A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of treatments for patients with untreated multiple myeloma not eligible for stem cell transplantation

References

• McCarthy PL, Palumbo A. Maintenance therapy for multiple myeloma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2014;28:839–859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faiman B, Richards T. Innovative agents in multiple myeloma. J Adv Pract Oncol. 2014;5:193–202.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Engelhardt M, Terpos E, Kleber M, et al. European Myeloma Network recommendations on the evaluation and treatment of newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2014;99:232–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreau P, Rajkumar SV. Should all eligible patients with multiple myeloma receive autologous stem-cell transplant as part of initial treatment? Leuk Res. 2012;36:677–681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benboubker L, Dimopoulos MA, Dispenzieri A, et al. Lenalidomide and dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients with myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:906–917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ades AE. A chain of evidence with mixed comparisons: models for multi-parameter synthesis and consistency of evidence. Stat Med. 2003;22:2995–3016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell DM, Ades AE, Higgins JP. Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence. Bmj. 2005;331:897–900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu G, Ades AE. Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons. Stat Med. 2004;23:3105–3124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney JF, Stewart LA, Ghersi D, et al. Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials. 2007;8:16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summary of Product Characteristics, REVLIMID, February 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Summary of Product Characteristics, VELCADE, April 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Summary of Product Characteristics, THALIDOMIDE, April 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Dias S, Sutton AJ, Ades AE, et al. Evidence synthesis for decision making 2: a generalized linear modeling framework for pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Med Decis Making. 2013;33:607–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facon T, Mary JY, Hulin C, et al. Melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide versus melphalan and prednisone alone or reduced-intensity autologous stem cell transplantation in elderly patients with multiple myeloma (IFM 99-06): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2007;370:1209–1218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulin C, Facon T, Rodon P, et al. Efficacy of melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide in patients older than 75 years with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: IFM 01/01 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:3664–3670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacchi S, Marcheselli R, Lazzaro A, et al. A randomized trial with melphalan and prednisone versus melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients not eligible for autologous stem cell transplant. Leuk Lymphoma. 2011;52:1942–1948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks SP, Gelman A. Alternative methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. J Comput Graph Stat. 1998;7:434–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman A. Inference and monitoring convergence. In: Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter DJ, editors. Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. London: Chapman & Hall; 1996. p. 1311–1143.
   Google Scholar
• Facon T, Dimopoulos MA, Hulin C, et al. Updated overall survival analysis of the FIRST study: continuous lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone vs melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2015;100:3 (Abstract S105).
   Google Scholar
• Beksac M, Haznedar R, Firatli-Tuglular T, et al. Addition of thalidomide to oral melphalan/prednisone in patients with multiple myeloma not eligible for transplantation: results of a randomized trial from the Turkish Myeloma Study Group. Eur J Haematol. 2011;86:16–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facon T, Mary JY, Pegourie B, et al. Dexamethasone-based regimens versus melphalan-prednisone for elderly multiple myeloma patients ineligible for high-dose therapy. Blood. 2006;107:1292–1298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateos MV, Oriol A, Martinez-Lopez J, et al. Bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone versus bortezomib, thalidomide, and prednisone as induction therapy followed by maintenance treatment with bortezomib and thalidomide versus bortezomib and prednisone in elderly patients with untreated multiple myeloma: a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:934–941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Gregory WM, et al. Cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (CTD) as initial therapy for patients with multiple myeloma unsuitable for autologous transplantation. Blood. 2011;118:1231–1238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Liberati AM, et al. Oral melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: updated results of a randomized controlled trial. Blood. 2008;112:3107–3114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Rossi D, et al. Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide followed by maintenance with bortezomib-thalidomide compared with bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:5101–5109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo A, Hajek R, Delforge M, et al. Continuous lenalidomide treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1759–1769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magarotto V, Bringhen S, Offidani M, et al. Triplet vs doublet lenalidomide-containing regimens for the treatment of elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood. 2016;127:1102–1108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San Miguel JF, Schlag R, Khuageva NK, et al. Persistent overall survival benefit and no increased risk of second malignancies with bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone versus melphalan-prednisone in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:448–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San-Miguel J, Blade J, Shpilberg O, et al. Phase 2 randomized study of bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone with or without siltuximab (anti-IL-6) in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2014;123:4136–4142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waage A, Gimsing P, Fayers P, et al. Melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide or placebo in elderly patients with multiple myeloma. Blood. 2010;116:1405–1412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijermans P, Schaafsma M, Termorshuizen F, et al. Phase III study of the value of thalidomide added to melphalan plus prednisone in elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the HOVON 49 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3160–3166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart AK, Jacobus S, Fonseca R, et al. E1A06: A phase III trial comparing melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide (MPT) versus melphalan, prednisone, and lenalidomide (MPR) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Haematologica. 2014;99:220 (Abstract S642).
   Google Scholar
• Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Caravita T, et al. Oral melphalan and prednisone chemotherapy plus thalidomide compared with melphalan and prednisone alone in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006;367:825–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San Miguel JF, Schlag R, Khuageva NK, et al. Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:906–917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayers PM, Palumbo A, Hulin C, et al. Thalidomide for previously untreated elderly patients with multiple myeloma: meta-analysis of 1685 individual patient data from 6 randomized clinical trials. Blood. 2011;118:1239–1247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo A, Waage A, Hulin C, et al. Safety of thalidomide in newly diagnosed elderly myeloma patients: a meta-analysis of data from individual patients in six randomized trials. Haematologica. 2013;98:87–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou Y, Sheng Z, Niu S, et al. Lenalidomide versus thalidomide based regimens as first-line therapy for patients with multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2013;54:2219–2225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morabito F, Bringhen S, Larocca A, et al. Bortezomib, melphalan, prednisone (VMP) versus melphalan, prednisone, thalidomide (MPT) in elderly newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: A retrospective case-matched study. Am J Hematol. 2014;89:355–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Hozo I, Wheatley K, et al. Thalidomide versus bortezomib based regimens as first-line therapy for patients with multiple myeloma: a systematic review. Am J Hematol. 2011;86:18–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NICE technology appraisal guidance 228. Bortezomib and thalidomide for the first-line treatment of multiple myeloma; [cited 2011 Jul]. Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta228.
   Google Scholar
• Delforge M, Minuk L, Eisenmann JC, et al. Health-related quality-of-life in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in the FIRST trial: lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone versus melphalan, prednisone, thalidomide. Haematologica. 2015;100:826–833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar