Med. Cutan. Ibero Lat. Am. 1982; 10(6)361–364
   Google Scholar
• DaCosta J. C., Jones J. F.X., Rosenberger R. C. Tanners' ulcer. Chrome sores—chrome holes—acid bites. Ann. Surg. 1916; 63: 155–166
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Raeve H., Vandecasteele C., Demedts M., Nemery B. Dermal and respiratory sensitization to chromate in a cement floorer. Am. J. Ind. Med. 1998; 34(2)169–176
   Google Scholar
• EEC. 1976, Council Directive 76/768/EEC of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of laws of Member States relating to cosmetic products. European Economic Council, Brussels, Belgium
   Google Scholar
• Eun H. C., Marks R. Dose-response relationships for topically applied antigens. Br. J. Dermatol. 1990; 122(4)491–499
   Google Scholar
• Fagliano J. A., Savrin J. E. Chromium medical surveillance project: Final technical report. New Jersey Department of Health, Trenton 1994
   Google Scholar
• Fagliano J. A., Savrin J., Udasin I., Gochfeld M. Community exposure and medical screening near chromium waste sites in New Jersey. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 1997; 26: S13–S22, (1 Pt 2)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feuerman E. Chromates as the cause of contact dermatitis in housewives. Dermatologica 1971; 143(5)292–297
   Google Scholar
• Finley B. L., Paustenbach D. J., Nethercott J., Fowler J. Risk assessment of the allergic dermatitis potential of environmental exposure to hexavalent chromium. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 1995; 44(3)377–383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finley B. L., Proctor D. M., Harris M., Fowler J. Patch testing for chromium sensitivity. Am. J. Contact Dermatitis 2000; 11(2)121–123
   Google Scholar
• Fowler J. F. Systemic contact dermatitis caused by oral chromium picolinate. Cutis 2000; 65(2)116
   Google Scholar
• Fowler J. F., Jr., Kauffman C. L., Marks J. G., Jr., Proctor D. M., Fredrick M. M., Otani J. M., Finley B. L., Paustenbach D. J., Nethercott J. R. An environmental hazard assessment of low-level dermal exposure to hexavalent chromium in solution among chromium-sensitized volunteers. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 1999; 41(3)150–160
   Google Scholar
• Fregert S. Sensitization to hexa– and trivalent chromium. Pemphigus; Occupational dermatoses due to chemical sensitization, E. Liebner, E. Florian. Congress of the Hungarian Dermatological Society, Budapest 1965; 50–55
   Google Scholar
• Fregert S. Occupational dermatitis in a 10-year material. Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1(2)96–107
   Google Scholar
• Fregert S., Ovrum P. Chromate in welding fumes with special reference to contact dermatitis. Acta Derm. Venereol. 1963; 43: 119–124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann P. S. The immunology of allergic contact dermatitis: the DNCB story. Adv. Dermatol. 1990; 5: 175–195, discussion 196
   Google Scholar
• Gammelgaard B., Fullerton A., Avnstorp C., Menne T. Permeation of chromium salts through human skin in vitro. Contact Dermatitis 1992; 27(5)302–310
   Google Scholar
• Goh C. L., Gan S. L., Ngui S. J. Occupational dermatitis in a prefabrication construction factory. Contact Dermatitis 1986; 15(4)235–240
   Google Scholar
• Guo Y. L., Wang B. J., Yeh K. C., Wang J. C., Kao H. H., Wang M. T., Shih H. C., Chen C. J. Dermatoses in cement workers in southern Taiwan. Contact Dermatitis 1999; 40(1)1–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks R., Hewitt P. J., Lam H. F. An investigation of the experimental induction of hypersensitivity in the guinea pig by material containing chromium, nickel and cobalt from arc welding fumes. Int. Arch. Allergy Appl. Immunol. 1979; 59(3)265–272
   Google Scholar
• Hostynek J. J., Maibach H. I. Chromium in US household bleach. Contact Dermatitis 1988; 18(4)206–209
   Google Scholar
• Hovding G. Cement eczema and chromium allergy: An epidemiological investigation. University of Bergen, Oslo, Norway 1970
   Google Scholar
• Kiec-Swierczynska M. Occupational dermatoses and allergy to metals in Polish construction workers manufacturing prefabricated building units. Contact Dermatitis 1990; 23(1)27–32
   Google Scholar
• Kligman A. M. The identification of contact allergens by human assay. 3. The maximization test: A procedure for screening and rating contact sensitizers. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1966; 47(5)393–409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosann M. K., Brancaccio R. R., Shupack J. L., Franks A. G.J., Cohen D. E. Six-hour versus 48-hour patch testing with varying concentrations of potassium dichromate. Am. J. Contact Dermatitis 1998; 9(2)92–95
   Google Scholar
• Kumpulainen J. T., Wolf W. R., Veillon C., Mertz W. Determination of chromium in selected United States diets. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1979; 27(3)490–494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammintausta K., Pitkanen O. P., Kalimo K., Jansen C. T. Interrelationship of nickel and cobalt contact sensitization. Contact Dermatitis 1985; 13(3)148–152
   Google Scholar
• Lantinga H., Nater J. P., Coenraads P. J. Prevalence, incidence and course of eczema on the hands and forearms in a sample of the general population. Contact Dermatitis 1984; 10(3)135–139
   Google Scholar
• Liden S., Lundberg E. Penetration of chromium in intact human skin in vivo. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1979; 72(1)42–45
   Google Scholar
• Marks J. G., Belsito D. V., DeLeo V. A., Fowler J. F.J., Fransway A. F., Maibach H. I., Mathias C. G., Nethercott J. R., Rietschel R. L., Rosenthal L. E., Sherertz E. F., Storrs F. J., Taylor J. S. North American Contact Dermatitis Group standard tray patch test results (1992 to 1994). Am. J. Contact Dermatitis 1995; 6(3)160–165
   Google Scholar
• Marks J. G., Belsito D. V., DeLeo V. A., Fowler J. F.J., Fransway A. F., Maibach H. I., Mathias C. G., Nethercott J. R., Rietschel R. L., Sherertz E. F., Storrs F. J., Taylor J. S. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for the detection of delayed-type hypersensitivity to topical allergens. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1998; 38: 911–918, (6 pt 1)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks J. G., Jr., Belsito D. V., DeLeo V. A., Fowler J. F.J., Fransway A. F., Maibach H. I., Mathias C. G., Pratt M. D., Rietschel R. L., Sherertz E. F., Storrs F. J., Taylor J. S. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1996–1998. Arch. Dermatol. 2000; 136(2)272–273
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marks J. G., Jr., Belsito D. V., DeLeo V. A., Fowler J. F., Jr., Fransway A. F., Maibach H. I., Mathias C. G., Pratt M. D., Rietschel R. L., Sherertz E. F., Storrs F. J., Taylor J. S. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1998 to 2000. Am. J. Contact Dermatitis 2003; 14(2)59–62
   Google Scholar
• Nethercott J. R. Practical Problems in the Use of Patch Testing In the Evaluation of Patients with Contact Dermatitis. Curr. Problems Dermatol. 1990; 2: 95–123
   Google Scholar
• Nethercott J. R., Holness D. L., Adams R. M., Belsito D. V., De Leo V. A., Emmett E. A., et al. Patch testing with a routine screening tray in North America 1985–1989. 1. Frequency of response. Am. J. Contact Dermatitis 1991; 2: 122–129
   Google Scholar
• Nethercott J., Paustenbach D., Adams R., Fowler J., Marks J., Morton C., Taylor J., Horowitz S., Finley B. A study of chromium induced allergic contact dermatitis with 54 volunteers: implications for environmental risk assessment. Occup. Environ. Med. 1994; 51(6)371–380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen N. H., Menne T. Allergic contact sensitization in an unselected Danish population. The Glostrup Allergy Study, Denmark. Acta Derm. Venereol. 1992; 72(6)456–460
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nielsen N. H., Kristiansen J., Borg L., Christensen J. M., Poulsen L. K., Menne T. Repeated exposures to cobalt or chromate on the hands of patients with hand eczema and contact allergy to that metal. Contact Dermatitis 2000; 43(4)212–215
   Google Scholar
• Paustenbach D. J., Sheehan P. J., Paull J. M., Wisser L. M., Finley B. L. Review of the allergic contact dermatitis hazard posed by chromium-contaminated soil: Identifying a “safe” concentration. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health. 1992; 37(1)177–207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polak L. Immunology of chromium. Chromium: Metabolism and toxicity, D. Burrows. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL 1983; 51–136
   Google Scholar
• Pratt M. D., Belsito D. V., DeLeo V. A., Fowler J. F.J., Fransway A. F., Maibach H. I., Marks J. G., Mathias C. G., Rietschel R. L., Sasseville D., Sherertz E. F., Storrs F. J., Taylor J. S., Zug K. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 2001–2002 study period. Dermatitis 2004; 15(4)176–183
   Google Scholar
• Proctor D. M., Fredrick M. M., Scott P. K., Paustenbach D. J., Finley B. L. The prevalence of chromium allergy in the United States and its implications for setting soil cleanup: A cost-effectiveness case study. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 1998; 28(1)27–37
   Google Scholar
• Quinones P. A., Garcia Munoz C. M. [Allergic contact sensitizations to nickel and chromium: Presence of these metallic elements in commercial detergents for household use]. Ann. Dermatol. Syphiligr. (Paris) 1965; 92(4)383–386
   Google Scholar
• Rudner E. J., Clendenning W. E., Epstein E., Fisher A. A., Jillson O. F., et al. Epidemiology of contact dermatitis in North America: 1972. Arch. Dermatol. 1973; 108: 537–540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudolf E., Cervinka M., Cerman J., Schroterova L. Hexavalent chromium disrupts the actin cytoskeleton and induces mitochondria-dependent apoptosis in human dermal fibroblasts. Toxicol In Vitro. 2005; 19(6)713–723
   Google Scholar
• Rudzki E., Prystupa K. Sensitivity to various nickel and chromium concentrations in patch tests and oral challenge tests. Contact Dermatitis 1994; 30(4)254–255
   Google Scholar
• Ruff C. A., Belsito D. V. The impact of various patient factors on contact allergy to nickel, cobalt, and chromate. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2006; 55(1)32–9
   Google Scholar
• Samitz M. H., Katz S., Shrager J. D. Studies of the diffusion of chromium compounds through skin. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1967; 48(6)514–520
   Google Scholar
• Sertoli A., Lombardi P., Francalanci S., Gola M., Giorgini S., Panconesi E. [Effect of oral administration of haptens in sensitized subjects with contact allergic eczema. II). Personal contribution]. G. Ital. Dermatol. Venereol. 1985; 120(3)213–218
   Google Scholar
• Shelley W. B. Chromium in welding fumes as cause of eczematous hand eruption. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1964; 189: 772–773
   Google Scholar
• Stern A. H., Bagdon R. E., Hazen R. E., Marzulli F. N. Risk assessment of the allergic dermatitis potential of environmental exposure to hexavalent chromium. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 1993; 40(4)613–641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storrs F. J., Rosenthal L. E., Adams R. M., Clendenning W., Emmett E. A., Fisher A. A., Larsen W. G., Maibach H. I., Rietschel R. L., Schorr W. F., et al. Prevalence and relevance of allergic reactions in patients patch tested in North America—1984 to 1985. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1989; 20(6)1038–1045
   Google Scholar
• Tsai T. F., Maibach H. I. How irritant is water? An overview. Contact Dermatitis 1999; 41(6)311–314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ketel W. G. Low incidence of occupational dermatitis from chromate. Contact Dermatitis 1984; 10(4)249
   Google Scholar
• Veien N. K. Systemically induced eczema in adults. Acta Derm. Venereol. Suppl. (Stockh.) 1989; 147: 1–58
   Google Scholar
• Veien N. K., Hattel T., Laurberg G. Chromate-allergic patients challenged orally with potassium dichromate. Contact Dermatitis 1994; 31(3)137–139
   Google Scholar
• Wahlberg J. E. Percutaneous absorption from chromium (51Cr) solutions of different pH, 1.4–12.8. An experimental study in the guinea pig. Dermatologica 1968; 137(1)17–25
   Google Scholar
• Wahlberg J. E. Thresholds of sensitivity in metal contact allergy. 2. The value of percutaneous absorption studies for selection of the most suitable vehicle. Berufsdermatosen 1973; 21(4)151–158
   Google Scholar
• Waldorf H. A., Walsh L. J., Schechter N. M., Murphy G. F. Early cellular events in evolving cutaneous delayed hypersensitivity in humans. Am. J. Pathol. 1991; 138(2)477–486
   Google Scholar
• Walsh E. N. Chromate hazards in industry. Council on Industrial Health, American Medical Association, Chicago 1953
   Google Scholar
• Wass U., Wahlberg J. E. Chromated steel and contact allergy. Recommendation concerning a “threshold limit value” for the release of hexavalent chromium. Contact Dermatitis 1991; 24(2)114–118
   Google Scholar
• Zaczkiewicz A., Czerwinska-Dihm I. [Occupational skin diseases from material of the Regional Center for Occupational Medicine collected during the years 1979–1991]. Med. Pr. 1994; 45(4)311–318
   Google Scholar
• Zelger J. [On the clinical aspects and pathogenesis of chromate eczema.]. Arch. Klin. Exp. Dermatol. 1964; 218: 499–542
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang J. D., Li X. L. [Chromium pollution of soil and water in Jinzhou]. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi (Chin. J. Prev. Med.) 1987; 21(5)262–264
   PubMedGoogle Scholar