Revealing evolutionary pathways by fitness landscape reconstruction

References

• Arnold SJ, Pfrender ME and Jones AG. 2001. The adaptive landscape as a conceptual bridge between micro- and macroevolution. Genetica 112–113:9–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo RB, Lohaus R, Srinivasan S, Dang KK and Burch CL. 2006. Sexual reproduction selects for robustness and negative epistasis in artificial gene networks. Nature 440:87–90.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson W. 1907. Facts limiting the theory of heredity. Science 26:649–660.
   Google Scholar
• Benson DA, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J and Wheeler DL. 2004. GenBank: update. Nucleic Acids Res 32:D23–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blattner FR, Plunkett G 3rd, Bloch CA, Perna NT, Burland V, Riley M, Collado-Vides J, Glasner JD, Rode CK, Mayhew GF, Gregor J, Davis NW, Kirkpatrick HA, Goeden MA, Rose DJ, Mau B, Shao Y. 1997. The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science 277:1453–1474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom JD, Labthavikul ST, Otey CR and Arnold FH. 2006. Protein stability promotes evolvability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:5869–5874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burch CL, Turner PE and Hanley KA. 2003. Patterns of epistasis in RNA viruses: a review of the evidence from vaccine design. J Evol Biol 16:1223–1235.
   Google Scholar
• Collins SR, Schuldiner M, Krogan NJ and Weissman JS. 2006. A strategy for extracting and analyzing large-scale quantitative epistatic interaction data. Genome Biol 7:R63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins SR, Miller KM, Maas NL, Roguev A, Fillingham J, Chu CS, Schuldiner M, Gebbia M, Recht J, Shales M, Ding H, Xu H, Han J, Ingvarsdottir K, Cheng B, Andrews B, Boone C, Berger SL, Hieter P, Zhang Z, Brown GW, Ingles CJ, Emili A, Allis CD, Toczyski DP, Weissman JS, Greenblatt JF, Krogan NJ. 2007. Functional dissection of protein complexes involved in yeast chromosome biology using a genetic interaction map. Nature 446:806–810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conant GC and Wagner A. 2003. Asymmetric sequence divergence of duplicate genes. Genome Res 13:2052–2058.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper TF, Rozen DE and Lenski RE. 2003. Parallel changes in gene expression after 20,000 generations of evolution in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:1072–1077.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper TF, Remold SK, Lenski RE and Schneider D. 2008. Expression profiles reveal parallel evolution of epistatic interactions involving the CRP regulon in Escherichia coli. PLoS Genet 4:e35.
   Google Scholar
• Dean AM and Thornton JW. 2007. Mechanistic approaches to the study of evolution: the functional synthesis. Nat Rev Genet 8:675–688.
   Google Scholar
• DePristo MA, Weinreich DM and Hartl DL. 2005. Missense meanderings in sequence space: a biophysical view of protein evolution. Nat Rev Genet 6:678–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Visser JA and Elena SF. 2007. The evolution of sex: empirical insights into the roles of epistasis and drift. Nat Rev Genet 8:139–149.
   Google Scholar
• de Visser JAGM, Hoekstra RF and van den Ende H. 1997. Test of interaction between genetic markers that affect fitness in Aspergillus niger. Evolution 51:1499–1405.
   Google Scholar
• Elena SF. 1999. Little evidence for synergism among deleterious mutations in a nonsegmented RNA virus. J Mol Evol 49:703–707.
   Google Scholar
• Elena SF and Lenski RE. 1997. Test of synergistic interactions among deleterious mutations in bacteria. Nature 390:395–398.
   Google Scholar
• Francino MP. 2005. An adaptive radiation model for the origin of new gene functions. Nat Genet 37:573–577.
   Google Scholar
• Gandon S and Otto SP. 2007. The evolution of sex and recombination in response to abiotic or coevolutionary fluctuations in epistasis. Genetics 175:1835–1853.
   Google Scholar
• Gosset G, Zhang Z, Nayyar S, Cuevas WA and Saier Jr MH. 2004. Transcriptome analysis of Crp-dependent catabolite control of gene expression in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 186:3516–3524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger J, Blagov M, Kosman D, Kozlov KN, Manu, Myasnikova E, Surkova S, Vanario-Alonso CE, Samsonova M, Sharp DH, Reinitz J. 2004. Dynamical analysis of regulatory interactions in the gap gene system of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 167:1721–1737.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kauffman S and Levin S. 1987. Towards a general theory of adaptive walks on rugged landscapes. J Theor Biol 128:11–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondrashov AS. 1988. Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction. Nature 336:435–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondrashov FA and Kondrashov AS. 2001. Multidimensional epistasis and the disadvantage of sex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:12089–12092.
   Google Scholar
• Kouyos RD, Otto SP and Bonhoeffer S. 2006. Effect of varying epistasis on the evolution of recombination. Genetics 173:589–597.
   Google Scholar
• Lehming N, Sartorius J, Kisters-Woike B, von Wilcken-Bergmann B and Muller-Hill B. 1990. Mutant lac repressors with new specificities hint at rules for protein-DNA recognition. Embo J 9:615–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenski RE, Ofria C, Collier TC and Adami C. 1999. Genome complexity, robustness and genetic interactions in digital organisms. Nature 400:661–664.
   Google Scholar
• Lunzer M, Miller SP, Felsheim R and Dean AM. 2005. The biochemical architecture of an ancient adaptive landscape. Science 310:499–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch M. 2005. Simple evolutionary pathways to complex proteins. Protein Sci 14:2217–2225; discussion 2226–2227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin G, Elena SF and Lenormand T. 2007. Distributions of epistasis in microbes fit predictions from a fitness landscape model. Nat Genet 39:555–560.
   Google Scholar
• Masel J. 2005. Evolutionary capacitance may be favored by natural selection. Genetics 170:1359–1371.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller SP, Lunzer M and Dean AM. 2006. Direct demonstration of an adaptive constraint. Science 314:458–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore JH. 2005. A global view of epistasis. Nat Genet 37:13–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr HA and Turelli M. 2001. The evolution of postzygotic isolation: accumulating Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities. Evolution 55:1085–1094.
   Google Scholar
• Otto SP. 1997. Unravelling gene interactions. Nature 390:343.
   Google Scholar
• Poelwijk FJ, Kiviet DJ and Tans SJ. 2006. Evolutionary potential of a duplicated repressor-operator pair: simulating pathways using mutation data. PLoS Comput Biol 2:e58.
   Google Scholar
• Poelwijk FJ, Kiviet DJ, Weinreich DM and Tans SJ. 2007. Empirical fitness landscapes reveal accessible evolutionary paths. Nature 445:383–386.
   Google Scholar
• Remold SK and Lenski RE. 2001. Contribution of individual random mutations to genotype-by-environment interactions in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 11388–11393.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe HC, Hansen BG, Halkier BA and Kliebenstein DJ. 2008. Biochemical networks and epistasis shape the Arabidopsis thaliana metabolome. Plant Cell 20:1199–1216.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanjuan R, Moya A and Elena SF. 2004. The contribution of epistasis to the architecture of fitness in an RNA virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:15376–15379.
   Google Scholar
• Schuldiner M, Collins SR, Thompson NJ, Denic V, Bhamidipati A, Punna T, Ihmels J, Andrews B, Boone C, Greenblatt JF, Weissman JS, Krogan NJ. 2005. Exploration of the function and organization of the yeast early secretory pathway through an epistatic miniarray profile. Cell 123:507–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segre D, Deluna A, Church GM and Kishony R. 2005. Modular epistasis in yeast metabolism. Nat Genet 37:77–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tischler J, Lehner B and Fraser AG. 2008. Evolutionary plasticity of genetic interaction networks. Nat Genet 40:390–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinreich DM, Delaney NF, Depristo MA and Hartl DL. 2006. Darwinian evolution can follow only very few mutational paths to fitter proteins. Science 312:111–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wloch DM, Szafraniec K, Borts RH and Korona R. 2001. Direct estimate of the mutation rate and the distribution of fitness effects in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 159:441–452.
   Google Scholar
• Wright S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97–159.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wright, S. 1932. The role of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution. Proceedings of the VI International Congress of Genetics. 1: 356–366.
   Google Scholar
• You L and Yin J. 2002. Dependence of epistasis on environment and mutation severity as revealed by in silico mutagenesis of phage t7. Genetics 160:1273–1281.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu G, Golding GB and Dean AM. 2005. The selective cause of an ancient adaptation. Science 307:1279–1282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar